Child Neglect

Child Neglect (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Edwird -> Child Neglect (6/3/2016 12:14:03 AM)
Well here we are, having now under various and sundry considerations the issue of zoo moms, some guy estimating that beating the brat as best prescriptive to enhance reading skills (only in the US, folks! Or at least, in the upper midwest therein), fags in every men's public restroom, etc. What a way to start or end the day! Such terrible things! But it all eventually conduces to ... Child Neglect. (Hands Gretta the pistol, so she can shoot my parents in the head right now, even if one of them is already gone, but she's a proven 'even if' kinda girl, so no obstacle for her there.) And this 'neglect' would consist of? This! A young lad, hearing this come across the AM radio. Had no clue what it meant at the time, but it made me become 'excited' for what reason I was a year or two away yet from understanding. Completely banned in Britain. If only I had known at the time! It doesn't matter that I survived the experience. OK, so who can we shoot now? I mean, after my parents, there are still others that deserve to be shot, right? Just listen to Jane Birkin, irresponsibly contaminating young boy's minds! Well OK, shoot her too, but who else? Or at least, let's take a baseball bat to somebody's head. Gotta get some restitution for our own life being so miserable, don't we? And don't give me that crap about 'the constitution' blah blah. Just pick up the bat and express your feelings, the only way you can. I'm here for you. Helmet on, but I'm still here for you.

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Child Neglect (6/4/2016 10:21:15 AM)
Dafuq?

WhoreMods -> RE: Child Neglect (6/4/2016 10:28:09 AM)
To be fair, it is a pretty crappy novelty record. If it's deemed to be traumatically so, I might be suing Black Lace on Monday when the courts are open...

dcnovice -> RE: Child Neglect (6/4/2016 10:47:45 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick Dafuq? That would make a great license plate. [:)]

BamaD -> RE: Child Neglect (6/4/2016 11:15:29 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird Well here we are, having now under various and sundry considerations the issue of zoo moms, some guy estimating that beating the brat as best prescriptive to enhance reading skills (only in the US, folks! Or at least, in the upper midwest therein), fags in every men's public restroom, etc. What a way to start or end the day! Such terrible things! But it all eventually conduces to ... Child Neglect. (Hands Gretta the pistol, so she can shoot my parents in the head right now, even if one of them is already gone, but she's a proven 'even if' kinda girl, so no obstacle for her there.) And this 'neglect' would consist of? This! A young lad, hearing this come across the AM radio. Had no clue what it meant at the time, but it made me become 'excited' for what reason I was a year or two away yet from understanding. Completely banned in Britain. If only I had known at the time! It doesn't matter that I survived the experience. OK, so who can we shoot now? I mean, after my parents, there are still others that deserve to be shot, right? Just listen to Jane Birkin, irresponsibly contaminating young boy's minds! Well OK, shoot her too, but who else? Or at least, let's take a baseball bat to somebody's head. Gotta get some restitution for our own life being so miserable, don't we? And don't give me that crap about 'the constitution' blah blah. Just pick up the bat and express your feelings, the only way you can. I'm here for you. Helmet on, but I'm still here for you. The only in the US comment was uncalled for and wrong. You forget "honor killings" hardly an American concept.

Edwird -> RE: Child Neglect (6/4/2016 5:09:14 PM)
[/quote] The only in the US comment was uncalled for and wrong. You forget "honor killings" hardly an American concept. [/quote] You're right. I got carried away there. In the entire post, in fact. Read below. Termy isn't exactly the one to take as any 'standard' or 'average' of what Americans think. So then not the best opinion to use for the purpose.

BamaD -> RE: Child Neglect (6/4/2016 5:15:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird The only in the US comment was uncalled for and wrong. You forget "honor killings" hardly an American concept. You're right. I got carried away there. In the entire post, in fact. Read below. Termy isn't exactly the one to take as any 'standard' or 'average' of what Americans think. So then not the best opinion to use for the purpose. Fair enough.

Edwird -> RE: Child Neglect (6/4/2016 5:20:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick Dafuq? I understand your logically-based consternation, there. My mind, or mental process, sometimes splays 50 different ways at once. Try writing a paper for the professors with that crap going on in the head all the time. Congrats to the rest of you. You all did a fine job, I'm sure. I was addressing issues and questions across 10 different posts all at once. How come that didn't work?

BamaD -> RE: Child Neglect (6/4/2016 5:24:02 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird quote: ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick Dafuq? I understand your logically-based consternation, there. My mind, or mental process, sometimes splays 50 different ways at once. Try writing a paper for the professors with that crap going on in the head all the time. Congrats to the rest of you. You all did a fine job, I'm sure. I was addressing issues and questions across 10 different posts all at once. How come that didn't work? Can't imagine what went wrong. I can see the maze you were dealing with. No hard feelings.

Edwird -> RE: Child Neglect (6/4/2016 6:01:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods To be fair, it is a pretty crappy novelty record. If it's deemed to be traumatically so, I might be suing Black Lace on Monday when the courts are open... Actually, it's not. And it was a bit more than a 'novelty record' when first presented, however much you might be on board with great shoving-aside effort of MS media at the time. Musically, it's just fine. From that stand point, the worst (or most derisive) that could be said about it might be to call it "an X rated Whiter Shade Of Pale." No one (in critique of popular music) had any issue with that one. Still considered in the top 100 all-time, etc. Ah, but what is commenting on any cultural item with out making at least some effort to delve into contemporaneous context? I wasn't (and still am not) so lazy when I dig into history. I understand a decent bit of the context when reading books written 200 yrs. ago, Music and art 80-500 yrs. ago, what it was like at the time when I watch movies from the 1930's, etc. If you want to plaster something from an era that saw 4 significant leaders in the US alone assassinated in less than 6 years, the Vietnam war, back when that was actually considered a bad thing, once brought to attention, racial riots, etc. ... to an 'era' where the media makes every effort to leave us clueless (succeeding famously, BTW), and seemingly 80% of anything you hear on the radio is done by computer chip ... Gainsbourg and Birkin were taking the course they saw available at the time. Some thought that there might be different response to all the assassinations, all the rioting, etc. Not saying they or their ilk were 'right,' but no doubt in my mind they were a lot less wrong.

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Child Neglect (6/4/2016 7:51:57 PM)
quote: How come that didn't work? Because you can't write worth shit.

Edwird -> RE: Child Neglect (6/5/2016 1:29:02 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick quote: How come that didn't work? Because you can't write worth shit. You can't even play a ukulele worth shit. Make a point, in the extraordinary event you ever stumble across one.

WhoreMods -> RE: Child Neglect (6/30/2016 12:57:08 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods To be fair, it is a pretty crappy novelty record. If it's deemed to be traumatically so, I might be suing Black Lace on Monday when the courts are open... Actually, it's not. And it was a bit more than a 'novelty record' when first presented, however much you might be on board with great shoving-aside effort of MS media at the time. Musically, it's just fine. From that stand point, the worst (or most derisive) that could be said about it might be to call it "an X rated Whiter Shade Of Pale." No one (in critique of popular music) had any issue with that one. Still considered in the top 100 all-time, etc. Ah, but what is commenting on any cultural item with out making at least some effort to delve into contemporaneous context? I wasn't (and still am not) so lazy when I dig into history. I understand a decent bit of the context when reading books written 200 yrs. ago, Music and art 80-500 yrs. ago, what it was like at the time when I watch movies from the 1930's, etc. If you want to plaster something from an era that saw 4 significant leaders in the US alone assassinated in less than 6 years, the Vietnam war, back when that was actually considered a bad thing, once brought to attention, racial riots, etc. ... to an 'era' where the media makes every effort to leave us clueless (succeeding famously, BTW), and seemingly 80% of anything you hear on the radio is done by computer chip ... Gainsbourg and Birkin were taking the course they saw available at the time. Some thought that there might be different response to all the assassinations, all the rioting, etc. Not saying they or their ilk were 'right,' but no doubt in my mind they were a lot less wrong. Gainsbourg dismissed that one as a novelty record. If anybody else is better qualified to comment on it, I'd be interested to know who that was.

Greta75 -> RE: Child Neglect (7/1/2016 12:30:05 AM)
FR I think it's appropriate to mentioned the Ikea case here. I can't believe that Ikea USA has sold 27 million chest drawers and only 6 child dead from the drawers collapsing on them. And on top of that, Ikea chest drawers installation instructions comes with child safety instructions to bolt the drawers to the wall!!!! They even made it so idiot proof to inform you that IF you don't bolt your drawers to the wall, it may fall on your child and hurt your child!! [image]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/07/22/22/2AC2E23200000578-3171344-image-a-10_1437600721209.jpg[/image] And yet, Ikea is taking the blame for it! And being so kind to take back all their chest drawers and issue refunds, or give free bolting to wall services. Just another example of irresponsible parenting, blaming the furniture instead of themselves for not doing simple child safety procedures! So 6 irresponsible parents causes ikea to recall all their chest drawers. In Singapore, Ikea's public statement is just like, "Bolt the drawers to your wall! Your child will be safe!" They are like, WTF too! They are not taking back the drawers!

Termyn8or -> RE: Child Neglect (7/2/2016 4:58:46 AM)
I think we are getting to the bottom of the barrell here. T^T

Page: [1]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875