RE: Melbourne cinema drops men's rights film after feminist backlash

RE: Melbourne cinema drops men's rights film after feminist backlash (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

thompsonx -> RE: Melbourne cinema drops men's rights film after feminist backlash (10/26/2016 7:09:12 PM)
ORIGINAL: respectmen http://archive.is/TcZ4t#selection-767.15-767.80 Feminists once again displaying their totalitarianism. As always, feminists seem to think that an opinion is only allowed if it's kowtowing the feminist narrative when it comes to a discussion about gender issues. Other than that, when it comes to these controlling nutbags, no one else is entitled to speak. From the link you posted it is quite clear that both sides spoke and were heard. That the cinema owner chose one over the other seems to bother you. Why is that? You and your possie do not own that venue and the owner is the only one who has the right to decide what he will show. Why do you feel it is your right to dictate to him what he may do with his theater? Oz is not nazi germany and you are not the boss of anyting or anyone. You seem to be of the opinion that yours is the only voice that should be heard. That would make you the nazi like thug trying to impose your will on an unwilling citizen of oz. This is why in pretty much nearly every space, universities, forums on the net, there are never a shortage of feminists trying to censor anyone having an opinion that's opposing feminism. Are they not entitled to free speech? How is their voicing their opinion censorship? Why do you feel that it is right, fair or legal for you to censor their right to free speech? One would think when it comes to equality, that means all genders are entitled to the same type of freedom of speech that feminists use. The article you posted is quite clear that both sides were heard. The girls did not stop the boiz from speaking. Both sides were heard and the owner of a private not government enterprise made his choice. Only a thug would demand that the owner should do as he is told by a bunch of punks who are not happy with the decission. Who would ever listen to men if they complained about feminist videos or conferences and demanded them to be cancelled/banned simply because these men disagree with what is said? History shows quite clearly that they have not only complained but also beaten and imprisoned women for doing so. Perhaps if you were to acquaint yourself with a history book written for someone beyond the fifth grade you would not appear so ignorant. No one would. But society always listens to the woman's side to get men's voices silenced. That is a prime example of female privilege. Not at al,l it is a perfect example of a punkassmotherfucker butt hurt because he feels his white male priviledge slipping through his fingers like semin from a freshly polished nubbin.

MercTech -> RE: Melbourne cinema drops men's rights film after feminist backlash (10/27/2016 7:31:36 AM)
If it were Westboro Baptist Church protestors getting a film screening canceled would people be so complacent? Or, would it be outrage to the rafters?

thompsonx -> RE: Melbourne cinema drops men's rights film after feminist backlash (10/27/2016 7:38:25 AM)
ORIGINAL: MercTech If it were Westboro Baptist Church protestors getting a film screening canceled would people be so complacent? Or, would it be outrage to the rafters? How would what I posted differ?

longwayhome -> RE: Melbourne cinema drops men's rights film after feminist backlash (10/28/2016 4:04:03 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: respectmen http://archive.is/TcZ4t#selection-767.15-767.80 Feminists once again displaying their totalitarianism. As always, feminists seem to think that an opinion is only allowed if it's kowtowing the feminist narrative when it comes to a discussion about gender issues. Other than that, when it comes to these controlling nutbags, no one else is entitled to speak. This is why in pretty much nearly every space, universities, forums on the net, there are never a shortage of feminists trying to censor anyone having an opinion that's opposing feminism. One would think when it comes to equality, that means all genders are entitled to the same type of freedom of speech that feminists use. The men's rights movement is just as stupid as the feminist movement, but they are still entitled to their speech though, just like feminists. Feminists evidently don't want that equality while forever claiming they are about equality. Who would ever listen to men if they complained about feminist videos or conferences and demanded them to be cancelled/banned simply because these men disagree with what is said? No one would. But society always listens to the woman's side to get men's voices silenced. That is a prime example of female privilege. Not keen on censorship of any kind, whether I like the message or not. Freedom of speech doesn't however mean obligation to listen. As long as the film doesn't promote violence or incite hatred I don't see what the fuss is. The problem here seems to be that the cinema was scared that showing the film might ruin its credibility and presumably its ticket sales. Persuading a commercial organisation to carry your message, especially if it is not a mainstream message, is not a right in a democratic society. If the film maker really wants the film to be seen, she may have to host it on the net rather than trying to persuade a cinema to show it. Bottom line is a cinema is not obliged to show the film, but the state shouldn't interfere with it's publication.

Awareness -> RE: Melbourne cinema drops men's rights film after feminist backlash (10/28/2016 11:57:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SecondBestBoy Dude, get over your butthurt mommy issues. You're an embarrassment to masculinity. Women who want to be treated with respect aren't oppressing you. Really. I guessed right. A male sub. You guys are always pathetic as fuck.

respectmen -> RE: Melbourne cinema drops men's rights film after feminist backlash (10/29/2016 1:59:41 AM)
quote: Dude, get over your butthurt mommy issues. You're an embarrassment to masculinity. Women who want to be treated with respect aren't oppressing you. Really. You can always easily spot a gynocentric turd. All you have to do is think about if he would say this to feminists. Just imagine if men's rights groups managed to shutdown something important to feminists, would you have the same type of response to feminists? You silly lefties are retarded hypocrites.

thompsonx -> RE: Melbourne cinema drops men's rights film after feminist backlash (10/29/2016 2:44:07 AM)
ORIGINAL: Awareness I guessed right. A male sub. You guys are always pathetic as fuck. Guessing, as opposed to reasoned thought, seems to be your long suit.

PeonForHer -> RE: Melbourne cinema drops men's rights film after feminist backlash (10/29/2016 2:50:38 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness quote: ORIGINAL: SecondBestBoy Dude, get over your butthurt mommy issues. You're an embarrassment to masculinity. Women who want to be treated with respect aren't oppressing you. Really. I guessed right. A male sub. You guys are always pathetic as fuck. You're a fruitcake, Awareness.

thompsonx -> RE: Melbourne cinema drops men's rights film after feminist backlash (10/29/2016 3:04:23 AM)
ORIGINAL: respectmen You can always easily spot a gynocentric turd. You would seem to be the only gynocentric turd posting here. You are the one who is consatantly whimpering about how the almighty vagina is supressing you. It occupies your every thought and your every post. All you have to do is think about if he would say this to feminists. My post are visible to gynocentric turds like yourself as well as any feminist on this board. Just imagine if men's rights groups managed to shutdown something important to feminists, You have no more right to dictate to the theater owner what he may show than he to tell you what you can say. Now gynocentric turds like yourself may think that you have a hitler like power to compell others to believe your way but you are mistaken would you have the same type of response to feminists? My response is the same to all who read my posts. You silly lefties are retarded hypocrites. You have a right to your opinion no matter how ignorant,ill founded or unsubstantiated they may be. Feminists once again displaying their totalitarianism. As always, feminists seem to think that an opinion is only allowed if it's kowtowing the feminist narrative when it comes to a discussion about gender issues. Other than that, when it comes to these controlling nutbags, no one else is entitled to speak. From the link you posted it is quite clear that both sides spoke and were heard. That the cinema owner chose one over the other seems to bother you. Why is that? You and your possie do not own that venue and the owner is the only one who has the right to decide what he will show. Why do you feel it is your right to dictate to him what he may do with his theater? Oz is not nazi germany and you are not the boss of anyting or anyone. You seem to be of the opinion that yours is the only voice that should be heard. That would make you the nazi like thug trying to impose your will on an unwilling citizen of oz. This is why in pretty much nearly every space, universities, forums on the net, there are never a shortage of feminists trying to censor anyone having an opinion that's opposing feminism. Are they not entitled to free speech? How is their voicing their opinion censorship? Why do you feel that it is right, fair or legal for you to censor their right to free speech? One would think when it comes to equality, that means all genders are entitled to the same type of freedom of speech that feminists use. The article you posted is quite clear that both sides were heard. The gurlz did not stop the boiz from speaking. Both sides were heard and the owner of a private not government enterprise made his choice. Only a thug would demand that the owner should do as he is told by a bunch of punks who are not happy with the decission. Who would ever listen to men if they complained about feminist videos or conferences and demanded them to be cancelled/banned simply because these men disagree with what is said? History shows quite clearly that they have not only complained but also beaten and imprisoned women for doing so. Perhaps if you were to acquaint yourself with a history book written for someone beyond the fifth grade you would not appear so ignorant. No one would. But society always listens to the woman's side to get men's voices silenced. That is a prime example of female privilege. Not at all it is a perfect example of a punkassmotherfucker butt hurt because he feels his white male priviledge slipping through his fingers like semen from a freshly polished nubbin.

Awareness -> RE: Melbourne cinema drops men's rights film after feminist backlash (10/29/2016 8:26:02 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer quote: ORIGINAL: Awareness quote: ORIGINAL: SecondBestBoy Dude, get over your butthurt mommy issues. You're an embarrassment to masculinity. Women who want to be treated with respect aren't oppressing you. Really. I guessed right. A male sub. You guys are always pathetic as fuck. You're a fruitcake, Awareness. Oh, look. Another pathetic male sub. You sound like you're about to cry.

MercTech -> RE: Melbourne cinema drops men's rights film after feminist backlash (10/30/2016 11:55:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: MercTech If it were Westboro Baptist Church protestors getting a film screening canceled would people be so complacent? Or, would it be outrage to the rafters? How would what I posted differ? I don't know, would it? Would you speak out in favor of protest driven censorship by fundamentalist bible thumping fanatics?

thompsonx -> RE: Melbourne cinema drops men's rights film after feminist backlash (10/30/2016 3:37:23 PM)
ORIGINAL: MercTech ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: MercTech If it were Westboro Baptist Church protestors getting a film screening canceled would people be so complacent? Or, would it be outrage to the rafters? How would what I posted differ? I don't know, would it? Would you speak out in favor of protest driven censorship by fundamentalist bible thumping fanatics? Try it again sweet cheeks. Read what I posted and tell me how it would differ?

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875