RE: Link for submissive women to follow if they would like to respond to this question.

RE: Link for submissive women to follow if they would like to respond to this question. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive

Message

ImperialPath -> RE: Link for submissive women to follow if they would like to respond to this question. (3/30/2016 3:05:04 PM)
quote: You seem to feel that you're owed that attention and you think that being a "Dom" gives you a pass on respecting the wishes of the very women that you wish to attract. I love that phrase "you seem to feel". it suggests something is fact when it really is not. What did I say that "seems" that I am owed attention simply by being a "Dom" (your quotes)? This is fun... "You" seem to be making things up.

ImperialPath -> RE: Link for submissive women to follow if they would like to respond to this question. (3/30/2016 3:06:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath Here are some like views from others in past threads... http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2464924 http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2465012 http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2462885 Rather disingenuous, wouldn't you say? One post is a single word answer that says "yes," that a reply shouldn't be expected. One of the posts includes this: "I would say no, don't expect it, though yes, it would be nice." The remaining says, "You can expect all you want. It doesn't mean that you'll get one." NONE of them are saying anything similar to the postings that you've made on this thread. Even when women have SHOWN you that they don't appreciate you continuing on, asking about their physical attributes, being rude by hitting on them, or being offensive, that it's a good idea to treat them that way. Do you honestly not get that women who are not interested in you do not want you to keep going? If you have to try as hard to get women interested in you as you have on this thread, I don't think I want to know about the contents of your email. You really have women interested in you this way? I do know some women continue to respond to certain interactions for some of the Return To Sender fodder but that's usually for the comedy factor. I'm afraid not. All of them are saying something similar to my postings. For example in the first one, one of three you decided not to read entirely... quote: would say no, don't expect it, though yes, it would be nice. I have a tendency to ignore email, cmail, whatever-other-mail whenever I sense insincerity, but I say that right in my profile. Especially if you're being sincere, and it's been a week or so and you're still interested, drop another message with your previous one at the bottom (if it went unread) The second post, the one word "yes" was another girl agreeing with the first post. The third is from a Domme who agrees with the "tactic" of a second pass... quote: Dominant women get a lot of email, and if a week or so passes, a polite "I don't want to pester you if you're uninterested, but I'm still very interested in you because of X and Y" can go a long way with me. As all can see, these ladies are expressing my views from the perspective of being on the receiving end of the cmail contact. They are reasonable and even encouraging a second cmail. They are classy and confident and no where near as touchy as some of you have been. I suspect there are many more classy submissive women out there without a hair trigger on their delete button. Bump.

SinFix -> RE: Link for submissive women to follow if they would like to respond to this question. (3/30/2016 3:19:07 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath Here are some like views from others in past threads... http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2464924 http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2465012 http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=246288 As all can see, these ladies are expressing my views from the perspective of being on the receiving end of the cmail contact. They are reasonable and even encouraging a second cmail. They are classy and confident and no where near as touchy as some of you have been. I suspect there are many more classy submissive women out there without a hair trigger on their delete button. I've been lurking on this and the other thread since the beginning, for the most part I would be the actual target audience you would be seeking. So with that, I will comment on two of your points. 1) On the quote above you posted links to a thread over 7 years old, a time before catfjishing become a thing, a time when women still thought that the guys on profiles were genuine, real and not just out for some easy targets for booty calls. Since that time, reverse image searches and investigating those that interest you are the norm. I can honestly say that each time in the past I responded to a second inquiry or attempt at my attention, it was confirmed that my original instincts were correct and that he was not what I was looking for. 2) Yes, it is highly annoying and irritating for a guy that I have made it clear to that I am not interested in to keep trying to "chat" me up. As an example, a gentleman was in front of me going into Giant, as we got to the door he caught sight of me and in an attempt to be gentlemanly "open" the door for me ( couldn't because they were the self opening type). He proceeds to mildly chat with me which I politely thank him for the compliments but at this time I am not interested in anyone or wanting to date. At that point he thanks me and tells me to have a nice day, which should have been the end of it. BUT no, running into him again, a polite smile and acknowledgement of his existence which then leads to him following me into the next isle and trying yet again to get me to give him my number and go on a date with him. Now I am in the awkward situation of needing to yet again as politely as I could reiterate that I am not interested. Why should I have been put into the situation by him to feel uncomfortable, when he should have respected my polite decline of his first attempt.

ImperialPath -> RE: Link for submissive women to follow if they would like to respond to this question. (3/30/2016 3:26:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath Here are some like views from others in past threads... http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2464924 http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2465012 http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2462885 Rather disingenuous, wouldn't you say? One post is a single word answer that says "yes," that a reply shouldn't be expected. One of the posts includes this: "I would say no, don't expect it, though yes, it would be nice." The remaining says, "You can expect all you want. It doesn't mean that you'll get one." NONE of them are saying anything similar to the postings that you've made on this thread. Even when women have SHOWN you that they don't appreciate you continuing on, asking about their physical attributes, being rude by hitting on them, or being offensive, that it's a good idea to treat them that way. Do you honestly not get that women who are not interested in you do not want you to keep going? If you have to try as hard to get women interested in you as you have on this thread, I don't think I want to know about the contents of your email. You really have women interested in you this way? I do know some women continue to respond to certain interactions for some of the Return To Sender fodder but that's usually for the comedy factor. I'm afraid not. All of them are saying something similar to my postings. For example in the first one, one of three you decided not to read entirely... quote: would say no, don't expect it, though yes, it would be nice. I have a tendency to ignore email, cmail, whatever-other-mail whenever I sense insincerity, but I say that right in my profile. Especially if you're being sincere, and it's been a week or so and you're still interested, drop another message with your previous one at the bottom (if it went unread) The second post, the one word "yes" was another girl agreeing with the first post. The third is from a Domme who agrees with the "tactic" of a second pass... quote: Dominant women get a lot of email, and if a week or so passes, a polite "I don't want to pester you if you're uninterested, but I'm still very interested in you because of X and Y" can go a long way with me. As all can see, these ladies are expressing my views from the perspective of being on the receiving end of the cmail contact. They are reasonable and even encouraging a second cmail. They are classy and confident and no where near as touchy as some of you have been. I suspect there are many more classy submissive women out there without a hair trigger on their delete button. Bump. Bump. Nothing has really changed since these posts were made. It is important to be honest in your posts LP. Honor is important to most Doms.

SinFix -> RE: Link for submissive women to follow if they would like to respond to this question. (3/30/2016 3:39:04 PM)
See my above post and you are incorrect when you say nothing has changed, when it comes to the internet and dating, everything has changed since the posts you gave originated.

BitaTruble -> RE: Link for submissive women to follow if they would like to respond to this question. (3/30/2016 3:43:11 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BitaTruble quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath I understand. You are afraid of a strong Dom. You dream of them shrugging and walking away and never standing up for what they desire and call this good. I understand. You dream of stars out of reach and, like Machiavelli, believe the ends justify the means to achieve the dream. You claim it works for you and yet, you have a lovely submissive woman ready to melt into your arms and you are online chatting with, mostly, female dominants. Michael, of course, had the same option you do. He had me at home but he could have just as easily spent his time on line with folks he found more interesting than he found me. I think the fact that he had a total of 5 forums posts in the ten years he was here and they were all related directly to me is very telling of what he held as a more important use of his time. He gave me his forever and none of his forever was wasted defending ghosts as you have done. You find the online dominant woman interacting with you more important than the submissive you claim to have. I find that interesting and often wonder what folks with partners are doing spending so much of their time on line? I didn't work. Michael went on business trips and if I had to stay home, I played online a lot and contributed frequently to the forums when I was alone. Most of the dominants with submissives with whom I have been acquainted are more interested in their real life submissive than dominant pixels on a screen. To each their own though. You rode in on the black horse of Machiavelli, defended it with surety and it turns out you were wearing Polka Dots with a pretty little Minnie Mouse ribbon in your hair doing a square dance rather than a tango and backpeddled off your outrageous OP in which you proclaimed in boldness that.. 'DO NOT CONTACT' does not matter to you.. but then.. as I said.. dance off that proclamation when you contradicted your own OP and got called out on it. A single "oops" from you proclaiming that what you wrote was not what you 'meant'. You are forgiven for pretending to be Machiavelli. What is not so easily forgiven is your spin on the words others say. But as those stand in black or white, I won't reiterate them again. Others can read as well as I so I leave them to it if they are of the mind. So, my little Machiavellian pretender.. be grateful you are not he as he was tortured and exiled although.. methinks the screen name you now wear won't be here long enough to make a lasting difference. A mere noise lasting a few weeks full of piss and vinegar that shall die. To die then to dust with you then, Miss Minnie. You do have some small value here serving as a limited lesson but you probably should go back down to the politics dungeon. It's safer there. Btw: I wanted to ask how it was you lost your legs? Was it a car accident? Do you use a wheel chair or prosthetics because it seems that you keep pulling your cock out to excuse your behavior and its the only leg you have to stand on so.. yanno, I was just wondering what happened to you? I have this thing for amps and dwarfs.. it involved a pissed off mage and a dragon.. don't ask .. but anyway.. since you are using the All Mighty Cock as justification, I'd like to see it. If it's a Pee Wee Herman.. just hold upon a sign in front of the baby beast that says Pee Wee.. and if it's a Herman Munster then hold up a sign that says Herman. If you say 'yes' I promise to unblock you on the other side.. or, even better... just put it here! You should tooooooooooooootally read this as me hitting on you. Yep. No, no. Seriously. [sm=AttentionWhore.gif][sm=waiting.gif][sm=tongue_smiley07.gif][sm=friends.gif] We are going to get married and adopt babies and rescue puppies. You will go to work, come home and take out the trash then be treated like a God with food prepared by an expert in French cooking techniques, wine supplied by a well-trained sommelier, a home stylish and so tastefully decorated it would serve as a cover for any Home magazine and a sexual creature crafted in hell, clothed by heaven and designed to kill an ache so intense it makes you weep and you will NEVER have nor want to find the time to be online again. As you can see, I'm an outstanding slave. I even did the pre-spin cycle. I not only do laundry, I do windows! Take me! I'm yours! Obviously, I'm not taking 'no' for an answer. [;)] My Master is dead so I'm free this Saturday. Say.. noonish? You can buy lunch since you're the man. I don't eat much but I do eat expensive then bring it home. That's okay, right? Oh.. what's your credit rating? Mine's over 800. You don't mind signing a pre-nup do you? My dad is going to get really pissed if I don't get a pre-nup. Trust me.. you do NOT want to be cut out of his will. He's one of those lives like a miser but is a fucking billionaire types. Never spends a damn dime. Typical for someone in the depression actually. You don't mind my age, right? Doesn't matter. I don't care what you want.. I want you and that's all that matters. I can not WAIT to send out my second email after getting ignored. (Getting ignored means I get to send a second email, right because I'm getting a little confused about the rules change midstream) .. That's the one where I get to tell all about my desires and history, right? Yes!! I even have pictures and folks might think I joke about the blood thing.. but.. um.. it's not a joke. Most of this post is.. but that is not. Savvy there Miss Daisy or need some more driving? This has been brought to you bi Justa Bita Knotta Lotta Truble. (You know it's serious when the full name was used.. man, I used to cringe when my mom screamed out my first, middle and last name cuz I knew truble was right around the corner.) I can always send in my evil twin sister HeapaTruble but she has never been to this place and.. well, that's probably for the best because she is one mean ass muther fucker. That said.. she can entertain like no ones business. Feisty, that one. bump Still waiting for that cock shot.

ImperialPath -> RE: Link for submissive women to follow if they would like to respond to this question. (3/30/2016 3:44:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SinFix quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath Here are some like views from others in past threads... http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2464924 http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2465012 http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=246288 As all can see, these ladies are expressing my views from the perspective of being on the receiving end of the cmail contact. They are reasonable and even encouraging a second cmail. They are classy and confident and no where near as touchy as some of you have been. I suspect there are many more classy submissive women out there without a hair trigger on their delete button. I've been lurking on this and the other thread since the beginning, for the most part I would be the actual target audience you would be seeking. So with that, I will comment on two of your points. 1) On the quote above you posted links to a thread over 7 years old, a time before catfjishing become a thing, a time when women still thought that the guys on profiles were genuine, real and not just out for some easy targets for booty calls. Since that time, reverse image searches and investigating those that interest you are the norm. I can honestly say that each time in the past I responded to a second inquiry or attempt at my attention, it was confirmed that my original instincts were correct and that he was not what I was looking for. 2) Yes, it is highly annoying and irritating for a guy that I have made it clear to that I am not interested in to keep trying to "chat" me up. As an example, a gentleman was in front of me going into Giant, as we got to the door he caught sight of me and in an attempt to be gentlemanly "open" the door for me ( couldn't because they were the self opening type). He proceeds to mildly chat with me which I politely thank him for the compliments but at this time I am not interested in anyone or wanting to date. At that point he thanks me and tells me to have a nice day, which should have been the end of it. BUT no, running into him again, a polite smile and acknowledgement of his existence which then leads to him following me into the next isle and trying yet again to get me to give him my number and go on a date with him. Now I am in the awkward situation of needing to yet again as politely as I could reiterate that I am not interested. Why should I have been put into the situation by him to feel uncomfortable, when he should have respected my polite decline of his first attempt. The timeframe does not matter. Their views are just as important as yours. Incredible. It is a shame you had to be bothered to answer a second cmail and it did you no good. It is all about you "it seems". Number 2 is an interesting story but does not relate at all to our discussion a second cmail or a second sentence at the bar. This guy is actually asking you for personal info after meeting you again. Not the same situation at all. let's not help muddy the water any more than quite a few "ladies" have attempted to do already.

ImperialPath -> RE: Link for submissive women to follow if they would like to respond to this question. (3/30/2016 3:46:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath Here are some like views from others in past threads... http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2464924 http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2465012 http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2462885 Rather disingenuous, wouldn't you say? One post is a single word answer that says "yes," that a reply shouldn't be expected. One of the posts includes this: "I would say no, don't expect it, though yes, it would be nice." The remaining says, "You can expect all you want. It doesn't mean that you'll get one." NONE of them are saying anything similar to the postings that you've made on this thread. Even when women have SHOWN you that they don't appreciate you continuing on, asking about their physical attributes, being rude by hitting on them, or being offensive, that it's a good idea to treat them that way. Do you honestly not get that women who are not interested in you do not want you to keep going? If you have to try as hard to get women interested in you as you have on this thread, I don't think I want to know about the contents of your email. You really have women interested in you this way? I do know some women continue to respond to certain interactions for some of the Return To Sender fodder but that's usually for the comedy factor. I'm afraid not. All of them are saying something similar to my postings. For example in the first one, one of three you decided not to read entirely... quote: would say no, don't expect it, though yes, it would be nice. I have a tendency to ignore email, cmail, whatever-other-mail whenever I sense insincerity, but I say that right in my profile. Especially if you're being sincere, and it's been a week or so and you're still interested, drop another message with your previous one at the bottom (if it went unread) The second post, the one word "yes" was another girl agreeing with the first post. The third is from a Domme who agrees with the "tactic" of a second pass... quote: Dominant women get a lot of email, and if a week or so passes, a polite "I don't want to pester you if you're uninterested, but I'm still very interested in you because of X and Y" can go a long way with me. As all can see, these ladies are expressing my views from the perspective of being on the receiving end of the cmail contact. They are reasonable and even encouraging a second cmail. They are classy and confident and no where near as touchy as some of you have been. I suspect there are many more classy submissive women out there without a hair trigger on their delete button. Bump. Bump. Nothing has really changed since these posts were made. It is important to be honest in your posts LP. Honor is important to most Doms.

LilJuly76 -> RE: Link for submissive women to follow if they would like to respond to this question. (3/30/2016 3:48:12 PM)
I would tell him no first and if he kept still trying to make contact than I would have to call somebody for help.

ImperialPath -> RE: Link for submissive women to follow if they would like to respond to this question. (3/30/2016 3:49:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LilJuly76 I would tell him no first and if he kept still trying to make contact than I would have to call somebody for help. Reasonable. Classy. Smart.

ImperialPath -> RE: Link for submissive women to follow if they would like to respond to this question. (3/30/2016 3:50:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath Here are some like views from others in past threads... http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2464924 http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2465012 http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2462885 Rather disingenuous, wouldn't you say? One post is a single word answer that says "yes," that a reply shouldn't be expected. One of the posts includes this: "I would say no, don't expect it, though yes, it would be nice." The remaining says, "You can expect all you want. It doesn't mean that you'll get one." NONE of them are saying anything similar to the postings that you've made on this thread. Even when women have SHOWN you that they don't appreciate you continuing on, asking about their physical attributes, being rude by hitting on them, or being offensive, that it's a good idea to treat them that way. Do you honestly not get that women who are not interested in you do not want you to keep going? If you have to try as hard to get women interested in you as you have on this thread, I don't think I want to know about the contents of your email. You really have women interested in you this way? I do know some women continue to respond to certain interactions for some of the Return To Sender fodder but that's usually for the comedy factor. I'm afraid not. All of them are saying something similar to my postings. For example in the first one, one of three you decided not to read entirely... quote: would say no, don't expect it, though yes, it would be nice. I have a tendency to ignore email, cmail, whatever-other-mail whenever I sense insincerity, but I say that right in my profile. Especially if you're being sincere, and it's been a week or so and you're still interested, drop another message with your previous one at the bottom (if it went unread) The second post, the one word "yes" was another girl agreeing with the first post. The third is from a Domme who agrees with the "tactic" of a second pass... quote: Dominant women get a lot of email, and if a week or so passes, a polite "I don't want to pester you if you're uninterested, but I'm still very interested in you because of X and Y" can go a long way with me. As all can see, these ladies are expressing my views from the perspective of being on the receiving end of the cmail contact. They are reasonable and even encouraging a second cmail. They are classy and confident and no where near as touchy as some of you have been. I suspect there are many more classy submissive women out there without a hair trigger on their delete button. Bump. Bump. Nothing has really changed since these posts were made. It is important to be honest in your posts LP. Honor is important to most Doms. Bump

SinFix -> RE: Link for submissive women to follow if they would like to respond to this question. (3/30/2016 3:51:26 PM)
Imperial, As it so happens, yes the time frame matters. As I stated they were made before all the internet "dark side" so to say of people on it. The normal of now is that everybody is and should be wary of who is contacting them, as the years since those posts have shown that the "majority" are not sincere. As to my story, that all took place within the span of maybe 10 mins at most, not unlike if I was sitting at the bar and he had came up to me. Mine was just at a grocery store instead, but given your reaction to my post, it is very apparent you are just on a "bitch" hunt for the other ladies that have posted in response to you. A shame that you went from a polite gentleman that may in some peoples opinions was misguided to a complete jackass douche that is on a vendetta. I wish you well. edit to add: Yes it was about me, just as it was about them, about everyone. We are all individuals with our own preferences and wants, I am allowed mine just as they are allowed theirs. At their initial email, me checking out their profiles, my first "gut instinct" was that he was not what I was looking for, that I allowed them to try to convince me otherwise was my mistake.

ImperialPath -> RE: Link for submissive women to follow if they would like to respond to this question. (3/30/2016 3:57:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SinFix Imperial, As it so happens, yes the time frame matters. As I stated they were made before all the internet "dark side" so to say of people on it. The normal of now is that everybody is and should be wary of who is contacting them, as the years since those posts have shown that the "majority" are not sincere. As to my story, that all took place within the span of maybe 10 mins at most, not unlike if I was sitting at the bar and he had came up to me. Mine was just at a grocery store instead, but given your reaction to my post, it is very apparent you are just on a "bitch" hunt for the other ladies that have posted in response to you. A shame that you went from a polite gentleman that may in some peoples opinions was misguided to a complete jackass douche that is on a vendetta. I wish you well. Nonesense. The "dark side" is only in Star Wars. 10 min. or 10 days, the point is it was not in the same sit-down and he is asking you personal information and we are not talking about if you dance or how did you hair look so wonderful in this light. Standing up for myself and not letting these "ladies" go off on me over several pages on a son-of-a-bitch hunt is something I don't need your permission to do nor do I need to let them to continue to be a gentleman. Nice try. Besides, we have seen this "herd" in action before, have we not? We will see if they can stand the heat themselves. It will be interesting.

ImperialPath -> RE: Link for submissive women to follow if they would like to respond to this question. (3/30/2016 4:01:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath Here are some like views from others in past threads... http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2464924 http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2465012 http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2462885 Rather disingenuous, wouldn't you say? One post is a single word answer that says "yes," that a reply shouldn't be expected. One of the posts includes this: "I would say no, don't expect it, though yes, it would be nice." The remaining says, "You can expect all you want. It doesn't mean that you'll get one." NONE of them are saying anything similar to the postings that you've made on this thread. Even when women have SHOWN you that they don't appreciate you continuing on, asking about their physical attributes, being rude by hitting on them, or being offensive, that it's a good idea to treat them that way. Do you honestly not get that women who are not interested in you do not want you to keep going? If you have to try as hard to get women interested in you as you have on this thread, I don't think I want to know about the contents of your email. You really have women interested in you this way? I do know some women continue to respond to certain interactions for some of the Return To Sender fodder but that's usually for the comedy factor. I'm afraid not. All of them are saying something similar to my postings. For example in the first one, one of three you decided not to read entirely... quote: would say no, don't expect it, though yes, it would be nice. I have a tendency to ignore email, cmail, whatever-other-mail whenever I sense insincerity, but I say that right in my profile. Especially if you're being sincere, and it's been a week or so and you're still interested, drop another message with your previous one at the bottom (if it went unread) The second post, the one word "yes" was another girl agreeing with the first post. The third is from a Domme who agrees with the "tactic" of a second pass... quote: Dominant women get a lot of email, and if a week or so passes, a polite "I don't want to pester you if you're uninterested, but I'm still very interested in you because of X and Y" can go a long way with me. As all can see, these ladies are expressing my views from the perspective of being on the receiving end of the cmail contact. They are reasonable and even encouraging a second cmail. They are classy and confident and no where near as touchy as some of you have been. I suspect there are many more classy submissive women out there without a hair trigger on their delete button. Bump. Bump. Nothing has really changed since these posts were made. It is important to be honest in your posts LP. Honor is important to most Doms. LP, "it seems" this question of honesty in you has surfaced before if I am not mistaken. Bump

SinFix -> RE: Link for submissive women to follow if they would like to respond to this question. (3/30/2016 4:01:52 PM)
Good lord you are obtuse... the dark side I was speaking of is that the vast majority of people are not on dating sites for altruistic purposes.

LadyPact -> RE: Link for submissive women to follow if they would like to respond to this question. (3/30/2016 4:18:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath Because you are out with your friends does not mean you should be rude to men who express an interest. It lacks class. OK, this one was directed at Oside, but I'm genuinely curious. Why do you think a married woman "lacks class" if she doesn't want unwanted attention from men? If she took your hypothetical of being at a bar, I'd assume she was probably wearing her wedding ring. quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath Nonsense. Pure nonsense. I've never suggested to keep on "hitting" on a woman who does not appreciate the company or conversation. That's what we are talking about, conversation. Can you converse with men not in "your community". I am having my doubts. Depending on which "community" you are referencing, (local or just kink community in general) the answer would be it depends. I absolutely answer emails from people that I know or we know someone (real time) in common. I'll answer the majority of long term forum participants. Will I answer random dude who decided to send a message to this (CM) account? Nope. If a woman isn't interested in you, and all you're doing is hitting on her, that's not a conversation. It's annoying. Edited to add, I'm not cutting down the quote upon quote upon quote, but yes, to whoever is receiving the email it is about them. They get to decide who they want to have a conversation with and who they don't. If they don't want to talk to the person who sent the email, for whatever reason, there shouldn't be a problem with that.

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Link for submissive women to follow if they would like to respond to this question. (3/30/2016 4:40:33 PM)
quote: Good lord you are obtuse That's something of an understatement. But you have to laugh at how hard he is trying to convince us all we are wrong.

FieryOpal -> RE: Link for submissive women to follow if they would like to respond to this question. (3/30/2016 5:31:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: Danemora Nah, I'd rather do exactly what I'm doing. Telling you to fuck off is not nearly as fun as whacking you around like you were a candy filled piñata at a kids party Me too. So I posted a picture on my un-hidden profile just for you. Interesting somewhat, that you when you started this OP, your profile had you down as a Middle Eastern Dom aged 34 in Indiana. Now you list yourself at an arbitrary 99 with a pic of your girl in your photo gallery. You do not appear to be Middle Eastern, but she does, yet this is not a couple's profile. You look to be in your 60s. There are two main reasons why I will not deal with men of your generation. Skipping the first reason, the second is that you fall squarely smack-dab in the era of the post-WWII baby boomer "ME" generation infected with self-entitlement issues which swung one of two directions. Either that of sociopathic crass materialism, which you passed along to the generations coming after you with snowballing momentum; or else the hippie-dippies who never learned how to respect individual boundaries either and thumbed their noses at social conventions in their drug-induced hazes, and polluted the gene pool of subsequent generations in those ways. You referred to having exchanged c-mails for about 10 years. You of all people should know that this place is most assuredly a meat market for men seeking hook-ups primarily. Having been on the forums before for many years, you still don't know that you are supposed to trim quotes, or is that also a pretense? It's nice that you met your lady here, and that she mistook your egocentric doggedness for dominance; however, none of the ladies here are impressed with your disingenuous OP, nor with your having shown your true colors. You must be bored with what you have at home, to invest so much of your time and energy here grasping at straws. LP, this is none other than the so-called "Master of the House" reinvented. BitaTruble, your Post#154 was a stroke of genius![sm=biggrin.gif]

Wayward5oul -> RE: Link for submissive women to follow if they would like to respond to this question. (3/30/2016 5:50:23 PM)
quote: Bump Dude, you really should stop bumping your head. It's just making your brain damage worse.

BitaTruble -> RE: Link for submissive women to follow if they would like to respond to this question. (3/30/2016 6:02:08 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic [sm=bowdown.gif][sm=bowdown.gif][sm=bowdown.gif][sm=bowdown.gif][sm=bowdown.gif] To Bita and her sister. [sm=friends.gif][sm=hearts.gif][sm=witch08.gif][sm=yourock.gif] [sm=angel_girl.gif] [sm=angel_smiley023.gif][sm=angel.gif][sm=evil.gif]

Page: << < prev 8 9 [10] 11 12 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.078125