DesideriScuri -> RE: How The Republican Convention Rules Work (3/9/2016 2:04:54 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: satanscharmer quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44 haven't peeked at the article yet, but this might be an appropriate place to add a few tidbits. bama and I were recently talking about this, that trump is doing better in states with open primaries. there is in that, some truth in saying that democrats might be helping republicans pick their nominee. also, some recent exit polling showed that had it been a two man race between trump and cruz, the voters who voted for Kasich and Rubio would have very disproportionately gone for cruz. i see those two things as being favorable for cruz in a contested convention. I have a sneaking suspicion that party crashing happens on both sides of the fence. Though, I can't see that much of it going on to have that great of an effect. The problem is choices. There are too many of them and none of them are that great. Trump is the only one pulling excitement, unfortunately. Had the party had a better option, or less candidates running, Trump may not have been as successful as he is. Like you mentioned with the polls, I strongly believe it would be a much closer race had there only been Trump and Cruz, Cruz may have even been in the lead. Kasich and Rubio really need to take a step back and decide what's more important to them. Who knows, maybe the two dislike Cruz that much that they're more than happy to take votes from him. It seems unlikely to me that Trump will not get the nomination. Personally, I don't like the idea of an establishment messing with things to favor how they believe it should turn out. Much like the left side and their Super Delegates. The difference is, though, these are the rules. It's not just about the "party establishment" taking over and imposing it's will (Cruz isn't an "establishment" candidate, either; that's Rubio or Kasich) on We the People. It's like the House of Representatives voting on the next President if there isn't a majority electoral college vote-getter. A plurality isn't enough. I'm not sure how the vote in the House is decided (simple majority, 2/3 majority, etc.), but that body could end up choosing the next President of the US, even against a simple majority vote of the populace.
|
|
|
|