LadyPact
Posts: 32566
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: vincentML LadyPact: Good Evening, (sorry, Morning) Vincent. quote:
I was speaking generally of the death penalty; not this particular case. That's kind of an issue, isn't it? When looking at a facts of a case, one must concentrate on that particular case. Not person B got a harsh sentence or person C *must* have done it but got off scott free. quote:
Often, as I understand it, the impoverished are represented by public defenders who lack experience and resources but have an ample case load. Additionally, defense attorneys have less of a duty to the state and more of a duty to their clients. I think that is significant. I'll offer my apologies if I missed where this particular defendant was impoverished. I only read the two links posted and nothing on this particular person's financial status. My point with my prior comment is that some defense attorneys are looking for that opportunity to make a name for themselves, just as much as prosecutors. Various types of cases can be that 'big break' to argue something in front of the Supreme Court. It might not be the road to Congress that a DA might see, but it is the way to notoriety, the big office, and the lucrative billing hours. quote:
This from a citizen of a nation that wantonly tortures individuals and invades other nations based on fraud or pretense? Nice try. Has nothing to do with a father shooting his own children. If you want to talk about law, stick with law. Skip world politics. The prosecutor in this case probably had a cake ride. The defendant did it. Nobody disputes it. From the sound of it, premeditation existed because he prepped one of the children about what to say during that phone call before she was shot. Easy win. The defense attorney, at best, could only mitigate damage. That whole person's job should have been to keep his guilty client alive. Didn't succeed because the client got the death penalty. So, the convicted goes to the joint, where he finds folks who know the law just as well (or better) than some folks who have passed the bar... Wait! What about the long shot of mental disease/defect? No real history of it, but, oh-ho! The lawyer didn't try it. That translates into lacking an affirmative defense. Ipso facto, they HAD to stay the execution on the premise of law, based not on whether the defendant did it or not, whether he was really mentally ill or not. It's based on lacking trying a defense that is nothing short of grabbing every straw possible, even if it's not realistic. In the meantime, this guy who shot his two little girls, keeps breathing.
_____________________________
The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie. Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread
|