RE: How Trump could technically unite the senate

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: How Trump could technically unite the senate

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: How Trump could technically unite the senate

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: How Trump could technically unite the senate - 7/22/2016 2:45:05 AM

MrRodgers

Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

But make no mistake, the Russians and Chinese would sniff the weakness of the American public, and the US as a nation, instantly, if Trump were elected.

But just what would they do ? How would they discern American weakness and how could they take real advantage ? I keep hearing and reading about America's imminent economic/military collapse but just can't see how or why in our lifetimes.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to Edwird)

Profile

Post #: 21

RE: How Trump could technically unite the senate - 7/22/2016 2:48:16 AM

MrRodgers

Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

I wouldn't bet against either the casino or the new wife.

And I certainly wouldn't bet against China and Russia sending war ships all over the place to see what a media blowhard would do about it.

Well on that note, neither has enough warships to be 'sent all over the place' or could they leave home 'unprotected' as a result of that.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to Edwird)

Profile

Post #: 22