a general question (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message

roythesub -> a general question (4/3/2016 2:07:00 PM)

Balance is the iron clad key to being my slave. It is not found in a lock attached to any chains but deep in your mind. If balance is overlooked, the entire D/s connection is lost. You must need to serve to live while living to need to serve and be needed in return. Without need, both involved are irrelevant.
An old joke, ripe with relevance:
The true masochist begs 'Whip me, beat me, use me for your pleasure, please, Mistress!' The true sadist replies, 'No!'


My ex Mistress posted this in her journal. In my heart, I lived to serve her, and I sincerely needed her. Does this mean that she doesn't need me? Does this mean she is toying with me and my emotions because she is a sadist? What does it mean? I know it's aimed at me.



mnottertail -> RE: a general question (4/3/2016 2:30:46 PM)

The old chestnut....

So nigh is granduer to our dust,
so near to god is man,
when duty whispers "lo, though must'.,
The youth replies "I can'.

But real llfe is taking out the garbage and changing tires, and paying bills, and not poetry.



LadyPact -> RE: a general question (4/3/2016 2:53:23 PM)

If it were me, I would say it means she's your ex.



stef -> RE: a general question (4/3/2016 3:07:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: roythesub

My ex Mistress posted this in her journal. In my heart, I lived to serve her, and I sincerely needed her. Does this mean that she doesn't need me? Does this mean she is toying with me and my emotions because she is a sadist? What does it mean? I know it's aimed at me.

Why would you ask complete strangers what she means? Nobody here knows her. How would we know better than you what she might mean?

If you want to know for sure, ask HER.



ThatDizzyChick -> RE: a general question (4/3/2016 9:59:01 PM)

quote:

I know it's aimed at me.

Correction. You think it is.



peppermint -> RE: a general question (4/4/2016 2:45:26 PM)

Perhaps it is not about you at all. Perhaps she wrote about what she is looking for in her next relationship.



OsideGirl -> RE: a general question (4/4/2016 2:50:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: roythesub

Balance is the iron clad key to being my slave. It is not found in a lock attached to any chains but deep in your mind. If balance is overlooked, the entire D/s connection is lost. You must need to serve to live while living to need to serve and be needed in return. Without need, both involved are irrelevant.
An old joke, ripe with relevance:
The true masochist begs 'Whip me, beat me, use me for your pleasure, please, Mistress!' The true sadist replies, 'No!'


My ex Mistress posted this in her journal. In my heart, I lived to serve her, and I sincerely needed her. Does this mean that she doesn't need me? Does this mean she is toying with me and my emotions because she is a sadist? What does it mean? I know it's aimed at me.


It means you should stop cyber stalking your Ex.

Seriously, stop watching what she posts and move on.



AtUrCervix -> RE: a general question (4/4/2016 5:54:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: roythesub
You must need to serve to live while living to need to serve.


Well, I think you have a smidge of Iambic Pentameter going on here.

(It could use some work though).



mousekabob -> RE: a general question (4/4/2016 5:57:06 PM)

Yes it means she doesn't need you. As you stated, she's your EX! [8|]



pleasnpetrichor -> RE: a general question (4/4/2016 8:47:41 PM)

What a ridiculous thread, eh?



SweetlySadistic1 -> RE: a general question (4/11/2016 4:52:13 PM)

No one here has asked yet if the OP is paranoid? OP, are you paranoid? The foil hats are over there in Aisle 3.... Oh, shit, that wasn't very nice of me. Oh well.[:D]



FieryOpal -> RE: a general question (4/20/2016 2:40:06 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: roythesub

Balance is the iron clad key to being my slave. It is not found in a lock attached to any chains but deep in your mind. If balance is overlooked, the entire D/s connection is lost. You must need to serve to live while living to need to serve and be needed in return. Without need, both involved are irrelevant.
An old joke, ripe with relevance:
The true masochist begs 'Whip me, beat me, use me for your pleasure, please, Mistress!' The true sadist replies, 'No!'

My ex Mistress posted this in her journal. In my heart, I lived to serve her, and I sincerely needed her. Does this mean that she doesn't need me? Does this mean she is toying with me and my emotions because she is a sadist? What does it mean? I know it's aimed at me.

Your former Mistress does not need you because of your de facto state of being her ex-sub, as mousekabob pointed out. What reason(s) did she give you for releasing you from ownership?

You must not be feeling closure in this matter, and may be reading too much into her words. What part of her clearly stating that she believes a slave "needs to be needed in return. Without need, both involved are irrelevant" eludes your understanding?

She is not toying with your emotions -- she has already moved on, and so should you.



BondageersT -> RE: a general question (4/20/2016 9:51:27 AM)

find yourself someone new who will bother about you. x



BondageersT -> RE: a general question (4/20/2016 9:52:49 AM)

you missed out aka douchebag ASSHOLE IDIOT .



debydeb -> RE: a general question (5/21/2016 7:51:52 AM)

what are you talking about here?



crumpets -> RE: a general question (5/21/2016 8:22:00 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal
She is not toying with your emotions -- she has already moved on, and so should you.


I don't know how you guys know so much a about so many people, but this is probably the correct answer, just based on what FO normally knows about people (which is scary).



ResidentSadist -> RE: a general question (5/25/2016 5:02:14 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: crumpets
quote:

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal
She is not toying with your emotions -- she has already moved on, and so should you.


I don't know how you guys know so much a about so many people, but this is probably the correct answer, just based on what FO normally knows about people (which is scary).

He has already moved on. He is "under consideration" and spending two weeks with potential new Mistress next month. They both acknowledge each other in their profiles.

However, I read his bleeding heart abandoned puppy journal entries. He sounds like an obsessed emotional wreck and looks like he is still emotionally attached to the ex. Following her journal and advertising that he doing so by posting her journal in his journal isn't a good idea. Makes him look like a stalker. If he can't handle what she writes, he should stop stalking her.



MizzSpitfire -> RE: a general question (5/26/2016 5:53:32 PM)

Indeed, RS... he sounds like a total wreck.
If I were this potential owner, I sure as hell would remove him from consideration for having all the blubbering laments to another woman on his profile.



LadyPact -> RE: a general question (5/26/2016 6:24:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MizzSpitfire
If I were this potential owner, I sure as hell would remove him from consideration for having all the blubbering laments to another woman on his profile.

Can I get an AMEN?

I'll settle for an emoji with a big flashing neon sign.

No owner worth their salt would have this.




littleclip -> RE: a general question (5/26/2016 6:58:07 PM)

[sm=agree.gif][sm=alarm.gif][sm=accordion.gif][sm=beatdeadhorse.gif][sm=boohoo.gif]
me too



Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875