LadyPact -> RE: At what age does one get to be a dominant? (9/18/2016 12:49:48 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Gauge quote:
ORIGINAL: ilovestarbucks It's not "dumb-ass" at all. What separates "Master" from "Dominant" is that a "Master" is able to "know." Know what exactly? Know what night garbage night is? Know how to do quantum physics? Know what? quote:
The Dominant doesn't take any training. Really? I have been a dominant all of my life. When I discovered BDSM, I had to learn a metric-shitton of stuff, so I didn't injure or kill someone. You learned this in a day. It took me years. I dare you to call me stupid. quote:
For example, if you could just sit for 5 minutes and let go of all your thoughts you can be mindful. What the actual fuck does this mean? I can tell you that one day, I was so wasted that I forgot my own name. I let go of all of my thoughts and didn't know my own fucking name. This state makes you a Master? Seriously? quote:
The Dominant doesn't do that. What separates the Master from the Dominant is his inner being. What separates the Master from the dominant is more vowels and consonants. Inner being? Define that. quote:
But you didn't know this, or other Dominants, because they didn't take the seminar. I didn't know this because I am able to think. I don't need to prove shit to anyone, I know I am a dominant, and my girl absolutely knows I am a dominant. I need no validation outside of my own relationship. Fuck the seminar. I missed it. Please, please, please tell me I am not dominant. quote:
I'm proud that I took the class. I'm proud that I've received a certificate that I've earned. You wasted your money. You are proud that you wasted your money. We get that. quote:
It's the same thing as receiving training from any other venture, like dental assistant or physical therapy assistant. Except there are parameters and actual criteria, and a two year (at least) collegiate degree involved in the professions indicated. You claim you are someone you are not, and it cost you more money per hour than an actual credible degree. Who is the dolt in this equation? quote:
When you approach a submissive and show her the certificate, it gives her confidence in you as a Master. When I have approached any sub, I talked to her like a human fucking being. I told her what I wanted and if she didn't fit, I moved on. I found my girl. I didn't have to flash a certificate to her, she was putty in my hands the day I said we would play together. I told her about this thread and I asked her to read it. She was in tears from laughter reading the drivel you have set forth. OK, I will throw myself to the wolves right now. Just to make a point. Is there anyone here that has known me over the years that thinks I am not a dominant? I can take critics... but has anyone doubted my claim? One last thing, is there anyone here that would have been silenced if I flashed a certificate to them? I want to be clear. I didn't say it was dumb@ss to take the class. I said it was stupid for anyone to think a piece of paper makes them a Master. Even though that particular class is laughed off by every person that I've ever known because of the 'certificate' crap, I hope it's valid education for the people who take it. However, if that's the advertisement of how much "Richard's" class makes someone a Master? Well, you know what they say about good and bad press.
|
|
|
|