Noah -> RE: A SIMPLER APPROACH AND SOLUTIO (7/20/2006 10:05:40 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MasterRenegade77 Tell Me what your country's compassion got you all in London just over a year ago... It got them relief from a pale monotony of color in skin and added richness to a culture already very much colored by influences from across the world.. It got them ska and bhangra and many amazing composers and performers of "serious" music as well. It got them a fantastic array of cuisines--and dear God we know what food was there before the immigrants. In literature it got them V.S. Naipaul, Salman Rushdie, Sam Selvon, Hanif Kureishi, and Michael Ondaatje, as I understand things. This list could be expanded to fill pages by someone with more knowledge of British culture than I have. Similar lists could be drawn up of actors, dancers, painters and sculptors, educators, researchers, and on and on. In general it got them many thousands of living, breathing, vibrant interesting and valuable visitors, residents and citizens. Engineers, housewives, nurses and doctors, tradesmen and professionals of all sorts. And yeah, a bunch of layabouts and criminals too. Do you think crime and sloth were never seen in Avalon before the non-English speakers arrived? Has it occurred to you that English is itself the most polyglot of all languages? It is the language that it is--the language Conrad chose to write in for God's sake--specifically because it has admitted and encouraged outside influences rather than rejecting them. And as someone else has kindly indicated for your benefit, those with a basic command of the language know that it is called English, not American. Your reasoning carried toward its conclusion would have the Queen of England speaking some tiny, gutteral Pictish dialect and all residents of North America speaking local languages ranging from that of the Mohawks to that of the Hopi. Or is it cool to speak your old language in a new land as long as the linguistic intrusion is accompanied by genocide? That you would judge a decades-old British approach to immigration on the actions of a handful of people on a given day shows the paucity of your claim. Your implicit conclusion that Native Language Testing would have prevented the London bombings demonstrates the quality of your reasoning. Now let me put the issue to you another way. As far as I know no nation in the past half-century been more successful than North Korea at filtering outside influences. How, in your estimation, has that worked out for them?
|
|
|
|