RE: Why isn't no fly a denial of due process?

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Why isn't no fly a denial of due process?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Why isn't no fly a denial of due process?

Page: << < prev 11 12 13 14 [15]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Why isn't no fly a denial of due process? - 7/5/2016 6:02:43 AM

Termyn8or

Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

FR

Still, those planes did what ? ATTACKED. With what did they attack ? Bombs or bullets. They were not empty. You do not destroy a significant part of the US navy with a few handguns.

So how the fuck could the US military, knowing what was going on and all the people they fucked with, think that a bunch of planes from Japan were a delivery of new planes from the manufacturer ?

I tell you this, the only possibility is that the Japanese had inside information on this, OK, that is possible. But then where the fuck did they get it ?

Incompetence or collusion, just like 911.

T^T

(in reply to mnottertail)

Profile

Post #: 281

RE: Why isn't no fly a denial of due process? - 7/5/2016 8:30:25 AM

thompsonx

Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

I tell you this, the only possibility is that the Japanese had inside information on this, OK, that is possible. But then where the fuck did they get it ?

Tarnto

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Taranto

(in reply to Termyn8or)

Profile

Post #: 282

RE: Why isn't no fly a denial of due process? - 7/5/2016 8:38:32 AM

BamaD

Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

FR

Still, those planes did what ? ATTACKED. With what did they attack ? Bombs or bullets. They were not empty. You do not destroy a significant part of the US navy with a few handguns.

So how the fuck could the US military, knowing what was going on and all the people they fucked with, think that a bunch of planes from Japan were a delivery of new planes from the manufacturer ?

I tell you this, the only possibility is that the Japanese had inside information on this, OK, that is possible. But then where the fuck did they get it ?

Incompetence or collusion, just like 911.

T^T

Are you saying that the B-17s attacked.
Or are you pretending someone said that the Japanese planes were empty.
The answer to both is you have to be kidding.
They came in on a heading that aircraft coming from the mainland always used.
OPSEC was terrible, as with 911 there was vast complacency which leads to sloppy security and costly mistakes.
The attack had been planned for months, it did not depend upon the B-17s they lucked out on that part.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Termyn8or)

Profile

Post #: 283

RE: Why isn't no fly a denial of due process? - 7/5/2016 8:40:53 PM

Termyn8or

Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

The Japanese planes got here and attacked, successfully. They were not empty and they did not come from Oregon.

T^T

(in reply to BamaD)

Profile

Post #: 284

RE: Why isn't no fly a denial of due process? - 7/5/2016 8:50:52 PM

BamaD

Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

The Japanese planes got here and attacked, successfully. They were not empty and they did not come from Oregon.

T^T

And nobody claims they did.
They were carrier based, and fully loaded.
I thought everyone knew that.
If not you really should do some research.

Only the B-17s came from Oregon (or Washington) and were empty.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Termyn8or)

Profile

Post #: 285

RE: Why isn't no fly a denial of due process? - 7/5/2016 10:45:44 PM

Dvr22999874

Posts: 2849
Joined: 9/11/2008
Status: offline

you and I have repeated that a number of times Bama. For some reason, it doesn't seem to be sinking in............wilful blindness maybe ?

(in reply to BamaD)

Profile

Post #: 286

RE: Why isn't no fly a denial of due process? - 7/6/2016 12:52:57 AM

BamaD

Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

you and I have repeated that a number of times Bama. For some reason, it doesn't seem to be sinking in............wilful blindness maybe ?

looks like it.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Dvr22999874)

Profile

Post #: 287