RE: Trump vs Clinton as of 5/21/16 (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


MrRodgers -> RE: Trump vs Clinton as of 5/21/16 (5/23/2016 7:34:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

They did? I must have missed that.

Obama has always fan the flames. I see so many black people in successful positions now, the goal should be to focus on all the troubled black neighbourhood and how to help their children stay out of drugs and violence and do well in school and building a better future.

Not fan the flames about all the police brutality and racism stuffs. I mean, the police force is not majority white policemen right? Perhaps that may also depend white state or black state.

Personally, I think Obama doesn't understand how to enforce racial integration and cohesiveness. When he speaks, he only speaks for black people which makes other races feel, his just a black President for black people. Even Latinos and Asians will feel excluded.

I tell you IF Bush can speak out for Muslims and defend them on right after 9/11. A right wing racist person can do that? For the better good of the whole country, because he understands cohesiveness and keeping the country united is required to deal with such threat.

Obama should have spoke out for white people and tell all the blacks to calm down and that not all white people are like that. But he join the bandwagon to lynch the white people.



How about the magic that has been turned tragic...not nearly enough fucking decent paying jobs for everybody that wants one. The Fortune 500 left the cities in the 60's and 70's. Many of what was left...to China and Mexico.




MrRodgers -> RE: Trump vs Clinton as of 5/21/16 (5/23/2016 7:50:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

They did? I must have missed that.

Not fan the flames about all the police brutality and racism stuffs. I mean, the police force is not majority white policemen right? Perhaps that may also depend white state or black state.

Personally, I think Obama doesn't understand how to enforce racial integration and cohesiveness. When he speaks, he only speaks for black people which makes other races feel, his just a black President for black people. Even Latinos and Asians will feel excluded.


In hundreds of police departments across the country, the percentage of whites on the force is more than 30 percentage points higher than in the communities they serve, according to an analysis of a government survey of police departments. Minorities make up a quarter of police forces, according to the 2007 survey, the most recent comprehensive data available.

Experts say that diversity in the police force increases a department’s credibility with its community. “Even if police officers of whatever race enforce the law in relatively the same way, there is a huge image problem with a department that is so out of sync with the racial composition of the local population,” said Ronald Weitzer, a sociologist at George Washington University. HERE




Greta75 -> RE: Trump vs Clinton as of 5/21/16 (5/23/2016 7:54:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
How about the magic that has been turned tragic...not nearly enough fucking decent paying jobs for everybody that wants one. The Fortune 500 left the cities in the 60's and 70's. Many of what was left...to China and Mexico.

You know, telling me this, what solutions did Obama come out for this? And what solution is Hillary gonna come out for this? Is minimum wage really the solution? As per Sanders? And now Hillary jumped on the same bandwagon too.
Trump has some drastic solutions but I think Trump is on the right track to fix this problem.

I think the school system needs to change and there is alot to learn from Germany.




Greta75 -> RE: Trump vs Clinton as of 5/21/16 (5/23/2016 7:58:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
In hundreds of police departments across the country, the percentage of whites on the force is more than 30 percentage points higher than in the communities they serve, according to an analysis of a government survey of police departments. Minorities make up a quarter of police forces, according to the 2007 survey, the most recent comprehensive data available.

Experts say that diversity in the police force increases a department’s credibility with its community. “Even if police officers of whatever race enforce the law in relatively the same way, there is a huge image problem with a department that is so out of sync with the racial composition of the local population,” said Ronald Weitzer, a sociologist at George Washington University. HERE


So the solution is to recruit more black police to police their own community.

My government would have done that. After all, best to let their own people police their own people. That way, no racial problems.
The police force needs to be pragmatic too. In my country, they actually intentionally send a petite very feminine police women to go diffuse a situation when a man is being very aggressive. Because I guess experiences shows that, naturally the man protective instincts will come out and kinda calm himself down, when dealing with the female police women. And she will speak gently and softly to him. They find it works.

Same thing as black police to go diffuse black neighbourhood problems! White police going in will probably escalate the problem.




Blank101 -> RE: Trump vs Clinton as of 5/21/16 (5/23/2016 8:47:51 PM)

quote:

Greta75

So the solution is to recruit more black police to police their own community recruit more black police to police their own community.

My government would have done that. After all, best to let their own people police their own people. That way, no racial problems.


Have you ever heard of a little thing called racial segregation?





Greta75 -> RE: Trump vs Clinton as of 5/21/16 (5/23/2016 9:35:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Blank101
Have you ever heard of a little thing called racial segregation?

In my country, different races are forced to live together. We have race quota in every area, so you can't live there, if your race exceeds the quota.
As they don't want like chinese enclaves, indian enclaves, malay enclaves etc etc.

So since the different races are forced to live together, they gotta mingle. My apartment floor alone is so balance, we have 4 chinese homes, and 2 malay and 2 indian homes. Totally balance and mixed race. But when problems come. So if the malay are creating problems, chinese police may come first, but if they see a malay, they will call back up for a malay officer to come with them as well. This is how it works. And the malay can diffuse things. There are cultural differences at work too, so people from their own culture can better help the problem.

And to me it's always strange that black accent differs from white accent in America, when they both have no second language, technically should sound the same, like geez, they even have differences in accent on top of colour, that I always find, something wrong. Over here, we all speak our mother tongue as well, so it makes sense our accent is influenced by our mother tongue pronunciations.

Multicultural/racial police force works wonders. Especially when people see them working together as a team.

So all that situations, with perceived racism towards blacks, they should have called in some black officers to come in for some balance. And if they don't have enough black officers, time to promote it as a noble job to black kids! For a better future!





ifmaz -> RE: Trump vs Clinton as of 5/21/16 (5/23/2016 10:04:44 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: Blank101
Have you ever heard of a little thing called racial segregation?

In my country, different races are forced to live together. We have race quota in every area, so you can't live there, if your race exceeds the quota.
As they don't want like chinese enclaves, indian enclaves, malay enclaves etc etc.


While potentially beneficial in theory your government is removing choice from its citizens. One could argue they're no longer citizens but, to a certain degree, slaves.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
So since the different races are forced to live together, they gotta mingle.
...


And you view being forced to live in a certain neighborhood in order to reach a government-mandated quota as a good thing?

Each time you detail life in your borderline totalitarian nation I'm reminded to not vacation there.




Greta75 -> RE: Trump vs Clinton as of 5/21/16 (5/23/2016 10:08:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz
While potentially beneficial in theory your government is removing choice from its citizens. One could argue they're no longer citizens but, to a certain degree, slaves.

We don't feel like slaves. We still have choices of where to live. But if certain areas have over quota of a certain race, then we just can't live there, no big deal. Find somewhere else. I mean it's exactly the same as IF you wanna live there but no houses are for sale, then you have no choice but to live somewhere else where they have houses available for sale right? Exactly same thing. Or wait until a house is available for sale then move to the area. The race quota is always changing. When someone of your race move out of the area, it opens, you can move in.

It enforces different races to mingle. If not, you will have racial enclaves and segregation, which is no good for race relations. I mean, US having these all black neighbourhoods are no good clearly. Our kids are doing better, our minorities are doing better. If that is slavery, then it's damn good slavery. You don't have poor and problematic kids all together in one area, where all they get is bad influences. Every kid gets expose to a variety of other kids with different backgrounds. And then the local school also, is managed by the areas. Because the areas have race quota. Only if you live within a certain distance from the school are you allowed into the school.

So the schools, you won't have bad schools and good schools. Every school has a good mix.

I think the US system isn't working because I believe black kids in bad neighbourhoods go to bad schools and only have bad company. It perpetuates their cycle, keep their social circumference close to within people in their same plight, they lack exposure to kids that come from healthier families and the opportunity to hang out with them and be friends with them.

The US system is a failure.

I tell you what a difference it makes when a kid from a bad family hangs out with a kid from a better family. They are expose to different things.

I like to think Blindside is the perfect movie that illustrates this. Black kid gets adopted into a middle class family, gets saved from a life time of crime and gangs. They just need better role models.

I don't know how it's like in the US. Over here, our friends often hang out with our whole families. Like, I am always welcome to have dinner at my school mate's place and they are always welcome to have dinner at our place. It's Asian hospitality, we treat the friends of our kids, like family. And those kids can hang out with us all weekend and follow us on our family activities together too. Parents are all chill about it.

I was practically adopted by my best friend family, on weekends, I follow his family to go swimming, to beaches, whatever. And he is welcome in my family for the same things. And this isn't from teenager level. It's like from 8 yr old and stuffs.

As I said, I was chaffeured to school and back by a Muslim family, and they also take me out on their family dinners with them almost every night. Regardless of race or religion. That happens.




Blank101 -> RE: Trump vs Clinton as of 5/21/16 (5/23/2016 10:19:21 PM)

quote:

Greta75
Multicultural/racial police force works wonders. Especially when people see them working together as a team.

So all that situations, with perceived racism towards blacks, they should have called in some black officers to come in for some balance. And if they don't have enough black officers, time to promote it as a noble job to black kids! For a better future!


This is entirely different than what you suggested previously. Balance is good, but previously you said that "people should police their own people" which is abhorrently racist.

I'm also against the idea of forcing different race's to coexist. It can indirectly escalate racial tensions/racism, as well as create socioeconomic issues. It's a form of racial segregation in of itself, and history has shown us that eventually the shit will hit the fan.




Greta75 -> RE: Trump vs Clinton as of 5/21/16 (5/23/2016 10:22:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Blank101

quote:

Greta75
Multicultural/racial police force works wonders. Especially when people see them working together as a team.

So all that situations, with perceived racism towards blacks, they should have called in some black officers to come in for some balance. And if they don't have enough black officers, time to promote it as a noble job to black kids! For a better future!


This is entirely different than what you suggested previously. Balance is good, but previously you said that "people should police their own people" which is abhorrently racist.

I'm also against the idea of forcing different race's to coexist. It can indirectly escalate racial tensions/racism, as well as create socioeconomic issues. It's a form of racial segregation, and history has shown us that racial segregation has zero benefit.

But it is essentially getting their people to police their people. When the chinese police call their malay police to come handle a malay situation, that's telling the malay guy to go police his people.

Exactly the same thing. But it's working together, and not worrying about the "racist" bit of it, because there is nothing racist about getting their own race to police their own race. And the Multi/Racial part is having all the different kinds of races so that you got the specific race to handle whatever specific race problems. That's working together.

After all, especially in the US situation where anything a white cop does now is racism, so I wouldn't send a white cop to the black community at all.




Greta75 -> RE: Trump vs Clinton as of 5/21/16 (5/23/2016 10:24:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Blank101
I'm also against the idea of forcing different race's to coexist. It can indirectly escalate racial tensions/racism, as well as create socioeconomic issues. It's a form of racial segregation in of itself, and history has shown us that eventually the shit will hit the fan.

We started off as country filled with racial tension and racial riots. Malays and Chinese distrust each other. There were religious wars too. The usual between Christian Chinese and Muslim Malays.

So we are a proven country that this system works. It's the only way, progress can happen at super speed. We force all the races to work together as one.

We are the fastest progressing country in the world. We are only 50 yr old.

US has longer history than us to fix their race problems and it's still not solved. So their method is not working.




ifmaz -> RE: Trump vs Clinton as of 5/21/16 (5/23/2016 10:29:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz
While potentially beneficial in theory your government is removing choice from its citizens. One could argue they're no longer citizens but, to a certain degree, slaves.


We don't feel like slaves. We still have choices of where to live. But if certain areas have over quota of a certain race, then we just can't live there, no big deal. Find somewhere else.


If you can't live somewhere because of an artificial quota then you don't have the choice you think you have.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
I mean it's exactly the same as IF you wanna live there but no houses are for sale, then you have no choice but to live somewhere else where they have houses available for sale right? Exactly same thing. Or wait until a house is available for sale then move to the area. The race quota is always changing. When someone of your race move out of the area, it opens, you can move in.


No, it's pretty far from the exact same thing. If there are houses available but your race/religion's quota is already met, you cannot live at that home even though it's available. If there are no houses available because they're all sold, there's nothing available. There's an impossibly large difference between the two.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
...
The US system is a failure.

I tell you what a difference it makes when a kid from a bad family hangs out with a kid from a better family. They are expose to different things.


I'd say your totalitarian system of removing choice and forcing people to live together in mock harmony is more of a failure.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
I like to think Blindside is the perfect movie that illustrates this. Black kid gets adopted into a middle class family, gets saved from a life time of crime and gangs. They just need better role models.


So only white, middle-class families are good role models and black children will lead lives of crime and gangs unless the white families save them?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
I don't know how it's like in the US.


You don't say.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
Over here, our friends often hang out with our whole families. Like, I am always welcome to have dinner at my school mate's place and they are always welcome to have dinner at our place. It's Asian hospitality, we treat the kids of our friends like family. And those kids can hang out with us all weekend and follow us on our family activities together too. Parents are all chill about it.


Over here it's mostly the same apart from our government not enforcing quotas of people living together.




Greta75 -> RE: Trump vs Clinton as of 5/21/16 (5/23/2016 10:36:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz
If you can't live somewhere because of an artificial quota then you don't have the choice you think you have.

But the quota is very transparent and fair, according to the ratios of the whole country race percentage. So to me, it's the same as, if I want a house and no house is available for sale in that area.
quote:

No, it's pretty far from the exact same thing. If there are houses available but your race/religion's quota is already met, you cannot live at that home even though it's available. If there are no houses available because they're all sold, there's nothing available. There's an impossibly large difference between the two.

House available = Quota Available, once a house is available, you can buy it, once a quota is available, you can buy it. It's the same thing. You can't buy the house because the person has not moved out. You can't move in because a person of your quota has not moved out.

quote:

I'd say your totalitarian system of removing choice and forcing people to live together in mock harmony is more of a failure.

I would say the quality of life here of every minority would disagree with you. I think our minority live better quality of life than the minorities in the US.

quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
I like to think Blindside is the perfect movie that illustrates this. Black kid gets adopted into a middle class family, gets saved from a life time of crime and gangs. They just need better role models.

So only white, middle-class families are good role models and black children will lead lives of crime and gangs unless the white families save them?

This is a super American thing. Everything is linked to race. I was using that situation illustrates that a kid from a bad neighbourhood could really improve when hanging out around a kid from a better family. In that specific real life example. The middle class family was white. And the kid was black. But black youth unemployment is the highest in the US, Bernie keeps saying it's 70%. So unfortunately, reality is, the race that is doing the worst are the blacks. If there are enough black middle class families for them to mingle with, there is nothing stopping them from doing that, but these black middle class families ALSO won't live or go to the same schools as these black kids from bad neighbourhoods, and THERE lies the problem.


quote:

Over here it's mostly the same apart from our government not enforcing quotas of people living together.

That's why you have slums. We don't have slums. So that all different races regardless of social backgrounds, can live in the same quality type areas. Race quota helps that. In reality, there is always a race that is falling behind that needs more help than other races. In every country.

So to me, you are more interested in your silly perception of racism than doing anything constructive to really help the people falling behind and THIS is exactly why, it's been more than 100 years, and black youth unemployment is 70%. Because of this attitude.
I swear if the black youths are raised by chinese families, that unemployment would drop drastically. I can't imagine it being not! Like if we adopted them and raise them by our culture and our school of thoughts. They will all become super child geniuses.

I tell you when slaves were freed, they were given no direction, and just told to be free and do what they want. THIS was exactly what happen. They had no help, no direction, no nothing and are just expected to enjoy their freedom and use thier freedom to go forth and become great!

They made that mistake years ago. They should have really handled their transition properly, and given proper guidance. This is a mistake done in the past, still perpetuated today. To me, giving them freedom is helping them being able to support and take care of themselves and survive and be competitive being able to land a job in whatever tough economy. That's giving them their freedom.




eulero83 -> RE: Trump vs Clinton as of 5/21/16 (5/24/2016 1:19:34 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
Washington Post - ABC poll from C-Span this AM.
DEAD heat for the national election.
Negatives Trump 17%
Clinton 16%
With this being a whole new exec. election without an incumbent, this is going to be very interesting.
Also, big repub donors that gave $90 million in the last pres. election cycle, refuse to throw in behind Trump.
HOPE ?
Black woman calls in, she is a grandmother with 4 children all college grad. and 8 grandchildren, they are all thriving. I have helped all of my children find their success. Everybody in America can thrive.
Another black woman, 87, 4 children, all college educated, 12 grandchildren, all thriving and 4 great grandchildren and 4 great, great grandchildren...all of them are a success. I have helped all of my children to find success.
They both will vote for HRC.


Read some articles that said that Clinton and Trump are almost equal in the public's belief that they are untrustworthy and dishonest. Probably the craziest election in my limited lifetime. Neither candidate is perceived well. The Democratic public are definitely not united behind the presumptive nominee as much as the Democratic party leadership. The Republican public is more united in the presumptive nominee than the Republican party leadership.

Maybe this is that year when a third party starts to rise.



I thought that too but the only one that can get a significative size of votes not directly contested between clinton and trump is sanders and he will not destry the status quo, he didn't in over a year even if he had chances to burn any clinton's chance and get himself the nomination. Probably because he knows the democratic establishment is "hillary or bust".
Just for fun as a thought experiment: if sanders had a dozen of senators willing to form a new party on the left of the dems I think he could have success, because they could bust a probable democratic majority in the senate and force the democratics to negotiate with them in order to "get things done" or openly ally with the republicans while having now the name recognition to give the project national coverage. In two years turn out of gop and dem voters will be lower and there are enough voters alienated by the dems that might find represented in that kind of programs and so win a good number of seats in the lower house. Meanwhile focusing on state legislatures to create a solid electoral base. At that point fight in the next years for a more proportional system to at the same time get the majority and prevent the new party from being hijacked by establishment former democrats and die.




MrRodgers -> RE: Trump vs Clinton as of 5/21/16 (5/24/2016 1:56:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
How about the magic that has been turned tragic...not nearly enough fucking decent paying jobs for everybody that wants one. The Fortune 500 left the cities in the 60's and 70's. Many of what was left...to China and Mexico.

You know, telling me this, what solutions did Obama come out for this? And what solution is Hillary gonna come out for this? Is minimum wage really the solution? As per Sanders? And now Hillary jumped on the same bandwagon too.
Trump has some drastic solutions but I think Trump is on the right track to fix this problem.

I think the school system needs to change and there is alot to learn from Germany.

There is a lot to learn from Germany and our govt. steadfastly refuses to learn them. As for Obama and the rest, what would you have them do ? Just what do you really think Trump is going to do ? If I am going hear or read one more time that cutting taxes and regulations will create jobs, I think I am going vomit.

The US economy and its ability to create jobs is as most any, dependent upon the take home pay of the consumer. That take home pay has stagnated for over 40 years (the only slight exception being the 90's) and thanks in large part to the degradation of collective bargaining and the export of jobs as I implied above. (the Fortune 500 has not created a single new net job in the US...since the 60's)

There is no magic. Either there is a thriving, consuming middle class that continues to drive demand for goods and services which creates demand for jobs, or things will get worse before they get better and they aren't getting any better and no president is going to make any real difference.

The only single significant act any pres. could do is to push, stump and argue for a the tax code that treats all income the same and all of that...subject to the same tables.




AtUrCervix -> RE: Trump vs Clinton as of 5/21/16 (5/24/2016 3:41:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

They did? I must have missed that.

Obama has always fan the flames. I see so many black people in successful positions now, the goal should be to focus on all the troubled black neighbourhood and how to help their children stay out of drugs and violence and do well in school and building a better future.

Not fan the flames about all the police brutality and racism stuffs. I mean, the police force is not majority white policemen right? Perhaps that may also depend white state or black state.

Personally, I think Obama doesn't understand how to enforce racial integration and cohesiveness. When he speaks, he only speaks for black people which makes other races feel, his just a black President for black people. Even Latinos and Asians will feel excluded.

I tell you IF Bush can speak out for Muslims and defend them on right after 9/11. A right wing racist person can do that? For the better good of the whole country, because he understands cohesiveness and keeping the country united is required to deal with such threat.

Obama should have spoke out for white people and tell all the blacks to calm down and that not all white people are like that. But he join the bandwagon to lynch the white people.



How about the magic that has been turned tragic...not nearly enough fucking decent paying jobs for everybody that wants one. The Fortune 500 left the cities in the 60's and 70's. Many of what was left...to China and Mexico.


Make your own job.

(It's actually pretty simple).




DesideriScuri -> RE: Trump vs Clinton as of 5/21/16 (5/24/2016 5:10:07 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz
While potentially beneficial in theory your government is removing choice from its citizens. One could argue they're no longer citizens but, to a certain degree, slaves.

We don't feel like slaves. We still have choices of where to live. But if certain areas have over quota of a certain race, then we just can't live there, no big deal. Find somewhere else. I mean it's exactly the same as IF you wanna live there but no houses are for sale, then you have no choice but to live somewhere else where they have houses available for sale right? Exactly same thing. Or wait until a house is available for sale then move to the area. The race quota is always changing. When someone of your race move out of the area, it opens, you can move in.


No, it isn't the same, Greta. That's the point. When you can only make choices the government determines, you don't really have freedom to choose what you want. You have the freedom to choose what your government wants.

quote:

It enforces different races to mingle. If not, you will have racial enclaves and segregation, which is no good for race relations. I mean, US having these all black neighbourhoods are no good clearly. Our kids are doing better, our minorities are doing better. If that is slavery, then it's damn good slavery. You don't have poor and problematic kids all together in one area, where all they get is bad influences. Every kid gets expose to a variety of other kids with different backgrounds. And then the local school also, is managed by the areas. Because the areas have race quota. Only if you live within a certain distance from the school are you allowed into the school.
So the schools, you won't have bad schools and good schools. Every school has a good mix.


You are essentially being forced into desegregation according to skin color and quotas. That's racism. Period. While it may have some altruistic aim, it's racism.

quote:

I think the US system isn't working because I believe black kids in bad neighbourhoods go to bad schools and only have bad company. It perpetuates their cycle, keep their social circumference close to within people in their same plight, they lack exposure to kids that come from healthier families and the opportunity to hang out with them and be friends with them.


You're wrong. Poor people (black, white, hispanic, etc.) live in poor neighborhoods. The poor people who commit wrongs are the ones that make the areas "bad." Sadly, it's becoming a generational thing where people growing up in those areas tend to stay there and raise their kids the same way they were raised.

And, you also have those that bust ass and work their way out of those areas. The schools aren't bad because of the school district, school staff, teachers or administrators, either. The problem with US schools is, by and large, a problem outside of the school setting. It's the home life and academic support they are missing.

quote:

The US system is a failure.


It isn't a failure. It's rare that a person fails in this country while busting ass and working hard.

quote:

I tell you what a difference it makes when a kid from a bad family hangs out with a kid from a better family. They are expose to different things.
I like to think Blindside is the perfect movie that illustrates this. Black kid gets adopted into a middle class family, gets saved from a life time of crime and gangs. They just need better role models.
I don't know how it's like in the US. Over here, our friends often hang out with our whole families. Like, I am always welcome to have dinner at my school mate's place and they are always welcome to have dinner at our place. It's Asian hospitality, we treat the friends of our kids, like family. And those kids can hang out with us all weekend and follow us on our family activities together too. Parents are all chill about it.
I was practically adopted by my best friend family, on weekends, I follow his family to go swimming, to beaches, whatever. And he is welcome in my family for the same things. And this isn't from teenager level. It's like from 8 yr old and stuffs.
As I said, I was chaffeured to school and back by a Muslim family, and they also take me out on their family dinners with them almost every night. Regardless of race or religion. That happens.


No one will argue that your circle of friends has a significant impact on you. I think you're going to find more people that will argue that government forcing you to live in a place based on your race is a good thing. You're taking away a parents' right to raise their children as best they can.

Think about it from the other side, Greta. The impact goes both ways. You want good kids to hang out with bad kids and not be as good?




Greta75 -> RE: Trump vs Clinton as of 5/21/16 (5/24/2016 6:45:29 PM)

quote:

Think about it from the other side, Greta. The impact goes both ways. You want good kids to hang out with bad kids and not be as good?

If it's just one good kid thrown into a whole school of bad kids. That is bad. But we are talking about balance. A regular balance school that has kids from all types of background. Of course the good kids still need parental management to prevent them from being influence by bad kids.

But bad kids will have a chance to choose to stay with his own bad company or hang out with the better kids.

And these are government schools I am talking about. Public schools.

The really affluent ones will probably send their kids to private school and private school is private school. Geography location does not apply.

quote:

No, it isn't the same, Greta. That's the point. When you can only make choices the government determines, you don't really have freedom to choose what you want. You have the freedom to choose what your government wants. You are essentially being forced into desegregation according to skin color and quotas. That's racism. Period. While it may have some altruistic aim, it's racism.

You guys see it as racism. I see it as fairness. The quota goes by actual statistic of national percentages of races. This is pure equality. To give each and every race fair and equal opportunity to be located in good areas. And the quotas is based on the ratio of the percentage of their race by over all population of the country. It can't get any more transparent and fairer than that!

IF there was no race quota, what happens is, Indians will refuse to sell their house to Malays, Chinese refuses to sell their homes to Indians and Malays, and basically, REAL racism will happen. Natural Racial segregated enclaves is seriously caused by Racism.

Because of the race quota, they have no choice but to open up to other races. They are unable to discriminate.

In a real no race quota world. People can refuse to sell you a property because of the colour of your skin. And it's a free world, they can choose whoever they want to sell to.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Trump vs Clinton as of 5/21/16 (5/25/2016 3:14:37 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
quote:

Think about it from the other side, Greta. The impact goes both ways. You want good kids to hang out with bad kids and not be as good?

If it's just one good kid thrown into a whole school of bad kids. That is bad. But we are talking about balance. A regular balance school that has kids from all types of background. Of course the good kids still need parental management to prevent them from being influence by bad kids.
But bad kids will have a chance to choose to stay with his own bad company or hang out with the better kids.


So, it's on the "good kid's" parents to make sure he stays good, but it's not on the "bad kid's" parents to get their kid to stop being bad? In a sense, you're practically tasking the "good kid's" parents with raising both kids.

This is not a black or white thing. This has to do with mindsets and upbringing. You want to make schools more successful? Changes have to be made at home (not even a change of address necessary).

"Good" people don't accept bad behaviors as much as "bad" people do.

quote:

And these are government schools I am talking about. Public schools.
The really affluent ones will probably send their kids to private school and private school is private school. Geography location does not apply.


Oddly enough, that can make it more difficult, as the neighborhood kids aren't attending the same school. Those who can afford the private schools take their kids out of public schools, segregating them from their peers. This is a good thing because it's not based on race, right?

quote:

quote:

No, it isn't the same, Greta. That's the point. When you can only make choices the government determines, you don't really have freedom to choose what you want. You have the freedom to choose what your government wants. You are essentially being forced into desegregation according to skin color and quotas. That's racism. Period. While it may have some altruistic aim, it's racism.

You guys see it as racism. I see it as fairness. The quota goes by actual statistic of national percentages of races. This is pure equality. To give each and every race fair and equal opportunity to be located in good areas. And the quotas is based on the ratio of the percentage of their race by over all population of the country. It can't get any more transparent and fairer than that!
IF there was no race quota, what happens is, Indians will refuse to sell their house to Malays, Chinese refuses to sell their homes to Indians and Malays, and basically, REAL racism will happen. Natural Racial segregated enclaves is seriously caused by Racism.
Because of the race quota, they have no choice but to open up to other races. They are unable to discriminate.
In a real no race quota world. People can refuse to sell you a property because of the colour of your skin. And it's a free world, they can choose whoever they want to sell to.


Racism hasn't ended in your country. If the Indians won't sell to the Malays, if they could, then the racism is still there.

I do not like your definition of "fair." If a Chinese person has more options than I do, simply because I'm not Chinese, that is, by definition, racial discrimination.

In Toledo, there is a section called the "Old West End." It used to be the West End until the city expanded as it's population grew. The houses are some of the largest in the area and were build out of stone and brick. I attended a party in one of these behemoths while in college, and it was simply amazing. That area is dropping in value, as fewer people want to live there. Crime has increased, the schools aren't very good, and less savory clientele are ruining the neighborhoods.

My then-wife and I moved to the suburbs because the schools were significantly better and our quiet little neighborhood was seeing an increase in break ins and thefts. Why the Hell would I want to raise my kids in that environment? Why should I have to send them to a school that wasn't as nice as I could send them to? That area high school wasn't even a "bad" one. It was one of the better ones in the Toledo Public School District. My then-wife and I both worked hard so our kids could have it better than we did (and we didn't even have it bad).

We moved to a more expensive area to get into a better situation for our kids. Under your laws, we wouldn't have been allowed to do that. Hell, we likely wouldn't have been allowed to move to the first house we bought!

All because of our skin color.

How is that NOT racism?




AtUrCervix -> RE: Trump vs Clinton as of 5/21/16 (5/25/2016 5:55:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Blank101

quote:

Greta75

So the solution is to recruit more black police to police their own community recruit more black police to police their own community.

My government would have done that. After all, best to let their own people police their own people. That way, no racial problems.


Have you ever heard of a little thing called racial segregation?




Yeah...we made that illegal in the late 60's.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625