Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Cosmopolitan's double standards


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Cosmopolitan's double standards Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Cosmopolitan's double standards - 8/8/2016 1:19:06 AM   
respectmen


Posts: 2042
Joined: 8/28/2015
Status: offline
https://imgur.com/a/Ji236

Plenty of other people hold the same double standard.
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Cosmopolitan's double standards - 8/8/2016 1:24:58 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
gotta larf

_____________________________



(in reply to respectmen)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Cosmopolitan's double standards - 8/8/2016 2:14:51 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
Gotta larf.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to respectmen)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Cosmopolitan's double standards - 8/8/2016 3:04:40 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
No, actually I don't

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Cosmopolitan's double standards - 8/8/2016 4:08:15 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

No, actually I don't



Yes you do. It's compulsory.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Cosmopolitan's double standards - 8/8/2016 4:21:03 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
gotta larf

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Cosmopolitan's double standards - 8/8/2016 5:15:39 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
I wasn't aware that Cosmo had standards. They wrote articles like 20 things that will drive your man crazy in bed, none of which actually do.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Cosmopolitan's double standards - 8/8/2016 5:16:01 AM   
Kaliko


Posts: 3381
Joined: 9/25/2010
Status: offline
FR

I don't really see what's to "larf" about. You may not care for the messenger, but the point is valid.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Cosmopolitan's double standards - 8/8/2016 5:27:09 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline
All of these glossy mags have been like it since their inception.
It's nothing new.
And for the most part, people don't give a flying fuck about it.
For those that buy them, it's exactly why they buy them.



_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to Kaliko)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Cosmopolitan's double standards - 8/8/2016 5:37:17 AM   
Kaliko


Posts: 3381
Joined: 9/25/2010
Status: offline
Well, being in my mid forties now, I agree about the lack of impact such magazines should have. My former 20 year old self would disagree. Glamour, Cosmo, Elle....these were my magazies of choice. Different today with the internet, I'm sure, but Cosmo still has its niche.

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Cosmopolitan's double standards - 8/8/2016 5:40:28 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kaliko

FR

I don't really see what's to "larf" about. You may not care for the messenger, but the point is valid.

Yes, this is the only double standard that cosmo has ever printed.
Its the first point ever made about double standards.
No Magazine ever mens, or womens or any popular printed womens magazine has ever held to one standard.
Anyone that thinks cosmo speaks for anyone but their advertising is crazy.
Thats why they rarely show anything but models and celebrity, have stupid fucking quizzes.
I havent read a womans magazine since the 80s.
Pics of perfect size 0 women, how realistic is that?
how to diet for that perfect date
its all bullshit.
Yeah, I really do gotta larf, becauase its pathetic

< Message edited by Lucylastic -- 8/8/2016 5:46:40 AM >


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Kaliko)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Cosmopolitan's double standards - 8/8/2016 5:45:06 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kaliko

FR

I don't really see what's to "larf" about. You may not care for the messenger, but the point is valid.


The point being that Cosmo has double standards? I'm not sure it has *any* moral standards. It's just a trash magazine, as far as I'm concerned.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Kaliko)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Cosmopolitan's double standards - 8/8/2016 6:07:54 AM   
Kaliko


Posts: 3381
Joined: 9/25/2010
Status: offline
Agreed. But its readers would probably disgree...or haven't reached a point where they care much about disagreeing. So they are ingesting it as is.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Cosmopolitan's double standards - 8/8/2016 6:24:41 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kaliko

Agreed. But its readers would probably disgree...or haven't reached a point where they care much about disagreeing. So they are ingesting it as is.



That mag - and lots like it - has been utterly resistant to criticism for as long as I can remember.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Kaliko)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Cosmopolitan's double standards - 8/8/2016 9:42:44 AM   
stef


Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline
Poor Little Nicky. Are you going to cancel your Cosmo subscription over this?

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to respectmen)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Cosmopolitan's double standards - 8/8/2016 5:04:53 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

No, actually I don't



Yes you do. It's compulsory.



Ok fine, but I am not going to mean it

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Cosmopolitan's double standards - 8/8/2016 5:24:31 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Cosmopolitan's double standards - 8/9/2016 2:29:03 PM   
tj444


Posts: 7574
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

https://imgur.com/a/Ji236

Plenty of other people hold the same double standard.


Oh ffs... that mag is owned by the hearst corp (first published in 1886) and all the f'n Ceo's of hearst have been MEN.. so go blame yer own kind if you dont like what they put out..

btw, do you complain about the mens mags that publish articles on how sorry arsed dudes can get "the girl of their dreams", keep her and make her happy? same f'n shite, just change a few words around.. she instead of he.. blah, blah, blah.. who cares?

btw 2,.. do you complain when women have to pay 2 to 10+ times what you do for a freaking haircut????? I stopped going to get mine cut cuz it takes all of 2 minutes to cut and why should i pay more cuz i dont have dangly bits?

_____________________________

As Anderson Cooper said “If he (Trump) took a dump on his desk, you would defend it”

(in reply to respectmen)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Cosmopolitan's double standards - 8/9/2016 2:56:25 PM   
SunDominant


Posts: 136
Joined: 7/12/2016
Status: offline
I stopped paying attention to Cosmo covers when I was waiting in the checkout line (queue for me Brit friends) after I realized they ignore the all-important E-Cup demographic. They obviously haven't done their research.



< Message edited by SunDominant -- 8/9/2016 2:57:36 PM >

(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Cosmopolitan's double standards - 8/9/2016 3:11:13 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

Oh ffs... that mag is owned by the hearst corp (first published in 1886) and all the f'n Ceo's of hearst have been MEN.. so go blame yer own kind if you dont like what they put out..


Nope. It's never, ever the richest and most powerful people who are at fault. Perish the thought.

One of just the most gobsmacking things I've done in the past is to leaf through Cosmo and find an article about anorexia and its relation to over-skinny models in adverts ... then, turn a couple of pages to find, yes, an advert involving an over-skinny model. I've seen that more than a few times.

You read all the way through Cosmo, pump yourself full of all the exquisite aesthetic perfection of womanhood; finally, after you've been suitably destroyed inside, redemption is at hand in the final few pages in the form of hundreds of adverts for cosmetic surgery. Brilliant!




_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to tj444)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Cosmopolitan's double standards Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109