RE: Would you declare martial law?

RE: Would you declare martial law? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

[Poll]

Would you declare martial law?

Absolutely! The bankrupt creature is a fuking insane wreck

54% (6)

Absolutely not! All hail our dark overlord Hail! Hail!

27% (3)

Obama will

18% (2)

Total Votes : 11

(last vote on : 11/9/2016 2:47:55 PM)
(Poll will run till: -- )

Message

Greta75 -> RE: Would you declare martial law? (11/9/2016 9:20:31 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker Trump is promiscuous. So you using the word on a man you despise and denying it's a slur.

heavyblinker -> RE: Would you declare martial law? (11/9/2016 9:26:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker Trump is promiscuous. So you using the word on a man you despise and denying it's a slur. Not that this was such an awesome thread to begin with, but I don't think this discussion is really helping it become any more interesting. I honestly didn't mean to offend you... but I think you probably get enough criticisms to make you touchy about the issue so I should have been more sensitive. But I promise it's the most neutral adjective out there for describing people who have a lot of sex partners. Here is a wikipedia article that can help you to understand the word better: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Promiscuity

missseekingrl -> RE: Would you declare martial law? (11/9/2016 9:29:05 AM)
who are y ou kidding Obama has no respect for our constitution

Greta75 -> RE: Would you declare martial law? (11/9/2016 9:44:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker But I promise it's the most neutral adjective out there for describing people who have a lot of sex partners. Here is a wikipedia article that can help you to understand the word better: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Promiscuity It is not a neutral word. It is never used in a neutral way ever. And the way you were using it was not on neutral term at all. And end of the day, it is a personal attack that has absolutely zero to do with the topic at hand. You would never ever attack a man's sexuality for having loads of consensual sex, that's for sure, in a political debate. You wouldn't use that against him. So own up to it. Men who keeps attacking women for their sexuality is just blatantly fucking wrong especially when it's to "win" a political argument that has zero to do with sex. And yes, I will keep calling it out, because this is fucking ridiculous! One thing needs to change in this world is for people to start seeing women who enjoys sex for sex as not a crime or a undesirable. So that women can actually stop repressing themselves from enjoying sex. Because in my country, women are even afraid to show that she likes sex with her own husband worrying her own husband thinks she's a slut. And that is still the reality of things around here.

heavyblinker -> RE: Would you declare martial law? (11/9/2016 9:52:31 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 It is not a neutral word. It is never used in a neutral way ever. And the way you were using it was not on neutral term at all. And end of the day, it is a personal attack that has absolutely zero to do with the topic at hand. You would never ever attack a man's sexuality for having loads of consensual sex, that's for sure, in a political debate. You wouldn't use that against him. So own up to it. You've said this already. I can't change the meaning of the word for you... sorry. And obviously I haven't used it to win anything because I can't even remember what we were talking about before... was it how handsome and righteous Trump is?

smartsub10 -> RE: Would you declare martial law? (11/9/2016 9:57:17 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker Greta, you need to stop. I really can't imagine that anyone is even reading your posts anymore. I agree. Greta doesn't have clue one what's she talking about.

WickedsDesire -> RE: Would you declare martial law? (11/9/2016 10:05:25 AM)
You will do know such thing tomorrow american man creature who calls itself greta75

Greta75 -> RE: Would you declare martial law? (11/9/2016 10:07:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire You will do know such thing tomorrow american man creature who calls itself greta75 I will and I am gonna write, "Wicked is a wrong cunt with a microscopic cock" on it! With Singapore as a background. Just thinking of what view should I show you.

susie -> RE: Would you declare martial law? (11/9/2016 12:17:47 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 I read an article today talking about what Peter Thiel said about Trump and I think Thiel gets it. I am paraphrasing. He said that, when Trump says something, the media take it literally. And they would question him like, "How would you build a wall?" "How would you deport Illegals?" Too literally. But when voters hear Trump say these things, they hear, "I hear you and I am gonna do something to fix your concerns." It's that simple. Voters just want somebody who is gonna do something and not just talk talk talk and then later, not keep her promises. Hillary has a bad track record of breaking promises during her Senate run already. So when Dump said he would build a wall he didn't really mean it? When he said he was going to deport illegals he didn't really mean it? Got it now. He says things he doesn't mean.

UllrsIshtar -> RE: Would you declare martial law? (11/9/2016 12:40:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: susie quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 I read an article today talking about what Peter Thiel said about Trump and I think Thiel gets it. I am paraphrasing. He said that, when Trump says something, the media take it literally. And they would question him like, "How would you build a wall?" "How would you deport Illegals?" Too literally. But when voters hear Trump say these things, they hear, "I hear you and I am gonna do something to fix your concerns." It's that simple. Voters just want somebody who is gonna do something and not just talk talk talk and then later, not keep her promises. Hillary has a bad track record of breaking promises during her Senate run already. So when Dump said he would build a wall he didn't really mean it? When he said he was going to deport illegals he didn't really mean it? Got it now. He says things he doesn't mean. Well, when Obama was asked in an interview about the campaign promises he broke, he answered that those promises were "rhetorical". And that's not to harp on Obama, that's just pretty much the case for all campaign promises any candidate ever makes. If you're really dumb enough to believe that any candidate -including Clinton had she been elected- is going to keep their campaign promises, you pretty much should leave voting to those who actually understand that it's a circus of lies they're taking part in...

thishereboi -> RE: Would you declare martial law? (11/9/2016 12:59:57 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: smartsub10 quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker Greta, you need to stop. I really can't imagine that anyone is even reading your posts anymore. I agree. Greta doesn't have clue one what's she talking about. Really, cause she kept saying Trump would win and a lot of folks told her she didn't have a clue and apparently she did.

tamaka -> RE: Would you declare martial law? (11/9/2016 1:19:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: susie quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 I read an article today talking about what Peter Thiel said about Trump and I think Thiel gets it. I am paraphrasing. He said that, when Trump says something, the media take it literally. And they would question him like, "How would you build a wall?" "How would you deport Illegals?" Too literally. But when voters hear Trump say these things, they hear, "I hear you and I am gonna do something to fix your concerns." It's that simple. Voters just want somebody who is gonna do something and not just talk talk talk and then later, not keep her promises. Hillary has a bad track record of breaking promises during her Senate run already. So when Dump said he would build a wall he didn't really mean it? When he said he was going to deport illegals he didn't really mean it? Got it now. He says things he doesn't mean. I don't agree with that. I think people believe what he says... literally.

WhoreMods -> RE: Would you declare martial law? (11/9/2016 1:22:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 It is not a neutral word. It is never used in a neutral way ever. And the way you were using it was not on neutral term at all. And end of the day, it is a personal attack that has absolutely zero to do with the topic at hand. Sorry but, it's a lot more neutral than most other terms used to describe the sexually overactive. There's some slant there, but that's a more a cultural thing than implicit in the language. Now if hb had called you a slut, a slag, a skank, a whore, a cumbucket, a jizzjar, or somesuch, that would have been a personal attack.

subrob1967 -> RE: Would you declare martial law? (11/9/2016 1:24:38 PM)
FR IF President Lame Duck Obama declared Martial Law, who the fuck would listen to him?

mnottertail -> RE: Would you declare martial law? (11/9/2016 1:40:13 PM)
More than will listen to donald when he declares it.

tamaka -> RE: Would you declare martial law? (11/9/2016 1:59:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 It is not a neutral word. It is never used in a neutral way ever. And the way you were using it was not on neutral term at all. And end of the day, it is a personal attack that has absolutely zero to do with the topic at hand. Sorry but, it's a lot more neutral than most other terms used to describe the sexually overactive. There's some slant there, but that's a more a cultural thing than implicit in the language. Now if hb had called you a slut, a slag, a skank, a whore, a cumbucket, a jizzjar, or somesuch, that would have been a personal attack. Overactive? What's the threshold for determining that?

WhoreMods -> RE: Would you declare martial law? (11/9/2016 2:48:50 PM)
You tell me: that's what Greta's pissing and moaning about, isn't it?

MrRodgers -> RE: Would you declare martial law? (11/9/2016 2:52:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JVoV President Obama has far too much respect for our Constitution to enact Marshall law to maintain power. My money's on a military coup. Now that would be exciting.

MrRodgers -> RE: Would you declare martial law? (11/9/2016 3:15:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: heavyblinker quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi Touched a nerve? Or are you one of those who believes in free speech but only if they say something you agree with? Or maybe you are just so butt hurt over the election you can't help your self. But here's a thought for everyone on the left, next time tell us how good your candidate is instead of telling people they are ignorant racist homophobes and perhaps they will vote for your guy. Oh look a free speech argument. I was commenting on how all of Greta's posts are essentially identical at this point. Islam and Hillary are bad, Trump is an inspiration to us all, not because of his policies, but because he has 'common sense' and 'tells it like it is'. I don't have any power to stop her from going on and on like that, so it doesn't have anything to do with free speech. And wait... are you saying that the right had nothing bad to say about Hillary? You're so upset about how mean the left was that I guess you forgot about all of the attacks on Bill, the email scandal that wasn't even a real scandal, etc. But the thing is, all of those anti-Trump ads mostly showed Trump making himself look ignorant, racist, homophobic, etc... that was sort of the point. But nobody cared... because name-calling and personal attacks ultimately don't work. People only care about themselves. I think the election mostly came down to Trump's incredibly stupid platform, which stood out as different as opposed to Hillary's 'more of the same'. What they don't realize is that Trump's platform is WORSE than more of the same. The bottom line is that it was the worst election I have ever seen and both sides were incredibly horrible... I don't think anyone should feel good about a Trump victory. I wouldn't feel great about a Hillary victory, but I would definitely feel safer knowing that things would keep plugging along... but maybe that's just because I'm doing alright for myself (and so is everyone I know) and I don't like the idea of rocking the boat over some stupid conspiracy theories about bankers and NWO and global elites who want to enslave everyone. Well the facts are, it's their boat and if its rocking it needs...it will be rocked. But to the extent that any such conspiracy might exist, neither of these two were (and no other) president would, get in the way, proven by the fact that as I written several times, Obama didn't get in the way and continued the so-called elitist or globalist polices necessary but at a pace to keep the masses at bay and obviously...in the dark. No bankers were even investigated, they all kept and and even gained more wealth. Equities are doing just fine. (more wealth) An insatiable market still exists for US debt. The drone war (war on terror) continues unabated. America is on track for all future hegemony. "Yes we can ?" No we can't. "Make America great again ?" It's 'great' enough now for...all of the above. There will be no martial law...yet. That's an unnecessary acceleration of events. Maybe the North American Union and the elimination of the dollar will do it...who knows ? But right now and for the foreseeable future, the dollar as expected, still rules and all of those holding them...know it and will continue to hold them. Even countries that don't follow along now with every policy nuance, know what the future holds and are willing partners.

MrRodgers -> RE: Would you declare martial law? (11/9/2016 3:18:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer quote: I think that Hillary lost because she was seen as 'more of the same', whereas Trump was 'something different'. I agree - that's it, in a nutshell. I see a theme emerging both sides of the pond, now: 'establishment' losing to (what looks like) 'anti-establishment'. Whether that anti-establishment force is right wing or left wing, though ... that's another matter. .....and it will not change a thing except the wealthy get wealthier and poor get poorer. There will be war and the rest is conversation.

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 [4] 5 next > >>

Spam Policy

0.046875