HRC E-mail Investigatin Part 2 (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


KenDckey -> HRC E-mail Investigatin Part 2 (7/8/2016 3:09:21 AM)

http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-36742095

quote:

The US State Department is to restart its investigation into Hillary Clinton's handling of classified material when secretary of state.

The likely Democratic presidential nominee learned this week that she will not face criminal charges over her use of private email.

The FBI said that although she had sent and received sensitive material there was no evidence of intent.

Now that inquiry is over, the State Department will reopen its review.

As well as the former secretary of state, it will also include some of her former aides, all of whom have now left the department.


Guess it isn't over for her yet.





bounty44 -> RE: HRC E-mail Investigatin Part 2 (7/8/2016 3:38:39 AM)

um, ken don't mind me too much, but I keep wondering why people keep creating new Hillary threads when there is already an ongoing one. so now we've got 4 Hillary threads.




KenDckey -> RE: HRC E-mail Investigatin Part 2 (7/8/2016 4:03:50 AM)

probably because one seemed to close another. This one seems to close that one. This is a new investigation. New news. I personally think that the criminal side of the last investigation is over. Now State is starting over. If they find something criminal (highly doubtful at this point), then so be it. If and.or When Congress decides to proceed with a DOJ investigation into purgery charges, that could restart a new thread. Intermingling them only creates confusion to some because you get lost in the name calling.




bounty44 -> RE: HRC E-mail Investigatin Part 2 (7/8/2016 4:30:21 AM)

im in disagreement ken from a couple of perspectives---the whole thing is "Hillary" and there are multiple aspects of "Hillary" that have been broached in the "Hillary probed" thread. if we had teased out each individual aspect, we'd actually have ~6-8 different Hillary threads going on.

in that regard then, and its not so much as "closed" as continuing on in yet another different direction.

lastly---this particular story will have very little coverage to it as it goes on. that is, its not enough to keep a thread going and so one of a very few things could happen---it'll come and go quickly, or someone will change the subject and it'll die a death that way, or vile critter parts will bring his malevolence show over here and all the infighting will go on here too.

I think multiple threads waters down the pudding so to speak, though I could be wrong on that.




mnottertail -> RE: HRC E-mail Investigatin Part 2 (7/8/2016 4:37:42 AM)

LOL, I have no fear, felchgobbler44, you will felch for us geysers of ignorant factless asswipe from your nutsuckers slobberblogs.

BTW, what you did was violating tos, but I fixed it up for you, because I enjoy pointing out your deep tongue felching. And shameless factless imbecilic nutsuckersim.




bounty44 -> RE: HRC E-mail Investigatin Part 2 (7/8/2016 6:38:47 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
or vile critter parts will bring his malevolence show over here and all the infighting will go on here too.







Lucylastic -> RE: HRC E-mail Investigatin Part 2 (7/8/2016 6:40:19 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
or vile critter parts will bring his malevolence show over here and all the infighting will go on here too.









you keep baiting him, you get what you deserve.




bounty44 -> RE: HRC E-mail Investigatin Part 2 (7/8/2016 6:54:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
or vile critter parts will bring his malevolence show over here and all the infighting will go on here too.


sorry there comrade---mod3 stated mentioning another user's name who is not on the thread in a derogatory manner is "not allowed" as a "guideline."

its not in the TOS.

however, she mentioned some other moderator made the case that doing so was "harassment"---which is indeed in the TOS.

if you believe my saying "you would bring your malevolence over here" is an attack on you (a partial definition of harassment) as opposed to a simple observation of what you do (see your above post and the overwhelming majority of the rest of your posts since ive been on the site), then by all means, report my post.

and by the way, "vile critter parts" is not "mnottertail."






mnottertail -> RE: HRC E-mail Investigatin Part 2 (7/8/2016 7:02:18 AM)

USC, statutes, et al make up our laws. colloquially referred to as laws.

You shiteating gaybashing felchgobbler, I am only factually observing your nutsuckerisms and commenting upon them.

and 'felchgobbler44', 'nutsucker44', 'shiteater44', and so on is not bounty44.

Your malevolent factless shiteating is world reknown toiletlicker44, don't forget to felch the fuckwhistles Judge Jeannie and Judge Nappie between your townhall slobberblogs.


Suck a wad of cowpiss, my bolshevik friend.




MrRodgers -> RE: HRC E-mail Investigatin Part 2 (7/9/2016 7:45:31 PM)

The whole thing seems to me to be quite a bit overwrought by now, to the point of obsession. I mean just when did the whole DC crowd ever become so righteously clean ? [sic]

I am thinking if we were all that truly worried about all of this, there could be investigations of dozens of people and until the proverbial cows come home and they...aren't coming home, or they wouldn't have left in the first place.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: HRC E-mail Investigatin Part 2 (7/9/2016 8:01:16 PM)

Oh dear God, what silliness




Termyn8or -> RE: HRC E-mail Investigatin Part 2 (7/9/2016 8:20:23 PM)

FR Suck a wad of cowpiss ? Now that I would like to see.

Now to the normal people here. Got a question for internet people and those who know about email and all that cool shit. Mind you I have no love for her and might kill myself with Ted Nugent if she gets elected, I think this whole thing is bullshit. Know why ?

Because the NSA has a copy or every email that was SENT OVER THE INTERNET. Every email she sent was SENT OVER THE INTERNET. Every email she received was SENT OVER THE INTERNET.

Did everyone she sent an email to have a private server ? Did everyone she ever received an email from have a private server. What's more, were they all on some type of P2P type thing ? If not, the NSA has copies of each and every email she ever sent or received. And now they say Russia has them and I ALMOST believe it because they got some kickass hackers over there. I wonder if Snowden helped them.

They got recordings of all your phone calls, every post you make on the net and every email you ever received or sent. It does not take access to YOUR computer to gain access to this shit, it is on servers on the net, all over the place. This whole thing is just a game, and as much as I would like to see that bitch get eaten alive by a shark, this is a red herring. It is so full of holes that those attacking her about this stupid shit are actually hurting, not helping their position. Just like the 42,576,226,901 votes to send a bill (recalling the ACA) to a President that revokes something HE SIGNED. Just trying to look good.

Well it ain't working. And I don't much care what was in those emails. What the fuck could she type out that would really change the course of history ? Who would she contact ? You think maybe she threatened Putin or something ? You think she contacted Iran and wrote "Once elected I am bombing the fuck out of you" or some shit ? Even she is not that stupid. In fact she is not stupid at all, but from what I have seen I would rather have someone stupid than her.

Congress did way worse sending that letter to Iran. That is an attempt to undermine peace negotiations with a country we are at odds with and might attack. That is fucking treason.

They are ALL WRONG. Neither side is right. I am so sick of this shit. No wonder there are more mass shootings now, people are fucking fed up with this bullshit. Maybe they are nuts but if intelligent they see the future. There is not future, it is only going to get worse and worse unless we take drastic steps. Like China, one kid that's it, have another and you pay through the nose. Make the poisons they put in the food illegal, and do the socialised medicine thing. And legalise drugs, ALL drugs. You want to kill yourself on heroin, who am I to stop you ? Just do it, just like the shoe commercial says. But, to keep things fair, any bad thing you do when all fucked up is considered a willful act. Get in a car wreck it is at least vandalism. Someone gets hurt it is assault and battery. Kill someone it is first degree murder. That ONLY applies if you are at fault though. If someone rearends you and dies that is different.

Put personal responsibility back into the game here. In preemptively busting people for what they MIGHT do you are creating a society that is not free. And it does not punish the right people. Punish the ones who actually DO something.

I am very suspicious of Clinton. I know all of her circle of whatever are crookeder than anyone. And in this case, the People and the courts should be able to examine her correspondence WRT the US. But I fail to see how the NSA is unable to retrieve this stuff from their records, so that drives a stake into whatever belief I might have had. Sure she belongs in jail but so do 90 % of the politicians in this country. Did she slip Iran a note under the table saying "We gonna fuck you N_____ up" ? That would be something gets her in trouble. Congress did it. If I were the President, when those members of congress sent that letter to Iran I would have ordered the military to arrest EVERY SIGNATORY to it and charge them with treason. They voted for Gitmo, and didn't let him close it down, and there are vacancies, send them down there. I am not fucking kidding here. Hillary, well she should have been hanging from a tall tree in 1953. And the revolution should have started back in the 1930s when they called in all the gold. What are you nuts ? I ain't giving you my gold. Now they got paper gold.

Look how good things are. People used to pay cash for a house. People used to pay cash for a new car, now they don't even pay cash for the fucking gasoline. One Man could work a regular full time job and provide for like five kids and an olady and even maybe his or her Mother. Hardly anyone had credit cards. A few rich people had Diner's Club, later came American Express but that was not credit, it had to be paid off every month. Then came Bank Americard.

Back then the US debt was not all that bad, and there was almost no consumer debt. Now, you think the national debt is high ? Look at consumer debt.

And BTW, they do scan snail mail. Quick bright light. If anything shows up it is kicked out for further scanning, then they got techniques to read the whole thing even folded up. If you want the communication to be private get one of those tamperproof seals, and put a sheet of aluminum foil in it that is as big as the envelope. You do not need to totally wrap the letter you wrote in foil unless you are a person of interest. But then if they detect the foil, you become a person of interest.

So, Clinton was a person of interest even in a democrat regime, and scandal happened. What does that tell you ?

Much as I hate to see it, Trump is going to be President. But what other choices do we have ?

T^T




mnottertail -> RE: HRC E-mail Investigatin Part 2 (7/10/2016 7:38:25 AM)

Trump will not be elected KFC toiletlicker, let alone president.




mnottertail -> RE: HRC E-mail Investigatin Part 2 (7/10/2016 7:50:37 AM)

Trump will not be elected KFC toiletlicker, he has zero chance at president.




Edwird -> RE: HRC E-mail Investigatin Part 2 (7/11/2016 1:06:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey
http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-36742095
quote:

The US State Department is to restart its investigation into Hillary Clinton's handling of classified material when secretary of state.

The likely Democratic presidential nominee learned this week that she will not face criminal charges over her use of private email.

The FBI said that although she had sent and received sensitive material there was no evidence of intent.

Now that inquiry is over, the State Department will reopen its review.

As well as the former secretary of state, it will also include some of her former aides, all of whom have now left the department.


Guess it isn't over for her yet.



Valerie Plame.

She and her whole long and expensively developed operation, her deep cover agents providing the best information at the time, betrayed by treasoners.

The treasoners Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and especially Karl Rove are still laughing about that one.

When you KNOW that you are committing the premeditated crime of treason, then you KNOW to set up a fall guy for that purpose (Libby).

Who, BTW, though convicted, served no time. As he shouldn't have, since relative justice wasn't served when Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Rove were not put in front of a firing squad, as they should have been. Condi Rice, 5-10 years for her part in the coverup.

So yeah, untidy email security is all the rage nowadays.

Fucking godamn liberal media.









MrRodgers -> RE: HRC E-mail Investigatin Part 2 (7/11/2016 8:29:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird


quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey
http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-36742095
quote:

The US State Department is to restart its investigation into Hillary Clinton's handling of classified material when secretary of state.

The likely Democratic presidential nominee learned this week that she will not face criminal charges over her use of private email.

The FBI said that although she had sent and received sensitive material there was no evidence of intent.

Now that inquiry is over, the State Department will reopen its review.

As well as the former secretary of state, it will also include some of her former aides, all of whom have now left the department.


Guess it isn't over for her yet.



Valerie Plame.

She and her whole long and expensively developed operation, her deep cover agents providing the best information at the time, betrayed by treasoners.

The treasoners Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and especially Karl Rove are still laughing about that one.

When you KNOW that you are committing the premeditated crime of treason, then you KNOW to set up a fall guy for that purpose (Libby).

Who, BTW, though convicted, served no time. As he shouldn't have, since relative justice wasn't served when Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Rove were not put in front of a firing squad, as they should have been. Condi Rice, 5-10 years for her part in the coverup.

So yeah, untidy email security is all the rage nowadays.

Fucking godamn liberal media.


...in only Bush II's 4th commutation. Still, Libby had to pay $250,000 fine and had 2 years probation.

Gee, I wonder what people would say if the dems started doing that ? I think I have an idea.

I think between all of Bush I's and Bush II's pardons and commutations...they easily lead the league on that stat.




KenDckey -> RE: HRC E-mail Investigatin Part 2 (7/11/2016 9:13:24 PM)

https://oversight.house.gov/release/21387/

https://judiciary.house.gov/press-release/goodlatte-presses-information-fbis-investigation-hillary-clinton/

Oversight and Judiciary Committees Send letters to FBI for further investigation of the e-mails of HRC and her server.




Termyn8or -> RE: HRC E-mail Investigatin Part 2 (7/13/2016 4:39:15 AM)

I say send such requests to the NSA.

T^T




DesideriScuri -> RE: HRC E-mail Investigatin Part 2 (7/13/2016 3:17:10 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
I think between all of Bush I's and Bush II's pardons and commutations...they easily lead the league on that stat.


The you would be wrong; completely wrong. They are in a very different league. They might even be considered Single-A farm league.
Wikipedia page

HW Bush - 77
W Bush - 200
Obama - 61 (through 12/2013)

Bill Clinton - 459
Reagan - 406
Carter - 566
Ford - 409
Nixon - 926
LBJ - 1187
JFK - 575
DDE - 1157
Truman - 2044
FDR - 3687






Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.078125