RE: Obama nominates Garland...centrist moderate. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


MasterJaguar01 -> RE: Obama nominates Garland...centrist moderate. (3/17/2016 1:13:46 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

You seem to forget the voters spoke a bit more recently: 54 republican senators. 246 house of representatives. 31 Republican governors. More than 9000 local and state politician pickups for the republicans. Pretty much their high water mark since 1929.

So it seems you have a bit of a selective memory.

Here's hoping the senate does what we sent them to congress to do. Tell obama to shove his nomine up his ass.



You seem to have zero understanding of how the American political system works. The Senate does not appoint Supreme Court nominees. Nor do gerrymandered Congressmen. Nor do Governors. The President does. Mitch McConnell (in my quote) was referring to the choice for President.

Obama: 65,918,507 Romney: 60,934,407





mnottertail -> RE: Obama nominates Garland...centrist moderate. (3/17/2016 4:08:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: subrob1967


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

I mean yet another old white guy?

"Yet another"?

President Obama's first two SCOTUS appointees were women. (Still are, for that matter.) Justice Sotomayor is also the first Hispanic on the Supreme Court.




Sanders is an old white guy, O'Malley was an old white guy, Clinton is an old white woman... Yes another old white guy.

Lucy, you wouldn't know a fact if it came up and kicked you in the British Arse of yours.



WTF? Are nutsuckers the champions of EEOC now? Where the fuck was I when they became for it after they were against it? Apparently there are nutsuckers in name only. NINOs




mnottertail -> RE: Obama nominates Garland...centrist moderate. (3/17/2016 4:12:34 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Here's the inconvenient fact that I wish the republicans would pick up on:

There are literally a thousand jurists the senate would vote to confirm. The republicans could publish a list and tell obama - since the business of the supreme court is so important to you - you pick any one of these x number of jursts - and we'll vote to confirm him.

And then watch that whole kerfluffle blowback in the dims face. The sad fact is the republicans don't know how to play the game.



And the nutsuckers would look like fools dictating policy to the president when they have that 'strict constitutionalist' asswipe they peddle all the time, separation of powers and shit. Fucking stupid move. But that is sort of par for the course for nutsuckers, they do BIG STUPID good.




dcnovice -> RE: Obama nominates Garland...centrist moderate. (3/17/2016 10:47:18 AM)

quote:

WTF? Are nutsuckers the champions of EEOC now?

It is pretty entertaining. [:)]




dcnovice -> RE: Obama nominates Garland...centrist moderate. (3/17/2016 10:53:27 AM)

quote:

There are literally a thousand jurists the senate would vote to confirm. The republicans could publish a list and tell obama - since the business of the supreme court is so important to you - you pick any one of these x number of jursts - and we'll vote to confirm him.

Along those lines, Judiciary Committee chair Orrin Hatch recently named a potential nominee who'd be amply qualified and acceptable. But, Hatch complained, President Obama would never select such a moderate judge.

The good senator's suggestion: Merrick Garland.




mnottertail -> RE: Obama nominates Garland...centrist moderate. (3/17/2016 10:54:03 AM)

LOL, DC, I cant figure out if this is Mortimer Snerd comedy tour or Shakespeare comedy tour.

Somewhere between tragic and rodney dangerfield. The venn diagram is in too many dimensions.




thompsonx -> RE: Obama nominates Garland...centrist moderate. (3/17/2016 11:28:42 AM)


ORIGINAL: dcnovice


Along those lines, Judiciary Committee chair Orrin Hatch recently named a potential nominee who'd be amply qualified and acceptable. But, Hatch complained, President Obama would never select such a moderate judge.

The good senator's suggestion: Merrick Garland.


In an interview on pbs yesterday hatch said the president spoke with him about this and he, hatch, recomended garland but hatch added that obama would never do that in a million years.




Phydeaux -> RE: Obama nominates Garland...centrist moderate. (3/17/2016 7:58:12 PM)

Sure.




thompsonx -> RE: Obama nominates Garland...centrist moderate. (3/20/2016 5:57:31 PM)


ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Sure.


Google is everyones friend even dumbasses like you. Look it up for phoques sake.




Phydeaux -> RE: Obama nominates Garland...centrist moderate. (3/21/2016 12:36:29 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
BTW if the 'American people have spoken' having elected a majority of 54 repub senators, that means they have told them specifically not to vote any judge in and a majority of the people 55% want the senate to give him a vote.



And 80% of all statistics - like yours here, is made up on the spot. The numbers are somewhere around 43% wait, 51% nominate. But only 27% think a candidate will or should be confirmed.

38% view the court as too liberal. 23% too conservative.

51% believe obama has been less faithful to the constitution than most. Rasmussen Feb 17 poll.

OK, what it did say is that fifty-five (55) percent of registered voters are sour on the GOP's move to block hearings to consider the nominee, regardless of the person Obama ultimately announces as his choice for the job. Which to me is saying 55% want a vote

Only about one in three - 28 percent - approve of the GOP's strategy.

But to be objective, 48-43 want a vote.

HERE

The NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll was conducted March 3-6. Funny how you know what 'I am trying to say' in other posts, when I have 'said' no such thing. And you post what I am saying about what you've said on other OP's, when I have said no such thing.

Now you claim I just made this all up.


I never claimed you made it up. I said your percentages were wrong. The 48-43 number is correct.




Phydeaux -> RE: Obama nominates Garland...centrist moderate. (3/21/2016 12:40:21 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Sure.


Google is everyones friend even dumbasses like you. Look it up for phoques sake.



Idiot - I'm AGREEING WITH YOU.

Obama and Hatch were just playing a political game. Hatch wanted Obama to name a centrist (to not rile up the base). Obama did so to discredit Hatch. Thrust / Counter-thrust.

They both know the nomination is going nowhere until electoral results can be predicted. This is just playing politics.




thompsonx -> RE: Obama nominates Garland...centrist moderate. (3/23/2016 5:55:23 PM)


ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Sure.


Google is everyones friend even dumbasses like you. Look it up for phoques sake.

[/quote]

Idiot - I'm AGREEING WITH YOU.

Obama and Hatch were just playing a political game. Hatch wanted Obama to name a centrist (to not rile up the base). Obama did so to discredit Hatch. Thrust / Counter-thrust.

No dumbass...hatch agreed on garland and said obama would never do it.

They both know the nomination is going nowhere until electoral results can be predicted. This is just playing politics.


Time will tell




MrRodgers -> RE: Obama nominates Garland...centrist moderate. (3/23/2016 6:42:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
BTW if the 'American people have spoken' having elected a majority of 54 repub senators, that means they have told them specifically not to vote any judge in and a majority of the people 55% want the senate to give him a vote.



And 80% of all statistics - like yours here, is made up on the spot. The numbers are somewhere around 43% wait, 51% nominate. But only 27% think a candidate will or should be confirmed.

38% view the court as too liberal. 23% too conservative.

51% believe obama has been less faithful to the constitution than most. Rasmussen Feb 17 poll.

OK, what it did say is that fifty-five (55) percent of registered voters are sour on the GOP's move to block hearings to consider the nominee, regardless of the person Obama ultimately announces as his choice for the job. Which to me is saying 55% want a vote

Only about one in three - 28 percent - approve of the GOP's strategy.

But to be objective, 48-43 want a vote.

HERE

The NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll was conducted March 3-6. Funny how you know what 'I am trying to say' in other posts, when I have 'said' no such thing. And you post what I am saying about what you've said on other OP's, when I have said no such thing.

Now you claim I just made this all up.


I never claimed you made it up. I said your percentages were wrong. The 48-43 number is correct.


What I have here is in the link.




KenDckey -> RE: Obama nominates Garland...centrist moderate. (3/23/2016 7:29:04 PM)

Personally, I have no problem with Garland. I also knows that the process of when to hold hearings and/or vote is securely in the hands of the Senate. I doknow a lawyer that I would prefer to see on the bench. She is a progressive liberal, but knows how to read and apply the law fairly without infusing her politics.




Phydeaux -> RE: Obama nominates Garland...centrist moderate. (3/23/2016 8:14:23 PM)

Ken
Its entirely different when they have to apply the law, and when they get to make it.




dcnovice -> RE: Obama nominates Garland...centrist moderate. (3/23/2016 8:18:58 PM)

quote:

I doknow a lawyer that I would prefer to see on the bench. She is a progressive liberal, but knows how to read and apply the law fairly without infusing her politics.

Emphasis mine.

That would be a welcome change from Scalia.




kdsub -> RE: Obama nominates Garland...centrist moderate. (3/23/2016 8:38:31 PM)

quote:

Now the senate repubs are on the hot seat


I think you are overstating the importance of the nomination. Republicans will vote for their senator and the independents could not care less about a court nomination... at least that is my opinion by people I talk to in my area. Democratic challengers are better off addressing other issues if they want to unseat Republicans.

Butch




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875