handgun scare at Trump event

handgun scare at Trump event (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Lordandmaster -> handgun scare at Trump event (11/5/2016 11:29:57 PM)
In case you haven't heard: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/06/us/politics/donald-trump-rally.html?_r=0 Amusing because (1) there was no gun after all, and (2) I thought the Second Amendment says we're allowed to carry handguns. What's the fear?

BamaD -> RE: handgun scare at Trump event (11/6/2016 12:03:36 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster In case you haven't heard: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/06/us/politics/donald-trump-rally.html?_r=0 Amusing because (1) there was no gun after all, and (2) I thought the Second Amendment says we're allowed to carry handguns. What's the fear? 1 There have already been 3 attacks on GOP campaign offices so it wasn't the least bit amusing. 2 Within the presence of the president or major Presidential candidates, the Secret Service is the controlling authority, it is their job to assume the worst. 3 Why do some people , when pro second people concur with what are reasonable restrictions, try to pretend that those people should be up in arms about it.

mnottertail -> RE: handgun scare at Trump event (11/6/2016 5:34:06 AM)
and the assumption of the nutsuckers and welfare patients are that guns are good. I don't quite see the reason for the stupidity here. What concurrence do the pro second people have to reasonable restrictions? if that were the case, they would be there. list out the reasonable restrictions the pro2 agree with, and tell us of the bills introduced that the LOLOLOLOL anti2 voted down.

WhoreMods -> RE: handgun scare at Trump event (11/6/2016 5:37:04 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster In case you haven't heard: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/06/us/politics/donald-trump-rally.html?_r=0 Amusing because (1) there was no gun after all, and (2) I thought the Second Amendment says we're allowed to carry handguns. What's the fear? 1 There have already been 3 attacks on GOP campaign offices so it wasn't the least bit amusing. 2 Within the presence of the president or major Presidential candidates, the Secret Service is the controlling authority, it is their job to assume the worst. 3 Why do some people , when pro second people concur with what are reasonable restrictions, try to pretend that those people should be up in arms about it. I might even feel sympathetic if he hadn't suggested that his cult should shoot Clinton a few months back.

multiskills -> RE: handgun scare at Trump event (11/6/2016 5:39:58 AM)
A staged event. I saw two different versions. One he was being surrounded and ussured out to his right, the cameras left and in another he was being surrounded and ussured out to his left our right. There were no cameras behind him on the stage so explain that one please?

WhoreMods -> RE: handgun scare at Trump event (11/6/2016 5:49:16 AM)
Maybe they started rushing him off to one side, realised that the door was over the other way, and rushed him to the other side of the stage instead? If they'd hadn't edited the clip and broken it into two segments then redubbed it, you'd have heard the swanee whistle sting played as ~~Laurel and Hardy~~ his bodyguards realised that they'd gone the wrong way at first...

hot4bondage -> RE: handgun scare at Trump event (11/6/2016 7:21:58 AM)
~FR~ Trump said, "Take him out." Reminds me of producer Bob Johnston talking about Johnny Cash playing at Folsom prison. quote: Bob Johnston: So he did that (song San Quentin) and it took quite a while, took a while to get that crowd built up like that, and what he said about that thing was "all the convicts were standing up on the tables. They were out of control during the second rehash of that song. All I would have had to do was say 'break,' and they were gone. Man, they were ready. I've got a book called Extraordinary Popular Delusion and the Madness of Crowds that I've studied for years, and I knew I had that prison audience where all I had to do was say 'take over' and they would have. Those guards knew it, too." And then listen to this, "I was tempted." (laughs) That's Johnny Cash.

angelikaJ -> RE: handgun scare at Trump event (11/6/2016 7:23:43 AM)
fr There was no gun.

WickedsDesire -> RE: handgun scare at Trump event (11/6/2016 8:12:41 AM)
As I said on another thread Call me ~~a mad olde loon with a cat problem~~ fuking cycnical, but i cant help wonder if that was staged to eek out another electoral point - and second time too I think they yelled out crucifix

Lordandmaster -> RE: handgun scare at Trump event (11/6/2016 8:28:00 AM)
All right, I'll call your bluff. What "reasonable restrictions" do you support? Think before you answer, because if you support any at all, you're probably going to find yourself unintentionally stating Hillary Clinton's position. quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD 3 Why do some people , when pro second people concur with what are reasonable restrictions, try to pretend that those people should be up in arms about it.

bondageerone -> RE: handgun scare at Trump event (11/6/2016 9:07:34 AM)
MAYBE THEY SHOUTED BUM. not gun.

kdsub -> RE: handgun scare at Trump event (11/6/2016 11:38:04 AM)
Now the Trump propaganda machine for guppies is calling it an assassination attempt by a Clinton undercover operative. Butch

Termyn8or -> RE: handgun scare at Trump event (11/6/2016 12:07:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail and the assumption of the nutsuckers and welfare patients are that guns are good. I don't quite see the reason for the stupidity here. What concurrence do the pro second people have to reasonable restrictions? if that were the case, they would be there. list out the reasonable restrictions the pro2 agree with, and tell us of the bills introduced that the LOLOLOLOL anti2 voted down. You're a fucking idiot. None of us say that people convicted of a violent crime should be allowed a gun. The NRA doesn't say that, unlike the ultrasickeing liberal bullshitters. Nobody wants crazy people to have guns, but you can't deny them knives and hammers n shit. What's more, you buy guns alll the time. You want others to give up their guns based on what you say but keep yours ? After your inane postings on here I think you should not be allowed a gun. T^T

Termyn8or -> RE: handgun scare at Trump event (11/6/2016 12:10:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kdsub Now the Trump propaganda machine for guppies is calling it an assassination attempt by a Clinton undercover operative. Butch Where ? T^T

kdsub -> RE: handgun scare at Trump event (11/6/2016 1:11:35 PM)
I'm not by my computer but check out the Jack Trapper and Conway interview on CNN. Just be sure it is the full interview.

mnottertail -> RE: handgun scare at Trump event (11/6/2016 1:47:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Termyn8or quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail and the assumption of the nutsuckers and welfare patients are that guns are good. I don't quite see the reason for the stupidity here. What concurrence do the pro second people have to reasonable restrictions? if that were the case, they would be there. list out the reasonable restrictions the pro2 agree with, and tell us of the bills introduced that the LOLOLOLOL anti2 voted down. You're a fucking idiot. None of us say that people convicted of a violent crime should be allowed a gun. The NRA doesn't say that, unlike the ultrasickeing liberal bullshitters. Nobody wants crazy people to have guns, but you can't deny them knives and hammers n shit. What's more, you buy guns alll the time. You want others to give up their guns based on what you say but keep yours ? After your inane postings on here I think you should not be allowed a gun. T^T you are a fucking retard. You spew your stupid shit, you aint been right yet, of course they do, fuckwhistle: http://www.vpc.org/studies/felons.htm further, the denial of gunrights to violent felons was not under discussion, what is, and not your toiletlicking is a list of restrictions that the prodeathbygun people want and support, you got one? I have been here quite a while and know you cannot own a gun based upon your posts. You are a mental defective.

BamaD -> RE: handgun scare at Trump event (11/6/2016 4:56:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster In case you haven't heard: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/06/us/politics/donald-trump-rally.html?_r=0 Amusing because (1) there was no gun after all, and (2) I thought the Second Amendment says we're allowed to carry handguns. What's the fear? 1 There have already been 3 attacks on GOP campaign offices so it wasn't the least bit amusing. 2 Within the presence of the president or major Presidential candidates, the Secret Service is the controlling authority, it is their job to assume the worst. 3 Why do some people , when pro second people concur with what are reasonable restrictions, try to pretend that those people should be up in arms about it. I might even feel sympathetic if he hadn't suggested that his cult should shoot Clinton a few months back. To bad that isn't what he said.

BamaD -> RE: handgun scare at Trump event (11/6/2016 6:12:13 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster All right, I'll call your bluff. What "reasonable restrictions" do you support? Think before you answer, because if you support any at all, you're probably going to find yourself unintentionally stating Hillary Clinton's position. quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD 3 Why do some people , when pro second people concur with what are reasonable restrictions, try to pretend that those people should be up in arms about it. I am sure that Hillary agrees with everything I agree with. I don't want a national gun registry which would be needed with her universal background checks. I don't want people denied their rights based on rumor and innuendo which is what using the no fly list is. I don't want a Australian style buyback like she does, that isn't a buyback it is confiscation with some compensation. Get the idea? Her aim is to stop guns, mine is to stop crime. I want all information checked on to current background check to be mandatory for the states to enter, she wants part of it left out. I want gun laws to be aimed at the criminals, she wants them aimed at the rest of us, she believes in trickle down crime control, if you stick it to the honest people enough eventually it will affect the criminals, and even if it doesn't the government more control over the people and, to that is all the reason you need.

mnottertail -> RE: handgun scare at Trump event (11/6/2016 6:18:11 PM)
you are contradicting yourself, and you will have to pay to have the states enter that information, and keep it up, and that is part of universal background checks. Its the mandate now, but nobody is paying for it. the laws are aimed at the criminals, but that is not stopping them without teeth. You have told us what you dont want, but not what the proguns are for in reasonable requirements.

Lordandmaster -> RE: handgun scare at Trump event (11/6/2016 7:41:19 PM)
That's not even true, but since you didn't bother to state what restrictions on handgun ownership you'd support, I'll assume you don't really want to have this conversation. quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD Her aim is to stop guns

Page: [1] 2 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875