FieryOpal
Posts: 2821
Joined: 12/8/2013
From: Maryland
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire
You do not understand my words fieryopal Now I understand most of your words just not why you used them versus mine. So I will just state those words of yours, you used against me for reasons that escape me, I have a problem with.
BTW, it isn't a matter of looking harder. It is a matter of looking women tend not to look, they look less than men and that is a great shame
I see many of the same faces across multiple dating sites, myself included! This is not the norm, yes it is the norm
I don't understand what you are saying here whatsoever. Ah I see you have sampled the long distance thingy only to find out when you were not about he was collecting the titties. They don’t all do that you know. I thought it self-explanatory but och well. It means when people get involved in along distance relationship. Some men are not hunting in the background for tits/looker/next best thing - we are faithful to those at the other side of the world. What do I know about this. Everything...and i used the words some men(women)
Uh, more like no farther than 15 miles. Other cities and countries and continents that's how far I have went, and will go for that other. and them me.
and you ramble on about poly men and those in an open relationship - their partners are unaware 99% I know this, I have talked about this often everywhere (i have even been banned of fetlife forums and swingers forums for asking does your partner know you are here. or should a creature of utter wretch like that email I say give me a call and put your partner on. But what has that to do with anything I said.
Op has my answer and I am happy with it fieryopal :)
I did understand most of what you said other than the sub-quoted line there. Speaking of which, I don't see where I used your words "against" you or where you would have a problem with whatever I posted. My words were not limited to reply-only mode. 
Women do not cast as wide a net as men are prone to do, I agree. It is not a shame at all. Unless a woman is looking for some cyber fun, trying to boost her sagging ego by cyber flirting, and is not seriously seeking out an IRT relationship, then why would she reach out across the country, much less across continents to contact an Internet stranger?
Now, there are some women who are not yet ready for a relationship commitment. There are submissive women (and men) who will consent to being "groomed" until they are found *worthy*.
Let us get real here. You and I are not cut from the same cloth (I gather, if you don't mind the inclusion) as those Dominants who for reasons of their own prefer to conduct cyber domination. It would seem to me that their cyber sub is not their primary partner in such an event, which isn't to say that said sub couldn't become their primary partner further on down the road. I would not bank on it, though.
If I met my soul mate (had one once, but if another one exists, of that I am uncertain), then would we move heaven and earth to be together? I would trust that we would, if we knew we were truly meant for one another, and had interacted in the flesh--not by living in a conjured-up fantasy world from behind a computer screen.
ETA: The not-norm reference prefaced what I wrote right after that, about having 3-5 profiles on the same site.
Also ETA: UllrsIshtar, you are right. I was just not that into him to give it a go. Nuttin' I couldn't find closer to home. 
< Message edited by FieryOpal -- 3/26/2016 11:33:23 AM >
_____________________________
Being deeply loved by someone gives you strength, while loving someone deeply gives you courage. - Lao Tzu
There is no remedy for love but to love more. - Thoreau
|
RE: Other sites like this? - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread