We all know Military Intelligence is an oxymoron... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity



Message


jlf1961 -> We all know Military Intelligence is an oxymoron... (9/4/2016 12:22:48 PM)

Being a history buff, it is funny to see some of the things that everyone but the Generals in charge knew was a really bad idea.

Take the Maginot line, that line of forts and fortifications built by the French between the wars that stretched from the Swiss border the entire length of the border with Germany.

Great idea except, someone forgot that when German invaded France in WW1, they went through the low countries.

That stretch the French forgot to fortify, so the Germans went around the line and attacked it from the rear, the direction the guns did not point.

Now for the American Army, one of the best examples is Fort Jefferson.

Fort Jefferson was built between 1846 and 1875 on the largest of the Dry Tortugas, a group of islands in the Florida Keys.

There is a reason the islands are called the DRY Tortugas, there are no sources of fresh water on any of them.

No problem, the designers thought of that, and designed channels to direct rain water into cisterns to hold fresh water.

The Army built the fort, lining these channels and cisterns with a lime based plaster, making the water impossible to drink, extremely high alkaline content which basically made it poisonous.

Hence the construction of the first large scale desalination plant.

Now, the fort was still under construction at the out break of the civil war, and was not even finished until ten years after the war was over.

Why is that point significant?

Simple, by 1863, the masonry fort was obsolete. Ships were mounting rifled breach loading cannons that would have turned those brick walls into rubble in a matter of hours.

But, the army, knowing this, continued to build the fort.

Of course, when it was constructed, it was and is the largest masonry fort ever built. The kicker is that, no one thought about the island itself. Technically it was never finished, because the coral base of the island started to collapse under the weight of the structure, and it never had all the cannon it was designed to have for two reasons.

1) The island would never support the fort
2) By the end of the civil war, the island was obsolete and to replace the original cannon with modern guns (for the time) would have bankrupted the country.

WW2, again.

Prior to Operation Market Garden, the RAF flew countless missions over the line of march for the attack.

There were a number of pictures taken of German tanks near Arnham.

The Dutch resistance informed the Allies about the three panzer divisions in the area.

No one believed any of it.

On the other side, a German soldier found the crashed glider of a British officer. Inside he found the complete operational plan of the attack, with which the German army could have flanked the allies and stopped the attack in a day.

The over all German commander took those plans, declared them false (even though all reports of the paratrooper landings confirmed the plans were real) and burned them to keep his officers from being distracted.

Then there was the 8th airforce general who, seeing the damage and losses for american bombers flying unescorted on missions deep into germany came up with the brilliant idea of putting a shit load of guns on B17's so that they could act like escorts.

Great idea, in theory.

However, the men who worked on the forts, flew the forts, knew the forts better than anyone else kept telling him that with all the extra guns and ammo, the planes would not be able to keep up with the bomber formations.

The general ignored these points, ordered 50 of the bombers converted, and....

Well, the nay sayers were right.

The planes were so slow they could not keep up, they barely got off the ground for that matter.

The germans figured out these were not to be messed with when they tried to attack them and found them to have twice as many guns as the regular forts and left them alone.

After 10 missions the project was declared a failure.




MrRodgers -> RE: We all know Military Intelligence is an oxymoron... (9/5/2016 6:19:21 PM)

The allies's pre-attack aerial bombing at Normandy in Operation Overlord, didn't continue even and in weather good enough for a small Luftwaffe response, and few battleship bombardments did almost nothing to stop or much reduce what was the slaughter of 5000 mostly Americans at Omaha or Utah beaches. All the allies could do is hope to overwhelm with numbers...as we did.

Reagan or his military advisers didn't read up before his gun-boat adventurism at Beirut that left 241 marines vulnerable in their barracks to what became a successful attack that left those men dead. If he had, he would have seen that Eisenhower during the Suez crisis had ordered up for deployment if necessary, a complete armored div. (30,000 men, communications, mobile artillery, trucks jeeps etc.) should it be needed.

When asked later in an interview after US diplomatic pressure resulted in British and French withdrawal, why, Eisenhower replied...'you always protect your perimeter.'

In both cases Normandy and Beirut...military intelligence was nowhere to be seen.




thompsonx -> RE: We all know Military Intelligence is an oxymoron... (9/5/2016 8:12:57 PM)


ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

The allies's pre-attack aerial bombing at Normandy in Operation Overlord, didn't continue even and in weather good enough for a small Luftwaffe response, and few battleship bombardments did almost nothing to stop or much reduce what was the slaughter of 5000 mostly Americans at Omaha or Utah beaches. All the allies could do is hope to overwhelm with numbers...as we did.

Utah bch. was a walkon




MrRodgers -> RE: We all know Military Intelligence is an oxymoron... (9/6/2016 1:34:46 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

The allies's pre-attack aerial bombing at Normandy in Operation Overlord, didn't continue even and in weather good enough for a small Luftwaffe response, and few battleship bombardments did almost nothing to stop or much reduce what was the slaughter of 5000 mostly Americans at Omaha or Utah beaches. All the allies could do is hope to overwhelm with numbers...as we did.

Utah bch. was a walkon

Total casualities for op. Overlord were 10,000 over 4400 dead, while comparatively speaking yes, Utah beach...only 589, Omaha 3,686. They got lucky at Utah actually as they landed 2000 yds. south of their intended target due to the tides and it current. That also helped in clearing seaborne hazards.

HERE

But as I did suggest, although for the entire Battle of Normandy, it succeeded in its objective by sheer force of numbers. By July 1944, some one million Allied troops, mostly American, British, and Canadian, were entrenched in Normandy. HERE and at a cost of some 125,847 from the US ground forces. HERE again




thompsonx -> RE: We all know Military Intelligence is an oxymoron... (9/19/2016 6:11:39 AM)

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
ORIGINAL: thompsonx


The allies's pre-attack aerial bombing at Normandy in Operation Overlord, didn't continue even and in weather good enough for a small Luftwaffe response, and few battleship bombardments did almost nothing to stop or much reduce what was the slaughter of 5000 mostly Americans at Omaha or Utah beaches. All the allies could do is hope to overwhelm with numbers...as we did.

Utah bch. was a walkon

Total casualities for op. Overlord were 10,000 over 4400 dead, while comparatively speaking yes, Utah beach...only 589, Omaha 3,686. They got lucky at Utah actually as they landed 2000 yds. south of their intended target due to the tides and it current. That also helped in clearing seaborne hazards.

HERE

But as I did suggest, although for the entire Battle of Normandy, it succeeded in its objective by sheer force of numbers. By July 1944, some one million Allied troops, mostly American, British, and Canadian, were entrenched in Normandy. HERE and at a cost of some 125,847 from the US ground forces. HERE again


How many men won the body bag lotto at utah bch?
Quoting figures for other than utah bch is irrelevant.




thompsonx -> RE: We all know Military Intelligence is an oxymoron... (9/19/2016 6:53:46 AM)

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Being a history buff, it is funny to see some of the things that everyone but the Generals in charge knew was a really bad idea.


First "we all" do not know that military intelligence is an oxy-moron.


Take the Maginot line, that line of forts and fortifications built by the French between the wars that stretched from the Swiss border the entire length of the border with Germany.


Actually that was just the french part. The belgians remembered about the first world war and constructed forts to stop the next german invasion.The maginot line held until the brit and french army in the field were defeated and france surrendered.



Great idea except, someone forgot that when German invaded France in WW1, they went through the low countries.

That stretch the French forgot to fortify, so the Germans went around the line and attacked it from the rear, the direction the guns did not point.

Not exactly. The germans did what is now known as a "vertical envelopment" and took eban emanual with an airborn assault from which the fortress had no protection since assault by parachute was unknown at the time of it's construction.

Now for the American Army, one of the best examples is Fort Jefferson.

Fort Jefferson was built between 1846 and 1875 on the largest of the Dry Tortugas, a group of islands in the Florida Keys.

There is a reason the islands are called the DRY Tortugas, there are no sources of fresh water on any of them.

No problem, the designers thought of that, and designed channels to direct rain water into cisterns to hold fresh water.

The Army built the fort, lining these channels and cisterns with a lime based plaster, making the water impossible to drink, extremely high alkaline content which basically made it poisonous.

Are you sugesting that this was unknown or that some contractor sought to make a few bux by cutting corners?

Hence the construction of the first large scale desalination plant.

Now, the fort was still under construction at the out break of the civil war, and was not even finished until ten years after the war was over.

Why is that point significant?

Simple, by 1863, the masonry fort was obsolete. Ships were mounting rifled breach loading cannons that would have turned those brick walls into rubble in a matter of hours.


Yet the spanish forts constructed hundreds of years earlier out of coral absorbed cannon balls. It was not until exploding cannon balls became common that those became obsolete. That the u.s. army would use masonry instead of native coral once again lead me to suspect a more common cause as noted above...larceny on the part of the building contractor and complicity on the part of the procurement officer.


But, the army, knowing this, continued to build the fort.

Of course, when it was constructed, it was and is the largest masonry fort ever built. The kicker is that, no one thought about the island itself. Technically it was never finished, because the coral base of the island started to collapse under the weight of the structure, and it never had all the cannon it was designed to have for two reasons.

1) The island would never support the fort
2) By the end of the civil war, the island was obsolete and to replace the original cannon with modern guns (for the time) would have bankrupted the country.


Are you saying the island would sink?[8|]



WW2, again.

Prior to Operation Market Garden, the RAF flew countless missions over the line of march for the attack.

There were a number of pictures taken of German tanks near Arnham.

The Dutch resistance informed the Allies about the three panzer divisions in the area.

No one believed any of it.

On the other side, a German soldier found the crashed glider of a British officer. Inside he found the complete operational plan of the attack, with which the German army could have flanked the allies and stopped the attack in a day.

The over all German commander took those plans, declared them false (even though all reports of the paratrooper landings confirmed the plans were real) and burned them to keep his officers from being distracted.

Then there was the 8th airforce general who, seeing the damage and losses for american bombers flying unescorted on missions deep into germany came up with the brilliant idea of putting a shit load of guns on B17's so that they could act like escorts.

Great idea, in theory.

However, the men who worked on the forts, flew the forts, knew the forts better than anyone else kept telling him that with all the extra guns and ammo, the planes would not be able to keep up with the bomber formations.

The general ignored these points, ordered 50 of the bombers converted, and....

Well, the nay sayers were right.

The planes were so slow they could not keep up, they barely got off the ground for that matter.

The germans figured out these were not to be messed with when they tried to attack them and found them to have twice as many guns as the regular forts and left them alone.

After 10 missions the project was declared a failure.


The flaw goes back to doughett..."the bombers will always get through" is a false premise. B17 in formation couid not protect themselves against fighter interdiction and were virtually defensless against aa.




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875