Early Voting...19 million estimated or about 20%

Early Voting...19 million estimated or about 20% (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

MrRodgers -> Early Voting...19 million estimated or about 20% (10/31/2016 7:17:34 PM)
For those who think the Donald has a chance at all..... With 11 days to go before the US presidential election, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton leads Republican Donald Trump by 15 percentage points among early voters surveyed in the past two weeks, according to the Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation project. Though data is not available for all early voting states, Clinton enjoys an edge in swing states such as Ohio and Arizona and in Republican Party strongholds such as Georgia and Texas. An estimated 19 million Americans have voted so far in the election, according to the University of Florida's United States Election Project, accounting for as much as 20 percent of the electorate. It would be one thing for HRC to have such a lead in strong blue states but...this could be a route kinkroids. HERE

Kirata -> RE: Early Voting...19 million estimated or about 20% (10/31/2016 7:22:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers For those who think the Donald has a chance at all..... With 11 days to go before the US presidential election, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton leads Republican Donald Trump by 15 percentage points among early voters surveyed in the past two weeks, according to the Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation project. Though data is not available for all early voting states, Clinton enjoys an edge in swing states such as Ohio and Arizona and in Republican Party strongholds such as Georgia and Texas. An estimated 19 million Americans have voted so far in the election, according to the University of Florida's United States Election Project, accounting for as much as 20 percent of the electorate. It would be one thing for HRC to have such a lead in strong blue states but...this could be a route kinkroids. HERE But a new poll released Saturday shows the two in a statistical tie: “Clinton's 47%-45% edge in the new Washington Post/ABC tracking poll released Saturday is within the poll's 3-point margin of error. As recently as Sunday, Clinton led Trump 50% to 38% in the poll. Same source. K.

MrRodgers -> RE: Early Voting...19 million estimated or about 20% (10/31/2016 7:40:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers For those who think the Donald has a chance at all..... With 11 days to go before the US presidential election, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton leads Republican Donald Trump by 15 percentage points among early voters surveyed in the past two weeks, according to the Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation project. Though data is not available for all early voting states, Clinton enjoys an edge in swing states such as Ohio and Arizona and in Republican Party strongholds such as Georgia and Texas. An estimated 19 million Americans have voted so far in the election, according to the University of Florida's United States Election Project, accounting for as much as 20 percent of the electorate. It would be one thing for HRC to have such a lead in strong blue states but...this could be a route kinkroids. HERE But a new poll released Saturday shows the two in a statistical tie: “Clinton's 47%-45% edge in the new Washington Post/ABC tracking poll released Saturday is within the poll's 3-point margin of error. As recently as Sunday, Clinton led Trump 50% to 38% in the poll. Same source. K. Yea, I read that too with the main difference being the poll I referenced is actual voting and why I posted it. Plus it refers to that actual voting in traditional red states...going for HRC.

Kirata -> RE: Early Voting...19 million estimated or about 20% (10/31/2016 7:54:57 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers Yea, I read that too with the main difference being the poll I referenced is actual voting and why I posted it. Plus it refers to that actual voting in traditional red states...going for HRC. That story has been carried by a number of outlets, but without a link to the actual poll, and I couldn't find it on the Reuters/IPSOS States of the Nation project website. Where is it? K.

dcnovice -> RE: Early Voting...19 million estimated or about 20% (10/31/2016 8:10:53 PM)
FR [image]https://northmantrader.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/fatlady-sings.gif[/image] This election, I'm definitely giving the old girl her due.

tamaka -> RE: Early Voting...19 million estimated or about 20% (10/31/2016 8:54:44 PM)
The thought of either one of them winning scares the shit out of me.

MrRodgers -> RE: Early Voting...19 million estimated or about 20% (10/31/2016 8:59:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers Yea, I read that too with the main difference being the poll I referenced is actual voting and why I posted it. Plus it refers to that actual voting in traditional red states...going for HRC. That story has been carried by a number of outlets, but without a link to the actual poll, and I couldn't find it on the Reuters/IPSOS States of the Nation project website. Where is it? K. HERE

MrRodgers -> RE: Early Voting...19 million estimated or about 20% (10/31/2016 9:10:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka The thought of either one of them winning scares the shit out of me. Well now you know at least a little, how millions of American white (nominally) racists felt when Obama won...and twice. .....and of course what happened for 8 years, is we remained a status quo and did about as well as anyone could have expected and especially in the face of such passionate and comprehensive repub intransigence. Shall we expect McPartisan senate leader to say again that his job is to make HRC a one term pres. if...he remains leader ?

AtUrCervix -> RE: Early Voting...19 million estimated or about 20% (10/31/2016 9:21:15 PM)
I read somewhere that only 50 million will vote, in total.

MrRodgers -> RE: Early Voting...19 million estimated or about 20% (10/31/2016 9:24:47 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AtUrCervix I read somewhere that only 50 million will vote, in total. .....out of well over 200 million eligible. Some say as many as 98 million will vote. Still less than 1/2.

Lucylastic -> RE: Early Voting...19 million estimated or about 20% (10/31/2016 9:26:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: AtUrCervix I read somewhere that only 50 million will vote, in total. Nearly 130 million voted last election, do you think its dropping ? 21 million according to todays numbers have voted, and its still a week out to actual election day?

Kirata -> RE: Early Voting...19 million estimated or about 20% (10/31/2016 9:28:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers Yea, I read that too with the main difference being the poll I referenced is actual voting and why I posted it. Plus it refers to that actual voting in traditional red states...going for HRC. That story has been carried by a number of outlets, but without a link to the actual poll, and I couldn't find it on the Reuters/IPSOS States of the Nation project website. Where is it? HERE That's just the same story, again. Where is the poll? The numbers. The methodology. K.

MrRodgers -> RE: Early Voting...19 million estimated or about 20% (10/31/2016 9:34:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: AtUrCervix I read somewhere that only 50 million will vote, in total. Nearly 130 million voted last election, do you think its dropping ? 21 million according to todays numbers have voted, and its still a week out to actual election day? Actually over 24 million as of the 29th and counting according to that Reuter's poll.

MrRodgers -> RE: Early Voting...19 million estimated or about 20% (10/31/2016 9:37:38 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers Yea, I read that too with the main difference being the poll I referenced is actual voting and why I posted it. Plus it refers to that actual voting in traditional red states...going for HRC. That story has been carried by a number of outlets, but without a link to the actual poll, and I couldn't find it on the Reuters/IPSOS States of the Nation project website. Where is it? HERE That's just the same story, again. Where is the poll? The numbers. The methodology. K. Since we are talking about actual voting which is counted, what 'methodology' is required beyond calling the polling stations and asking what the numbers are ? This isn't an opinion poll but a tally.

Kirata -> RE: Early Voting...19 million estimated or about 20% (11/1/2016 1:52:59 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers Yea, I read that too with the main difference being the poll I referenced is actual voting and why I posted it. Plus it refers to that actual voting in traditional red states...going for HRC. That story has been carried by a number of outlets, but without a link to the actual poll, and I couldn't find it on the Reuters/IPSOS States of the Nation project website. Where is it? HERE That's just the same story, again. Where is the poll? The numbers. The methodology. Since we are talking about actual voting which is counted, what 'methodology' is required beyond calling the polling stations and asking what the numbers are ? This isn't an opinion poll but a tally. Now you're just making shit up. They didn't call the polling stations and ask what the numbers were. With 11 days to go before the U.S. presidential election, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton leads Republican Donald Trump by 15 percentage points among early voters surveyed in the past two weeks, according to the Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation project . . . Overall, Clinton remained on track to win a majority of votes in the Electoral College, the Reuters/Ipsos survey showed. How many people were surveyed? Where were the surveys conducted? How many locations? How many people at each location? How is anyone supposed to evaluate anything without that information. We're just being told what to think. K.

klmpong -> RE: Early Voting...19 million estimated or about 20% (11/1/2016 2:54:06 AM)
Just in case anyone still believes the democrats bullshit............ http://movie4k.to/Hillary-s-America-The-Secret-History-Of-The-Democratic-Party-watch-movie-7685283.html

Lucylastic -> RE: Early Voting...19 million estimated or about 20% (11/1/2016 6:20:19 AM)
LMFAO do you get paid to create this dribble? I hope so

mnottertail -> RE: Early Voting...19 million estimated or about 20% (11/1/2016 6:31:18 AM)
The nutsucker convict and darling Dinesh D'Souza? Brilliant. Lets hear it from all the convicts in the nutsucker party.

Lucylastic -> RE: Early Voting...19 million estimated or about 20% (11/1/2016 6:33:32 AM)
I didnt even click the link...but if its d'souza lmao I would have given him even more shit.

MrRodgers -> RE: Early Voting...19 million estimated or about 20% (11/1/2016 11:44:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers Yea, I read that too with the main difference being the poll I referenced is actual voting and why I posted it. Plus it refers to that actual voting in traditional red states...going for HRC. That story has been carried by a number of outlets, but without a link to the actual poll, and I couldn't find it on the Reuters/IPSOS States of the Nation project website. Where is it? HERE That's just the same story, again. Where is the poll? The numbers. The methodology. Since we are talking about actual voting which is counted, what 'methodology' is required beyond calling the polling stations and asking what the numbers are ? This isn't an opinion poll but a tally. Now you're just making shit up. They didn't call the polling stations and ask what the numbers were. With 11 days to go before the U.S. presidential election, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton leads Republican Donald Trump by 15 percentage points among early voters surveyed in the past two weeks, according to the Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation project . . . Overall, Clinton remained on track to win a majority of votes in the Electoral College, the Reuters/Ipsos survey showed. How many people were surveyed? Where were the surveys conducted? How many locations? How many people at each location? How is anyone supposed to evaluate anything without that information. We're just being told what to think. K. HERE To be honest, I don't see how this relates to early voting even though it is a pretty good mathematical model.

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.078125