RE: A Dangerous Faggot

RE: A Dangerous Faggot (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

MrRodgers -> RE: A Dangerous Faggot (3/27/2016 10:06:40 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail but as we have learned by repeated pointings out by yourself chiefly, the poofter is right of the most slobbering factless tory. (thats all of them, insofar as I am able to discern). He goes beyond putting his johnson in a pigs maw, and rather turns the table on the whole vignette, not a radical rightwing notion, the States have nutsuckers and have had them for eons. Throwing rocks at the other tribe? How quaint, yet how utterly predictable. Well but Awareness could be right but one wonders which irony is more dispositive. What's the value here ? This and 50 cents will not even buy me a cup of coffee and even at 7/11. While the left is allegedly spending its social capital offending sensibilities, while mocking those that do it to them, the right (sauvignon capitalist) is the movement today that will have you walking to work, looking for bottled water and living in a tent. Which is more probative about your future ?

Awareness -> RE: A Dangerous Faggot (3/27/2016 10:16:29 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers Well but Awareness could be right but one wonders which irony is more dispositive. What's the value here ? This and 50 cents will not even buy me a cup of coffee, even at 7/11. While the left is allegedly spending its social capital offending sensibilities, while mocking those that do it to them, the right is the movement today that will have you walking to work, looking for bottled water and living in a tent. Which is more probative about your future ? Which is probably why I regard Sanders as the brightest hope in America right now. I know the gender wage gap is fucking bullshit, but I can tolerate that piece of idiocy if it means tearing down corporate power, money in politics and instituting a decent health care system. What's interesting is that much of Sander's support is coming from those people who will be hit hardest by his policies. That's an interesting phenomenon. While - in a feat of spectacular irony - the African American community is voting for a candidate who mischaracterised them as super-predators and whose husband instituted the rise of the "prisons for profit" model which made a shit-ton of money out of incarcerated African Americans. (A lobby group she was still taking money from as late as November last year). The problem is that the left is trying to build an Orwellian society. The right is trying to profit at the expense of the people, but already we're seeing signs of that model breaking down as billionaires come to realise that their companies will die if nobody can afford their shit. Several of them are already showing signs of understanding that reality right now. Frankly, I think the idea of being caught in the left's ideological straitjacket is less preferable, although it's clearly just the greater of two evils.

mnottertail -> RE: A Dangerous Faggot (3/27/2016 3:43:30 PM)
your second paragraph used to be pretty popular repubilcan, there was Teddy and Franklin one republican one democrat and both wildly popular.

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: A Dangerous Faggot (3/27/2016 4:25:32 PM)
The funny thing here is that this "left" people are complaining about are actually right of centre.

Phydeaux -> RE: A Dangerous Faggot (3/27/2016 5:13:15 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer quote: ORIGINAL: Phydeaux Bravo. Poor old Awareness. Way to get him a forum-full of enemies with just one word, Phydeaux! You noticed did you? Still, He seems to handle himself well. You know what Andrew Jackson said. One man, with courage, is a majority.

thompsonx -> RE: A Dangerous Faggot (3/27/2016 5:25:09 PM)
ORIGINAL: Phydeaux You know what Andrew Jackson said. One man, with courage, is a majority. Would that be andrew jackson the murderer,rapist, bigamist who could not hold a job in the private sector? Whose only source of income was slavery...outside of his perpetual "stipend" from the public trough?

MrRodgers -> RE: A Dangerous Faggot (3/27/2016 6:37:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: Phydeaux You know what Andrew Jackson said. One man, with courage, is a majority. Would that be andrew jackson the murderer,rapist, bigamist who could not hold a job in the private sector? Whose only source of income was slavery...outside of his perpetual "stipend" from the public trough? The only redeeming value that Jackson had and yes, it was a big one, was that he stopped a corrupt central bank. That lasted until the states-rights capitalists learned how to rape the people, each with their own shit-paper currency, which lasted until Lincoln's greenback which lasted until his murder yet still didn't stop rampant corruption. Then we had borrower beware for about 40-50 years until Wilson succumbed to allowing the current fed. Otherwise, I would have never been in the same room with A. Jackson.

MrRodgers -> RE: A Dangerous Faggot (3/27/2016 6:47:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers Well but Awareness could be right but one wonders which irony is more dispositive. What's the value here ? This and 50 cents will not even buy me a cup of coffee, even at 7/11. While the left is allegedly spending its social capital offending sensibilities, while mocking those that do it to them, the right is the movement today that will have you walking to work, looking for bottled water and living in a tent. Which is more probative about your future ? Which is probably why I regard Sanders as the brightest hope in America right now. I know the gender wage gap is fucking bullshit, but I can tolerate that piece of idiocy if it means tearing down corporate power, money in politics and instituting a decent health care system. What's interesting is that much of Sander's support is coming from those people who will be hit hardest by his policies. That's an interesting phenomenon. While - in a feat of spectacular irony - the African American community is voting for a candidate who mischaracterised them as super-predators and whose husband instituted the rise of the "prisons for profit" model which made a shit-ton of money out of incarcerated African Americans. (A lobby group she was still taking money from as late as November last year). The problem is that the left is trying to build an Orwellian society. The right is trying to profit at the expense of the people, but already we're seeing signs of that model breaking down as billionaires come to realise that their companies will die if nobody can afford their shit. Several of them are already showing signs of understanding that reality right now. Frankly, I think the idea of being caught in the left's ideological straitjacket is less preferable, although it's clearly just the greater of two evils. Well you may be right again but I guess the real difference is under liberalism, I get to live out my years under their social conscriptions and even if I get lucky and they know whose between my legs or even if they know, which hand I use. While under the right, I'll be adjudged similarly on my ability to make a profit for myself or somebody else and end up insufficiently and prematurely...soylent green. I don't know, I guess I'd prefer the future of the rightists because I get to be...the bigger whore. I am still waiting on the 1% to occupy something, maybe march...on something.

Hillwilliam -> RE: A Dangerous Faggot (3/27/2016 6:48:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness What's interesting is that much of Sander's support is coming from those people who will be hit hardest by his policies. What is even more interesting is that, for decades, a disproportionate number of votes for the Republicans has come from poor people who are collecting SSI and have a handicap sticker on their car.

MrRodgers -> RE: A Dangerous Faggot (3/27/2016 7:00:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness What's interesting is that much of Sander's support is coming from those people who will be hit hardest by his policies. What is even more interesting is that, for decades, a disproportionate number of votes for the Republicans has come from poor people who are collecting SSI and have a handicap sticker on their car. As I've written, a good part of the southern and mid-western republican base is those 1000's of $40,000/yr farmers who spend their time comparing subsidy checks while bitching about welfare cheats and feel the left are all pussies living off Uncle Sam. They want govt. small, out of their lives all except for the money, Medicare and Soc. sec, et al. Oh and don't dare touch that great corn deal.

Hillwilliam -> RE: A Dangerous Faggot (3/27/2016 7:04:25 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness What's interesting is that much of Sander's support is coming from those people who will be hit hardest by his policies. What is even more interesting is that, for decades, a disproportionate number of votes for the Republicans has come from poor people who are collecting SSI and have a handicap sticker on their car. As I've written, a good part of the southern and mid-western republican base is those 1000's of $40,000/yr farmers who spend their time comparing subsidy checks while bitching about welfare cheats and feel the left are all pussies living off Uncle Sam. They want govt. small, out of their lives all except for the money, Medicare and Soc. sec, et al. Oh and don't dare touch that great corn deal. The ones I'm talking about are too damn lazy to farm. They collect their checks and vote for anything with an (R) after it.

thompsonx -> RE: A Dangerous Faggot (3/27/2016 7:20:05 PM)
ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam The ones I'm talking about are too damn lazy to farm. They collect their checks and vote for anything with an (R) after it. Why farm when you can get paid not to farm?[;)]

Hillwilliam -> RE: A Dangerous Faggot (3/27/2016 7:23:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam The ones I'm talking about are too damn lazy to farm. They collect their checks and vote for anything with an (R) after it. Why farm when you can get paid not to farm?[;)] You can't farm when you have a $2000 singlewide with a $30,000 bass boat taking up a quarter acre rented lot.

thompsonx -> RE: A Dangerous Faggot (3/27/2016 7:25:32 PM)
Low overhead

mnottertail -> RE: A Dangerous Faggot (3/27/2016 7:53:59 PM)
Awareness, You should be aware, there is no other side for me. There is only my side.

MrRodgers -> RE: A Dangerous Faggot (3/27/2016 8:23:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness What's interesting is that much of Sander's support is coming from those people who will be hit hardest by his policies. What is even more interesting is that, for decades, a disproportionate number of votes for the Republicans has come from poor people who are collecting SSI and have a handicap sticker on their car. As I've written, a good part of the southern and mid-western republican base is those 1000's of $40,000/yr farmers who spend their time comparing subsidy checks while bitching about welfare cheats and feel the left are all pussies living off Uncle Sam. They want govt. small, out of their lives all except for the money, Medicare and Soc. sec, et al. Oh and don't dare touch that great corn deal. The ones I'm talking about are too damn lazy to farm. They collect their checks and vote for anything with an (R) after it. .....or too dumb to farm.

ManOeuvre -> RE: A Dangerous Faggot (3/27/2016 9:50:12 PM)
I don't know that liberal and left really belong with each other, I have my doubts about religious and right sharing a bunk as well. I think Milo is on the money when he says that the great political conflict of our age is not left vs right, but auhoritarian vs libertarian. What do you think?

Phydeaux -> RE: A Dangerous Faggot (3/27/2016 11:03:19 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: Phydeaux You know what Andrew Jackson said. One man, with courage, is a majority. The only redeeming value that Jackson had and yes, it was a big one, was that he stopped a corrupt central bank. So stopping the main british invasion in 1812, defending new orleans - means nothing. Winning florida for the US? Serving in the revolutionary war? Puting in vogue the symbol of the democratic party - the jackass. He accomplished a lot for the US. The fact that he owned slaves - meh - quite a lot of democrats did.

Greta75 -> RE: A Dangerous Faggot (3/27/2016 11:32:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness I know the gender wage gap is fucking bullshit, Okay, but please tell me you have nothing against men and women who have the same capability and qualifications, doing the same type of job, getting equal pay right? Absolutely no problem with this right?

Edwurde -> RE: A Dangerous Faggot (3/28/2016 1:09:20 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness Milo is overwhelmingly right wing - he's a Trump supporter ffs (although I wonder if he's doing so ironically) , but find his opinions on the rise of Islam and the idiocy of the regressive left to be remarkably on point. https://youtu.be/0OAnm0RpPkE One of the things I find particularly interesting is that those most invested in the rise of victim culture and identity politics are exactly the same people who feel that mocking Christianity is something to which the concept of 'free speech' entitles them to. What's interesting is how that concept of 'free speech' is suddenly done away with when it involves a threat to their investment in the political correctness of the victim-hood narrative. "Blah blah blah ... " Because frankly, if the level of discourse in this forum is a representative sample of how America thinks, then we're all fucked and Trump will be President. Riiight, so we should all raise the level of discussion to that of this "dangerous faggot" that you dug out from under the carpet in order to save ourselves, then, is that it? You parrot the 30 year old term "political correctness" (which was actually originally coined by 'leftists,' which Republicans co-opted after they dropped it, so sorry to disappoint), and eagerly lap up the latest in derogatory dished out into your dog bowl, 'the regressive left,' (that's buying something at least 5 years after the 'sell by' date, BTW, but better than the 30 year past date of the previous, no?) and along with the 'dangerous faggot' thing ... We're expected to take you seriously, right? So yeah, we can't thank you enough for raising the level of discussion, here. PS While on the subject of "Islamist supporters," why is it that the Bush supporters, who were and will always be supporters of the Saudi Wahabist terrorists, not involved in that discourse? OTOH, I see that from your perspective, those who don't shoot Muslims on sight are "Islamist supporters," just from the wrong side of it, in your world.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625