Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Which description suits the Republican nominee best?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Which description suits the Republican nominee best? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
[Poll]

Which description suits the Republican nominee best?


The Circus Peanut
  33% (4)
Donald Flump
  0% (0)
The Mop
  8% (1)
The Cockwomble
  8% (1)
Satan's Combover
  8% (1)
Bankruptcy Boy
  8% (1)
Caterpillar Head
  0% (0)
Tiny-handed Shitweasel
  25% (3)
Johnny Fartypants (TRUUUUUUUUMP!)
  0% (0)
Lyin' Don
  8% (1)


Total Votes : 12
(last vote on : 8/24/2024 1:46:53 PM)
(Poll will run till: -- )
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Which description suits the Republican nominee best? - 9/6/2016 3:07:52 PM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline 		There was a special on CNN last night that provided an excellent, though abreviated, bio of both main candidates. Trump was too chicken shit to be interviewed.

_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Which description suits the Republican nominee best? - 9/6/2016 3:13:05 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

There was a special on CNN last night that provided an excellent, though abreviated, bio of both main candidates. Trump was too chicken shit to be interviewed.

Trump wouldn't be interviewed by the Clinton News Network?

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Which description suits the Republican nominee best? - 9/6/2016 3:16:00 PM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech

Trump - loud mouthed obnoxious bastard. What he isn't is a proven liar who has sold a soul to Wall Street and flip flops regularly to the beat of the opinion polls


Actually, as an Independent voter that might have voted Republican if they'd chosen wisely, I've seen him lie almost daily. It's simply that those that have drank of his kool-aid refuse to see it.

_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to MercTech)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Which description suits the Republican nominee best? - 9/6/2016 3:17:01 PM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

There was a special on CNN last night that provided an excellent, though abreviated, bio of both main candidates. Trump was too chicken shit to be interviewed.

Trump wouldn't be interviewed by the Clinton News Network?


Apparently that kool-aid goes down smoothly.

_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Which description suits the Republican nominee best? - 9/6/2016 3:25:58 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

There was a special on CNN last night that provided an excellent, though abreviated, bio of both main candidates. Trump was too chicken shit to be interviewed.

Trump wouldn't be interviewed by the Clinton News Network?


Apparently that kool-aid goes down smoothly.

I would think you were old enough to remember that in 92 CNN told us every day that Clinton was right about the worst economy in 50 years.
The the day after the election they started telling us about how the economy had turned around a year and a half earlier. That in fact when in Jan. of 92 when they trashed Bush for saying the recession was over, it was. They have put everything in the best light for the Clintons. When asked about about Gore's blatant campaign finacing violations Clinton said that "the crime wasn't the laws that were violated, it is what the law allows" and the next day CNN was praising Clinton for championing campaign finace reform.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Which description suits the Republican nominee best? - 9/6/2016 3:57:38 PM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline 		In January of 1992 I could not have cared less about the Clintons. I was busy worrying about loved ones in a war zone that Bush thought was a good idea and sold to the US based on lies and half truths.

I am basing my opinions of the two viable candidates on extensive research done this year. Donald Trump isn't fit to lead a starving kitten to a t-bone. Hell, based on what I've seen and read, he'd probably put the kitten in a gunny sack with a chunk of concrete, blame the kitten, bill it's family for the sack and concrete, eat the steak, then deny the whole thing ever happened. When cornered he'd either say he didn't mean it or blame someone else.

Yeah, I'll take Hillary every day all day.

< Message edited by LaTigresse -- 9/6/2016 3:58:16 PM >

_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Which description suits the Republican nominee best? - 9/6/2016 5:25:38 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

There was a special on CNN last night that provided an excellent, though abreviated, bio of both main candidates. Trump was too chicken shit to be interviewed.

Apparently since the beginning of june, he has only been on fox news as an interviewee, specially rewarding was his town hall with hannity
CNN has been questionable for a long time, but more so since Zucker bought it, and Corey Lewandowski joined. Its been far from great, but he likes banning the press from his rallies.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Which description suits the Republican nominee best? - 9/6/2016 6:14:46 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech

Trump - loud mouthed obnoxious bastard. What he isn't is a proven liar who has sold a soul to Wall Street and flip flops regularly to the beat of the opinion polls.
Sorry, I think the obnoxious bastard will do less damage to the country than an elitist career politician who would be in jail several times over if not a connected elite.

say what now?
Not a proven liar?
would you like a list?
start with immigration.
Building the wall
Getting mexico to pay for it....did he really think the Pena Nieto would not callhim out on his lie?


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to MercTech)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Which description suits the Republican nominee best? - 9/6/2016 6:35:03 PM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

There was a special on CNN last night that provided an excellent, though abreviated, bio of both main candidates. Trump was too chicken shit to be interviewed.

Apparently since the beginning of june, he has only been on fox news as an interviewee, specially rewarding was his town hall with hannity
CNN has been questionable for a long time, but more so since Zucker bought it, and Corey Lewandowski joined. Its been far from great, but he likes banning the press from his rallies.


Considering Fox's truth (ahem....) track record, I will stick to other, more reliable, news sources.

_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Which description suits the Republican nominee best? - 9/6/2016 6:46:45 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

In January of 1992 I could not have cared less about the Clintons. I was busy worrying about loved ones in a war zone that Bush thought was a good idea and sold to the US based on lies and half truths.

I am basing my opinions of the two viable candidates on extensive research done this year. Donald Trump isn't fit to lead a starving kitten to a t-bone. Hell, based on what I've seen and read, he'd probably put the kitten in a gunny sack with a chunk of concrete, blame the kitten, bill it's family for the sack and concrete, eat the steak, then deny the whole thing ever happened. When cornered he'd either say he didn't mean it or blame someone else.

Yeah, I'll take Hillary every day all day.

You are aware that we were not fighting anyone in Jan of 92?
In fact, at that time the conventional wisom was to gut the military so we could spend the "peace dividend " on other things. Bush lied? Youmean that Iraq didn't really invade Kuwait? I think you are more than a little confused.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 9/6/2016 7:19:41 PM >

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Which description suits the Republican nominee best? - 9/6/2016 7:15:26 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

There was a special on CNN last night that provided an excellent, though abreviated, bio of both main candidates. Trump was too chicken shit to be interviewed.

Apparently since the beginning of june, he has only been on fox news as an interviewee, specially rewarding was his town hall with hannity
CNN has been questionable for a long time, but more so since Zucker bought it, and Corey Lewandowski joined. Its been far from great, but he likes banning the press from his rallies.


Considering Fox's truth (ahem....) track record, I will stick to other, more reliable, news sources.


LOL I have to admit I do watch it, just to measure the level of crazy
Not to mention harassment. they are 60 million down just in the last 2 months, just a hiccup im sure




_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Which description suits the Republican nominee best? - 9/6/2016 7:19:18 PM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

In January of 1992 I could not have cared less about the Clintons. I was busy worrying about loved ones in a war zone that Bush thought was a good idea and sold to the US based on lies and half truths.

I am basing my opinions of the two viable candidates on extensive research done this year. Donald Trump isn't fit to lead a starving kitten to a t-bone. Hell, based on what I've seen and read, he'd probably put the kitten in a gunny sack with a chunk of concrete, blame the kitten, bill it's family for the sack and concrete, eat the steak, then deny the whole thing ever happened. When cornered he'd either say he didn't mean it or blame someone else.

Yeah, I'll take Hillary every day all day.

You are aware that we were not fighting anyone in Jan of 92?
In fact, at that time the conventional wisom was to gut the military so we could spend the "peace dividend " on other things. Bush lied? Youmean that Iraq didn't really invade Kuwait? I think you are more than alittle confused.


Yes, I read and responded too quickly. While generic dude was on active duty in 92, I jumped to his 2002-2003 tour, for some ridiculous reason. 20 years of being a military spouse it's rather easy to fuck up the when and where dates when I'm multitasking and my other tasks are actually important. As for Bush, perhaps it's more realistic to say those he was listening to lied. W was just too stupid to know. But that was a different time frame than you inferred. To know where GD was stationed at that time (92) I'd have to interrupt his timed test and even I am not that ditzy at this time of day.

_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Which description suits the Republican nominee best? - 9/6/2016 7:22:39 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

In January of 1992 I could not have cared less about the Clintons. I was busy worrying about loved ones in a war zone that Bush thought was a good idea and sold to the US based on lies and half truths.

I am basing my opinions of the two viable candidates on extensive research done this year. Donald Trump isn't fit to lead a starving kitten to a t-bone. Hell, based on what I've seen and read, he'd probably put the kitten in a gunny sack with a chunk of concrete, blame the kitten, bill it's family for the sack and concrete, eat the steak, then deny the whole thing ever happened. When cornered he'd either say he didn't mean it or blame someone else.

Yeah, I'll take Hillary every day all day.

You are aware that we were not fighting anyone in Jan of 92?
In fact, at that time the conventional wisom was to gut the military so we could spend the "peace dividend " on other things. Bush lied? Youmean that Iraq didn't really invade Kuwait? I think you are more than alittle confused.


Yes, I read and responded too quickly. While generic dude was on active duty in 92, I jumped to his 2002-2003 tour, for some ridiculous reason. 20 years of being a military spouse it's rather easy to fuck up the when and where dates when I'm multitasking and my other tasks are actually important. As for Bush, perhaps it's more realistic to say those he was listening to lied. W was just too stupid to know. But that was a different time frame than you inferred. To know where GD was stationed at that time (92) I'd have to interrupt his timed test and even I am not that ditzy at this time of day.

I infered nothing, I stated the time and what happened.
So W's advisors lied to him about Kuwait being invaded, and I know exactly were I was in 92 and what was bein done to the military.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Which description suits the Republican nominee best? - 9/6/2016 8:01:15 PM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

I infered nothing, I stated the time and what happened.
So W's advisors lied to him about Kuwait being invaded, and I know exactly were I was in 92 and what was bein done to the military.


I am happy for you that you remember dates and specifics far better than I do. It was my weakness in history as well. I can remember the whys but names and dates have never mattered. The best I can give for 1992 is that I worked for Seifert Corp Crédit office, lived in Cedar Rapids and was trying to raise 2.5 kids while my husband was stationed someplace not Cedar Rapids Iowa. I remember the emotional family stuff that was going on, not the specifics. I can tell you how I felt when my teenage son shot a neighbor's garage windows with a pellet gun and the police showed up. My husband can remember the name of the neighbor and how much it cost us. I remember being angry I had to deal with it alone. The stuff that mattered to me.

As for debating you, I fully admit to only giving it about 5% of my attention and give a damn. At the same time I've had a discussion about amortized versus accreted bonds. As well as a debate as to which will be a better real estate investment, ranch land near Taos NM or commercial property in downtown Fairfield Iowa. Also a phone call from my son about a new investment property he is looking at as he has finalized the sale of the one they finished. So yeah, I should have refrained.




_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Which description suits the Republican nominee best? - 9/6/2016 8:41:38 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

In January of 1992 I could not have cared less about the Clintons. I was busy worrying about loved ones in a war zone that Bush thought was a good idea and sold to the US based on lies and half truths.

I am basing my opinions of the two viable candidates on extensive research done this year. Donald Trump isn't fit to lead a starving kitten to a t-bone. Hell, based on what I've seen and read, he'd probably put the kitten in a gunny sack with a chunk of concrete, blame the kitten, bill it's family for the sack and concrete, eat the steak, then deny the whole thing ever happened. When cornered he'd either say he didn't mean it or blame someone else.

Yeah, I'll take Hillary every day all day.

You are aware that we were not fighting anyone in Jan of 92?
In fact, at that time the conventional wisom was to gut the military so we could spend the "peace dividend " on other things. Bush lied? Youmean that Iraq didn't really invade Kuwait? I think you are more than alittle confused.


Yes, I read and responded too quickly. While generic dude was on active duty in 92, I jumped to his 2002-2003 tour, for some ridiculous reason. 20 years of being a military spouse it's rather easy to fuck up the when and where dates when I'm multitasking and my other tasks are actually important. As for Bush, perhaps it's more realistic to say those he was listening to lied. W was just too stupid to know. But that was a different time frame than you inferred. To know where GD was stationed at that time (92) I'd have to interrupt his timed test and even I am not that ditzy at this time of day.

I infered nothing, I stated the time and what happened.
So W's advisors lied to him about Kuwait being invaded, and I know exactly were I was in 92 and what was bein done to the military.

No, they lied in 1990 about 250,000 Iraqi troops with 1500 tanks on the Saudi border, ready to invade SA. Other sources reported there was nothing but desert sand.

They used a PR firm and the daughter of Saud Nasir al-Sabah, Kuwait’s ambassador to the US. Her testimony had been organized by a group called Citizens for a Free Kuwait, to testify in congress which was all over western media for weeks and all done by a front for the Kuwaiti government. She lied through her teeth.

Additionally, Saddam had made it clear many times through channels, that he was getting out of Kuwait but the news was never allowed in most western press so the coalition could go into Kuwait to kick Saddam out and...more then decimate his army.

Whatever was done to the military prior to 1/93...it's all on GHWB...not Clinton.

< Message edited by MrRodgers -- 9/6/2016 8:45:11 PM >

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Which description suits the Republican nominee best? - 9/6/2016 9:05:04 PM   
klmpong


Posts: 73
Joined: 1/11/2016
Status: offline 		wasn't an option but I vote "necessary"

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Which description suits the Republican nominee best? - 9/6/2016 9:13:43 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		why do you hate america so much?

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to klmpong)
Profile   Post #: 57
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Which description suits the Republican nominee best? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094