Am I Comparing Apples To Oranges? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


ilovestarbucks -> Am I Comparing Apples To Oranges? (4/11/2016 8:19:15 PM)

I belong to another forum and I posted a question but it got deleted because the admin said this is just ranting. But honestly, I'm not ranting. I'm not here to rile or stir things up. I would like to know your opinion.

I've been reading some interesting posts concerning BDSM dating sites. I would like to ask this question.

1. Say an average guy joined a BDSM dating site and he wants to find an authentic long term relationship. He reads listing and sends out thoughtful emails but gets no response. He comes to a forum and complains and bitches about it. The most valid response I've read would be something like this:
"Well, you are only writing to women who are an #8, 9, 10. (I hate giving numbers like this.) And you are just a 3! Of course you're not getting a response. If you are serious in finding someone, why don't you write to the women who are a #2, 3, 4, 5.
If the guy complains that those women are ugly fat, etc, he gets the wrath of the community - a lot of derogatory remarks.

2. An average women joins a BDSM dating site and wants an authentic long term relationship. She complains that she can't find anyone of substance. 99% of the emails she receives are of dick pictures, men who live in another country, etc. However, 1% come through who live near her. But she says, "Look at that 1%! They look like they need a bath - they are ugly - etc."

Does she deserve the wrath of the community and derogatory remarks?




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Am I Comparing Apples To Oranges? (4/11/2016 8:21:29 PM)

Oh Dear




OsideGirl -> RE: Am I Comparing Apples To Oranges? (4/11/2016 10:23:07 PM)

Still ranting.




ilovestarbucks -> RE: Am I Comparing Apples To Oranges? (4/11/2016 10:39:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl

Still ranting.



My intention isn't to rant. If it sounds like ranting, how would I change the question so it doesn't sound like ranting?
Why is the popular thread, "Fetish delivery system vs financial delivery system" not considered ranting but this one is?




Andalusite -> RE: Am I Comparing Apples To Oranges? (4/11/2016 10:48:44 PM)

They both are rants, IMO.[:D] I do think that expecting to date a supermodel if you're ugly is unrealistic, but wanting something more than a dick pic or wanting someone who is local seems reasonable to me. If she is complaining about men being ugly or overweight, I do think that is something that isn't fair for her to criticise on a public forum. Everyone has their preferences and attractions, but being rude and hurtful about it is uncalled for.




OsideGirl -> RE: Am I Comparing Apples To Oranges? (4/11/2016 11:23:02 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ilovestarbucks

quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl

Still ranting.



My intention isn't to rant. If it sounds like ranting, how would I change the question so it doesn't sound like ranting?
Why is the popular thread, "Fetish delivery system vs financial delivery system" not considered ranting but this one is?

It is a rant. Nicky boy has been ranting about how life is unfair for men for at least 5 years. He's a one note trombone and we know it. He's the crazy guy at the end of the street who yells at every car that goes by his house...we, on occaision, try to talk sense into him, but for the most part roll our eyes and think he's a bitter idiot.




ilovestarbucks -> RE: Am I Comparing Apples To Oranges? (4/11/2016 11:40:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: ilovestarbucks

quote:

ORIGINAL: OsideGirl

Still ranting.



My intention isn't to rant. If it sounds like ranting, how would I change the question so it doesn't sound like ranting?
Why is the popular thread, "Fetish delivery system vs financial delivery system" not considered ranting but this one is?

It is a rant. Nicky boy has been ranting about how life is unfair for men for at least 5 years. He's a one note trombone and we know it. He's the crazy guy at the end of the street who yells at every car that goes by his house...we, on occaision, try to talk sense into him, but for the most part roll our eyes and think he's a bitter idiot.



Thank you for commenting.
Please talk sense into me.

Is what I'm doing comparing apples to oranges?
Or does the same standards hold true for both sexes?




WickedsDesire -> RE: Am I Comparing Apples To Oranges? (4/12/2016 6:15:52 AM)

I have told you, how many times is it now, keep it to 3 profiles or less and I am okay contributing. maybe it wasnt you i am not sure perhaps it was that other one.


Op is alluding to it is almost impossible to find a genuine single women on these sites and that people view him as a whiney little bitch and put the boot in. I am well aware of the women demographics who put the boot in, and I am equally aware of the men demographics who back those women up.

Your thread is fair and valid.
Your profile requires much work.
Your audience is minute - appeal to that openly and honestly.

Your main competition is actual man: bad stereotypes, grotesque caricatures and so on do you not yet understand this stand apart from them and be patient (yes I get frustrated at times myself)




Greta75 -> RE: Am I Comparing Apples To Oranges? (4/12/2016 6:55:20 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ilovestarbucks
2. An average women joins a BDSM dating site and wants an authentic long term relationship. She complains that she can't find anyone of substance. 99% of the emails she receives are of dick pictures, men who live in another country, etc. However, 1% come through who live near her. But she says, "Look at that 1%! They look like they need a bath - they are ugly - etc."

Does she deserve the wrath of the community and derogatory remarks?

I usually tell a woman, good things aren't suppose to be easy to come by.

But a man complaining about not receiving a reply is totally different from complaining about not finding quality.

Two different issues.

Because, nobody is obligated to reply him. It would seem to be more whiny than a woman simply complaining about being unable to find suitable candidates.

Whereas a man complains about "suitable candidates" not responding to them.

I have PMed many dominants who didn't respond to me too, and you don't see me coming here to cry about it. Silence means, we don't match. It's a good respond. I like it when a guy ignores me when his not interested. It's a non-confrontational response. I don't understand why men are getting so upset about it! Men also do drop off in the middle of days of correspondence. They signal their disinterest by no longer engaging with you. And that is perfectly fine. These are things that happen to women too. Because of my Asia location, many dominants also will immediately assume I am a scam, when I try to make conversation with them. I understand there are alot scams from Asia. But for me, if a man is dumb enough to not see from my writings that I am a genuine person then I think clearly we are not mentally compatible. His intelligence is in question, so it doesn't offend me, it tells me we will not fit.

So seriously...., I honestly think it's super dumb for any man to get upset with females if they got ignored, BECAUSE, take it as a strong signal that you are not compatible with each other. She does not GET YOU! If she got you, she'd have replied you or carried on conversation with you. She is not right for you. Why get upset about women who aren't right for you anyway, ignoring you?

Today I receive a PM from a sub male bitching about being unable to find a domme who does not want financial domination. He suggest I team up with him as sub-sub couple, to find free domination together lol.

I just asked him, "What's in it for me? I can find a dominant male to play with just fine without you."

I feel very hard to feel sympathetic about his comments. The fact that he suggests I team up with him for the sake of HIS pleasure, tells me as a sub male, if his not interested in doing what will pleasure his domme, his not gonna get his domme.




BitaTruble -> RE: Am I Comparing Apples To Oranges? (4/12/2016 8:01:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ilovestarbucks

If it sounds like ranting, how would I change the question so it doesn't sound like ranting?



"A rose by any other name..."

You don't need to change the question.. just your attitude. Shun envy and the rest will fall naturally in to place.

Sometimes bank robbers get away with robbing the bank but most times they get caught. Don't envy the few who get away with it, dude. They're criminals.






LadyPact -> RE: Am I Comparing Apples To Oranges? (4/12/2016 9:57:52 AM)

OK. Yesterday you said I was mean to you. Today, I'm going to use the same approach and it's going to be interpreted in a much different way.
quote:

ORIGINAL: ilovestarbucks
I belong to another forum and I posted a question but it got deleted because the admin said this is just ranting. But honestly, I'm not ranting. I'm not here to rile or stir things up. I would like to know your opinion.

Here is something that a lot of people don't seem to understand about forums. It is not your interpretation that matters. The Admin of any forum is making a judgement call on content, tone, and all of the other things they consider. If they see it as a rant, and rants are against whatever their guidelines are, it goes.

quote:

I've been reading some interesting posts concerning BDSM dating sites. I would like to ask this question.

It surprises me that more people *don't* read the research that is readily available about dating sites. Heck, OKCupid does this work for you. I'm not even here to date and I read more of this stuff than a lot of people do on average. Anyway...

quote:

1. Say an average guy joined a BDSM dating site and he wants to find an authentic long term relationship. He reads listing and sends out thoughtful emails but gets no response. He comes to a forum and complains and bitches about it. The most valid response I've read would be something like this:
"Well, you are only writing to women who are an #8, 9, 10. (I hate giving numbers like this.) And you are just a 3! Of course you're not getting a response. If you are serious in finding someone, why don't you write to the women who are a #2, 3, 4, 5.
If the guy complains that those women are ugly fat, etc, he gets the wrath of the community - a lot of derogatory remarks.

That response does come up sometimes. However, if you ever read these types of threads over the years, it's certainly not the most common reply. Most people who have been on sites like this aren't really going to direct you to write to women who are less attractive, etc because they know your chances of getting a response (because it's still you sending out the same type of email that you already send) don't get higher just based on the other person's level of physical attraction. You are still going to have the same things that discount you to women in general.

What you're doing with this is going with the theory that less attractive women would be more likely to reply because their options are fewer. This is actually rather silly in the online dating and especially the online kink world because women don't need to depend on this medium to accomplish what they want. Women, especially women in your age group, can go to a munch, club, or play party and get more than enough attention and potential interest in them. It's one of the constants of the kink world.

quote:

2. An average women joins a BDSM dating site and wants an authentic long term relationship. She complains that she can't find anyone of substance. 99% of the emails she receives are of dick pictures, men who live in another country, etc. However, 1% come through who live near her. But she says, "Look at that 1%! They look like they need a bath - they are ugly - etc.

Does she deserve the wrath of the community and derogatory remarks?

Here's what I'd like you to do.

Go find me the ten threads from the past year on this site where you find women doing that. Then, find all of the threads where men use terms like overweight, fatties, old, middle-aged, etc. You're going to see a huge imbalance about how many threads are generated by which gender. Heck, on this forum, a lot of posters can probably tell you the screen names of people who use negative terms like that because they do it so often. Quick hint: They happen to be male.

quote:

My intention isn't to rant. If it sounds like ranting, how would I change the question so it doesn't sound like ranting?

I'm basing this on your original.

For something not to be a rant, in my opinion, you need to take the negative out of it. That includes terminology such as b^tching, whining, complaining, or any other term or phrasing that puts the connotation to imply that it's a rant. There's a difference in writing an original with the immediate bad tone of "women never write back when I send nice emails" and "I'm not getting a lot of replies so I'm asking how I can improve my results". Even though it's the same subject, the underlying tone makes this two entirely different threads. It's all about approach.

quote:

Why is the popular thread, "Fetish delivery system vs financial delivery system" not considered ranting but this one is?

Oh, it's a rant. It's the same rant that's been that particular poster's MO for a very long time. When a person is sending those emails out to the smaller demographic, when they are part of the larger demographic, the smaller demographic is going to be looking at what they bring to the table. It's not a 1:1 scale, so those members of the smaller demographic are going to start picking and choosing why they would rather spend their time on the other.

What the original poster of that thread doesn't understand (or want to accept) is that when it comes to things like "casual" or fetish delivery systems, when it comes to women on either side of the slash, there are always more options. That's why the rules of supply and demand have come into play in the first place. Why are there so many female pros as compared to male pros (het)? It's because the demand is obvious and the supply is low. On the other, men looking for casual sex or casual play are about as hard to find as walking into my kitchen and getting a glass of tap water. This is even more compounded by the internet and the lack of effort that one has to put into trying to get that hook-up compared to actually taking a shower, putting on clean clothes, and going out into public. The latter are already at a higher advantage because they put more effort into meeting people and that nice email you sent is going unread on a Friday night because the gal is out doing what she wants to do.

*If* a person is just going to rely on the internet, the smartest thing they can do is listen to their target demographic because that's how to help improve your results. It doesn't hurt to read the reports that OKCupid does because they survey their members about what works and what doesn't.







ilovestarbucks -> RE: Am I Comparing Apples To Oranges? (4/12/2016 11:00:57 AM)

@LadyPact

The only research I know of is what posters have said. One prominent poster said, "80% of the men write to 20% of the women." The 20% of the women happen to be pretty, fit, etc.... top of the top. The reason men aren't able to get replies is because they are writing to those women.
Many posters claim that women date upward. So if you're a nice looking man you're better off writing to women who (I hate using numbers to quantify looks) are #2, 3, 4's.

I did what you said.
"Go find me the ten threads from the past year on this site where you find women doing that."
I can't find any.

"Then, find all of the threads where men use terms like overweight, fatties, old, middle-aged, etc."
There is a lot.


Okay, you make some good points.




OsideGirl -> RE: Am I Comparing Apples To Oranges? (4/12/2016 11:08:47 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ilovestarbucks

The reason men aren't able to get replies is because they are writing to those women.


I beg to differ - 99% of those guys aren't getting responses because they're ignoring the criteria in the woman's profile (I'm married, have a picture of M on my profile and say I'm just here for the forums - guys STILL send emails) or their approach is not attractive to the woman in question.




NotFiftyShades -> RE: Am I Comparing Apples To Oranges? (4/12/2016 11:28:14 AM)

OP bear in mind that you are on a free site. I will not "quote" numbers because I don't know them. Lots of the women here are fake. Lots of the women here are looking to be kept as in kept up. Lots of the women here are only interested in a unicorn. Lots of women here are attempting to live some kind of fantasy that their husbands won't or don't give them. Lots of women find satisfaction in being sought after.
A fair amount of the females here have absolutely no intention of meeting anyone. It's just the way it is.
Also keep this in mind. Women rule the world.
They have half the money.
And ALL the pussy.




Lucylastic -> RE: Am I Comparing Apples To Oranges? (4/12/2016 12:03:47 PM)

Lots of the men here are fake. Lots of the men here are looking to be kept. Lots of the men here are only interested in a unicorn. Lots of men here are attempting to live some kind of fantasy that their wives or girlfriends won't or don't give them. Lots of men find satisfaction in being sought after.
A fair amount of the fmales here have absolutely no intention of meeting anyone. It's just the way it is.
Also keep this in mind. men rule the world.
They have half the money.
And want ALL the pussy.




Cinnamongirl67 -> RE: Am I Comparing Apples To Oranges? (4/12/2016 12:10:10 PM)

I personally don't think your ranting.
I think your frustrated.

Of course, I can be a ranter, an award winning bitch, a lunatic and an insulter.
Lol....what a combo!

I'm married, and I have a little experience with bdsm. I'm more kinky, then anything.

Here's my advice, take it or leave it.
If I was single this would not be the place I would look for a relationship. I basically am a forum poster on and off. It's entertainment for me. Occasionally I see a post where people meet up and have a positive outcome.
Let's face it, the majority of people on the other side are VERY SEXUAL. A majority are looking for perfect built studs, or women, or money. (Not all)
Ok I'm rambling, my advice is go to a vanilla site, find someone you find attractive, hit bases on the Important compatibility things, then discuss your desires LaTER.
You might be surprised. I'm not saying physical attraction isn't important because it's Very Important. I'm saying once you tick all the boxes, if your brave enough to talk about it later, two people who are very into each other are very interested in pleasing the other. Unless your into hard core stuff really bizarre stuff, your chances are pretty good into finding someone willing to try YOUR brand.




OsideGirl -> RE: Am I Comparing Apples To Oranges? (4/12/2016 12:23:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Lots of the men here are fake. Lots of the men here are looking to be kept. Lots of the men here are only interested in a unicorn. Lots of men here are attempting to live some kind of fantasy that their wives or girlfriends won't or don't give them. Lots of men find satisfaction in being sought after.
A fair amount of the fmales here have absolutely no intention of meeting anyone. It's just the way it is.
Also keep this in mind. men rule the world.
They have half the money.
And want ALL the pussy.


I always find it interesting that men think the females have the market cornered on being fake. I would say that 99% of the guys I met when I was single had lied about something. I never engaged in the online stuff beyond getting to the first meeting, so I spared myself a lot of crap.

There was some guy on the other side that convinced one of my friends that he was relocating to San Diego...to the point where she went to the airport to pick him up....and he wasn't there and went poof. She had cammed with him many times and is now worried about it showing up somewhere.




LadyPact -> RE: Am I Comparing Apples To Oranges? (4/12/2016 2:36:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ilovestarbucks
@LadyPact

The only research I know of is what posters have said. One prominent poster said, "80% of the men write to 20% of the women." The 20% of the women happen to be pretty, fit, etc.... top of the top. The reason men aren't able to get replies is because they are writing to those women.

First, I can promise you for a fact this is not true. If that were correct, I should have never had the amount of incoming email that I've had on this site because of my age and my marital status. The reason my email is higher than what should be expected is because of a number of other factors that don't have anything to do with my profile pic.

If the only research that you know of is what other posters are telling you about the above, I would love to see the link you are referring to. (It's cool. You can post it on this thread.) I'd suggest you google some information from dating sites, themselves, because they mine their data.

quote:

Many posters claim that women date upward. So if you're a nice looking man you're better off writing to women who (I hate using numbers to quantify looks) are #2, 3, 4's.

On a site specifically like this one, it's not going to be based on looks alone. You're on a kink site so that means people are going to put a certain value on kink/power exchange relationships/whatever brought them to this site rather than EHarmony.







DesFIP -> RE: Am I Comparing Apples To Oranges? (4/12/2016 7:06:52 PM)

Op, you are basing this on a false assumption.

Your false assumption is that women are equally desperate as men. And that's not true.

We prefer to be alone rather than be with a man we cannot respect. So if you aren't someone we can respect, then we are fine staying home and have a satisfying life anyway.

Whereas all too many men cannot imagine a good life that doesn't include a woman with a specific list of superficial attributes. As a result, men outweigh women on these sites. Plus a significant percentage of female profiles are actually male.

So yes, apples to oranges. More importantly, how is whining about this going to help you achieve your end result?
In fact, since your forum posts are apparent to any woman who cares to read them, and women usually do read them, the more you rant about the actualities of life, the less likely you are to ever achieve your goal, to ever get the relationship you dream of.

So rant on. But don't expect it to change anything. And do expect it to make things worse. Because people who complain are not attractive, likable people. And damn few people want to be with someone unlikable.




Bhruic -> RE: Am I Comparing Apples To Oranges? (4/13/2016 4:27:52 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ilovestarbucks

...If the guy complains that those women are ugly fat, etc, he gets the wrath of the community - a lot of derogatory remarks...

...However, 1% come through who live near her. But she says, "Look at that 1%! They look like they need a bath - they are ugly - etc."...

Does she deserve the wrath of the community and derogatory remarks?


If the person in question answered "The people replying are just not my type. They don't appeal to me." instead of "they are fat and ugly"... then they might be viewed as a less unsavory person, and get a better response from the community.

Given the actual situation though, the community response you are complaining about sounds appropriate to me.




Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
6.152344E-02