RE: Paul Ryan for President

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Paul Ryan for President

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Paul Ryan for President

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Paul Ryan for President - 4/22/2016 3:55:35 AM

thompsonx

Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

They dont' care that he isn't part of the ruling case. Again - cheers.

Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

(in reply to Phydeaux)

Profile

Post #: 21

RE: Paul Ryan for President - 4/22/2016 4:10:09 AM

brispslave

Posts: 28
Joined: 1/27/2008
Status: offline

lol, I seriously thought this thread read "Rand Paul" for president for the first few scrolls. *That* would help Amerika. Anyone either party presents as a candidate will not.

Sheesh people, spot a fucking pattern already.

Einstein said that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.

(in reply to thompsonx)

Profile

Post #: 22

RE: Paul Ryan for President - 4/22/2016 4:12:53 AM

brispslave

Posts: 28
Joined: 1/27/2008
Status: offline

Um, that last message wasn't 'in reply' to Thompsonx. I'm not sure how to make a message 'in reply' to no one though...

(in reply to brispslave)

Profile

Post #: 23

RE: Paul Ryan for President - 4/22/2016 4:15:01 AM

crazyml

Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline

If you're replying quickly at the end of a thread, popping "FR" (for "fast reply") at the beginning of your post acts as a flag that you're not necessarily responding to anyone in partic.

_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to brispslave)

Profile

Post #: 24

RE: Paul Ryan for President - 4/22/2016 4:27:18 AM

ThatDizzyChick

Posts: 5490
Status: offline

Oh cool, thanks. I had noticed that a few times and didn't know what it meant.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to crazyml)

Profile

Post #: 25

RE: Paul Ryan for President - 4/22/2016 4:28:46 AM

ThatDizzyChick

Posts: 5490
Status: offline

quote:

But if between him and ted, who is the better of the worst?

I'd say Cruz, as he's likely to do less real damage.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Greta75)

Profile

Post #: 26

RE: Paul Ryan for President - 4/22/2016 7:45:55 AM

MrRodgers

Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

Look, they will ALL 'play ball.' They are allowed to tinker on the edges but there will be no real reform. He will continue or increase the drone war, creating as many new enemies as it kills.

He will very likely not only keep GITMO open but may well begin to restock it with so-called 'enemy combatants.' He will cut the taxes of the repub constituency. He may well try for a new DOMA act. He will continue corporate welfare, Ag. and ethanol subsidies, tariffs and scam. He will continue to have the FDA determine where the most profit is in drugs. He will continue to base most approvals on religion rather than science like stem cell research, among the most promising. He will almost assuredly continue the windfall profit from Med Part D.

I don't see Trump or Cruz or HRC being much different with the exception of HRC on taxes and a try for some spending differences.

Kinkroids they...Presidents are hood ornaments...enjoy how they cut the wind. That's all they will do. We'll take care of the partisan bullshit, make living or not and just to struggle through.

< Message edited by MrRodgers -- 4/22/2016 7:48:03 AM >

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)

Profile

Post #: 27

RE: Paul Ryan for President - 4/22/2016 3:48:55 PM

DesideriScuri

Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: brispslave
lol, I seriously thought this thread read "Rand Paul" for president for the first few scrolls. *That* would help Amerika. Anyone either party presents as a candidate will not.
Sheesh people, spot a fucking pattern already.
Einstein said that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.

Rand Paul certainly ain't his daddy, at least not yet. Rand is a lot more "Republican" than Ron. And, yes, I'm using "Republican" as an adjective with a negative connotation. I don't think he's as principled as Ron, either. If Rand were more like Ron, I'd agree that he'd be very good for the US (although all his budget plans have included increasing defense spending).

_____________________________

What I support: