FieryOpal -> RE: Orgasm T&D and relationships (4/27/2016 8:03:59 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DeliciousAche It appears that some clarification might be in order. Ultimately, orgasmic release is a good idea! The question is when. I don't expect anybody to talk about something impractical. We have limitations, for sure. The problem is in terminology. Denial can be absolute, practiced over an extended period of time, or involve orgasm delay within intervals or per encounter without outright denial. There is T&D with total denial (T&TD), the favorite of some chastity slaves who go along with periodic milkings, or subs who get into having Ruined Orgasms, T&D with partial denial, where the orgasm release process gets prolonged with delayed (T&DD) ejaculation, which employs Edging. Edging can be self-regulated by a non-submissive to varying degrees, and is not always exclusively enforced on the submissive partner. I am only aware of one female sub, who used to post on the fora fairly regularly, who enjoyed Orgasm Denial and would proudly mark how many months she had abstained from having an orgasm. (By the same token, it is also uncommon to come across a female sub who wants to get locked into a chastity belt.) quote:
ORIGINAL: OsideGirl Here's the thing sex doesn't equal intimacy. You can't "train" intimacy. And I don't provide service, obedience or submission because I'm sexually frustrated. I don't get this either, how training enters the picture or how T&D (with either distinction as made above) can create a deeper level of intimacy. Closer bonding occurs on many levels, regardless of what sexual activities are taking place between partners. Training usually refers to Obedience Training, and I do not believe that the withholding or granting of sexual gratification will reap long-lasting results in terms of greater obedience, only fleetingly superficial ones at most.
|
|
|
|