DaddySatyr
Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011 From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Phydeaux I should like to think that since the president embodies the hope of the people, presidential conduct is consonant that state. I gave the Commander-In-Heat a lot of crap, back in the day; not for fucking Monica (have you looked at Hillary, even back then? I wouldn't fuck her with a borrowed penis), but for being dishonest to the American people and, ultimately, a court (and possibly the congress). Forgetting the details, I think we should stick with the broader principles. Any of us could nit-pick some fault about every president. The question becomes the broader issues. Did Kennedy screw the Cubans, purposely during the Bay of Pigs fiasco? I tend to doubt it, but if someone thinks he did, that certainly speaks to integrity. Did Johnson really say what he was purported to have said, right after signing the CRA? If he did, it speaks to his smarminess and willingness to use a group of people for his political agenda (not to mention racism). Nixon? I can't even begin to hit on all the issues with him. Anyway, my point is: If we remove the obvious things upon which everyone can agree are "wrong", the rest is perspective. I think Bill Clinton was a lying scumbag. That he lied is a public fact. That lack of integrity is what is disturbing to me. Ted Cruz has a resumé that some would call "impressive". From the day he got on my radar, he struck me as "a slimy ambulance chaser". My initial assessment was probably wrong, but then, we have what he did to Dr. Carson. For me, the jury's not out on Cruz. He's a devious scumbag and that is what makes him "un-presidential" to me. Michael
_____________________________
A Stone in My Shoe Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me? "For that which I love, I will do horrible things"
|