QualityFirst
Posts: 240
Joined: 5/2/2016 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer I've never been able to get my head around the idea of letting go of control. I mean, really, how reliable can the tech involved actually be? Computers break down frequently, software is imperfectly written and keeps needing tweaking, satellite navigation is still unreliable .... and all this is meant to work seamlessly together, in order to avoid crashes. I'd be forever terrified that my car will drive itself into some small child. Actual prototypes of driverless cars are already extremely reliable. Computers can be built with redundant elements, so if one element fails, another takes over. For instance, on a server with RAID, if one hard disk fails, the machine continues working. If software is developed inaccurate, there are bugs in it, but if sufficient careful testing is done, this can be avoided. A driverless car doesn't make wrong estimates and is never tired, distracted, reckless, or agressesive. In fact, safely driving a car requires capacities many drivers don't have. In Germany, a driverless Mercedes drove about 100 km from Pforzheim to Mannheim, crossing both very busy cities. The driver had never intervene to avoid an accident, on the contrary, he intervened only two times because the car was too prudent and didn't overtake when it was possible. There will be a lot of legal work to do with respect to the responsibility if an accident happens. It is expected that driverless cars will first still be petrol driven cars, as it will take longer before electrical cars can compete with petrol cars.
|