Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Would you declare martial law?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Would you declare martial law? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
[Poll]

Would you declare martial law?


Absolutely! The bankrupt creature is a fuking insane wreck
  54% (6)
Absolutely not! All hail our dark overlord Hail! Hail!
  27% (3)
Obama will
  18% (2)


Total Votes : 11


(last vote on : 11/9/2016 2:47:55 PM)
(Poll will run till: -- )
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Would you declare martial law? - 11/9/2016 9:20:31 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker
Trump is promiscuous.

So you using the word on a man you despise and denying it's a slur.

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Would you declare martial law? - 11/9/2016 9:26:48 AM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker
Trump is promiscuous.

So you using the word on a man you despise and denying it's a slur.


Not that this was such an awesome thread to begin with, but I don't think this discussion is really helping it become any more interesting.

I honestly didn't mean to offend you... but I think you probably get enough criticisms to make you touchy about the issue so I should have been more sensitive.

But I promise it's the most neutral adjective out there for describing people who have a lot of sex partners. Here is a wikipedia article that can help you to understand the word better:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Promiscuity

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Would you declare martial law? - 11/9/2016 9:29:05 AM   
missseekingrl


Posts: 1
Joined: 3/24/2016
Status: offline
who are y ou kidding Obama has no respect for our constitution

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Would you declare martial law? - 11/9/2016 9:44:32 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker
But I promise it's the most neutral adjective out there for describing people who have a lot of sex partners. Here is a wikipedia article that can help you to understand the word better:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Promiscuity

It is not a neutral word. It is never used in a neutral way ever. And the way you were using it was not on neutral term at all.
And end of the day, it is a personal attack that has absolutely zero to do with the topic at hand.

You would never ever attack a man's sexuality for having loads of consensual sex, that's for sure, in a political debate. You wouldn't use that against him.

So own up to it.

Men who keeps attacking women for their sexuality is just blatantly fucking wrong especially when it's to "win" a political argument that has zero to do with sex.

And yes, I will keep calling it out, because this is fucking ridiculous!

One thing needs to change in this world is for people to start seeing women who enjoys sex for sex as not a crime or a undesirable. So that women can actually stop repressing themselves from enjoying sex.

Because in my country, women are even afraid to show that she likes sex with her own husband worrying her own husband thinks she's a slut. And that is still the reality of things around here.





< Message edited by Greta75 -- 11/9/2016 9:49:32 AM >

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Would you declare martial law? - 11/9/2016 9:52:31 AM   
heavyblinker


Posts: 3623
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
It is not a neutral word. It is never used in a neutral way ever. And the way you were using it was not on neutral term at all.
And end of the day, it is a personal attack that has absolutely zero to do with the topic at hand.

You would never ever attack a man's sexuality for having loads of consensual sex, that's for sure, in a political debate. You wouldn't use that against him.

So own up to it.


You've said this already.
I can't change the meaning of the word for you... sorry.

And obviously I haven't used it to win anything because I can't even remember what we were talking about before... was it how handsome and righteous Trump is?

< Message edited by heavyblinker -- 11/9/2016 9:53:30 AM >

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Would you declare martial law? - 11/9/2016 9:57:17 AM   
smartsub10


Posts: 865
Joined: 4/23/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

Greta, you need to stop.
I really can't imagine that anyone is even reading your posts anymore.



I agree. Greta doesn't have clue one what's she talking about.

_____________________________

Beauty fades...stupid is forever
~ Judge Judith Scheindlin
____________________________________________

“Be that self which one truly is" ~Soren Kierkegaard

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Would you declare martial law? - 11/9/2016 10:05:25 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
You will do know such thing tomorrow american man creature who calls itself greta75

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Would you declare martial law? - 11/9/2016 10:07:48 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

You will do know such thing tomorrow american man creature who calls itself greta75


I will and I am gonna write, "Wicked is a wrong cunt with a microscopic cock" on it! With Singapore as a background. Just thinking of what view should I show you.


(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Would you declare martial law? - 11/9/2016 12:17:47 PM   
susie


Posts: 1699
Joined: 11/21/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

I read an article today talking about what Peter Thiel said about Trump and I think Thiel gets it. I am paraphrasing.

He said that, when Trump says something, the media take it literally. And they would question him like, "How would you build a wall?" "How would you deport Illegals?" Too literally.

But when voters hear Trump say these things, they hear, "I hear you and I am gonna do something to fix your concerns."

It's that simple. Voters just want somebody who is gonna do something and not just talk talk talk and then later, not keep her promises. Hillary has a bad track record of breaking promises during her Senate run already.


So when Dump said he would build a wall he didn't really mean it?
When he said he was going to deport illegals he didn't really mean it?

Got it now. He says things he doesn't mean.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Would you declare martial law? - 11/9/2016 12:40:34 PM   
UllrsIshtar


Posts: 3693
Joined: 7/28/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: susie


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

I read an article today talking about what Peter Thiel said about Trump and I think Thiel gets it. I am paraphrasing.

He said that, when Trump says something, the media take it literally. And they would question him like, "How would you build a wall?" "How would you deport Illegals?" Too literally.

But when voters hear Trump say these things, they hear, "I hear you and I am gonna do something to fix your concerns."

It's that simple. Voters just want somebody who is gonna do something and not just talk talk talk and then later, not keep her promises. Hillary has a bad track record of breaking promises during her Senate run already.


So when Dump said he would build a wall he didn't really mean it?
When he said he was going to deport illegals he didn't really mean it?

Got it now. He says things he doesn't mean.


Well, when Obama was asked in an interview about the campaign promises he broke, he answered that those promises were "rhetorical".

And that's not to harp on Obama, that's just pretty much the case for all campaign promises any candidate ever makes.

If you're really dumb enough to believe that any candidate -including Clinton had she been elected- is going to keep their campaign promises, you pretty much should leave voting to those who actually understand that it's a circus of lies they're taking part in...




< Message edited by UllrsIshtar -- 11/9/2016 12:41:45 PM >


_____________________________

I can be your whore
I am the dirt you created
I am your sinner
And your whore
But let me tell you something baby
You love me for everything you hate me for

(in reply to susie)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Would you declare martial law? - 11/9/2016 12:59:57 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: smartsub10


quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

Greta, you need to stop.
I really can't imagine that anyone is even reading your posts anymore.



I agree. Greta doesn't have clue one what's she talking about.



Really, cause she kept saying Trump would win and a lot of folks told her she didn't have a clue and apparently she did.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to smartsub10)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Would you declare martial law? - 11/9/2016 1:19:55 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: susie


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

I read an article today talking about what Peter Thiel said about Trump and I think Thiel gets it. I am paraphrasing.

He said that, when Trump says something, the media take it literally. And they would question him like, "How would you build a wall?" "How would you deport Illegals?" Too literally.

But when voters hear Trump say these things, they hear, "I hear you and I am gonna do something to fix your concerns."

It's that simple. Voters just want somebody who is gonna do something and not just talk talk talk and then later, not keep her promises. Hillary has a bad track record of breaking promises during her Senate run already.


So when Dump said he would build a wall he didn't really mean it?
When he said he was going to deport illegals he didn't really mean it?

Got it now. He says things he doesn't mean.


I don't agree with that. I think people believe what he says... literally.

(in reply to susie)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Would you declare martial law? - 11/9/2016 1:22:00 PM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
It is not a neutral word. It is never used in a neutral way ever. And the way you were using it was not on neutral term at all.
And end of the day, it is a personal attack that has absolutely zero to do with the topic at hand.

Sorry but, it's a lot more neutral than most other terms used to describe the sexually overactive. There's some slant there, but that's a more a cultural thing than implicit in the language.
Now if hb had called you a slut, a slag, a skank, a whore, a cumbucket, a jizzjar, or somesuch, that would have been a personal attack.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Would you declare martial law? - 11/9/2016 1:24:38 PM   
subrob1967


Posts: 4591
Joined: 9/13/2004
Status: offline
FR

IF President Lame Duck Obama declared Martial Law, who the fuck would listen to him?

_____________________________

http://www.extra-life.org/

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Would you declare martial law? - 11/9/2016 1:40:13 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
More than will listen to donald when he declares it.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to subrob1967)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Would you declare martial law? - 11/9/2016 1:59:30 PM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
It is not a neutral word. It is never used in a neutral way ever. And the way you were using it was not on neutral term at all.
And end of the day, it is a personal attack that has absolutely zero to do with the topic at hand.

Sorry but, it's a lot more neutral than most other terms used to describe the sexually overactive. There's some slant there, but that's a more a cultural thing than implicit in the language.
Now if hb had called you a slut, a slag, a skank, a whore, a cumbucket, a jizzjar, or somesuch, that would have been a personal attack.


Overactive? What's the threshold for determining that?

(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Would you declare martial law? - 11/9/2016 2:48:50 PM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline
You tell me: that's what Greta's pissing and moaning about, isn't it?

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Would you declare martial law? - 11/9/2016 2:52:55 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

President Obama has far too much respect for our Constitution to enact Marshall law to maintain power. My money's on a military coup.

Now that would be exciting.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to JVoV)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Would you declare martial law? - 11/9/2016 3:15:53 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

Touched a nerve? Or are you one of those who believes in free speech but only if they say something you agree with? Or maybe you are just so butt hurt over the election you can't help your self.

But here's a thought for everyone on the left, next time tell us how good your candidate is instead of telling people they are ignorant racist homophobes and perhaps they will vote for your guy.


Oh look a free speech argument.

I was commenting on how all of Greta's posts are essentially identical at this point. Islam and Hillary are bad, Trump is an inspiration to us all, not because of his policies, but because he has 'common sense' and 'tells it like it is'. I don't have any power to stop her from going on and on like that, so it doesn't have anything to do with free speech.

And wait... are you saying that the right had nothing bad to say about Hillary? You're so upset about how mean the left was that I guess you forgot about all of the attacks on Bill, the email scandal that wasn't even a real scandal, etc. But the thing is, all of those anti-Trump ads mostly showed Trump making himself look ignorant, racist, homophobic, etc... that was sort of the point. But nobody cared... because name-calling and personal attacks ultimately don't work. People only care about themselves.

I think the election mostly came down to Trump's incredibly stupid platform, which stood out as different as opposed to Hillary's 'more of the same'. What they don't realize is that Trump's platform is WORSE than more of the same.

The bottom line is that it was the worst election I have ever seen and both sides were incredibly horrible... I don't think anyone should feel good about a Trump victory. I wouldn't feel great about a Hillary victory, but I would definitely feel safer knowing that things would keep plugging along... but maybe that's just because I'm doing alright for myself (and so is everyone I know) and I don't like the idea of rocking the boat over some stupid conspiracy theories about bankers and NWO and global elites who want to enslave everyone.

Well the facts are, it's their boat and if its rocking it needs...it will be rocked.

But to the extent that any such conspiracy might exist, neither of these two were (and no other) president would, get in the way, proven by the fact that as I written several times, Obama didn't get in the way and continued the so-called elitist or globalist polices necessary but at a pace to keep the masses at bay and obviously...in the dark.

No bankers were even investigated, they all kept and and even gained more wealth. Equities are doing just fine. (more wealth) An insatiable market still exists for US debt. The drone war (war on terror) continues unabated. America is on track for all future hegemony.

"Yes we can ?" No we can't. "Make America great again ?" It's 'great' enough now for...all of the above. There will be no martial law...yet. That's an unnecessary acceleration of events. Maybe the North American Union and the elimination of the dollar will do it...who knows ?

But right now and for the foreseeable future, the dollar as expected, still rules and all of those holding them...know it and will continue to hold them. Even countries that don't follow along now with every policy nuance, know what the future holds and are willing partners.



_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to heavyblinker)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Would you declare martial law? - 11/9/2016 3:18:03 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

I think that Hillary lost because she was seen as 'more of the same', whereas Trump was 'something different'.


I agree - that's it, in a nutshell. I see a theme emerging both sides of the pond, now: 'establishment' losing to (what looks like) 'anti-establishment'. Whether that anti-establishment force is right wing or left wing, though ... that's another matter.

.....and it will not change a thing except the wealthy get wealthier and poor get poorer. There will be war and the rest is conversation.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Would you declare martial law? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094