RE: Why isn't no fly a denial of due process?

RE: Why isn't no fly a denial of due process? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Termyn8or -> RE: Why isn't no fly a denial of due process? (7/5/2016 6:02:43 AM)
FR Still, those planes did what ? ATTACKED. With what did they attack ? Bombs or bullets. They were not empty. You do not destroy a significant part of the US navy with a few handguns. So how the fuck could the US military, knowing what was going on and all the people they fucked with, think that a bunch of planes from Japan were a delivery of new planes from the manufacturer ? I tell you this, the only possibility is that the Japanese had inside information on this, OK, that is possible. But then where the fuck did they get it ? Incompetence or collusion, just like 911. T^T

thompsonx -> RE: Why isn't no fly a denial of due process? (7/5/2016 8:30:25 AM)
ORIGINAL: Termyn8or I tell you this, the only possibility is that the Japanese had inside information on this, OK, that is possible. But then where the fuck did they get it ? Tarnto[8\|] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Taranto

BamaD -> RE: Why isn't no fly a denial of due process? (7/5/2016 8:38:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Termyn8or FR Still, those planes did what ? ATTACKED. With what did they attack ? Bombs or bullets. They were not empty. You do not destroy a significant part of the US navy with a few handguns. So how the fuck could the US military, knowing what was going on and all the people they fucked with, think that a bunch of planes from Japan were a delivery of new planes from the manufacturer ? I tell you this, the only possibility is that the Japanese had inside information on this, OK, that is possible. But then where the fuck did they get it ? Incompetence or collusion, just like 911. T^T Are you saying that the B-17s attacked. Or are you pretending someone said that the Japanese planes were empty. The answer to both is you have to be kidding. They came in on a heading that aircraft coming from the mainland always used. OPSEC was terrible, as with 911 there was vast complacency which leads to sloppy security and costly mistakes. The attack had been planned for months, it did not depend upon the B-17s they lucked out on that part.

Termyn8or -> RE: Why isn't no fly a denial of due process? (7/5/2016 8:40:53 PM)
The Japanese planes got here and attacked, successfully. They were not empty and they did not come from Oregon. T^T

BamaD -> RE: Why isn't no fly a denial of due process? (7/5/2016 8:50:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Termyn8or The Japanese planes got here and attacked, successfully. They were not empty and they did not come from Oregon. T^T And nobody claims they did. They were carrier based, and fully loaded. I thought everyone knew that. If not you really should do some research. Only the B-17s came from Oregon (or Washington) and were empty.

Dvr22999874 -> RE: Why isn't no fly a denial of due process? (7/5/2016 10:45:44 PM)
you and I have repeated that a number of times Bama. For some reason, it doesn't seem to be sinking in............wilful blindness maybe ?

BamaD -> RE: Why isn't no fly a denial of due process? (7/6/2016 12:52:57 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874 you and I have repeated that a number of times Bama. For some reason, it doesn't seem to be sinking in............wilful blindness maybe ? looks like it.

Page: << < prev 11 12 13 14 [15]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.09375