Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: HRC off the hook


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: HRC off the hook Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: HRC off the hook - 7/6/2016 7:49:50 PM   
ifmaz


Posts: 844
Joined: 7/22/2015
Status: offline


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: HRC off the hook - 7/6/2016 7:59:46 PM   
JeffBC


Posts: 5799
Joined: 2/12/2012
From: Canada
Status: offline
@Snowden

ROFL! He would be good if he had a few hundred million dollars and the political connections she does. As it sits, he participates in the people's justice track rather than the elite justice track so he's SOL.

_____________________________

I'm a lover of "what is", not because I'm a spiritual person, but because it hurts when I argue with reality. -- Bryon Katie
"You're humbly arrogant" -- sunshinemiss
officially a member of the K Crowd

(in reply to ifmaz)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: HRC off the hook - 7/6/2016 8:18:50 PM   
ifmaz


Posts: 844
Joined: 7/22/2015
Status: offline
A Navy sailor entered a guilty plea Friday in a classified information mishandling case that critics charge illustrates a double standard between the treatment of low-ranking government employees and top officials like former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and ex-CIA Director David Petraeus.

(in reply to JeffBC)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: HRC off the hook - 7/6/2016 8:36:12 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

It does make her VP pick an important one.



Yes it does. Now the question is will she pick one based on who will do the best job and compliment her abilities or will she go for the one who will get her the most votes.

http://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/2016/07/02/campaign-running-mates-vetting/86640198/

"Clinton has said she wants a running mate who is well-prepared to become president. But Democrats say she’s also giving priority to diversity and has been weighing women, Hispanic and black candidates — a nod to the voting blocs Democrats need to win in presidential elections."

That has to be the most honest thing I have heard the democrats say in a while.


She will pick the one who will get her the most votes, and they will be hailed as the best person for the job, and that the fact they will get the most votes proves how qualified to be president.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: HRC off the hook - 7/6/2016 8:38:23 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
"Clinton has said she wants a running mate who is well-prepared to become president. But Democrats say she’s also giving priority to diversity and has been weighing women, Hispanic and black candidates — a nod to the voting blocs Democrats need to win in presidential elections."

I see no problem with this in theory. And honestly.... uh... Sarah Palin? My issue here is that what Clinton thinks constitutes being "well prepared to become president" doesn't even remotely match what I think. Worse, the sorts of picks that might actually convince me otherwise I instead see as machiavellian choices to neuter the opposition (Warren/Sanders) or else just more kabuki theater neoliberalism. I expect her to pick someone who ticks off the right progressive check boxes in an effort to woo Sanders supports but is a full-throated supporter of oligarchy.

There is no conceivable pick she could make that would in any way encourage me to vote for her.

If he were still alive DR Kovorkian (sp) might do it.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to JeffBC)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: HRC off the hook - 7/6/2016 8:51:19 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz




Only if the law worked the same for the peasants as it does for the Clintons.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to ifmaz)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: HRC off the hook - 7/6/2016 11:20:16 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz

A Navy sailor entered a guilty plea Friday in a classified information mishandling case that critics charge illustrates a double standard between the treatment of low-ranking government employees and top officials like former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and ex-CIA Director David Petraeus.


The only one prosecuted, tried, convicted and served time for the Abu Garab torture of prisoners, was the guy...who exposed it.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to ifmaz)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: HRC off the hook - 7/6/2016 11:23:29 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz




Only if the law worked the same for the peasants as it does for the Clintons.

Well at least this saves Obama from needing to follow the repub playbook...a pres. pardon.

Oh and won't have the dem establishment all pissed off like the repub establishment was...when GWB didn't pardon Libby. Did commute his sentence though.

Oh and there was never going to be any need to pardon Rice or Powell...they never even got started on them.

< Message edited by MrRodgers -- 7/6/2016 11:25:31 PM >


_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: HRC off the hook - 7/7/2016 1:02:11 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz
A Navy sailor entered a guilty plea Friday in a classified information mishandling case that critics charge illustrates a double standard between the treatment of low-ranking government employees and top officials like former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and ex-CIA Director David Petraeus.

The only one prosecuted, tried, convicted and served time for the Abu Garab torture of prisoners, was the guy...who exposed it.


Where do you get your information?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Ghraib_torture_and_prisoner_abuse#Repercussions
    quote:

    Eleven soldiers were convicted of various charges relating to the incidents, with all of the convictions including the charge of dereliction of duty. Most soldiers only received minor sentences. Three other soldiers were either cleared of charges or were not charged. No one was convicted for the murders of the detainees.
    • Colonel Thomas Pappas was relieved of his command on May 13, 2005, after receiving non-judicial punishment for two instances of dereliction of duty, including that of allowing dogs to be present during interrogations. He was fined $8000 under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (non-judicial punishment). He also received a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand which effectively ended his military career.
    • Lieutenant Colonel Steven L. Jordan became the highest-ranking officer to have charges brought against him in connection with the Abu Ghraib abuse on April 29, 2006.[79] Prior to his trial, eight of the twelve charges against him were dismissed, including two of the most serious, after Major General George Fay admitted that he did not read Jordan his rights before interviewing him. On August 28, 2007, Jordan was acquitted of all charges related to prisoner mistreatment, and received a reprimand for disobeying an order not to discuss a 2004 investigation into the allegations.[80]
    • Specialist Charles Graner was found guilty on January 14, 2005 of conspiracy to maltreat detainees, failing to protect detainees from abuse, cruelty, and maltreatment, as well as charges of assault, indecency, adultery, and obstruction of justice. On January 15, 2005, he was sentenced to 10 years in prison, dishonorable discharge, and reduction in rank to private.[81][82] Graner was paroled from the U.S. military's Fort Leavenworth prison on August 6, 2011 after serving six-and-a-half years.[83]
    • Staff Sergeant Ivan Frederick pleaded guilty on October 20, 2004 to conspiracy, dereliction of duty, maltreatment of detainees, assault and committing an indecent act, in exchange for other charges being dropped. His abuses included forcing three prisoners to masturbate. He also punched one prisoner so hard in the chest that he needed resuscitation. He was sentenced to eight years in prison, forfeiture of pay, a dishonorable discharge and a reduction in rank to private.[84][85][86] He was released on parole in October 2007, after four years in prison.[87]
    • Sergeant Javal Davis pleaded guilty on February 4, 2005 to dereliction of duty, making false official statements, and battery. He was sentenced to six months in prison, a reduction in rank to private, and a bad conduct discharge.
      Specialist Jeremy Sivits was sentenced on May 19, 2004 by a special court-martial to the maximum one-year sentence, in addition to a bad conduct discharge and a reduction of rank to private, upon his guilty plea.[88]
    • Specialist Armin Cruz was sentenced on September 11, 2004, to eight months confinement, reduction in rank to private and a bad conduct discharge in exchange for his testimony against other soldiers.[89]
    • Specialist Sabrina Harman was sentenced on May 17, 2005, to six months in prison and a bad conduct discharge after being convicted on six of the seven counts. Previously, she had faced a maximum sentence of five years.[90] Harman served her sentence at Naval Consolidated Brig, Miramar.[91]
    • Specialist Megan Ambuhl was convicted on October 30, 2004, of dereliction of duty, and sentenced to reduction in rank to private, and loss of a half-month's pay.[92]
    • Private First Class Lynndie England was convicted on September 26, 2005, of one count of conspiracy, four counts of maltreating detainees and one count of committing an indecent act. She was acquitted on a second conspiracy count. England had faced a maximum sentence of ten years. She was sentenced on September 27, 2005, to three years confinement, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, reduction to Private (E-1) and received a dishonorable discharge.[86] England had served her sentence at Naval Consolidated Brig, Miramar.[93] She was paroled on March 1, 2007, after having served 1 year and 5 months.[93]
    • Sergeant Santos Cardona was convicted of dereliction of duty and aggravated assault, the equivalent of a felony in the U.S. civilian justice system. A military judge imposed a fine and reduction in rank, and he served 90 days of hard labor at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.[94] Cardona was unable to re-enlist due to the conviction. On September 29, 2007, Cardona left the Army with an Honorable Discharge.[95] In 2009, he was killed in action while working as a government contractor in Afghanistan.
    • Specialist Roman Krol pleaded guilty on February 1, 2005 to conspiracy and maltreatment of detainees at Abu Ghraib. He was sentenced to ten months confinement, reduction in rank to private, and a bad conduct discharge.[96]
    • Specialist Israel Rivera, who was present during abuse on October 25, was under investigation but was never charged and testified against other soldiers.
    • Sergeant Michael Smith was found guilty on March 21, 2006 of two counts of prisoner maltreatment, one count of simple assault, one count of conspiracy to maltreat, one count of dereliction of duty and a final charge of an indecent act, and sentenced to 179 days in prison, a fine of $2,250, a demotion to private, and a bad conduct discharge.


According to your assertion, those soldiers whose names are in bold were actually all the same guy.



_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: HRC off the hook - 7/7/2016 1:25:32 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
Thanks for clarifying that.

However whether it was one soldier prosecuted or a handful, the higher ups who ordered, and are responsible for the ill-treatment of prisoners at Abu Ghraibh managed to escape being charged and tried for their crimes.

The contrast between the treatment accorded to Snowden, Chelsea Manning* and these soldiers and that of HRC, or Bush Chaney et al (the culpable leaders who chose to invade Iraq) couldn't be starker.

It's one law for the rich and powerful, and another law for the rest of us. Sadly, the USA is not an exception in this, it is a situation that applies universally.

* Chelsea Manning, who was sentenced (outrageously) to 35 years was reported hospitalised yesterday after a suicide attempt.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 7/7/2016 1:36:31 AM >


_____________________________



(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: HRC off the hook - 7/7/2016 2:07:43 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle
It's one law for the rich and powerful, and another law for the rest of us. Sadly, the USA is not an exception in this, it is a situation that applies universally.


Unfortunately, even outside of government, the idea of two sets of laws holds true (ie. the "Affluenza" Kid).


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: HRC off the hook - 7/7/2016 3:53:55 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz

A Navy sailor entered a guilty plea Friday in a classified information mishandling case that critics charge illustrates a double standard between the treatment of low-ranking government employees and top officials like former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and ex-CIA Director David Petraeus.


Oh, yeah, what dump did she leave her classified documents at like saucier did? Which of her girlfriends did she give 8 binders to with codes in them he told her about like dave?

I missed those details.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to ifmaz)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: HRC off the hook - 7/7/2016 5:03:31 AM   
hot4bondage


Posts: 403
Joined: 7/29/2009
Status: offline
China and Russia.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: HRC off the hook - 7/7/2016 5:41:18 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
*snicker* Snowdon the darling of the right is sitting in Putins office giving him the codes.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to hot4bondage)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: HRC off the hook - 7/7/2016 6:39:27 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
FR

93% thinks Hillary should be prosecuted

I know it's just an online poll of 16,000 people, who knows what the demographic is! But! Clear indication ALOT of people think this is not right!

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: HRC off the hook - 7/7/2016 6:48:09 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
all it means is that you can vote as many times as you want if you refresh the page.
Online pols are as reliable as the weather.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: HRC off the hook - 7/7/2016 6:55:48 AM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

all it means is that you can vote as many times as you want if you refresh the page.
Online pols are as reliable as the weather.
And yet, the online survey which was used as the basis of the one in five sexual assault statistic is somehow incredibly reliable?

Not only are you inconsistent, you're actively stupid.


_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: HRC off the hook - 7/7/2016 8:03:15 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz
A Navy sailor entered a guilty plea Friday in a classified information mishandling case that critics charge illustrates a double standard between the treatment of low-ranking government employees and top officials like former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and ex-CIA Director David Petraeus.

The only one prosecuted, tried, convicted and served time for the Abu Garab torture of prisoners, was the guy...who exposed it.


Where do you get your information?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Ghraib_torture_and_prisoner_abuse#Repercussions
    quote:

    Eleven soldiers were convicted of various charges relating to the incidents, with all of the convictions including the charge of dereliction of duty. Most soldiers only received minor sentences. Three other soldiers were either cleared of charges or were not charged. No one was convicted for the murders of the detainees.
    • Colonel Thomas Pappas was relieved of his command on May 13, 2005, after receiving non-judicial punishment for two instances of dereliction of duty, including that of allowing dogs to be present during interrogations. He was fined $8000 under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (non-judicial punishment). He also received a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand which effectively ended his military career.
    • Lieutenant Colonel Steven L. Jordan became the highest-ranking officer to have charges brought against him in connection with the Abu Ghraib abuse on April 29, 2006.[79] Prior to his trial, eight of the twelve charges against him were dismissed, including two of the most serious, after Major General George Fay admitted that he did not read Jordan his rights before interviewing him. On August 28, 2007, Jordan was acquitted of all charges related to prisoner mistreatment, and received a reprimand for disobeying an order not to discuss a 2004 investigation into the allegations.[80]
    • Specialist Charles Graner was found guilty on January 14, 2005 of conspiracy to maltreat detainees, failing to protect detainees from abuse, cruelty, and maltreatment, as well as charges of assault, indecency, adultery, and obstruction of justice. On January 15, 2005, he was sentenced to 10 years in prison, dishonorable discharge, and reduction in rank to private.[81][82] Graner was paroled from the U.S. military's Fort Leavenworth prison on August 6, 2011 after serving six-and-a-half years.[83]
    • Staff Sergeant Ivan Frederick pleaded guilty on October 20, 2004 to conspiracy, dereliction of duty, maltreatment of detainees, assault and committing an indecent act, in exchange for other charges being dropped. His abuses included forcing three prisoners to masturbate. He also punched one prisoner so hard in the chest that he needed resuscitation. He was sentenced to eight years in prison, forfeiture of pay, a dishonorable discharge and a reduction in rank to private.[84][85][86] He was released on parole in October 2007, after four years in prison.[87]
    • Sergeant Javal Davis pleaded guilty on February 4, 2005 to dereliction of duty, making false official statements, and battery. He was sentenced to six months in prison, a reduction in rank to private, and a bad conduct discharge.
      Specialist Jeremy Sivits was sentenced on May 19, 2004 by a special court-martial to the maximum one-year sentence, in addition to a bad conduct discharge and a reduction of rank to private, upon his guilty plea.[88]
    • Specialist Armin Cruz was sentenced on September 11, 2004, to eight months confinement, reduction in rank to private and a bad conduct discharge in exchange for his testimony against other soldiers.[89]
    • Specialist Sabrina Harman was sentenced on May 17, 2005, to six months in prison and a bad conduct discharge after being convicted on six of the seven counts. Previously, she had faced a maximum sentence of five years.[90] Harman served her sentence at Naval Consolidated Brig, Miramar.[91]
    • Specialist Megan Ambuhl was convicted on October 30, 2004, of dereliction of duty, and sentenced to reduction in rank to private, and loss of a half-month's pay.[92]
    • Private First Class Lynndie England was convicted on September 26, 2005, of one count of conspiracy, four counts of maltreating detainees and one count of committing an indecent act. She was acquitted on a second conspiracy count. England had faced a maximum sentence of ten years. She was sentenced on September 27, 2005, to three years confinement, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, reduction to Private (E-1) and received a dishonorable discharge.[86] England had served her sentence at Naval Consolidated Brig, Miramar.[93] She was paroled on March 1, 2007, after having served 1 year and 5 months.[93]
    • Sergeant Santos Cardona was convicted of dereliction of duty and aggravated assault, the equivalent of a felony in the U.S. civilian justice system. A military judge imposed a fine and reduction in rank, and he served 90 days of hard labor at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.[94] Cardona was unable to re-enlist due to the conviction. On September 29, 2007, Cardona left the Army with an Honorable Discharge.[95] In 2009, he was killed in action while working as a government contractor in Afghanistan.
    • Specialist Roman Krol pleaded guilty on February 1, 2005 to conspiracy and maltreatment of detainees at Abu Ghraib. He was sentenced to ten months confinement, reduction in rank to private, and a bad conduct discharge.[96]
    • Specialist Israel Rivera, who was present during abuse on October 25, was under investigation but was never charged and testified against other soldiers.
    • Sergeant Michael Smith was found guilty on March 21, 2006 of two counts of prisoner maltreatment, one count of simple assault, one count of conspiracy to maltreat, one count of dereliction of duty and a final charge of an indecent act, and sentenced to 179 days in prison, a fine of $2,250, a demotion to private, and a bad conduct discharge.


According to your assertion, those soldiers whose names are in bold were actually all the same guy.



I stand corrected taking as evidence in your post but it is a bit conspicuous that the only ones to suffer the wrath of the law, were no higher it appears...than E5. (maybe E6)

The Maj. gen fails to read rights to the Lt. Col and then the Col. is 'acquitted' of all charges and gets a reprimand.

Then there are the wall street bankers who it seems are also...above the law. Only Iceland of all places prosecuted their banksters.

Look, from Nixon on, few and sometimes nobody pays for their crimes (Liddy) and while HRC has nothing I see to be proud of, what we see, is a very partisan affair in the right going after her for 25 years and without ever producing any charges. Even Col. North (Reagan white house, Iran/Contra) gets off on a technicality, the idea being that his testifying in congress was a violation of his 5th amend. rights if I recall correctly.

So if there is a double standard and there is, seems now the dems are only beginning to catch up. Yes, it is a sorry state of affairs but as I've also said, it doesn't matter in that even if a squeaky clean pol is elected POUS...he (or she) WILL play ball and nothing changes.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: HRC off the hook - 7/7/2016 8:20:53 AM   
markyugen


Posts: 129
Joined: 4/13/2013
Status: offline
Petraus did far worse than HRC, shared over 300 documents of classified secrets with his mistress, and got off with only a misdemeanor and a fine. I think even if HRC received a punishment similar to P's she'd be able to weather any political storm set against her, so this whole debate is not going to affect the outcome of the Presidential race one iota.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: HRC off the hook - 7/7/2016 8:38:17 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

all it means is that you can vote as many times as you want if you refresh the page.
Online pols are as reliable as the weather.
And yet, the online survey which was used as the basis of the one in five sexual assault statistic is somehow incredibly reliable?

Not only are you inconsistent, you're actively stupid.


oh really, care to source that????
Because according to THAT particular study, it was simply a web-based survey of 6,800 undergraduates at two large universities using multiple explicitly worded questions about sexual victimization.

Not a poll online covering ALL page readers and their morons.
Oh and that is why I distinctly called it into question on another thread. about three weeks ago
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4919285


oh I love it when your dribble your own shit covered bile
please read what I posted there on 6/14/2016 10:57:34 AM
Ah never mind, I will post it for you....


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

From Awareness OWN LINK.....
First and foremost, the 1-in-5 statistic is not a nationally representative estimate of the prevalence of sexual assault, and we have never presented it as being representative of anything other than the population of senior undergraduate women at the two universities where data were collected—two large public universities, one in the South and one in the Midwest.

@ universities with only fem undergraduates.
so the figures are not representative of ANYTHING but two universities undergrad fems. If you think that represents the bigger rape picture you are fucking nuts.


Just from the FBI Crime stats there is a rape in the US nearly every seven minutes.(from 2013)

According to the FBI UCR figures rape (reported rapes)
in 2013 there were 79,770 rapes
in 2012 there were 85,141 rapes
in 2011 there were 84,175 rapes
in 2010 there were 85,593 rapes
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables/1tabledatadecoverviewpdf/table_1_crime_in_the_united_states_by_volume_and_rate_per_100000_inhabitants_1994-2013.xls



how many unreported?
oh and those were rapes, not simply (hah) sexual assault.
You ignorati are making yourselves a big fucking hole.





< Message edited by Lucylastic -- 7/7/2016 8:39:54 AM >


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: HRC off the hook Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094