Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? - 6/20/2016 4:47:51 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

I am just not so sure the founders knew what they were doing when all they had at the time were flintlocks.

Did they ever imagine a rifle that could fire 30 rounds in less than a minute just by 30 pulls and be reloaded in a few seconds ? (like the AR-15) I don't think so.

The Belton rifle was offered to the Continetal Congress but they couldn't afford it. The Belton was demonstrated to fire 20 rounds in 5 seconds and it used cartriges, most likely paper cartriges. By the time of the Bill of Rights the Austrian Army had a 30 shot air rifle, Lewis and Clark also had one. Then there was the Ferguson 10 shot rifle, it's inventor and proponent was, fortunately for us, killed at Kings Mountain. So yes, they did know about weapons with far more firepower than the single shot musket or muzzle loading rifle (while you may not know it they weren't the same thing). They also allowed people to own thier own cannons.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? - 6/20/2016 4:50:29 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

FR
I personally think that high schools should teach gun safety courses.


I agree. Also, that they should be armed.

I mean, not the teachers or other staff, or the kids - the high schools themselves. I see no reason why high schools shouldn't be afforded the rights of the 2nd just because they're inanimate objects. After all, inanimate objects have feelings, too.

Not among the sane.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? - 6/20/2016 5:15:28 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

I am just not so sure the founders knew what they were doing when all they had at the time were flintlocks.

Did they ever imagine a rifle that could fire 30 rounds in less than a minute just by 30 pulls and be reloaded in a few seconds ? (like the AR-15) I don't think so.

The Belton rifle was offered to the Continetal Congress but they couldn't afford it. The Belton was demonstrated to fire 20 rounds in 5 seconds and it used cartriges, most likely paper cartriges. By the time of the Bill of Rights the Austrian Army had a 30 shot air rifle, Lewis and Clark also had one. Then there was the Ferguson 10 shot rifle, it's inventor and proponent was, fortunately for us, killed at Kings Mountain. So yes, they did know about weapons with far more firepower than the single shot musket or muzzle loading rifle (while you may not know it they weren't the same thing). They also allowed people to own thier own cannons.



If you dont know that air is a gas, that might be another reason you were RIFfed from the quasi-military service called the Air Force.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? - 6/20/2016 5:18:16 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

I am just not so sure the founders knew what they were doing when all they had at the time were flintlocks.

Did they ever imagine a rifle that could fire 30 rounds in less than a minute just by 30 pulls and be reloaded in a few seconds ? (like the AR-15) I don't think so.

The Belton rifle was offered to the Continetal Congress but they couldn't afford it. The Belton was demonstrated to fire 20 rounds in 5 seconds and it used cartriges, most likely paper cartriges. By the time of the Bill of Rights the Austrian Army had a 30 shot air rifle, Lewis and Clark also had one. Then there was the Ferguson 10 shot rifle, it's inventor and proponent was, fortunately for us, killed at Kings Mountain. So yes, they did know about weapons with far more firepower than the single shot musket or muzzle loading rifle (while you may not know it they weren't the same thing). They also allowed people to own thier own cannons.



If you dont know that air is a gas, that might be another reason you were RIFfed from the quasi-military service called the Air Force.

And if you don't know that a gas operated autmatic rifle and an air rifle aren't the same thing you are a smart as Thompsonx.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? - 6/20/2016 5:44:49 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline 		FR
I would rather have 10 left than be one short.


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? - 6/20/2016 5:50:40 PM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR
I would rather have 10 left than be one short.


Of course you would, because you're a shit shot. I mean come on you couldn't shoot somebody in a specific toe from 100 yrds while they were running like some on this forum.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? - 6/20/2016 5:57:21 PM   
stef


Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline 		Tell us a story, Uncle Ron!

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? - 6/20/2016 6:59:13 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

I am just not so sure the founders knew what they were doing when all they had at the time were flintlocks.

Did they ever imagine a rifle that could fire 30 rounds in less than a minute just by 30 pulls and be reloaded in a few seconds ? (like the AR-15) I don't think so.

The Belton rifle was offered to the Continetal Congress but they couldn't afford it. The Belton was demonstrated to fire 20 rounds in 5 seconds and it used cartriges, most likely paper cartriges. By the time of the Bill of Rights the Austrian Army had a 30 shot air rifle, Lewis and Clark also had one. Then there was the Ferguson 10 shot rifle, it's inventor and proponent was, fortunately for us, killed at Kings Mountain. So yes, they did know about weapons with far more firepower than the single shot musket or muzzle loading rifle (while you may not know it they weren't the same thing). They also allowed people to own thier own cannons.



If you dont know that air is a gas, that might be another reason you were RIFfed from the quasi-military service called the Air Force.

And if you don't know that a gas operated autmatic rifle and an air rifle aren't the same thing you are a smart as Thompsonx.


Since you cant even spell it, we know you dont know but both were fired by gasses
Now I dont know enough of that particular rifle to say if that one was automatic or not, but both were fired by gasses.

And you are as fucking stupid as they come, not possessing the brains of a fucking ice cube, welfare patient.

Automatic has nothing to do with whether or not air is a gas, dumbass, but toiletlicking more lies and more factlessness than you always do after you got schooled might be another reason your were RIFfed, welfare patient.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? - 6/20/2016 7:21:10 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR
I would rather have 10 left than be one short.


Of course you would, because you're a shit shot. I mean come on you couldn't shoot somebody in a specific toe from 100 yrds while they were running like some on this forum.

You forgot with my eyes closed with a .22

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? - 6/20/2016 8:06:17 PM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Adds considerably to the time urgency element to keep virgin ears.

How long does it take you to put on ear protection?


Oh boy, the age-long sure-fire way to know if a woman really likes you, or is rather just in the mood to be done with you soon after the event and be gone;

"How long does it take you to put on protection?"


(in reply to stef)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? - 6/21/2016 1:59:22 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline 		Back to the OP, my eyesight is to the point I should not drive, but I can still kill someone from across the street, I am sure.

I do not understand how cops needed 41 rounds for a guy with a knife. What the fuck is wrong with them ? And no matter what that is, how are they allowed to be cops and have a license to kill ?

And soldiers in a war, the government almost cornered the market on certain types of ammo a couple years ago. Why ? Can't anyone aim ? I can hit a bird in flight with a fucking BB gun, god damn. What is wrong with these people ? The way they shoot I wouldn't trust them with a pair of scissors.

But if you think I can't shoot, stop on by and I'll show you. My eye problems have to do with bright and dark and pollution of the humor. I have one eye with good accuity, and actually can drive. And you can put up a target and I bet I can hit it. Accuity, to my understanding means being able to focus. That is not my problem and glasses cannot fix it. But I have always hit everything I have shot at. The neighbors saw me shoot that pigeon in flight and well, never fucked with me. That was a nice BB gun with a .177 ball and pumped with 12 pumps which gave it almost the power of a .22. We used to shoot in my kitchen at the calendar over the stove. Now it need new seals n shit and if you want to shoot it you have to pour oil into it and you only get a few shots before it won't hold any pressure anymore.

But anyway, a real gun is much better. The ammo should last forever. Just keep some oil on/in the thing. I got one made in 1911. It is a bad design but I can handle it.

T^T

(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? - 6/21/2016 2:23:32 AM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline 		A 12 guage with buckshot will do the trick everytime. A .45 is also a great weapon.

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? - 6/21/2016 2:54:37 AM   
blnymph


Posts: 1599
Joined: 11/13/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

A 12 guage with buckshot will do the trick everytime. A .45 is also a great weapon.


So are flame-throwers and rocket-launchers ...

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? - 6/21/2016 5:20:15 AM   
mrevibo


Posts: 120
Joined: 5/30/2016
Status: offline 		Actually, you can still own a cannon, they're entirely unregulated. Flame throwers and rocket launchers aren't for inside.

I have indeed fired a 1911 inside without my ears on. I didn't have to change my panties. It was in the garage, where a raccoon had taken up residence. Unfortunately, I was loaded with FMJs from the range, so I wasn't doing the damage I could have. One shot flushed her, second from about 6m left her right leg hanging, then she charged me. Third was a headshot in motion; I missed the thinky bits but left her unable to bite me. Fourth finally did her in. This episode illustrates a few of the limitations I mentioned earlier, low light, moving target, shots that don't kill, variable range. To this I can add, know wtf your bullets are good for. What I carry now are Critical Duties, those FMJs are for paper.

_____________________________

Qui custodiet ipsos custodes?

(in reply to blnymph)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? - 6/21/2016 5:55:10 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		dayam what was the racoon carrying?

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to mrevibo)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? - 6/21/2016 6:30:44 AM   
blnymph


Posts: 1599
Joined: 11/13/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

dayam what was the racoon carrying?

probably armed to his teeth

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? - 6/21/2016 6:43:33 AM   
mrevibo


Posts: 120
Joined: 5/30/2016
Status: offline 		Ya learn better than to take half measures with a woman scorned, whatever the species.

_____________________________

Qui custodiet ipsos custodes?

(in reply to blnymph)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? - 6/21/2016 6:44:52 AM   
bondageerone


Posts: 522
Joined: 6/16/2016
Status: offline 		what a moronic douchebag you must be.incite a new breed of idiots. like you.

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? - 6/21/2016 8:13:32 AM   
mrevibo


Posts: 120
Joined: 5/30/2016
Status: offline 		Well, I may be a douchebag, but I take issue with the moronic part, wait... ok, I may be a moron, but I am definitely not a... oh, something like that. I have done some breeding in my time, but I'm not sure I can evaluate the oldest yet for whether he's quite enough of an idiot to be a moron. That was it! I'm an idiotic douchebag, not a moronic one. We must be precise in our terminology. And our punctuation.

_____________________________

Qui custodiet ipsos custodes?

(in reply to bondageerone)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? - 6/21/2016 8:47:23 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mrevibo

Ya learn better than to take half measures with a woman scorned, whatever the species.

But it takes you four shots?
fair enough.

Guess its a good job it wasnt shootin back

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to mrevibo)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109