RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction?

RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

KenDckey -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/3/2016 7:27:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: KenDckey ORIGINAL: thompsonx If convicted put him under the jail. Plain and simple. Same with Hilary. Makes no difference. you break the law, you go to jail.,pay the fine, or whatever the law calls for in the form of punishment,. As for if I think he may have done it, sounds reasonable. Sounds reasonable because that is how so many appointed officials get their job in my opinion. Opinions are a lot like assholes...everyone has one and most everyone feels their's works best for them. So are you suggesting that if convicted that they (or one or the other) not be punished according to the law? This boarders on fido stupid. Try again. You didn't answer the question. Must be to good to answer an honest question. Must be it. Of course I see it as law and order only aplies to anyone who isn't a progressive in your eyes. Just saying.

thompsonx -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/3/2016 8:24:07 PM)
ORIGINAL: KenDckey ORIGINAL: thompsonx If convicted put him under the jail. Plain and simple. Same with Hilary. Makes no difference. you break the law, you go to jail.,pay the fine, or whatever the law calls for in the form of punishment,. As for if I think he may have done it, sounds reasonable. Sounds reasonable because that is how so many appointed officials get their job in my opinion. Opinions are a lot like assholes...everyone has one and most everyone feels their's works best for them. So are you suggesting that if convicted that they (or one or the other) not be punished according to the law? This boarders on fido stupid. Try again. You didn't answer the question. You asked a stupid question unrelated to what I posted. Must be to good to answer an honest question. Must be it. Of course I see it as law and order only aplies to anyone who isn't a progressive in your eyes. Just saying. What you are saying is that you are too phoquing stupid to read. What you are saying is that you would rather try to make this about something other than what I said. Try to read what you said and what I responded to and stop trying to create an arguement by claiming I said something I did not.

KenDckey -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/3/2016 8:40:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: KenDckey ORIGINAL: thompsonx If convicted put him under the jail. Plain and simple. Same with Hilary. Makes no difference. you break the law, you go to jail.,pay the fine, or whatever the law calls for in the form of punishment,. As for if I think he may have done it, sounds reasonable. Sounds reasonable because that is how so many appointed officials get their job in my opinion. Opinions are a lot like assholes...everyone has one and most everyone feels their's works best for them. So are you suggesting that if convicted that they (or one or the other) not be punished according to the law? This boarders on fido stupid. Try again. You didn't answer the question. You asked a stupid question unrelated to what I posted. Must be to good to answer an honest question. Must be it. Of course I see it as law and order only aplies to anyone who isn't a progressive in your eyes. Just saying. What you are saying is that you are too phoquing stupid to read. What you are saying is that you would rather try to make this about something other than what I said. Try to read what you said and what I responded to and stop trying to create an arguement by claiming I said something I did not. I didn't miss quote you. I didn't say you said anythihng. I just asked a question. You know, that is how we learn. Of course if you don't want me to learn your opinion on something, then you, in my eyes, just call people names. How about the answer? That would be nice.

thompsonx -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/3/2016 8:47:38 PM)
ORIGINAL: KenDckey As for if I think he may have done it, sounds reasonable. Sounds reasonable because that is how so many appointed officials get their job in my opinion. Opinions are a lot like assholes...everyone has one and most everyone feels their's works best for them. Do you see the part of your statement that says it is your opinion? Do you see the part of my response about opinions? Jesus you are phouing stupid.

KenDckey -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/3/2016 8:55:11 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: KenDckey As for if I think he may have done it, sounds reasonable. Sounds reasonable because that is how so many appointed officials get their job in my opinion. Opinions are a lot like assholes...everyone has one and most everyone feels their's works best for them. Do you see the part of your statement that says it is your opinion? Do you see the part of my response about opinions? Jesus you are phouing stupid. And then I asked you a question which has gone unanswered.

thompsonx -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/3/2016 9:06:41 PM)
ORIGINAL: KenDckey ORIGINAL: thompsonx As for if I think he may have done it, sounds reasonable. Sounds reasonable because that is how so many appointed officials get their job in my opinion. Opinions are a lot like assholes...everyone has one and most everyone feels their's works best for them. Do you see the part of your statement that says it is your opinion? Do you see the part of my response about opinions? Jesus you are phouing stupid. And then I asked you a question which has gone unanswered. You simple minded phoque this is the question you asked quote: So are you suggesting that if convicted that they (or one or the other) not be punished according to the law? Do you not see that I did not suggest that? That it is a creation of your own mind and not related to anything I posted?

MrRodgers -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/3/2016 9:37:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Phydeaux quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers Well all we know for sure is that if this were Hillary, we know she'd be guilty. And Bill deBlasio endorsing Clinton was purely from the bottom of his heart eh? When his political leanings are well left of Mrs Clinton, and indeed closer to Bernie? I don't know. What's he been offered AG ? I got one. Secretary of Urban Civil/Police Relations. There can be no bottom when there is no heart. They are all just players. Some are just better than others.

DaddySatyr -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/3/2016 9:39:45 PM)
Well, the law exists though I wonder why it should. I'm sure this kind of thing happens all the time and I don't see it as an issue. Does anyone in their right mind believe that Obummer didn't offer the anti-Christ SoS in order to bow out of the '08 race? Reagan/Bush I? In fact, how many times have two candidates, locked in a bid for nomination, "teamed up"? Isn't the top of the ticket offering the Vice Presidency to the bottom of the ticket in an effort to have the bottom of the ticket kiss their ass? More to the point: Since when is an endorsement NOT for sale, in this society? My goodness! We can kiss Madison Avenue good-bye! Anyway, the law exists so, let's look at it this way: Trump: "Ben, we've had our differences and I've always liked you. I don't know if you were thinking of supporting me, but I can guess you're not supporting Lyin' Ted. That aside, I've been thinking that you you would make a great Sec. of Education or, even a great Surgeon General. Would you be interested in a position in a Trump administration?" Dr. Carson: "Well, Donald, if I thought I could make a positive difference, I think I would take a position in your cabinet, if you win. As far as my lack of support for Cruz, you're right, of course, but not exactly for the right reason. I always thought that if I couldn't get the nomination, that we still need an outsider to fix the mess this country's in and I have always admired your abilities as deal maker. I think, other than myself, you're the obvious choice." Trump: "Would you be willing to say that, publicly?" As far as how the law reads, that could be flirting with the line, but the two don't have to be connected, necessarily. What if Donald was "interviewing" Dr. Carson for a cabinet position and Dr. Carson just matter-of-factly mentioned that he'd been thinking about supporting Donald for a while and offered his endorsement? What if, months ago, Dr. Carson had said to Donald: "If I don't get the nomination, I think I'll be supporting you"? Much ado about nothing, but the anti-Christ's supporters are starting to realize that if she ever takes the oath of office, she'll be wearing an orange prison jump suit, instead of a blue, Umpa Loompa pants suit. Michael

KenDckey -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/4/2016 4:16:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: KenDckey ORIGINAL: thompsonx As for if I think he may have done it, sounds reasonable. Sounds reasonable because that is how so many appointed officials get their job in my opinion. Opinions are a lot like assholes...everyone has one and most everyone feels their's works best for them. Do you see the part of your statement that says it is your opinion? Do you see the part of my response about opinions? Jesus you are phouing stupid. And then I asked you a question which has gone unanswered. You simple minded phoque this is the question you asked quote: So are you suggesting that if convicted that they (or one or the other) not be punished according to the law? Do you not see that I did not suggest that? That it is a creation of your own mind and not related to anything I posted? Since I suggested that the law be followed and you commented it left me with the suggestion that you had an opposing suggestion. Otherwise, I don't understand why you would comment at all. Silence is not an agreement with my opinion, however comment suggests you do have an opinion, and I am asking for it. If My question, as you suggested, was stupid, then correct it. If you have an opposing opinion, then let me know what it is, all I ask is your opinion, not remarks that suggest something unknown. And I agree that all of us can have opinions, so what is yours about following the law?

thompsonx -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/4/2016 7:02:46 AM)
ORIGINAL: KenDckey ORIGINAL: thompsonx As for if I think he may have done it, sounds reasonable. Sounds reasonable because that is how so many appointed officials get their job in my opinion. Opinions are a lot like assholes...everyone has one and most everyone feels their's works best for them. Do you see the part of your statement that says it is your opinion? Do you see the part of my response about opinions? Jesus you are phouing stupid. And then I asked you a question which has gone unanswered. You simple minded phoque this is the question you asked So are you suggesting that if convicted that they (or one or the other) not be punished according to the law? Do you not see that I did not suggest that? That it is a creation of your own mind and not related to anything I posted? Since I suggested that the law be followed and you commented it left me with the suggestion that you had an opposing suggestion. As noted above I commented only on your opinion and nothing else. You have already admited that but now you wish to persist in your original ignorance. Why is that? Is it that you are incapable of prying your foot out of your mouth? Otherwise, I don't understand why you would comment at all. See above where you admit the purpose of my comment then your persistance in your feeble attempt to get your foot out of your mouth. Silence is not an agreement with my opinion, however comment suggests you do have an opinion, and I am asking for it. If you are having trouble understanding the english of this perhaps you might find a grown up to explain it. If My question, as you suggested, was stupid, then correct it. I have through several post.

KenDckey -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/4/2016 7:29:12 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: KenDckey ORIGINAL: thompsonx As for if I think he may have done it, sounds reasonable. Sounds reasonable because that is how so many appointed officials get their job in my opinion. Opinions are a lot like assholes...everyone has one and most everyone feels their's works best for them. Do you see the part of your statement that says it is your opinion? Do you see the part of my response about opinions? Jesus you are phouing stupid. And then I asked you a question which has gone unanswered. You simple minded phoque this is the question you asked So are you suggesting that if convicted that they (or one or the other) not be punished according to the law? Do you not see that I did not suggest that? That it is a creation of your own mind and not related to anything I posted? Since I suggested that the law be followed and you commented it left me with the suggestion that you had an opposing suggestion. As noted above I commented only on your opinion and nothing else. You have already admited that but now you wish to persist in your original ignorance. Why is that? Is it that you are incapable of prying your foot out of your mouth? Otherwise, I don't understand why you would comment at all. See above where you admit the purpose of my comment then your persistance in your feeble attempt to get your foot out of your mouth. Silence is not an agreement with my opinion, however comment suggests you do have an opinion, and I am asking for it. If you are having trouble understanding the english of this perhaps you might find a grown up to explain it. If My question, as you suggested, was stupid, then correct it. I have through several post. And here we go. More of nothing. Please elaborate on your opinion. Do you desire that the law be followed assuming conviction? Why do you persist in being so evasive about your opinion, why not just spell it out? I have, in no nucertain terms. Instead you appear to just insult others because of whatever reason.

mnottertail -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/4/2016 7:33:50 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr Much ado about nothing, but the anti-Christ's supporters are starting to realize that if she ever takes the oath of office, she'll be wearing an orange prison jump suit, instead of a blue, Umpa Loompa pants suit. Michael[/color] Certainly nutsuckers are not supporting Hillary. I won't insult your intelligence by suggesting that you really believe what you just said.

thompsonx -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/4/2016 7:46:29 AM)
ORIGINAL: KenDckey ORIGINAL: thompsonx And here we go. More of nothing. Please elaborate on your opinion. Do you desire that the law be followed assuming conviction? Why do you persist in being so evasive about your opinion, why not just spell it out? I have, in no nucertain terms. Instead you appear to just insult others because of whatever reason. I have made it abundantly clear that this and only this is what I was commenting on: quote: "As for if I think he may have done it, sounds reasonable. Sounds reasonable because that is how so many appointed officials get their job in my opinion." Opinions are a lot like assholes...everyone has one and most everyone feels their's works best for them. Do you see the part of your statement that says it is your opinion? Do you see the part of my response about opinions? Jesus you are phouing stupid.

KenDckey -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/4/2016 9:13:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: KenDckey ORIGINAL: thompsonx And here we go. More of nothing. Please elaborate on your opinion. Do you desire that the law be followed assuming conviction? Why do you persist in being so evasive about your opinion, why not just spell it out? I have, in no nucertain terms. Instead you appear to just insult others because of whatever reason. I have made it abundantly clear that this and only this is what I was commenting on: quote: "As for if I think he may have done it, sounds reasonable. Sounds reasonable because that is how so many appointed officials get their job in my opinion." Opinions are a lot like assholes...everyone has one and most everyone feels their's works best for them. Do you see the part of your statement that says it is your opinion? Do you see the part of my response about opinions? Jesus you are phouing stupid. And here we go. More of nothing. Please elaborate on your opinion. Do you desire that the law be followed assuming conviction? Why do you persist in being so evasive about your opinion, why not just spell it out? I have, in no nucertain terms. Instead you appear to just insult others because of whatever reason. Still waiting.

thompsonx -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/4/2016 9:45:48 AM)
ORIGINAL: KenDckey Still waiting. What exactly are you waiting for?

KenDckey -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/4/2016 2:03:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: KenDckey Still waiting. What exactly are you waiting for? Please elaborate on your opinion. Do you desire that the law be followed assuming conviction? Why do you persist in being so evasive about your opinion, why not just spell it out? I have, in no nucertain terms. Instead you appear to just insult others because of whatever reason.

thompsonx -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/4/2016 2:10:12 PM)
ORIGINAL: KenDckey ORIGINAL: thompsonx Please elaborate on your opinion. My opinion was that your opinion was an opinion and that opinions are like assholes...everyone has one and everyone believes theirs works best for them. Do you desire that the law be followed assuming conviction? Please show where I have ever suggested otherwise?

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.1875