Was trump correct to praise Saddam Hussein

Was trump correct to praise Saddam Hussein (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

[Poll]

Yes.

14% (2)

No. He is quite clearly madder than mad madmcfukery

85% (12)

Total Votes : 14

(last vote on : 7/8/2016 7:06:41 AM)
(Poll will run till: -- )

Message

WickedsDesire -> Was trump correct to praise Saddam Hussein (7/6/2016 9:49:54 AM)
King of the monkey people is barking mad - do you realise this yet? And a fuking errant idiot, I see surpassed in that capacity on only rare occasions. I think he will get in actually...best stock up on cake methinks and white emulsion. edited to actually add the clip Donald Trump praises Saddam Hussein in North Carolina (July 5, 2016) eg I got this text the other night to me phone which even by my standards I considered bonkers...yes I saved a screenshot madbint I had no choice but to call police u took a tvs out of my house Wicked Good for you but who the hell is this i think it may well have been trump, or one of his dark minions. Okay I should have did the The Iraq Inquiry, also referred to as the Chilcot Inquiry thread first but i may as well sling it in here Do you believe America and its wee bitch the UK were justified in going to war with Iraq - no poll for that one cant be bothered http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-36714717 Summary 1. UK went to war before peaceful options exhausted and military action was "not last resort", Chilcot report says 2. Invasion in 2003 was based on “flawed intelligence and assessments” that went unchallenged 3. Threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction were "presented with certainty that was not justified" 4. Former PM Tony Blair says decision for action made "in good faith" and he takes "full responsibility for any mistakes" 5. Families of Britons killed during Iraq War say conflict was "a fiasco" and do not rule out legal action 6. PM David Cameron says "lessons must be learned" and announces two-day Commons debate next week 7. Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn says war was "act of military aggression launched on a false pretence" 8. Chilcot rejects Blair's case for Iraq War American, and by partial proxy, (well we gota stand with you even I know this) but not Scotland. Dismantled his regime...and therefore made it a breeding ground for terrorists - which that bumbling fool failed to mention on account of him being fuking mental...no doubt America has an Iraq inquiry running concurrently? edited, to add in a brilliant film called In the Loop is a 2009 British satirical black comedy directed by Armando Iannucci as a spin-off from the BBC Television series The Thick of It (that veep pish based ont hat same writer). The film satirizes Anglo-American politics in the 21st century and the Invasion of Iraq.[2] It was nominated for the 2009 Academy Award for Best Adapted Screenplay. In the loop

ManOeuvre -> RE: Was trump correct to praise Saddam Hussein (7/6/2016 10:32:18 AM)
I think it was justified. I can certainly appreciate that the WMD thing was a bit fudged, but I think that a case could be made for intervention without any WMD smoking gun. It wasn't a choice between a peaceful status quo and a bloody war. One of the few cases I think of where the son tried to fix the father's mistake. ______________________ No signatures above the preceding line.

lovmuffin -> RE: Was trump correct to praise Saddam Hussein (7/6/2016 2:54:49 PM)
He actually didn't praise Sadom. He simply pointed out one particular benefit of having him in power. You need to add 2 more options to your poll. 3) I took Trump so far out of context as it doesn't exist within this Galaxy by plucking out only a few words of what he actually said. 4) I am actually quite clearly madder than mad madmcfukery.

DaddySatyr -> RE: Was trump correct to praise Saddam Hussein (7/6/2016 2:59:18 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lovmuffin He actually didn't praise Sadom. He simply pointed out one particular benefit of having him in power. You need to add 2 more options to your poll. 3) I took Trump so far out of context as it doesn't exist within this Galaxy by plucking out only a few words of what he actually said. 4) I am actually quite clearly madder than mad madmcfukery. Kind of like the PPL-led MSM did with Trump's "ban on all Muslims". The entire sentence (which the MSM never shows/reports) is: "I, Donald J. Trump call for the immediate ban on all Muslims entering our country until our leaders figure out what the hell is going on." The MSM always seems to leave that part out. Michael

MrRodgers -> RE: Was trump correct to praise Saddam Hussein (7/6/2016 3:04:17 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ManOeuvre I think it was justified. I can certainly appreciate that the WMD thing was a bit fudged, but I think that a case could be made for intervention without any WMD smoking gun. It wasn't a choice between a peaceful status quo and a bloody war. One of the few cases I think of where the son tried to fix the father's mistake. ______________________ No signatures above the preceding line. Except that the CIA told Bush I...don't go into Iraq and take over and the CIA told Bush II, don't go into Iraq on the basis of there being any Al Quaida connection...there was none. Otherwise the CIA gave Bush I, shit advice on WMD in Iraq. HERE Plus if it was all that important, the CIA and anybody else we needed, could have taken down Saddam without an invasion...from the inside.

lovmuffin -> RE: Was trump correct to praise Saddam Hussein (7/6/2016 3:10:48 PM)
Yes, and some people will either suck for that crap or parrot the talking points anyway. So far 6 people here, according to this silly poll, are either sucking or parroting.

Wayward5oul -> RE: Was trump correct to praise Saddam Hussein (7/6/2016 3:31:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lovmuffin Yes, and some people will either suck for that crap or parrot the talking points anyway. So far 6 people here, according to this silly poll, are either sucking or parroting. Well considering that the OP has posted in the forums under 3 different profiles in just the last week alone, who knows how many of those 6 votes are him.

lovmuffin -> RE: Was trump correct to praise Saddam Hussein (7/6/2016 3:44:33 PM)
Hmmmm........now I'm confused [8\|] Which ones are the sock, the OP or the other profiles ? [8D]

Wayward5oul -> RE: Was trump correct to praise Saddam Hussein (7/6/2016 3:48:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lovmuffin Hmmmm........now I'm confused [8\|] Which ones are the sock, the OP or the other profiles ? [8D] The other two profiles are new, but apparently others are aware of profiles he had prior to the one used in the OP. There is a discussion about it in General BDSM Discussion board in a thread he posted (as a sock) about getting banned from Fetlife. For using a bunch of socks to harass people and declare they are fake. Kinda like he does on here.

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Was trump correct to praise Saddam Hussein (7/6/2016 3:48:35 PM)
quote: The MSM always seems to leave that part out. Because it isn't really all that important.

Greta75 -> RE: Was trump correct to praise Saddam Hussein (7/7/2016 6:45:52 AM)
I feel in a mad world like the middle east. Only ruthless mad men can keep things in order! We all know why Saddam and Gaddafi was put down! Because they wanted to create a special currency for purchase of their oil. But Iraq with Saddam was a better Iraq, just like Libya with Gaddafi was a better Libya. If they wanna take out real evil, start with Saudi and liberate their women! Those people are evil! The shit thing is, we take out their leaders, then, do not take over properly. Instead, put a weak leader to manage in replacement. Everything just messes up. So if Trump praises Saddam on how he deals with terrorists. I can also praise Hitler for being a vegetarian. I mean, just because someone is a bad guy, doesn't mean he didn't have some good points. Just like just because someone is a good leader, doesn't mean there is no bad points. After all EVERY human is made up of good and bad in them.

Cinnamongirl67 -> RE: Was trump correct to praise Saddam Hussein (7/7/2016 7:48:03 AM)
I have come in peace to speak for the monkey people.[sm=happy-smiley58.gif] I am not real, I am an electrical current passing through Internet space[sm=alien.gif] Beep beep beep. Things are worse now then they have ever been. I think 9/11 has been revenges 10 fold now. We didn't fix anything just made it worse. Let them figure it out. If a country is dealing with killers, they probably need the genius killer to keep them in line. Fight fire with fire, to keep the mobs at bay. Different leaders needed for different countries. Yes, Donald is the mad hatter. Most geniuses are a bit off their rocker. Sometimes it's not a matter of picking the good or the bad. It's choosing the less of two evils when given no choice. Hitler was pure evil, but damn with the leadership qualities he had, he would have been practically a wizard if good for all people was what he intended. Signed Queen of the monkey people.[sm=abducted.gif]

WhoreMods -> RE: Was trump correct to praise Saddam Hussein (7/7/2016 8:49:33 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Cinnamongirl67 Yes, Donald is the mad hatter. Most geniuses are a bit off their rocker. So, also, are a lot of people who definitely aren't geniuses, and aren't capable of much more than playing with themselves and drooling.

WickedsDesire -> RE: Was trump correct to praise Saddam Hussein (7/7/2016 8:54:55 AM)
lovmuffin tis most definitely me pay no heed to the sophistry and mad screetchings of Wayward5oul the thread it(see I can be catty to especially to liars) refers to was created by me, my pictures, ,my words, the fact I mentioned it was me on that profile. What creature means by harass was the number of individual forum bans bans I received for asking many a pertinent question and voicing my concern at things like stolen pictures, asking some of the poly brigrade if their partners new they were here, what has lying and cheating got to do with the lifestyle and why are there so many of you, dear user name why are you using stolen pictures and have corrected no-one commenting on eg your beautiful hair - the list is vast. I will not bore you with the triviality . The reasons these places are full of malarkey and few genuine souls has nothing to do with me. I merely wonder why they are allowed to flourish and spout errant guff, and sophistry - see, like Wayward5oul and if you are the better of the kind then there is no hope. Sometimes I use the lesser of two evil arguments. But the UK US have an almighty history of dismantling this regime and that and they had no plan - stratagem.

NorthernGent1 -> RE: Was trump correct to praise Saddam Hussein (7/7/2016 11:02:12 AM)
The evidence is there for you to see with your own eyes. The West starts meddling in places such as Iraq and Libya and not long after all hell breaks loose. That's pretty clear to see.

NorthernGent1 -> RE: Was trump correct to praise Saddam Hussein (7/7/2016 11:31:45 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire Former PM Tony Blair says decision for action made "in good faith" and he takes "full responsibility for any mistakes" Of course it was made in good faith. He truly believed that he was doing the right thing. The problem being that he knew documents were forged in some cases and doctored in others. It doesn't matter how much he says it was done in good faith, there has to be some sort of international law and evidential basis for his actions. Mind you, it wasn't only him. There are a few issues here: The suppression of democracy in England considering he deliberately developed government decision making at the exclusion of many MPs in his own party, the cabinet and the people; most of whom did not support his intentions. The egomania that led him and close associates to believe that they knew best with scant regard for the deaths and dislocation that would inevitably follow in Iraq. Blair is a fairly dogmatic Christian by English standards and his Christianity led him into this situation. That's not to say that all Christians supported this, not by a long chalk, nor that I have any problem with Christianity or think there is no place for it in our society; but he certainly was a missionary in the 19th century Victorian mould. On that basis, the best thing that could happen is that all those involved are tried for war crimes and imprisoned, and it will send the message out that you will be held accountable for your actions. This way, they may think twice. It is simply not acceptable to bend the truth because they think they know best, knowing full well that it will lead to chaos with many, many people losing their lives and their homes. And, I don't want to turn this into a Brexit thread but I'd like to make the point that one of the reasons I wanted us to leave is that we should not be involved in these stupid liberal interventionist ventures where we think we must have influence in the world. Our involvement in the EU is just another form of the belief held by many people in this country that we need to have influence.

thompsonx -> RE: Was trump correct to praise Saddam Hussein (7/7/2016 7:35:18 PM)
ORIGINAL: NorthernGent1 I'd like to make the point that one of the reasons I wanted us to leave is that we should not be involved in these stupid liberal interventionist ventures [8\|]

Musicmystery -> RE: Was trump correct to praise Saddam Hussein (7/8/2016 7:08:04 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr quote: ORIGINAL: lovmuffin He actually didn't praise Sadom. He simply pointed out one particular benefit of having him in power. You need to add 2 more options to your poll. 3) I took Trump so far out of context as it doesn't exist within this Galaxy by plucking out only a few words of what he actually said. 4) I am actually quite clearly madder than mad madmcfukery. Kind of like the PPL-led MSM did with Trump's "ban on all Muslims". The entire sentence (which the MSM never shows/reports) is: "I, Donald J. Trump call for the immediate ban on all Muslims entering our country until our leaders figure out what the hell is going on." The MSM always seems to leave that part out. Michael That part doesn't make the statement any better, however.

Edwird -> RE: Was trump correct to praise Saddam Hussein (7/8/2016 7:33:29 AM)
Especially when Trump A) is the last person comes to mind when thinking of someone who can "figure out what the hell is going on," and B) proposes himself to be our leader. If anything, the latter part of his statement conveys that he has no clue either, but elect him anyway because he promises to take decisive action with out hindrance for need to know what is going on.

Kirata -> RE: Was trump correct to praise Saddam Hussein (7/8/2016 7:34:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire edited to actually add the clip Donald Trump praises Saddam Hussein in North Carolina (July 5, 2016) If that's your idea of praising Saddam, are you flattered when people call you an asshole? K.

Page: [1]

Spam Policy

6.201172E-02