Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Who is it gonna be?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Who is it gonna be? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Who is it gonna be? - 5/10/2016 2:53:48 PM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
Yeah, that's about right.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Who is it gonna be? - 5/10/2016 10:13:24 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Nope.


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Who is it gonna be? - 5/10/2016 10:42:05 PM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
LOL
I love how you confirm what he said. :)

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Who is it gonna be? - 5/10/2016 11:03:02 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
I was just posting in the negative, almost exactly the same as you posted. in message http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4908143
you obviously think "no" is all you need....
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

She's already decided. This discussion is closed on her end.


"nope."
seems to be a perfectly reasonable response.
The fact that I responded at all means I have decided nothing.
Or would you like to tell me how long I have to respond to any given message before you decide what I think about anything is no longer valid?
Puhleeze.
now if you really want to put me in my place, go right ahead, both of you.

Ive got more important things to get upset about.


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Who is it gonna be? - 5/10/2016 11:26:25 PM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
LOL
Yes dear, whatever you say.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Who is it gonna be? - 5/11/2016 12:09:05 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
I was just posting in the negative, almost exactly the same as you posted. in message http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4908143
you obviously think "no" is all you need....
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
She's already decided. This discussion is closed on her end.

"nope."
seems to be a perfectly reasonable response.
The fact that I responded at all means I have decided nothing.
Or would you like to tell me how long I have to respond to any given message before you decide what I think about anything is no longer valid?
Puhleeze.
now if you really want to put me in my place, go right ahead, both of you.
Ive got more important things to get upset about.


What you're missing, Lucy, is that I wasn't being critical of you at all. I was explaining why your post wasn't being taken the way you intended. You posted negatively about the GOP, which was was rebuffed (not by me), and you clarified yourself. I merely explained to you why it was rebuffed. Then you got yourself all worked up.

Feel free to put yourself in any place, except mine.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Who is it gonna be? - 5/11/2016 12:27:02 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
I was just posting in the negative, almost exactly the same as you posted. in message http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4908143
you obviously think "no" is all you need....
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
She's already decided. This discussion is closed on her end.

"nope."
seems to be a perfectly reasonable response.
The fact that I responded at all means I have decided nothing.
Or would you like to tell me how long I have to respond to any given message before you decide what I think about anything is no longer valid?
Puhleeze.
now if you really want to put me in my place, go right ahead, both of you.
Ive got more important things to get upset about.


What you're missing, Lucy, is that I wasn't being critical of you at all. I was explaining why your post wasn't being taken the way you intended. You posted negatively about the GOP, which was was rebuffed (not by me), and you clarified yourself. I merely explained to you why it was rebuffed. Then you got yourself all worked up.

Feel free to put yourself in any place, except mine.


In a thread that has been taking the piss out of the VEEP Trump might choose..including your own mention of alex jones, trump being his own vp in case of assassination, and narcisstic palin and folks, so please dont expect me to cry for the tone of the thread
just my post made you upset.
what I actually said was...
quote:

we have a couple in this forum on the right who would fit perfectly.

I didnt name names, I didnt even allude to anyone. a couple...is not all or specific.
TDC said lefties too, I agreed.
Now if both of you would like everyone to post all disclaimers and exactly who and what they dont mean in a given thread, go right ahead.

Believe me, while I like you, its nothing sexual, I said put me in MY Place, nothing about relocation anywhere close to you, so stop eh?
its obviously an idea offensive to both.



_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Who is it gonna be? - 5/11/2016 6:39:18 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
I suspect Trump is a secret admirer of Caligula the Roman Emperor. Their personalities are so similar. When asked to nominate someone for the vacant Consul position (a position of great power prestige and influence in those days) Caligula famously nominated his favourite horse Incitatus.

Following Caligula's model, Trump will nominate his lab Spinee for VP, therely guaranteeing his own survival from assassination in the unlikely event of The Mop ever winning the Presidency.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Who is it gonna be? - 5/11/2016 7:38:31 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

I suspect Trump is a secret admirer of Caligula the Roman Emperor. Their personalities are so similar. When asked to nominate someone for the vacant Consul position (a position of great power prestige and influence in those days) Caligula famously nominated his favourite horse Incitatus.

Following Caligula's model, Trump will nominate his lab Spinee for VP, therely guaranteeing his own survival from assassination in the unlikely event of The Mop ever winning the Presidency.

Wouldn't an admiration of Caligula require a knowledge of history, though?

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Who is it gonna be? - 5/11/2016 8:00:06 AM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

Who will Trump pick as his Veep?

I say go all-in, pick Anne Coulter and finish the destruction of a once great institution.
No, he'll pick a professional politician. He needs the credibility.

My money's on Rubio. He's a clean-cut counterpart to Trump's brash, borish ways and he'll play well with Hispanic voters and women.


_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Who is it gonna be? - 5/11/2016 8:09:39 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline
A plausible idea in theory, but...

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Who is it gonna be? - 5/11/2016 8:12:21 AM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

A plausible idea in theory, but...
Rubio's a follower, not a leader. If someone was to persuade him that it's in the best interests of the party and/or country, then I think there's a good chance he'd do it. ("Marco, we'd rather have you there to temper his excesses than somebody who just doesn't care as much").

Not saying it's a lock, but I don't think he's out of the running.


_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Who is it gonna be? - 5/11/2016 8:13:58 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
Rubio already publicly declared that he will NEVER accept VP from Trump.

Actually, I believe Trump's dilemma now is finding someone to be his VP!

Who is willing to take the heat that comes with that position? Could tank his career IF Trump loses.

< Message edited by Greta75 -- 5/11/2016 8:14:38 AM >

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Who is it gonna be? - 5/11/2016 8:23:28 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

A plausible idea in theory, but...
Rubio's a follower, not a leader. If someone was to persuade him that it's in the best interests of the party and/or country, then I think there's a good chance he'd do it. ("Marco, we'd rather have you there to temper his excesses than somebody who just doesn't care as much").

Not saying it's a lock, but I don't think he's out of the running.


He does.

I think you're underestimating just how many noses Butthair's nomination campaign has put out of joint, and as the Republican Illuminati now (probably) have a nominee they don't particularly want and poster boys with a lot more clout and respect in the party than Rubio have already declared that no way in Hell are they supporting the mop, Rubio's unlikely to be harmed by refusing to join a ticket with Butthair.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Who is it gonna be? - 5/11/2016 8:24:14 AM   
sloguy02246


Posts: 534
Joined: 11/5/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

Rubio already publicly declared that he will NEVER accept VP from Trump.

Actually, I believe Trump's dilemma now is finding someone to be his VP!

Who is willing to take the heat that comes with that position? Could tank his career IF Trump loses.



Also could tank his career if Trump wins.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Who is it gonna be? - 5/11/2016 8:43:24 AM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
quote:

Rubio already publicly declared that he will NEVER accept VP from Trump.

And when has a public declaration ever prevented a politician from doing the opposite of what they declared?
For example....
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/05/perry-tries-to-live-down-trump-cancer-comment.html#

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Who is it gonna be? - 5/11/2016 8:47:07 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

Rubio already publicly declared that he will NEVER accept VP from Trump.

Actually, I believe Trump's dilemma now is finding someone to be his VP!

Who is willing to take the heat that comes with that position? Could tank his career IF Trump loses.

his campaign manager, LS. further augering him in.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Who is it gonna be? - 5/11/2016 10:30:25 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

Rubio already publicly declared that he will NEVER accept VP from Trump.

And when has a public declaration ever prevented a politician from doing the opposite of what they declared?
For example....
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/05/perry-tries-to-live-down-trump-cancer-comment.html#

http://time.com/4323752/marco-rubio-donald-trump-vice-president/

This is recent announcement by Rubio though.

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Who is it gonna be? - 5/11/2016 10:44:05 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

Rubio already publicly declared that he will NEVER accept VP from Trump.

And when has a public declaration ever prevented a politician from doing the opposite of what they declared?
For example....
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/05/perry-tries-to-live-down-trump-cancer-comment.html#

Well yes, but these are Republicans, and they have a taste for bearing grudges: witness how they're giving Clinton shit for stuff her husband did twenty odd years ago.

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Who is it gonna be? - 5/11/2016 2:45:56 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Blank101

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
Remember that over the last few decades, it has been typical for a candidate to pick someone that is even more unacceptable than they are as "life insurance".
Gonna be a long search.
Palin?


Alex Jones. Bam!



Oh God. I will move to China if its Alex Jones.


Liberals always say, never do. Richly deserving of being ignored.

(in reply to Blank101)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Who is it gonna be? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094