Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Sanders agree to debate in Fox News but Hillary refuses!


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Sanders agree to debate in Fox News but Hillary refuses! Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Sanders agree to debate in Fox News but Hillary ref... - 5/25/2016 5:08:23 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

All rich people got experts to help them do alot of tax evasion. So I am sure his taxes will show alot of loopholes of tax evasions and he will pay WAY LESS than what he actually makes through those loopholes.
And that again, wouldn't bother me. EVERYBODY even poor ones, will use these loopholes IF it means paying less taxes.

Hell in my country, we have open public articles all the tricks to tax evade! And advise on how to do so. It's fine! As long as it's a legal loophole.

I tax invade myself!

Then you have a simpler tax code that we have.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Sanders agree to debate in Fox News but Hillary ref... - 5/25/2016 5:12:55 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Then you have a simpler tax code that we have.

Yea, we certainly do. US taxes looks crazy.

Our employers usually directly file taxes for us. We just need to fill in, all the deductions, like deductions for life insurance, deductions for charity donations, deductions for having children, or being married or serving the military etc etc.

But we also have a retirement account where we can temporary park our income, to not be taxed on those amount. So basically there is no tax on any income we put aside for retirement savings. And this amount of money can be used in stocks and shares and investment. And get no tax on it.

I think also US tax people for alot of things we don't get tax for. Like any additional income arising from rental or sale of property, or stocks and shares.

< Message edited by Greta75 -- 5/25/2016 5:15:31 PM >

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Sanders agree to debate in Fox News but Hillary ref... - 5/25/2016 5:17:47 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

And another thing, if Trump is being audited, he is NOT ALLOWED to release any information

Not according to the IRS.
quote:

“Nothing prevents individuals from sharing their own tax information,” IRS spokesman Anthony Burke said in an e-mail.

Or experts on tax law.
quote:

“He’s not legally prevented from disclosing tax returns publicly. There’s no prohibition on that,” said Georgetown University tax law and policy professor John Brooks.



http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article62741867.html


Alright, maybe HE can but they cannot. I stand by what I say, they have to pay you $100,000 per instance of giving out any information on anyone during an investigation. What's more, while this might not apply to Trump himself, the IRS is not even allowed to say that an investigation exists.

That's why when they walk in they insist on open books. If you say "What records do you want ?" they will not reply, they want them all so they do not tip their hand. If they question you about someone else, they will tell you that if you reveal to that person that they are being investigated and they find out you go to jail.

But hundred grand rule was, whether it still is, who knows. Anything that ever worked in favor of the people seems like they take it away. It was definitely true 20 years ago. And YOU still go to jail if they tell you not to say anything.

T^T

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Sanders agree to debate in Fox News but Hillary ref... - 5/25/2016 5:22:15 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
Oh BTW :

"Not according to the IRS. "

You get that from their website ?

I know another website that lies that actually IS the government, unlike the IRS. It says that participation in social security is mandatory. That is a flat out lie and it is on a dot gov. Participation in social security is NOT -mandatory, never was. I can prove it if you want to push it, but go look first and gather up all the fucking lying links n shit so I can use two sentences to blow it all out. And when you read them you will see that I am correct. But go ahead and get busy in the interim.

T^T

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Sanders agree to debate in Fox News but Hillary ref... - 5/25/2016 5:27:40 PM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
Sorry, but I just don't give a fuck about your delusions.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Sanders agree to debate in Fox News but Hillary ref... - 5/25/2016 5:44:24 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
"I think also US tax people for alot of things we don't get tax for. Like any additional income arising from rental or sale of property, or stocks and shares. "

Greta, one thing is not clear here, either you or me. Here we have what is called capital gains tax. You leave all the money in the market that is not taxed except dividends, if any. When you sell you are taxed at the capital gains rate which is lower than regular income tax. Of course if you roll the money over into a different stock or whatever it is not taxed. It is taxed when you actually take the money.

This is how rich people pay less tax. They don't need the money now so they let it build up, and can shift it around in the market and they can have a billion dollars after investing one penny and pay no tax, until they start taking money out. But if you already got money in the bank, why would you take it out of the market unless you thought it is going to crash ? Actually it will, it is just a question of when, the people who take the longest ride and get out at the exact right time will make out the best. Those who do not know when to get out will lose, and lose practically every dime.

The lesser tax is an incentive to leave your money with the stockbroker. And BTW in this country you are not necessarily buying the stocks you think you are. Someone could be shorting. You still get the expected dividends, and the value when you decide to drop it, but you, and all other small time investors' holding that stock are not helping its value, nor does the money you paid for the stock go for that company's expansion efforts or whatever, which hurts you.

Remember they said people were jumping out of windows in the crash of 29 ? Well those people did not jump because they were not going to have a very good Christmas and be able to afford a new radio. They jumped out of the windows because the were about to go to JAIL. They shorted stock without sponsoring it, which means to put up the money for the eventual dumping as well as the dividends. They STOLE the money, unnustan ?

Insurance agents also did it with certain types of policies. they would take the money to the horse track or whatever thinking that - it ain't gonna happen. And it usually doesn't so very few of them got busted. But with the stock market crash the shit was going to hit the BIG fan over this shit, even though by shorting stocks they should have made money. The problem there is that legally constitutes fraud. A felony. There goes their whole career and of course these assholes can't do anything useful.

And shit is creeping up on all the politicians. One of these days...

T^T

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Sanders agree to debate in Fox News but Hillary ref... - 5/25/2016 5:48:10 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

Sorry, but I just don't give a fuck about your delusions.


So you are not asking for nor offering any proof either way.

Is that correct ?

T^T

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Sanders agree to debate in Fox News but Hillary ref... - 5/25/2016 8:53:00 PM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
I just don't give a fuck about your delusions.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Sanders agree to debate in Fox News but Hillary ref... - 5/26/2016 4:32:00 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
Who cares how much these MFs make ? Does it really matter ?

Not particularly, but I would have thought the fact that Trump is now refusing to allow anybody to examine that information while having spent his whole campaign bragging about how rich his incredible business acumen has made him does make his tax returns a bit more relevant than they should be.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Sanders agree to debate in Fox News but Hillary ref... - 5/26/2016 10:30:20 AM   
sloguy02246


Posts: 534
Joined: 11/5/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

"And I know you dont work but its not a w-1040 it is simply called Form 1040. "

WTF planet are you on ? All their forms start with a W. There is W-1040 known as long form, and the A which is short form and then EZ which is meant for single White Men which makes it take less time to fuck us over.

When you start an above the board job you fill out a W-4. Every year you either get a W-2 or a W-1099.

It is CALLED a Form 1040 but it is still a W-1040.

You know, the spot of best focus in your eye is called the fovea. It has been called that for a hundred years. Now they call it the macula. Does that mean it is no longer a fovea ?

T^T


Sorry, but no.
The return forms you cite are simply titled forms 1040, 1040A, and 1040EZ.

IRS forms preceded by a "W" always relate to the withholding of earnings for tax purposes.

E.g.,
W-4 is the form filed by individuals to declare exemption entitlements which affect the amount withheld from their wages for taxes.
W-2 is the end of year statement from an employer showing an employee's total wages earned and the total taxes withheld from those wages.
W-2G is a statement of taxes withheld from gambling winnings.

More information here: https://apps.irs.gov/app/picklist/list/formsPublications.html


(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Sanders agree to debate in Fox News but Hillary ref... - 5/26/2016 10:48:44 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
nm

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 5/26/2016 10:49:03 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to sloguy02246)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Sanders agree to debate in Fox News but Hillary ref... - 5/26/2016 2:06:12 PM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

Because she pre-agreed to do the debate in California

Actually she didn't.

I posted a link to an CNN article that said she did.

In which case that article was incorrect. What actually happened was that the Democratic party determined a number of debates and invited the various candidates to participate. The debate decided on for May has never had a date or location determined, and swo, as of yet no candidates have been invited to participate.
quote:


TENTH DEBATE

Date: May 2016

Location: TBD

https://www.democrats.org/more/the-2016-primary-debate-schedule

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Sanders agree to debate in Fox News but Hillary ref... - 5/26/2016 2:09:02 PM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
quote:

EVERYBODY even poor ones, will use these loopholes IF it means paying less taxes.

I don't. I don't even use all the deductions/exemptions I am entitled to use. I use a lot of tax funded services so I have no problem with paying my share of the costs of those services.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Sanders agree to debate in Fox News but Hillary ref... - 5/26/2016 2:11:57 PM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
quote:

yet wanna bring up Trump being worst than her with his unwillingness to release his tax returns

It's not his unwillingness, it is his bullshit excuse.
quote:

since Trump's words was, he will release AFTER audits

Actually that is his 3rd explanation.
quote:

Hillary words is she agrees to four more debates, including the last one in California

Wrong on both accounts

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Sanders agree to debate in Fox News but Hillary ref... - 5/26/2016 2:14:22 PM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
quote:

Thats why she is hated as much as she is.

Actually, I think that a good part of why she is hated is because she is rather a hateful person.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Sanders agree to debate in Fox News but Hillary ref... - 5/26/2016 8:52:25 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

I just don't give a fuck about your delusions.


The atom bomb was a delusion at one time toots.

T^T

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Sanders agree to debate in Fox News but Hillary ref... - 5/27/2016 4:38:07 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

I just don't give a fuck about your delusions.


The atom bomb was a delusion at one time toots.

T^T

No it wasn't. There was never any doubt that it was possible, to the extent that SF magazines were getting investigated by the feds for stories that were a little too close to what the Manhattan Project was up to during the war.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Sanders agree to debate in Fox News but Hillary ref... - 5/27/2016 11:46:37 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

I just don't give a fuck about your delusions.


The atom bomb was a delusion at one time toots.

T^T

No it wasn't. There was never any doubt that it was possible, to the extent that SF magazines were getting investigated by the feds for stories that were a little too close to what the Manhattan Project was up to during the war.


You mean back in the 1500s n shit ? Or in 300 BC ?

T^T

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Sanders agree to debate in Fox News but Hillary ref... - 5/27/2016 12:22:37 PM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

I just don't give a fuck about your delusions.


The atom bomb was a delusion at one time toots.

T^T

No it wasn't. There was never any doubt that it was possible, to the extent that SF magazines were getting investigated by the feds for stories that were a little too close to what the Manhattan Project was up to during the war.


You mean back in the 1500s n shit ? Or in 300 BC ?

T^T

You appear to be mistaking "delusion" for "unimagined".

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Sanders agree to debate in Fox News but Hillary ref... - 5/27/2016 12:28:47 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Atoms were first postulated (and imagined) around 5 BCE. Their mechanisms was not thought about nor were bombs made of them thought about. The fact they did anything exploitable was not concidered. Real atoms and noticing they did something didnt really even happen until 1800s early on, and from the discovery of their radiation didnt happen until 1898. And the fact that it was electromagnetic wasnt known till 1914. Upon learning this H. G. Wells wrote a book where he made it into a bomb. Churchill postulated the atomic bomb in 1924. When critical masses were realized and accurized, it wasnt a matter of theory anymore, TADA!!!!! they were exploitable, it was how do we do it? (exploit that). At no time was it considered hallucination or delusional, by anyone with any intellect.

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 5/27/2016 12:29:48 PM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Sanders agree to debate in Fox News but Hillary refuses! Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094