RE: Child support to be audited (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


HoneyBears -> RE: Child support to be audited (10/2/2016 5:13:44 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

Since about 1980 everybody is wrong.

T^T
Just since 1980? [sm=40108_160x600.gif]

And now for something completely different ... --John Cleese

Men are like fine wine. They start out as grapes; and it's up to the women to stomp the crap out of them until they turn into something acceptable to have with dinner. --Unknown

-- Lisa & Cub




PeonForHer -> RE: Child support to be audited (10/2/2016 5:22:31 AM)

quote:


Men are like fine wine. They start out as grapes; and it's up to the women to stomp the crap out of them until they turn into something acceptable to have with dinner. --Unknown


I don't know why that makes me laugh as much as it does. :)




bondageerone -> RE: Child support to be audited (10/2/2016 7:41:59 AM)

another moron just using media b/s instead of original thought. idiot.x




MAINEiacMISTRESS -> RE: Child support to be audited (10/2/2016 8:31:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:


Men are like fine wine. They start out as grapes; and it's up to the women to stomp the crap out of them until they turn into something acceptable to have with dinner. --Unknown


I don't know why that makes me laugh as much as it does. :)


LMAO




MAINEiacMISTRESS -> RE: Child support to be audited (10/2/2016 8:51:23 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

I agree that feminists will probably not like this much. I will be pleasantly surprised to be proven wrong.

I'm a feminist and I don't disapprove.


I am a feminist and I actually think audits are a long time coming. Anytime money is involved there is a chance (and tendency) toward misappropriation. Child support money should be spent for the rearing of the child, i.e. shoes, clothing, glasses, food, school-related expenses, yet often the money is instead spent on makeup and clothing for mom, household items and furniture, and even items for a boyfriend and/or her OTHER children by different fathers while the INTENDED child goes without (I've witnessed such favoritism as I'm sure others have).

I think most child-support fathers would at least FEEL BETTER about having to pay child support if they had some guarantee the money was exclusively spent specifically on their own daughter/son rather than whatever whim the mother has. There should be full disclosure details of WHERE that money gets spent.




Awareness -> RE: Child support to be audited (10/2/2016 11:18:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:


Men are like fine wine. They start out as grapes; and it's up to the women to stomp the crap out of them until they turn into something acceptable to have with dinner. --Unknown


I don't know why that makes me laugh as much as it does. :)
Oh, that's your internalised misandry. Here, let's try reversing the genders and see if you still find it funny.

Women are like fine wine. They start out as grapes and it's up to the men to stomp the crap out of them until they turn into something acceptable to have with dinner.






HoneyBears -> RE: Child support to be audited (10/5/2016 4:53:27 AM)

Don't be daft. It is women who have traditionally stomped grapes, smashed and mashed up harvested fruits and vegetables into juices, pureed sauces, preparing essential foodstuffs.
Both preserved surpluses (pickling, canning, salting, curing, smoking, fermenting, brewing, distilling).

Your statement does not have the allegorical equivalent to convey humorous intent.
You are only a proponent of one-size-fits-all genders with interchangeable parts when it suits your demagogical purposes.
Most of the time, you are busy making as many polarized distinctions between men and women, masculinity and femininity, as you possibly can.

As such, that you are not a man who identifies with the transformative principle of grape> grape juice> into being elevated into a 'fine' wine, is boisterously loud and clear.
To each his own. No need to habitually [habitch-ually] take cheap shots at Peon, at us, or at any others in variance with yourself.

-- Lisa & Cub




Awareness -> RE: Child support to be audited (10/5/2016 10:41:17 AM)

Amazing. You really aren't the full quid.




WhoreMods -> RE: Child support to be audited (10/5/2016 11:56:10 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:


Men are like fine wine. They start out as grapes; and it's up to the women to stomp the crap out of them until they turn into something acceptable to have with dinner. --Unknown


I don't know why that makes me laugh as much as it does. :)
Oh, that's your internalised misandry. Here, let's try reversing the genders and see if you still find it funny.

Women are like fine wine. They start out as grapes and it's up to the men to stomp the crap out of them until they turn into something acceptable to have with dinner.




Women are like walnut trees and dogs: they get better the more you beat them.




PeonForHer -> RE: Child support to be audited (10/5/2016 12:06:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:


Men are like fine wine. They start out as grapes; and it's up to the women to stomp the crap out of them until they turn into something acceptable to have with dinner. --Unknown


I don't know why that makes me laugh as much as it does. :)
Oh, that's your internalised misandry. Here, let's try reversing the genders and see if you still find it funny.

Women are like fine wine. They start out as grapes and it's up to the men to stomp the crap out of them until they turn into something acceptable to have with dinner.






I'll take advice from you on humour about the same time as I take advice from you on how to train as an Olympic sprinter, A. [;)]




Awareness -> RE: Child support to be audited (10/5/2016 6:43:08 PM)

It wasn't about humour, but that's okay - I'm used to your generally dense response to pretty much everything.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Child support to be audited (10/5/2016 6:55:49 PM)

Wow they really missed your point, didn't they?




PeonForHer -> RE: Child support to be audited (10/5/2016 11:43:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

It wasn't about humour, but that's okay - I'm used to your generally dense response to pretty much everything.


Of course it wasn't about humour, you plonker. If it was about humour, you'd have been incapable of writing it.




Awareness -> RE: Child support to be audited (10/6/2016 8:24:19 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

It wasn't about humour, but that's okay - I'm used to your generally dense response to pretty much everything.


Of course it wasn't about humour, you plonker. If it was about humour, you'd have been incapable of writing it.
Now that's fucking irony, right there.




tweakabelle -> RE: Child support to be audited (10/7/2016 12:21:42 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

It wasn't about humour, but that's okay - I'm used to your generally dense response to pretty much everything.


Of course it wasn't about humour, you plonker. If it was about humour, you'd have been incapable of writing it.
Now that's fucking irony, right there.


No. Peon's comment was accurate and astute. The primary characteristic of your posts is the angry tone with which they are written. A writing POV that is angry all the time will find it very difficult to incorporate humour into the post. A GSOH and anger simply don't co-exist happily, they tend to be mutually exclusive.

However for people who have the misfortune to have to read your posts, the posts can be very funny. That's not because you are funny or intend to write humourously, it's because of hilariously pretentious drivel that you post continually. It's far too stupid to be taken seriously.

So the joke is on you Awareness (sic). You are the joke. And like most self important buffoons, you can't see it for the life of you.




Awareness -> RE: Child support to be audited (10/7/2016 10:13:50 AM)

Pot. Kettle. Black.

That also, is irony of the highest order.

Christ, it's STILL like shooting fish in a barrel in here.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Child support to be audited (10/7/2016 10:18:28 AM)

LOL




HoneyBears -> RE: Child support to be audited (10/8/2016 9:52:13 PM)

Here, let me add some more fuel to the fire ...[sm=ride.gif]
quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

Women are like walnut trees and dogs: they get better the more you beat them.

Got to correct you, my man:

Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea. --Robert A. Heinlein

"I think women are foolish to pretend they are equal to men, they are far superior and always have been." --William Golding

^ What every lady secretly knows already deep down inside. ^

-- Cub




Awareness -> RE: Child support to be audited (10/9/2016 2:58:47 PM)

It's always amusing watching women trot out pathetic statements from geldings, as though this will, in any way, influence men.

Men aren't the hive mind that women are... we think more independently than you lot do.




HoneyBears -> RE: Child support to be audited (10/12/2016 10:06:10 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

It's always amusing watching women trot out pathetic statements from geldings, as though this will, in any way, influence men.

Men aren't the hive mind that women are... we think more independently than you lot do.

LOLOLOL

It must be the hordes of women sports fans who start brawling in the stands, on the playing field, and who riot in the streets when their favorite team does not win ... NOT. [8|]
In fact, it must have been *swarms* of women who rounded up men like herds of cattle throughout the aeons, because men would never dream of grouping together in teams on their own, forming clans and tribes and nations ... NOT.

It must have been seamstresses who implemented the use of men's standard-issue uniforms to wear, since males are such rugged (fashion) individualists ... NOT.

It must have been secret societies of women who founded brotherhoods/fraternities, Masonic lodges, and who comprise the "hive mind" of human civilization ... Probably not.

So which is it? Men are NOT influenced by [ostensibly female] groupthink, or women have such an interminably dominant influence over men that we have managed to forge societal constructs without the benefit of male organizational pooling skills, being the loose cannons that you are ....

By spouting the nonsense that you do, Awareness, you make your own case for the following:

1. Women have greater influence over men than men have over women.
2. There are more matriarchal institutions than there are patriarchal institutions from the standpoint of community.
3. You are actually making a case for female elitism, far more effectively than any so-called feminazi could. [8D]
4. Female cultural norms dominate male cultural norms, which would make men subordinate to women, who would therefore be their superiors. [:D]

As for world-renowned Robert Heinlein, you could only hope to have a thimbleful of that man's prolific talent, creativity, wit, and visionary genius.
You may strive to be an iconoclast, but you are not as unique as you fancy yourself to be, as easily ruled and overruled by reactionary impulses as you are.

-- Lisa & Cub




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.699707E-02