Curt Shilling may run against Elizabeth Warren - if his wife lets him (?) (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


sloguy02246 -> Curt Shilling may run against Elizabeth Warren - if his wife lets him (?) (10/18/2016 11:44:56 AM)

Curt Schilling eyes US Senate run against Elizabeth Warren

10/18/16 1:25 PM ET
PROVIDENCE, R.I. (AP) — Former Red Sox pitcher Curt Schilling announced plans on Tuesday to run against Elizabeth Warren in the U.S. Senate if his wife agrees, and said that he's ultimately responsible for the collapse of his video game company in Rhode Island, though he didn't apologize to taxpayers left on the hook for tens of millions of dollars.
Schilling did his first interview about the failed 38 Studios deal on Tuesday with WPRO-AM. Democratic Gov. Gina Raimondo has said Rhode Island residents were hurt by the bad deal and deserve an apology.
Schilling said it's not that he won't apologize, but he wants Raimondo to tell him what he should apologize for. He asked listeners: "What do you want me to apologize for?"
The company moved from Massachusetts to Rhode Island in 2010 in exchange for a $75 million loan guarantee, then went bankrupt less than two years later.
Schilling said his company failed because it didn't raise enough money, not because he did anything malicious or illegal, and that he has apologized to his former employees.
"I couldn't raise the final tranche of money and get the product to launch and that will never be anyone's fault but mine," he said.
In a wide-ranging, three-hour interview, Schilling took questions from callers and said he'll run against Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, in 2018, but must clear the decision with his wife.
"I've made my decision, I'm going to run," he said. "But I have to talk to Shonda, my wife, and ultimately it's going to come down to how her and I feel this would affect our marriage and our kids."
Schilling took issue with Warren opposing a November ballot question aimed at dramatically expanding the number of charter schools in Massachusetts. He said he's not scared to debate her, noting that the Red Sox defeated the Cleveland Indians when he was a player.
"I've beaten the real ones before so I'm not worried about that," the self-described conservative and Donald Trump supporter said, an apparent reference to Warren's claims of Native American heritage.
Earlier this year Schilling was fired from his job as an ESPN baseball analyst after comments on Facebook critical of transgender rights. He now has an online radio show.
A judge recently approved a settlement with Schilling and three other 38 Studios officials over the 38 Studios deal. The state of Rhode Island sued Schilling and other key players involved.
Just one company remains as a defendant, First Southwest, which acted as the state's financial adviser. Schilling said he expects to testify at the trial.
"If I was the governor, I would have never even offered this deal," Schilling said. "The government doesn't belong in private business. But I'm on the other side of this. My job and responsibility is to my company and to my employees and I was doing everything I could do, within my legal means, to make that be a success."
Raimondo's spokesman said on Tuesday that Rhode Islanders were hurt by the 38 Studios deal and it's unfortunate that Schilling doesn't recognize his part in that.
___
Information from: WPRO-AM, http://www.630wpro.com/
Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.




WhoreMods -> RE: Curt Shilling may run against Elizabeth Warren - if his wife lets him (?) (10/18/2016 12:00:34 PM)

Christ, and there was me thinking the circus peanut was a lying cheapskate...




thompsonx -> RE: Curt Shilling may run against Elizabeth Warren - if his wife lets him (?) (10/18/2016 12:04:58 PM)


ORIGINAL: sloguy02246
He said he's not scared to debate her, noting that the Red Sox defeated the Cleveland Indians when he was a player.
"I've beaten the real ones before so I'm not worried about that," the self-described conservative and Donald Trump supporter said, an apparent reference to Warren's claims of Native American heritage.

I am pretty sure that the native amerikans said she was and that the baseball tream was not.




sloguy02246 -> RE: Curt Shilling may run against Elizabeth Warren - if his wife lets him (?) (10/18/2016 12:23:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: sloguy02246
He said he's not scared to debate her, noting that the Red Sox defeated the Cleveland Indians when he was a player.
"I've beaten the real ones before so I'm not worried about that," the self-described conservative and Donald Trump supporter said, an apparent reference to Warren's claims of Native American heritage.

I am pretty sure that the native amerikans said she was and that the baseball tream was not.


I was wondering how quickly someone would catch that comment.
In some ways, Shilling's thought process (or more correctly, lack thereof) really does remind me of Trump's tweets.




WhoreMods -> RE: Curt Shilling may run against Elizabeth Warren - if his wife lets him (?) (10/18/2016 12:29:08 PM)

"Not a Native American. Fuck off are we having them."




MrRodgers -> RE: Curt Shilling may run against Elizabeth Warren - if his wife lets him (?) (10/18/2016 1:33:03 PM)

What unmitigated horseshit. Don't you just love 'free market' capitalism ? [sic]

'Government doesn't belong in private business ?' Shilling is being disingenuous at best and an full of shit at worst. He was under no fiduciary responsibility to anybody to take that deal and particularly in view of the requirement to move the co. and all of its jobs to RI. (and this despite the long running fact that govt. and govt. investment is directly and indirectly responsible for countless millions of jobs)

The right will even tell you that say as opposed to moving 1,000's (now millions) of jobs to China and other parts Asia to make higher profits is just ok and not immoral but a minimum age...is immoral.

That's like saying Walmart has the same responsibility to pay their employees as little as possible to force them on food stamps just because its available and even though that's just what it does or at least has been doing until the last big news of raises and is also not immoral and only in the face of public opprobrium for...having done so.

I am sure when Shilling runs he'll espouse just how govt. needs to get out of the way of business (except when it offers handouts to businesses) and let the great and glorious marketplace work. The right having sold out to corporatism, has totally lost its conservative moorings and reveals the whole concept of being 'right wing' as the rent-seeking profiteers they have become.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Curt Shilling may run against Elizabeth Warren - if his wife lets him (?) (10/18/2016 3:53:36 PM)

quote:

The right having sold out to corporatism, has totally lost its conservative moorings and reveals the whole concept of being 'right wing' as the rent-seeking profiteers they have become.

So very true. However I would like to take this opportunity to point out that the democratic party is also a party of the right.




TieMeInKnottss -> RE: Curt Shilling may run against Elizabeth Warren - if his wife lets him (?) (10/18/2016 4:30:39 PM)

My biggest concern with the most likely victory of Hillary is that Elizabeth Warren will be given a cabinet position such as HUD or Treasury. She would do less damage at HUD but, GOD, that woman is clueless!




thompsonx -> RE: Curt Shilling may run against Elizabeth Warren - if his wife lets him (?) (10/19/2016 5:34:44 AM)

ORIGINAL: TieMeInKnottss

My biggest concern with the most likely victory of Hillary is that Elizabeth Warren will be given a cabinet position such as HUD or Treasury. She would do less damage at HUD but, GOD, that woman is clueless!


It would seem that her victory for the senate seat is is a foregone conclusion. I am unsure why bills wife would dilute her power in the senate by appointing warren to a cabnet post and equally unclear why warren would give up a senate seat for a cabinet post.
I would be interested in why you think otherwise???regardless of her real or imagined ?cluelessness"





TieMeInKnottss -> RE: Curt Shilling may run against Elizabeth Warren - if his wife lets him (?) (10/19/2016 1:40:15 PM)

My concern is that she was considered for vice-president plus it is not unusual for the "losing" side (Sanders in this case) to try to get some concessions for their supporters. Sanders and Warren have both been vocal in their hatred of banks. Good portion of the crap they spew is either extremely broad and does not apply to most who would be damaged or it is entirely inaccurate. And, yes, I have been in the industry since the early 90s and saw much of it 1st hand.




MrRodgers -> RE: Curt Shilling may run against Elizabeth Warren - if his wife lets him (?) (10/19/2016 2:33:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

The right having sold out to corporatism, has totally lost its conservative moorings and reveals the whole concept of being 'right wing' as the rent-seeking profiteers they have become.

So very true. However I would like to take this opportunity to point out that the democratic party is also a party of the right.

Both parties are corrupt, it's just that the dems are mere amateurs while the repubs...are real pros.




MrRodgers -> RE: Curt Shilling may run against Elizabeth Warren - if his wife lets him (?) (10/19/2016 2:35:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TieMeInKnottss

My biggest concern with the most likely victory of Hillary is that Elizabeth Warren will be given a cabinet position such as HUD or Treasury. She would do less damage at HUD but, GOD, that woman is clueless!

.....just because she stays all over the fed and the bankers both of whom are currently in clear violation of law ? Warren should stay where she is now.




MrRodgers -> RE: Curt Shilling may run against Elizabeth Warren - if his wife lets him (?) (10/19/2016 2:47:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TieMeInKnottss

My concern is that she was considered for vice-president plus it is not unusual for the "losing" side (Sanders in this case) to try to get some concessions for their supporters. Sanders and Warren have both been vocal in their hatred of banks. Good portion of the crap they spew is either extremely broad and does not apply to most who would be damaged or it is entirely inaccurate. And, yes, I have been in the industry since the early 90s and saw much of it 1st hand.

Well you reveal a certain bias in using the word...hatred. She and Sanders want them stringently regulated and if not sufficient...break them up. For a conservative that is a real conservative, for any business to be so large and intertwined with others including the multi levels of leveraging, to ultimately be too big to fail, means that business is...too big to exist.

There are no free market principles and in fact the opposite holds true, that requires the state be forced into a position of even one, let alone yet another potential bail-out of banks directly as a result of their size and lack of regulation and morally in view of bankers and dealers compensation. (much of it taxed at lower than the highest income tax)




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125