Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the bird.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the bird. Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/3/2016 8:16:13 AM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

There is a difference between gambling on an outcome and lending money.


Oh how little you know about the world of finance.

So then, all that profiling of prospective debtors, all the probability statistics, etc. are just an exercise of thumb twiddling while waiting upon guaranteed payment, is that it?

And since you missed the point entirely, I'll bring it up again, just for fun; it's not the original lenders in play here, it's those who KNOWINGLY bought -already defaulted bonds- gambling with 'house money' if they can only get the thing into the properly corrupted US circuit court, which they succeeded in doing in this instance.

The original lenders get zilch zero and nada out of all this latest, though they did get their 5-10 cents on the dollar by selling those bonds to the higher stakes gamblers.




< Message edited by Edwird -- 5/3/2016 8:34:33 AM >

(in reply to Aylee)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/3/2016 8:55:15 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
Phydo!!

quote:

I did not say that promising social benefits was the definition of socialism. I said it was endemic in socialist nations. And of course, it is.
Anytime you abandon the rule of free markets, you imposing some other value scale by which to award good & services. The rule of money - where everyone that has it can purchase a good gives way to the rule of the mob, or the rule of croneyism.

I dare say you would be hard pressed to name any nation in which social benefits were not promised to a segment of the population if for no other reason than as a device to placate and dissuade a rebellion.

Nor is there any nation where totally unfettered, unregulated free markets exists, or have ever existed outside of Adam Smith and neoliberal theory. A totally free market would carry within its own seeds of self destruction. Anarchy or Oligarchy would ensue in short order. In order to maintain stability a society must offer some form of benefits to all. They need not be the same benefits but surely basic and satisfactory to all elsewise the compact would dissolve and revolution would occur. The illusions of free markets and capital do not trump social necessity.

all societies provide their members with a stable frame of reference (order), a sense of purpose (meaning), and the feeling of belonging (membership). In the absence of these elements, cultures, societies, even organizations just don't work. So it follows that if the social conventions of order, meaning, and membership are declining, they must be resuscitated; if they are being disinvented, they must be reinvented--or society itself will fail.

Free marketers (neoliberals) have been disinventing or propagandizing against the collagen that holds our society together at their own peril.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/3/2016 10:48:42 AM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

a. Socialism is fucked. Always was, always will be. It always fails, once they run out of other people's money to spend.
You're presumably too young to remember when liberal meant - being generous with your OWN money. He was a liberal tipper, for example.

These days, it just means someone who wants to spend someone elese's money.

b. Markets forces humble even the biggest countries. EG: Soros breaking the bank of England.

c. Profit - and risk taking are not evil. In this case, it gave people that were risk aversive a way out.


Soros didn't "break" the BOE, he was just ahead of the game by one or two days. There was a long line for that, actually.

Sorry about your stupid.

Germany, Sweden, Norway, Luxembourg, Denmark, Switzerland, etc. et al. seem to be doing just fine, by measurables of things like -net- exports, personal savings, healthcare, etc. But nevertheless "socialistas" by your hair brained 'standards.'

Of course USSR and Chinese forms of socialism were "fucked," but they've come on board with capitalism now, and how is THAT working out for them now, or in any case for the gangsters?

The northern Germanic tribes work 36 hours a week, the women don't have to toss their babies off to state/federal sanctioned 'daycare' at six weeks (as in the US), they take half of their 6 weeks vacation to the beaches of Spain, and retire with a comfortable income, commensurate with their service to society. And Germany matches the US in -total- exports, all with collective bargaining, and 27% of the US underpaid work force.

By your estimation of things, this is "Socialism is fucked."

Sorry for your stupid.

And, no, it's not about giving an 'out' to the "risk averse" ; nobody who bought those bonds in the first place was "risk averse."

Sorry about your stupid.

Oh, and Chile under Pinochet had their country economically run by an acolyte of Milton Friedman, whereupon financial disaster and many deaths and ruin of that country's economy ensued.

Sorry about your stupid.

Bottom line: US and UK bankers are friendly to and forgiving of dictators and despots. Not so forgiving of countries looking out for their own well being.






< Message edited by Edwird -- 5/3/2016 11:47:00 AM >

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/3/2016 10:27:48 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

a. Socialism is fucked. Always was, always will be. It always fails, once they run out of other people's money to spend.
You're presumably too young to remember when liberal meant - being generous with your OWN money. He was a liberal tipper, for example.

These days, it just means someone who wants to spend someone elese's money.

b. Markets forces humble even the biggest countries. EG: Soros breaking the bank of England.

c. Profit - and risk taking are not evil. In this case, it gave people that were risk aversive a way out.


Soros didn't "break" the BOE, he was just ahead of the game by one or two days.



You claiming the sky is purple doesn't change the facts. Soros made a huge bet that the BOE coudl not sustain the pound. That market forces were going to exhaust BOE reserves. Soros was right.
quote:




Sorry about your stupid.

Germany, Sweden, Norway, Luxembourg, Denmark, Switzerland, etc. et al. seem to be doing just fine, by measurables of things like -net- exports, personal savings, healthcare, etc. But nevertheless "socialistas" by your hair brained 'standards.'


Obviously, first grade literacy escapes you. I gave a list of socialist nations. Funnily enough, Germany, Sweden, Norway etc, were not on that list.
But I have posted extensively on those nations. How they have cut taxes, cut corporate tax rates, pushe out the ages of retirement etc.
For example it is illustrative to note that Sweden in the 1990's was the 4th wealthiest country. By the 2010, social programs had cut its wealth and it dropped to 11th. Sweden cut its tax rates, cut its benefits and employment etc is returning.

The trend toward free market reforms is evident all over europe - whether greece, france, sweden - wherever you care to look.
quote:




Of course USSR and Chinese forms of socialism were "fucked," but they've come on board with capitalism now, and how is THAT working out for them now, or in any case for the gangsters?



Russia is moving away from capitalism and toward authoritarianism. Its not working out well for them.

China improved its situation immensely by moving toward capitalism. However, it too doesn't embrace free markets, believing that the party can direct capital better than the free markets.

At present, there resulting credit bubble exceed 26 trillion dollars in an economy half the size of the US. Ghosts cities stand unoccupied. Steel mills unused.
The chinese essentially promised prosperity in return for keeping the communist party in power.


quote:




The northern Germanic tribes work 36 hours a week, the women don't have to toss their babies off to state/federal sanctioned 'daycare' at six weeks (as in the US), they take half of their 6 weeks vacation to the beaches of Spain, and retire with a comfortable income, commensurate with their service to society. And Germany matches the US in -total- exports, all with collective bargaining, and 27% of the US underpaid work force.

By your estimation of things, this is "Socialism is fucked."


To the contrary. Germany is a capatalistic state, in fact one of the most competitive in the world. They choose to spend money on a social welfare state. They are entitled to spend their money as they see fit. But it is not their socialist policies that are making them an economic powerhouse. Its their support of free markets, work ethic etc.



quote:


Bottom line: US and UK bankers are friendly to and forgiving of dictators and despots. Not so forgiving of countries looking out for their own well being.



Fancy that. Banks want to be repaid when they make loans.








(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/3/2016 10:34:44 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Phydo!!

quote:

I did not say that promising social benefits was the definition of socialism. I said it was endemic in socialist nations. And of course, it is.
Anytime you abandon the rule of free markets, you imposing some other value scale by which to award good & services. The rule of money - where everyone that has it can purchase a good gives way to the rule of the mob, or the rule of croneyism.

Free marketers (neoliberals) have been disinventing or propagandizing against the collagen that holds our society together at their own peril.



Sure, free markets exist nowhere in complete purity. Nothing here is 100% pure - not even Dove. So your point is irrelevent.
Secondly, capitalists do not 'disinvent' or propagandize against the collagen that holds our society together.

Our society's collagen was just fine during the colonial era - at a time when markets were a great deal freer than they are now. The collagen seems to have survived just fine during times moving toward free markets as when moving against. Ie., you're wrong.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/4/2016 8:00:31 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
1789 at the inception of our first congress tariff laws were passed. There was never a freer market than now.
Absolute falsehood and wrong.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/4/2016 9:36:04 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

1789 at the inception of our first congress tariff laws were passed. There was never a freer market than now.
Absolute falsehood and wrong.

Exactly. The only free market was in the trading of human beings. Ironic, wot?!


(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/4/2016 9:48:30 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Phydo!!

quote:

I did not say that promising social benefits was the definition of socialism. I said it was endemic in socialist nations. And of course, it is.
Anytime you abandon the rule of free markets, you imposing some other value scale by which to award good & services. The rule of money - where everyone that has it can purchase a good gives way to the rule of the mob, or the rule of croneyism.

Free marketers (neoliberals) have been disinventing or propagandizing against the collagen that holds our society together at their own peril.



Sure, free markets exist nowhere in complete purity. Nothing here is 100% pure - not even Dove. So your point is irrelevent.
Secondly, capitalists do not 'disinvent' or propagandize against the collagen that holds our society together.

Our society's collagen was just fine during the colonial era - at a time when markets were a great deal freer than they are now. The collagen seems to have survived just fine during times moving toward free markets as when moving against. Ie., you're wrong.

The only social collagen employed by capitalists has been police power in defense of property.

Free market ideology without social safety nets is nothing but gussied up Social Darwinism; putting lipstick on a pig leaves it still a pig.

Your inability to grasp the inhumane consequences of your ideology surprises me only in its shallowness. Otherwise, it is not unexpected from a business school churriculm.


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/4/2016 12:39:45 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

and pure capitalism has never been used, except perhaps in nigeria, or the barbary coast.


If you mean laissez faire, you would be correct but we are getting closer all of the time. Thing is, that swashbuckling, risk taking [sic] capitalist. much rather just make the money while the taxpayers actually take the risk. Oh and while they (govt.) are at it, make sure [they] still pay only a 20% tax (just up from 15%) on their precious capital gains, (and stock dividends) while you hot shots in the great professional salaried world, bust your ass and...pay 40%.

BTW, wasn't it Nigeria where whose political office holders recently passed for themselves, an understandably hard-earned, free-market/capitalist [sic] $700 million oil bonus ? I mean who needs capitalism or socialism, when one can earn/make/take so much money...the easy way, steal it.

< Message edited by MrRodgers -- 5/4/2016 12:51:36 PM >


_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/4/2016 12:48:38 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Phydo!!

quote:

I did not say that promising social benefits was the definition of socialism. I said it was endemic in socialist nations. And of course, it is.
Anytime you abandon the rule of free markets, you imposing some other value scale by which to award good & services. The rule of money - where everyone that has it can purchase a good gives way to the rule of the mob, or the rule of croneyism.

Free marketers (neoliberals) have been disinventing or propagandizing against the collagen that holds our society together at their own peril.


Sure, free markets exist nowhere in complete purity. Nothing here is 100% pure - not even Dove. So your point is irrelevent.
Secondly, capitalists do not 'disinvent' or propagandize against the collagen that holds our society together.

Our society's collagen was just fine during the colonial era - at a time when markets were a great deal freer than they are now. The collagen seems to have survived just fine during times moving toward free markets as when moving against. Ie., you're wrong.



There were tariffs on many products and the free markets, so-called of the 18th and early 19th centuries, were much more highly regulated.

The collagen or I guess protein, that's hold the American society together is our individual liberties chief among which, is to produce a profit for yourself or somebody else, and debt of course, or just go to jail or die.

Good thing our founding fathers didn't subsidize shifting our jobs to China then hey.

< Message edited by MrRodgers -- 5/4/2016 12:52:44 PM >


_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/4/2016 1:12:28 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
I suspect this fits in somewhere:

"Money Down a Hole"

or "insulting [telling the truth about] the government vultures?"

quote:

Clinton might bankrupt America first, however, because Democrats promise more regulation and handouts -- free college, free pre-K, higher minimum wage, etc. Similar activist government spending just destroyed Puerto Rico.

This week, Puerto Rico defaulted on $370 million worth of bonds.

The territory's "generous" government squandered the island's resources. Decades of leftist governors hired their friends. In Puerto Rico and Greece, about one in four workers works for government, compared to 14.6 percent in the mainland U.S.

Puerto Rico's current governor points out that Puerto Ricans enjoy 30 days of paid vacation every year, 18 sick days and 14 paid holidays. That's about two months paid leave every year. No wonder businesses wither...

Puerto Rico's long reliance on handouts and welfare created a culture of helplessness and entitlement...

After years of decline, one Puerto Rican governor tried to do the right thing. Luis Fortuno, a free market guy who admired Ronald Reagan, froze government salaries, cut spending by 20 percent, eliminated some stupid regulations and fired 17,000 government workers. At the time, 250 policemen did nothing but approve liquor licenses.

Fortuno's policies might have helped the economy, but voters didn't like the cuts. Thousands of union protesters held demonstrations outside his house, calling him a Nazi. Fortuno was defeated in the 2012 election by a leftist, Garcia Padilla.

Padilla pledged to "create 50,000 jobs." But governments don't create real jobs. Padilla destroyed jobs by doing things like raising corporate taxes. As the island went broke, he promised to "cut down on tax evasion," "create two working groups to find ways to boost liquidity," and so on.

Now, more than a thousand Puerto Ricans leave the island every week for places with slightly less-bad politicians. But this will make life even tougher for Puerto Ricans left behind. Government having fewer suckers to tax makes it even harder to pay the bills.

Puerto Rico's debt has risen in the past 15 years from 60 percent to 100 percent of its gross domestic product. If it were a country, its fiscal situation would be about as bad as that of Greece. Like Greece, Puerto Rico is discovering that, eventually, other people get tired of bailing you out.

A group of hedge funds issued a report recommending going farther down the free market path Fortuno started on. They call for further simplification of labor regulations, cutting the number of government workers and privatizing government-run firms.

But some in Congress, warning of a "humanitarian crisis," want to bail the island out instead. Fortuno says that's a terrible idea. "That would reward irresponsible behavior."

It would. The real solution is to build a future in which bailouts aren't necessary, in which growing businesses, not government spending projects, flourish.

I hope Clinton and Trump learn something by watching other economies fail before the entire U.S. ends up like Puerto Rico and Greece.


http://townhall.com/columnists/johnstossel/2016/05/04/money-down-a-hole-n2157599

[small aside: makes me wonder whats going to happen to the muni bonds I hold, of which Puerto rico was a significant recipient.]

< Message edited by bounty44 -- 5/4/2016 1:13:38 PM >

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/4/2016 1:34:14 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Greeces only real industry is tourism. Tourism down, revenue down. Puerto Rico is failing because of the free-market where there were huge tax incentives to put corporations there. They are a country of minimum wages and are not making it go at that.

Since all the tax incentives and tax exemptions have expired, growth is negative. They sold bonds to cover the revenue deficits. The economy was nutsuckerized as our economy is being nutsuckerized.

Its epic failure thru nutsuckerism.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/4/2016 3:30:30 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
Treasure Island: Puerto Rico Bids To Become New Age Tax Haven (2/11/15) What Stossel has is old news and the great jobs from tax give-aways to the rich...aren't working. Imagine that.

HERE

Gee, all of those jobs for the great capitalist proletariat that govt. could tax, instead of wealthy of course, didn't yet appear. So guess what ? After all of the layoffs and belt-tightening. they still can't...pay their bonds. Imagine that.

Just what would this world do...without greed ?

< Message edited by MrRodgers -- 5/4/2016 3:38:05 PM >


_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/4/2016 3:54:37 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
"old news" with new repercussions...

and im not entirely sure what youre suggesting---that an attempt at a tax haven wasn't able to fix a decades old disastrous problem, so theyre bad?

you've also said nothing refuting what stossel claims to be the problem: too much debt caused by government spending and a lack of private incentive. you apparently think its a problem of not having taxed the rich enough?






< Message edited by bounty44 -- 5/4/2016 4:01:24 PM >

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/4/2016 9:37:03 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

1789 at the inception of our first congress tariff laws were passed. There was never a freer market than now.
Absolute falsehood and wrong.


Spoken like someone that has never run a business.

the federal government publishes 10,000 pages of rules a year. You have rules for how big the exit signs must be. How far the sinks must be from the ground, how much air the bathroom fan must vent per minute. It is illegal to sell margarine more than 1 lb at a time.

On top of this add state, and local taxes and regulations - and the idea that things were more highly regulated in colonial times is a joke.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/4/2016 9:40:05 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

"old news" with new repercussions...

and im not entirely sure what youre suggesting---that an attempt at a tax haven wasn't able to fix a decades old disastrous problem, so theyre bad?

you've also said nothing refuting what stossel claims to be the problem: too much debt caused by government spending and a lack of private incentive. you apparently think its a problem of not having taxed the rich enough?




Rather obviously, it seems every western nation whatever its spending (Ireland has big govt. deficit problems long after going to 12.5%) is now held hostage to trying to get the investor class to be so kind as come [here] to satisfy their unwillingness to pay even what labor pays to help pay any host country's bills.

Today, Ireland is under a different sort of tyranny, one imposed by the banks and the troika — the EU, ECB and IMF. The oppressors have demanded austerity and more austerity, forcing the public to pick up the tab for bills incurred by profligate private bankers.

A raft of new taxes (on labor of course) and charges has been sold as necessary to reduce the deficit, but they are simply a backdoor bailout of the banks. (of course)

Five years of austerity has not restored confidence in Ireland’s banks. In fact the banks themselves are packing up and leaving. On October 31st, RTE.ie reported that Danske Bank Ireland was closing its personal and business banking, only days after ACCBank announced it was handing back its banking license; and Ulster Bank’s future in Ireland remains unclear.

Ireland was the first European country to watch its entire banking system fail. Unlike the Icelanders, who refused to bail out their bankrupt banks, in September 2008 the Irish government gave a blanket guarantee to all Irish banks, covering all their loans, deposits, bonds and other liabilities. (more socialism for the rich) HERE

Apparently, Puerto Rico has no central bank or enough tax money to continue to entice the investor class.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/4/2016 11:03:43 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
We agree on one thing.

Iceland didn't bailout the banks. And Obama shouldn't have.

The only way to stop privatizing profit and socializing risk is to let businesses go bankrupt -whether its GM or citibank.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/5/2016 7:43:51 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

We agree on one thing.

Iceland didn't bailout the banks. And Obama shouldn't have.

The only way to stop privatizing profit and socializing risk is to let businesses go bankrupt -whether its GM or citibank.

There is no question that we agree on this but I always try my best to be objective and in doing so, have intellectually indicted many on most sides but all of this was occurring during the 4th quarter of 2008 and TARP was passed and signed into law months before Obama was even inaugurated.

The concept of 'bailing out GM' was begun with a federal govt. loan guarantee under Bush. Not much different than the Lockheed, NY city and Chrysler loan guarantees and thus, rather very...bipartisan affairs.

The essence of the political/social debate becomes very muddled and I think to the country's great damage, is that then the left wants tough regulations and enforcement to stop this shit...the right doesn't.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/5/2016 7:51:49 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

1789 at the inception of our first congress tariff laws were passed. There was never a freer market than now.
Absolute falsehood and wrong.


Spoken like someone that has never run a business.

the federal government publishes 10,000 pages of rules a year. You have rules for how big the exit signs must be. How far the sinks must be from the ground, how much air the bathroom fan must vent per minute. It is illegal to sell margarine more than 1 lb at a time.

On top of this add state, and local taxes and regulations - and the idea that things were more highly regulated in colonial times is a joke.



The federal government ........LOL. Show me the rule, the regulation, the law that says you can only sell margarine 1 lb at a time.

http://www.walmart.com/ip/Shedd-s-Spread-Country-Crock-Vegetable-Oil-Spread-45-oz/10291546

Spoken like a true failure in every walk of life, including business.

Nutsuckers are a joke.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the ... - 5/5/2016 10:03:39 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

We agree on one thing.

Iceland didn't bailout the banks. And Obama shouldn't have.

The only way to stop privatizing profit and socializing risk is to let businesses go bankrupt -whether its GM or citibank.

There is no question that we agree on this but I always try my best to be objective and in doing so, have intellectually indicted many on most sides but all of this was occurring during the 4th quarter of 2008 and TARP was passed and signed into law months before Obama was even inaugurated.


Tarp was passed under bush. And spent under obama. It was Obama's treasury secretaries that bailed out the banks.
quote:



is that then the left wants tough regulations and enforcement to stop this shit...the right doesn't.


Ridiculous. No republican wants spoiled meat. Corrupted scales. Illegal dumping.

Republicans don't want ineffective laws.
They don't overly burdensome laws: EPA wetlands, anyone?
They don't want laws infringing guaranteed constitutional rights. Gun laws, for example.
Generally, republicans want laws as close to the people as possible. State minimum wages, not federal minimum wage.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Insulting the vultures of capitalism...I mean the bird. Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.328