|
verbatimguy -> RE: Why not offer a Young girl, an Arrangement? (5/31/2016 7:51:50 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: FieryOpal
You opened the door, sh!t-for-brains, with your quasi-authoritative, unsubstantiated sweeping generalizations on how marriage works and how the dissolution of marriages unfold. Would it be improperly intrusive to ask whether you are a marriage counselor or a family court-appointed mediator, or have personal experience in these matters per your marital status?
Clearly, your posts reveal that you don't know what you're talking about. You say you are single. You sound like a bitter divorcé, with your lopsided anachronistic 1950s perspective on how merged m/f partnerships function in post-modern society.
Whether a woman is a stay-at-home mom, a career woman, or runs the family business alongside her husband, who are you to judge & begrudge what goes on in OTHER PEOPLE's lives?
Not everyone lives in a community property state, so there is not an across-the-board 50/50 split, another gross generalization of yours. Regardless, men whose wives out-earn them, or else who come into the marriage standing to gain from their bride's assets, also stand to benefit just as much in a divorce. There are husbands who get awarded alimony and child support, and it has been fairly uncommon for decades now for judges to award wives any alimony, circa the 1980s.
Your numerous mischaracterizations of [noncontributory] women are nothing more than a classic case of male chauvinism.
As for the rest of your strawman argument, Lucylastic did not ask you what size your dick is. If you were to refer to your dick when posting, then you are in effect inviting questions pertaining to your dick.
However, in your case, acting like a bona fide dickhead is something altogether different. [:-]
I didnt call you shitforbrains and I actually think you havce good ideas worthy of agreements.
You did make clear that there are only nine community properti statser
Arizona
California
Idaho
Louisiana
Nevada
New Mexico
Texas
Washington
Wisconsin
In those states marriage is a contract which has a clause in it that you lose half of what you own when you brake the contract.
It doesnt matter WHO brakes it or who earns the money unless there was a prenup which we wont assume for most marriages.
Knowing that we havce to look at teh arrangement that the old fart wants with the young barmaid.
What he wants is a long term contact where he pays something and she gives him sex.
He doesn't want to pay per act which would be something like $100 to $500 per fuck depending on how ugly or desperite the girl was.
He just wants her to live with him so that his costs are not greater and hers are less.
Hes thinking this is worth whatever her rent is which is something like $1000 to $2000 a month depending on many things.
If he fucks her five times a week for that month its about 20 times a month and if her rent is $1000 a month that comes out to only $50 per fuck.
Too cheep!
Buit probably she wont give it to him that much so lets just say twice a week for $125 per fuck.
Still too cheep!
See what I am getting you at?
She isnt going to be as cheep as the first poster things she will be.
She is going to want what every women wants which is more than that.
She will want a contract of some ways that will give her a bonus if he brakes teh contract.
If you dont like my idea of how contracts work that is nice but dont call me shithead for brains just becaseu I bring up ideas that she will want contracts when you think she will not wants them.
Nobody asked her yet so we can only guessed at what she wanted.
(my guess is she gets this offer all the time and is sick of it)
|
|
|
|
