Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Dems were pro-slavers, Reps ended Slavery, True or False?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Dems were pro-slavers, Reps ended Slavery, True or False? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Dems were pro-slavers, Reps ended Slavery, True or ... - 7/29/2016 2:17:07 PM   
Wayward5oul


Posts: 3314
Joined: 11/9/2014
Status: offline
OK Greta, you asked about something that happened over 2 centuries ago, and said that because of that, today you are glad to be right-leaning.

Let me ask you something-if you wanted a spot as a congressional intern in 2016, who do you think you would have a better shot with-the right or the left?

http://www.vox.com/2016/7/20/12240656/paul-ryan-selfie?yptr=yahoo

Jusy sayin'.


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Dems were pro-slavers, Reps ended Slavery, True or ... - 7/29/2016 3:58:34 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I know you have libertarian views and are a Gorean, so thats all good, have you decided on Stein? over Johnson?
what makes you lean more green if you dont mind me askin....
Im genuinely interested.
I dont seem to be able to take a liking to Stein herself, but maybe Im missing something...beyond the platform.


Ive been used to multi parties all my life and often voted for smaller ones, Im just wondering what the difference is in your eye

I do not have Libertarian views -- I think they have nice sounding but totally impractical and unrealistic ideas.

I'm 98% in agreement with the Greens platform.

< Message edited by Musicmystery -- 7/29/2016 3:59:10 PM >

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Dems were pro-slavers, Reps ended Slavery, True or ... - 7/29/2016 4:04:26 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul

OK Greta, you asked about something that happened over 2 centuries ago, and said that because of that, today you are glad to be right-leaning.

Let me ask you something-if you wanted a spot as a congressional intern in 2016, who do you think you would have a better shot with-the right or the left?

http://www.vox.com/2016/7/20/12240656/paul-ryan-selfie?yptr=yahoo

Jusy sayin'.



Of course with the left, because they would be less likely to care about her not being a U S citizen.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Wayward5oul)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Dems were pro-slavers, Reps ended Slavery, True or ... - 7/29/2016 4:08:19 PM   
Wayward5oul


Posts: 3314
Joined: 11/9/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul

OK Greta, you asked about something that happened over 2 centuries ago, and said that because of that, today you are glad to be right-leaning.

Let me ask you something-if you wanted a spot as a congressional intern in 2016, who do you think you would have a better shot with-the right or the left?

http://www.vox.com/2016/7/20/12240656/paul-ryan-selfie?yptr=yahoo

Jusy sayin'.



Of course with the left, because they would be less likely to care about her not being a U S citizen.

So I'll rephrase. Greta, if you were a U.S. citizen of Chinese heritage, and you wanted to be a congressional intern in 2016, who do you think you would have a better shot with-the right or the left?

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Dems were pro-slavers, Reps ended Slavery, True or ... - 7/29/2016 4:56:32 PM   
AtUrCervix


Posts: 2111
Joined: 1/15/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: AtUrCervix


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

I read this on a youtube comment.

The utter hypocrisy in Michelle's statement about slaves is that she belongs to the party that owned and mistreated those slaves, it wasn't until the Republican party was established that Republican President Lincoln took office that a bloody battle took place that resulted in ending slavery, and the slave owning Democrat party was dragged kicking and screaming to let their slaves go free. something you will never learn in public schools today, because in every part of our true history the left is hell bent on the truth dying.

If this is true. Wow! I am glad to be right leaning! Screw the left!


The White house was built with slaves, white, Irish, Polish, Chinese and other paid workers.

It was a time when slaves were predominate.

It's like saying "I was alive when Slurpees were the predominate drink at 7-11's."

It's like saying that "when I was a child they built super highways out of concrete...and then later out of asphalt."

THAT was the time....sue me....that was the time....thankfully we've all grown past that but....that was the time.

(Get the flying fuck over it!!!...That was the time...none of us today hire slaves....

Get the FUCK over it).

We don't now....we did....it's over.

Hire slaves?
Borrow maybe.
Own maybe.
Rent maybe.
But we abolished slavery 140 years ago.
Before Brazil.
Before Austrailia.
Long before Sudan, where it is still practiced.


It's over.

My Grandfather didn't....my Dad didn't.....(I didn't).

Get the fuck over it.

(It's over....has been for a while).

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Dems were pro-slavers, Reps ended Slavery, True or ... - 7/29/2016 5:06:19 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AtUrCervix


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: AtUrCervix


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

I read this on a youtube comment.

The utter hypocrisy in Michelle's statement about slaves is that she belongs to the party that owned and mistreated those slaves, it wasn't until the Republican party was established that Republican President Lincoln took office that a bloody battle took place that resulted in ending slavery, and the slave owning Democrat party was dragged kicking and screaming to let their slaves go free. something you will never learn in public schools today, because in every part of our true history the left is hell bent on the truth dying.

If this is true. Wow! I am glad to be right leaning! Screw the left!


The White house was built with slaves, white, Irish, Polish, Chinese and other paid workers.

It was a time when slaves were predominate.

It's like saying "I was alive when Slurpees were the predominate drink at 7-11's."

It's like saying that "when I was a child they built super highways out of concrete...and then later out of asphalt."

THAT was the time....sue me....that was the time....thankfully we've all grown past that but....that was the time.

(Get the flying fuck over it!!!...That was the time...none of us today hire slaves....

Get the FUCK over it).

We don't now....we did....it's over.

Hire slaves?
Borrow maybe.
Own maybe.
Rent maybe.
But we abolished slavery 140 years ago.
Before Brazil.
Before Austrailia.
Long before Sudan, where it is still practiced.


It's over.

My Grandfather didn't....my Dad didn't.....(I didn't).

Get the fuck over it.

(It's over....has been for a while).

That was the point I was making.
Part of my family is German.
They didn't get here till after the war.
Part of my family is Irish, they never owned slaves, and since they lived in the north they were most likely some of the people who fought to save the Union.
The rest were Souix, who the freed slaves helped fight a genocidal war against. So they would owe me, not the other way around.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to AtUrCervix)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Dems were pro-slavers, Reps ended Slavery, True or ... - 7/29/2016 6:33:01 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

That was the point I was making.
Part of my family is German.
They didn't get here till after the war.
Part of my family is Irish, they never owned slaves, and since they lived in the north they were most likely some of the people who fought to save the Union.
The rest were Souix, who the freed slaves helped fight a genocidal war against. So they would owe me, not the other way around.


Actually, the Irish ran amok against the draft laws of 1863, burning black owned buildings and lynching blacks.

http://www.history.com/news/four-days-of-fire-the-new-york-city-draft-riots


_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Dems were pro-slavers, Reps ended Slavery, True or ... - 7/29/2016 6:43:59 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

That was the point I was making.
Part of my family is German.
They didn't get here till after the war.
Part of my family is Irish, they never owned slaves, and since they lived in the north they were most likely some of the people who fought to save the Union.
The rest were Souix, who the freed slaves helped fight a genocidal war against. So they would owe me, not the other way around.


Actually, the Irish ran amok against the draft laws of 1863, burning black owned buildings and lynching blacks.

http://www.history.com/news/four-days-of-fire-the-new-york-city-draft-riots


I am well aware of that because, as if you didn't know this, the Irish were treated about as bad as the blacks and were mad because the government cared more about blacks than about them. By that time my ancestors had moved to Illinois so your point doesn't apply to them any way. Not every Irishman was responsible for those riots any more than every black is responsible for burning down Watts. My people got out of New York as soon as possible to escape the "Black Irish need not apply" signs.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Dems were pro-slavers, Reps ended Slavery, True or ... - 7/29/2016 6:55:48 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

That was the point I was making.
Part of my family is German.
They didn't get here till after the war.
Part of my family is Irish, they never owned slaves, and since they lived in the north they were most likely some of the people who fought to save the Union.
The rest were Souix, who the freed slaves helped fight a genocidal war against. So they would owe me, not the other way around.


Actually, the Irish ran amok against the draft laws of 1863, burning black owned buildings and lynching blacks.

http://www.history.com/news/four-days-of-fire-the-new-york-city-draft-riots


I notice you didn't own up to the African American participation in the destruction of Native American society.

I know of no people of Irish ancestory who take pride in those riots, but Blacks still take pride in the 0th and 10th Calvalry.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 7/29/2016 6:59:11 PM >


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Dems were pro-slavers, Reps ended Slavery, True or ... - 7/29/2016 7:03:25 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

I am well aware of that because, as if you didn't know this, the Irish were treated about as bad as the blacks and were mad because the government cared more about blacks than about them. By that time my ancestors had moved to Illinois so your point doesn't apply to them any way. Not every Irishman was responsible for those riots any more than every black is responsible for burning down Watts. My people got out of New York as soon as possible to escape the "Black Irish need not apply" signs.

I think your history of the Irish in NYC is a bit askew.

According to Lawrence McCaffrey, an authority on the Irish Catholic diaspora in the United States of America, Irish Catholics blended the methodology and principles of Anglo-American Protestant politics with their overwhelming sense of community and gregarious personalities into a distinct brand of politics. Perhaps no other era could provide better evidence of this assertion than in American municipal politics within the period leading from the 1880’s right up to the 1920’s.

In Boston, Chicago and San Francisco in the 1880’s, Irish politicians heavily influenced municipal politics but it was New York that stood out from the pack; it ran Tammany Hall. Set up in 1788, ‘The Hall’ was to become the single most important factor why the Irish ran New York from 1880, when the city elected it’s first Irish Catholic mayor – the Cobh-born William R. Grace – until lower-east side born Al Smith failed in his bid to obtain the office of President of the United States in the 1920’s.



http://www.theirishstory.com/2013/02/27/solid-men-the-irish-in-new-york-politics-1880-1920/#.V5wIoaKunXM

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Dems were pro-slavers, Reps ended Slavery, True or ... - 7/29/2016 7:05:16 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

That was the point I was making.
Part of my family is German.
They didn't get here till after the war.
Part of my family is Irish, they never owned slaves, and since they lived in the north they were most likely some of the people who fought to save the Union.
The rest were Souix, who the freed slaves helped fight a genocidal war against. So they would owe me, not the other way around.


Actually, the Irish ran amok against the draft laws of 1863, burning black owned buildings and lynching blacks.

http://www.history.com/news/four-days-of-fire-the-new-york-city-draft-riots


I notice you didn't own up to the African American participation in the destruction of Native American society.

I know of no people of Irish ancestory who take pride in those riots, but Blacks still take pride in the 0th and 10th Calvalry.

Give me a link please.

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Dems were pro-slavers, Reps ended Slavery, True or ... - 7/29/2016 8:08:15 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

That was the point I was making.
Part of my family is German.
They didn't get here till after the war.
Part of my family is Irish, they never owned slaves, and since they lived in the north they were most likely some of the people who fought to save the Union.
The rest were Souix, who the freed slaves helped fight a genocidal war against. So they would owe me, not the other way around.


Actually, the Irish ran amok against the draft laws of 1863, burning black owned buildings and lynching blacks.

http://www.history.com/news/four-days-of-fire-the-new-york-city-draft-riots


I notice you didn't own up to the African American participation in the destruction of Native American society.

I know of no people of Irish ancestory who take pride in those riots, but Blacks still take pride in the 0th and 10th Calvalry.

Give me a link please.

You don't know that Ft Pillow was brought on by a massacre of a Cheeroke village by the 10th?
You don't know that the 10th spent years in the southwest fighting the Apache?
You don't know that the biggest battle they had agianst the Apache was like the Movie Ft Apache except they had some place to retreat to?
For a man who claims to know all about the black experiance inAmersican you have massive holes in your knowledge. Particularly when the "buffulo soldiers" were long a centerpiece of black history month.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 7/29/2016 8:19:30 PM >


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Dems were pro-slavers, Reps ended Slavery, True or ... - 7/29/2016 8:25:02 PM   
markyugen


Posts: 129
Joined: 4/13/2013
Status: offline
To the OP's question: If you need a false, simplistic narrative like this to placate your inner demons and vindicate your bad choices in life and immoral treatment of others, then you are even more pathetic than the Republican party.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Dems were pro-slavers, Reps ended Slavery, True or ... - 7/29/2016 8:29:04 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: markyugen

To the OP's question: If you need a false, simplistic narrative like this to placate your inner demons and vindicate your bad choices in life and immoral treatment of others, then you are even more pathetic than the Republican party.

Since none of that describes me well it does.
None of what I said is a false narative.
I have no inner demons to placate and no immoral treatment of others do vindicate.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to markyugen)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Dems were pro-slavers, Reps ended Slavery, True or ... - 7/29/2016 9:00:59 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: markyugen

To the OP's question: If you need a false, simplistic narrative like this to placate your inner demons and vindicate your bad choices in life and immoral treatment of others, then you are even more pathetic than the Republican party.


I think OP might be referring to me.

But then I saw the word "immoral" lol!

You know republicans think it's immoral to abort babies, that homosexuality might be immoral too, at least the super far right republicans.

Hearing a leftie talk about morality to me, spare me.

We all make our own morals.

But anyway, according to majority here, it's apparently a fact and not false. Just simply facts of history. Origins of each party.

The argument is, they are different now. But it's nice to know what the heart of Reps are, what was the core. The one great thing they did when they were formed, is to fight to abolish slavery.

I see nothing immoral about that.



< Message edited by Greta75 -- 7/29/2016 9:03:08 PM >

(in reply to markyugen)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Dems were pro-slavers, Reps ended Slavery, True or ... - 7/29/2016 9:10:52 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75


quote:

ORIGINAL: markyugen

To the OP's question: If you need a false, simplistic narrative like this to placate your inner demons and vindicate your bad choices in life and immoral treatment of others, then you are even more pathetic than the Republican party.


I think OP might be referring to me.

But then I saw the word "immoral" lol!

You know republicans think it's immoral to abort babies.

Hearing a leftie talk about morality to me, spare me.

We all make our own morals.

But anyway, according to majority here, it's apparently a fact and not false. Just simply facts of history. Origins of each party.

The "modern" Democratic party began because Andrew Jackson got ripped off in the 1824 election. He had the most popular, and electorial votes.
Nobody had a majority though, there were 4 people running, so the house had to decide the outcome. John Quincy Adams was selected and the Jackson people went wild, bolting from the party and starting up their own party to win the 1828 election. This began the populist inclination of the Democratic party.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Dems were pro-slavers, Reps ended Slavery, True or ... - 7/29/2016 9:11:32 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul
Of course with the left, because they would be less likely to care about her not being a U S citizen.

So I'll rephrase. Greta, if you were a U.S. citizen of Chinese heritage, and you wanted to be a congressional intern in 2016, who do you think you would have a better shot with-the right or the left?


I have no ambition of being a congressional intern in the US, but I have a feeling, these days, republicans might be more welcoming towards minorities to show diversity in their party too. They love the black republicans. But since both parties has things in their beliefs that I don't believe in, I doubt I will actively participate in their organizations ever. Both are not fully inline with my own beliefs. But I support Reps more simply because, I agree more with their solutions to deal with radical Islam. Or at least, they are acknowledging it is a problem, while I just feel like the left is in constant denial there is even a problem and the problem has absolutely nothing to do with Islam. Just bad people who happen to be Muslims. I am glad my government don't think that way, that's why we are able to tackle terrorism effectively. I don't trust the left with my safety, even if they preach all inclusiveness. As I think the priority is to simply not live in a environment, where enemies gets amnesty and free run to plot and kill you. Being welcome and included does not protect my life. Hell, it gets personal now, considering in Germany, one of the attackers specifically went after orientals.

BTW, I noticed I think almost 99.9% orientals in the US identify with the Dems rather than the Reps.

But I often wondered to myself, IS it really the Reps that won't welcome diversity, or is it the minorities discriminating against them and always simply leaning towards the Dems, so they would never even think of working with the Reps? Like even black folks who identify as Reps now are sometimes referred to as "Race Traitor", there seem to be alot of peer pressure on minorities to boycott the Reps.

< Message edited by Greta75 -- 7/29/2016 9:21:14 PM >

(in reply to Wayward5oul)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Dems were pro-slavers, Reps ended Slavery, True or ... - 7/29/2016 9:27:58 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline
quote:

You don't know that Fr Pillow was brought on by a massacre of a Cheeroke village by the 10th? A remarkably dumb-ass comment since the 10th had not yet been formed in 1864.
You don't know that the 10th spent years in the southwest fighting the Apache?
You don't know that the biggest battle they had agist the aApache was like the Movie Ft Apache except they had some place to retreat to?
For a man who claims to know all about the black experiance inAmersican you have massive holes in your knowledge. Particularly when thee "buffulow soldiers" were long a centerpiece of black history month.


I asked you for a link, not a fuken sermon.

The massacre of 300 black troops by Bedford at Ft Pillow in April 1864 was an outrage. The only massacre of a Cherokee village occurred at Sand Creek during the following December, and there is no mention of black troops. So, I don't know wtf you're talking about. You could at least give me a link that doesn't depend on a freakin movie.

http://www.history.com/topics/american-civil-war/fort-pillow-massacre

http://www.savagesandscoundrels.org/flashpoints-conflicts/1864-sand-creek-massacre/

Here is the trailer for the John Wane Ft Apache movie from 1948. Not one black man in it. http://www.movies.com/fort-apache/m61966 But hey, your level of scholarship, I guess.

So, I ask you again. WTF are you prattling on about?

The 9th and 10th Calvary Units were formed after the end of the Civil War in 1866. Probably not a lot of jobs for black men at that time. They served with distinction, led by white officers. Called Buffalo Soldiers by the Indians as a sign of respect.


"Buffalo Soldiers" was the name given the black cavalrymen by the plains Indians. Reasoning for the name is uncertain. One view is that the Indians saw a resemblance between the black man's hair and the mane of the buffalo. Another view is that when a buffalo was wounded or cornered, it fought ferociously, displaying unusual stamina and courage. This was the same fighting spirit Indians saw in combat with black cavalrymen. Since Indians held the buffalo in such high regard, it was felt that the name was not given in disrespect. The buffalo soldiers were noted for their courage and discipline. Drunkenness, an especially widespread problem in the army, was rare among them; in a period when nearly a third of white army enlistees deserted, the black soldiers had the U.S. Army's lowest desertion and court-martial rates.

In nearly 30 years of frontier service buffalo soldiers took part in almost 200 major and minor engagements. From 1870 to 1890, 14 buffalo soldiers were awarded medals of honor, the army's highest award for bravery. When not fighting, both regiments built forts and roads, installed telegraph lines, located water holes, escorted wagon trains and cattle drives, rode "shotgun" on stagecoach and mail runs and protected settlers from renegade Indians, outlaws, and Mexican revolutionaries. Elements of the 9th & 10th regiments fought in Cuba during the War with Spain. In 1941, the two regiments formed the 4th Cavalry Brigade and were commanded by General Benjamin O. Davis Sr., at camp Funston, Kansas.


So, what's next? Are you going to blame the Tuskegee Airmen for the bombing of Hiroshima?

What destroyed the indigenous tribes was the deliberate killing off of the buffalo herds upon which the Plains Indians depended for food.

vML

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Dems were pro-slavers, Reps ended Slavery, True or ... - 7/29/2016 9:37:51 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

You don't know that Fr Pillow was brought on by a massacre of a Cheeroke village by the 10th? A remarkably dumb-ass comment since the 10th had not yet been formed in 1864.
You don't know that the 10th spent years in the southwest fighting the Apache?
You don't know that the biggest battle they had agist the aApache was like the Movie Ft Apache except they had some place to retreat to?
For a man who claims to know all about the black experiance inAmersican you have massive holes in your knowledge. Particularly when thee "buffulow soldiers" were long a centerpiece of black history month.


I asked you for a link, not a fuken sermon.

The massacre of 300 black troops by Bedford at Ft Pillow in April 1864 was an outrage. The only massacre of a Cherokee village occurred at Sand Creek during the following December, and there is no mention of black troops. So, I don't know wtf you're talking about. You could at least give me a link that doesn't depend on a freakin movie.

http://www.history.com/topics/american-civil-war/fort-pillow-massacre

http://www.savagesandscoundrels.org/flashpoints-conflicts/1864-sand-creek-massacre/

Here is the trailer for the John Wane Ft Apache movie from 1948. Not one black man in it. http://www.movies.com/fort-apache/m61966 But hey, your level of scholarship, I guess.

So, I ask you again. WTF are you prattling on about?

The 9th and 10th Calvary Units were formed after the end of the Civil War in 1866. Probably not a lot of jobs for black men at that time. They served with distinction, led by white officers. Called Buffalo Soldiers by the Indians as a sign of respect.


"Buffalo Soldiers" was the name given the black cavalrymen by the plains Indians. Reasoning for the name is uncertain. One view is that the Indians saw a resemblance between the black man's hair and the mane of the buffalo. Another view is that when a buffalo was wounded or cornered, it fought ferociously, displaying unusual stamina and courage. This was the same fighting spirit Indians saw in combat with black cavalrymen. Since Indians held the buffalo in such high regard, it was felt that the name was not given in disrespect. The buffalo soldiers were noted for their courage and discipline. Drunkenness, an especially widespread problem in the army, was rare among them; in a period when nearly a third of white army enlistees deserted, the black soldiers had the U.S. Army's lowest desertion and court-martial rates.

In nearly 30 years of frontier service buffalo soldiers took part in almost 200 major and minor engagements. From 1870 to 1890, 14 buffalo soldiers were awarded medals of honor, the army's highest award for bravery. When not fighting, both regiments built forts and roads, installed telegraph lines, located water holes, escorted wagon trains and cattle drives, rode "shotgun" on stagecoach and mail runs and protected settlers from renegade Indians, outlaws, and Mexican revolutionaries. Elements of the 9th & 10th regiments fought in Cuba during the War with Spain. In 1941, the two regiments formed the 4th Cavalry Brigade and were commanded by General Benjamin O. Davis Sr., at camp Funston, Kansas.


So, what's next? Are you going to blame the Tuskegee Airmen for the bombing of Hiroshima?

What destroyed the indigenous tribes was the deliberate killing off of the buffalo herds upon which the Plains Indians depended for food.

vML

Funny the black college I went to said it was the 10th.
Yes it was an outrage.
If you think the only massacre of Indians was Sands Creek you are sadly mistaken.
After they beat the 10th Texas Cavalry in Texas they headed back east.
The 10th Texas went after them for revenge.
In route the (what our history professor claimed was the 10th) went through a relatively small Cheeroke village and massacred the indians who were home. You don't know about it because no action was taken against them by our government. You do know that for some reason the Cheeroke men joined with the 10th Texas to hunt them down, well that is the reason. The massacre at pillow was begun by the indians out of revenge. Yes it was an outrage. Can you explain why for over a century the only quote to come out of Pillow was that the Confederates were ridding around saying "where is the 10th now"?

Nope I am not going to give the Tusegee airmen credit for Hiroshima, they were in Europe and a Mustang would never get off the ground with one of those nukes.

God you are confused, Sands Creek was Cheyenne under Black Kettle.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 7/29/2016 10:19:12 PM >


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Dems were pro-slavers, Reps ended Slavery, True or ... - 7/29/2016 9:54:38 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

You don't know that Fr Pillow was brought on by a massacre of a Cheeroke village by the 10th? A remarkably dumb-ass comment since the 10th had not yet been formed in 1864.
You don't know that the 10th spent years in the southwest fighting the Apache?
You don't know that the biggest battle they had agist the aApache was like the Movie Ft Apache except they had some place to retreat to?
For a man who claims to know all about the black experiance inAmersican you have massive holes in your knowledge. Particularly when thee "buffulow soldiers" were long a centerpiece of black history month.


I asked you for a link, not a fuken sermon.

The massacre of 300 black troops by Bedford at Ft Pillow in April 1864 was an outrage. The only massacre of a Cherokee village occurred at Sand Creek during the following December, and there is no mention of black troops. So, I don't know wtf you're talking about. You could at least give me a link that doesn't depend on a freakin movie.

http://www.history.com/topics/american-civil-war/fort-pillow-massacre

http://www.savagesandscoundrels.org/flashpoints-conflicts/1864-sand-creek-massacre/

Here is the trailer for the John Wane Ft Apache movie from 1948. Not one black man in it. http://www.movies.com/fort-apache/m61966 But hey, your level of scholarship, I guess.

So, I ask you again. WTF are you prattling on about?

The 9th and 10th Calvary Units were formed after the end of the Civil War in 1866. Probably not a lot of jobs for black men at that time. They served with distinction, led by white officers. Called Buffalo Soldiers by the Indians as a sign of respect.


"Buffalo Soldiers" was the name given the black cavalrymen by the plains Indians. Reasoning for the name is uncertain. One view is that the Indians saw a resemblance between the black man's hair and the mane of the buffalo. Another view is that when a buffalo was wounded or cornered, it fought ferociously, displaying unusual stamina and courage. This was the same fighting spirit Indians saw in combat with black cavalrymen. Since Indians held the buffalo in such high regard, it was felt that the name was not given in disrespect. The buffalo soldiers were noted for their courage and discipline. Drunkenness, an especially widespread problem in the army, was rare among them; in a period when nearly a third of white army enlistees deserted, the black soldiers had the U.S. Army's lowest desertion and court-martial rates.

In nearly 30 years of frontier service buffalo soldiers took part in almost 200 major and minor engagements. From 1870 to 1890, 14 buffalo soldiers were awarded medals of honor, the army's highest award for bravery. When not fighting, both regiments built forts and roads, installed telegraph lines, located water holes, escorted wagon trains and cattle drives, rode "shotgun" on stagecoach and mail runs and protected settlers from renegade Indians, outlaws, and Mexican revolutionaries. Elements of the 9th & 10th regiments fought in Cuba during the War with Spain. In 1941, the two regiments formed the 4th Cavalry Brigade and were commanded by General Benjamin O. Davis Sr., at camp Funston, Kansas.


So, what's next? Are you going to blame the Tuskegee Airmen for the bombing of Hiroshima?

What destroyed the indigenous tribes was the deliberate killing off of the buffalo herds upon which the Plains Indians depended for food.

vML

I am not claiming that black people are any worse than white people, just that they aren't any better.
Also that this crap about you own me because someone that hs no connection to you but maybe sort of looks like you did something to someone who sort of looked like me is just that because every group has been victimized at some point and every group has been an oppressor.

I didn't say that Ft Apache was about it I said they got themselves in the same position as in that movie except that they had some place to retreat to, thus they just got beat, not massacred. You are real good at misreading what I say and pretending it was something else.

Sands Creek, BTW was not Cheeroke, it was Cheyene under Black Kettle.
This happened to Black Kettle twice the 2nd time it was Custer, that is where Reno'e predecessor was killed.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 7/29/2016 10:17:24 PM >


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Dems were pro-slavers, Reps ended Slavery, True or False? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.156