RE: Obama Cements His "Legacy" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


MrRodgers -> RE: Obama Cements His "Legacy" (11/11/2016 11:14:44 AM)

Here's an idea. Could always ask Bush I. He's the reigning expert on presidential pardons having pardoned 14 from the Reagan admin. that either were indicted or about to be indicted for Iran/Contra et al.

Cannot escape history, when it comes to presidential pardons, the repubs are the real experts. (pros) That's 'their' legacy.





Lucylastic -> RE: Obama Cements His "Legacy" (11/11/2016 11:15:21 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

just another wankers dream,

Never an idea, always a snide comment.

LMAO projecting again slime?




Nnanji -> RE: Obama Cements His "Legacy" (11/11/2016 11:40:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

just another wankers dream,

Never an idea, always a snide comment.

LMAO projecting again slime?

You're so funny. Always true to form. Of course, it's a little form, but you're there always.




RottenJohnny -> RE: Obama Cements His "Legacy" (11/11/2016 11:45:39 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
Here's an idea. Could always ask Bush I. He's the reigning expert on presidential pardons having pardoned 14 from the Reagan admin. that either were indicted or about to be indicted for Iran/Contra et al.

Cannot escape history, when it comes to presidential pardons, the repubs are the real experts. (pros) That's 'their' legacy.

What a bunch of crap. Numerous presidents have pardoned thousands of people. According to this site, FDR and Truman apparently pardoned over 5,000 themselves.

http://www.infoplease.com/us/government/presidential-pardons-1789-present.html




Nnanji -> RE: Obama Cements His "Legacy" (11/11/2016 12:39:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
Here's an idea. Could always ask Bush I. He's the reigning expert on presidential pardons having pardoned 14 from the Reagan admin. that either were indicted or about to be indicted for Iran/Contra et al.

Cannot escape history, when it comes to presidential pardons, the repubs are the real experts. (pros) That's 'their' legacy.

What a bunch of crap. Numerous presidents have pardoned thousands of people. According to this site, FDR and Truman apparently pardoned over 5,000 themselves.

http://www.infoplease.com/us/government/presidential-pardons-1789-present.html

Wait, you're just now figuring out he's full of crap?




DaddySatyr -> RE: Obama Cements His "Legacy" (11/11/2016 1:47:26 PM)


Hmmmm ... That's weird. "Impeach" at that level usually equates to: "Indict". Which would be a formal charge.

Also a bit interesting is: Your Website.

quote:

Early in 1974, the cover-up began to fall apart. On March 1, a grand jury appointed by a new special prosecutor indicted seven of Nixon’s former aides on various charges related to the Watergate affair. The jury, unsure if they could indict a sitting president, called Nixon an “unindicted co-conspirator.”

In July, the Supreme Court ordered Nixon to turn over the tapes. While the president dragged his feet, the House of Representatives voted to impeach him for obstruction of justice, abuse of power, criminal cover-up and several violations of the Constitution. Finally, on August 5, Nixon released the tapes, which provided undeniable evidence of his complicity in the Watergate crimes. In the face of certain impeachment by the Senate, the president resigned on August 8.



While I LOVE the History Channel, I have to question the validity of this article since the entire population over 50 years old knows that only two presidents (Jackson and Clinton) have ever been impeached.


quote:

Now, THEREFORE, I, GERALD R. FORD, President of the United States, pursuant to the pardon power conferred upon me by Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, have granted and by these presents do grant a full, free, and absolute pardon unto Richard Nixon for all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 20, 1969 through August 9, 1974.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighth day of September, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and seventy-four, and of the Independence of the United States of America the one hundred and ninety-ninth.

GERALD R. FORD


Yep. He was only pardoned for (your claim) one crime, but on another part of their site, History claims that he was "charged" with at least three different crimes (and some that go un-named). They can't seem to make up their minds.

That said, Ford's pardon clearly says that there were "pending" issues at the time of the pardon which the pardon covers(/ed).



Michael




DaddySatyr -> RE: Obama Cements His "Legacy" (11/11/2016 1:59:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny

Then I expect two different scenarios could occur.

1) Trump removes Comey as soon as he's in office and pursues indictment, or

2) He drops it altogether.

I don't see an alternative for a third choice.



Comey has a ten-year term from which he can't be fired to avoid the politicizing of his position. I believe he's done with that term in 2018.

If the Statute of limitations doesn't expire by then, a new FBI chief could move things forward.

Now ... Loretta Lynch does NOT enjoy such parameters to her job. The new AG would be Comey's boss and would be completely justified calling ol' Jim boy up and saying: "Let me look at all the materials for the Clinton Scam". Remember: Lynch had to leave the decision to prosecute or not to Comey only because she and Slick Willy got caught making a back-room deal on an airport tarmac.

In the normal course of things, the FBI investigates and turns over their evidence/notes to prosecutors. Lynch is the boss of the prosecutors (as well as Comey).

It is VERY possible that Obummer may "have to" pardon the she cunt.



Michael




DaddySatyr -> RE: Obama Cements His "Legacy" (11/11/2016 2:03:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny

I'm sure Obama will issue a pardon if the FBI brings charges. But he's going to want to make sure that the FBI's case is as fully investigated as possible so that his pardon covers everything the Clintons can be charged with. He'll use the DOJ to delay the charges until the last possible moment then pardon them for everything as he's leaving the White House.




quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny

I'm sure Obama will issue a pardon if the FBI brings charges. But he's going to want to make sure that the FBI's case is as fully investigated as possible so that his pardon covers everything the Clintons can be charged with. He'll use the DOJ to delay the charges until the last possible moment then pardon them for everything as he's leaving the White House.



Please see my post #26 as far as a "blanket" pardon.



Michael




Real0ne -> RE: Obama Cements His "Legacy" (11/11/2016 2:04:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

to avoid the politicizing of his position.

Michael



or so it was set up to 'appear', he is very damaged goods




Musicmystery -> RE: Obama Cements His "Legacy" (11/11/2016 3:09:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


Hmmmm ... That's weird. "Impeach" at that level usually equates to: "Indict". Which would be a formal charge.

Also a bit interesting is: Your Website.

quote:

Early in 1974, the cover-up began to fall apart. On March 1, a grand jury appointed by a new special prosecutor indicted seven of Nixon’s former aides on various charges related to the Watergate affair. The jury, unsure if they could indict a sitting president, called Nixon an “unindicted co-conspirator.”

In July, the Supreme Court ordered Nixon to turn over the tapes. While the president dragged his feet, the House of Representatives voted to impeach him for obstruction of justice, abuse of power, criminal cover-up and several violations of the Constitution. Finally, on August 5, Nixon released the tapes, which provided undeniable evidence of his complicity in the Watergate crimes. In the face of certain impeachment by the Senate, the president resigned on August 8.



While I LOVE the History Channel, I have to question the validity of this article since the entire population over 50 years old knows that only two presidents (Jackson and Clinton) have ever been impeached.


quote:

Now, THEREFORE, I, GERALD R. FORD, President of the United States, pursuant to the pardon power conferred upon me by Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, have granted and by these presents do grant a full, free, and absolute pardon unto Richard Nixon for all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 20, 1969 through August 9, 1974.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighth day of September, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and seventy-four, and of the Independence of the United States of America the one hundred and ninety-ninth.

GERALD R. FORD


Yep. He was only pardoned for (your claim) one crime, but on another part of their site, History claims that he was "charged" with at least three different crimes (and some that go un-named). They can't seem to make up their minds.

That said, Ford's pardon clearly says that there were "pending" issues at the time of the pardon which the pardon covers(/ed).



Michael


Spin it anyway you feel the need to.

The House passed articles of impeachment; the Senate never tried the case.

You might want to brush up on your History Channel watching skills.

No president has been convicted by the Senate thus far, but two have been found guilty by the House: Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton.




RottenJohnny -> RE: Obama Cements His "Legacy" (11/11/2016 5:05:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr
Comey has a ten-year term from which he can't be fired to avoid the politicizing of his position. I believe he's done with that term in 2018.

Comey was confirmed by the Senate on July 29, 2013.

In 2014 the Congressional Research Service wrote a report that said "there are no statutory conditions on the President’s authority to remove the FBI Director."

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41850.pdf
(Page 2 summary)




BamaD -> RE: Obama Cements His "Legacy" (11/11/2016 5:18:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


Hmmmm ... That's weird. "Impeach" at that level usually equates to: "Indict". Which would be a formal charge.

Also a bit interesting is: Your Website.

quote:

Early in 1974, the cover-up began to fall apart. On March 1, a grand jury appointed by a new special prosecutor indicted seven of Nixon’s former aides on various charges related to the Watergate affair. The jury, unsure if they could indict a sitting president, called Nixon an “unindicted co-conspirator.”

In July, the Supreme Court ordered Nixon to turn over the tapes. While the president dragged his feet, the House of Representatives voted to impeach him for obstruction of justice, abuse of power, criminal cover-up and several violations of the Constitution. Finally, on August 5, Nixon released the tapes, which provided undeniable evidence of his complicity in the Watergate crimes. In the face of certain impeachment by the Senate, the president resigned on August 8.



While I LOVE the History Channel, I have to question the validity of this article since the entire population over 50 years old knows that only two presidents (Jackson and Clinton) have ever been impeached.


quote:

Now, THEREFORE, I, GERALD R. FORD, President of the United States, pursuant to the pardon power conferred upon me by Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, have granted and by these presents do grant a full, free, and absolute pardon unto Richard Nixon for all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 20, 1969 through August 9, 1974.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighth day of September, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and seventy-four, and of the Independence of the United States of America the one hundred and ninety-ninth.

GERALD R. FORD


Yep. He was only pardoned for (your claim) one crime, but on another part of their site, History claims that he was "charged" with at least three different crimes (and some that go un-named). They can't seem to make up their minds.

That said, Ford's pardon clearly says that there were "pending" issues at the time of the pardon which the pardon covers(/ed).



Michael


Hate to correct you but the first president to be impeached was Andrew Johnson , not Andrew Jackson, I sure that was just a matter of your fingers getting ahead of your brain, happens to everyone sometime.




DaddySatyr -> RE: Obama Cements His "Legacy" (11/11/2016 6:56:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Hate to correct you but the first president to be impeached was Andrew Johnson , not Andrew Jackson, I sure that was just a matter of your fingers getting ahead of your brain, happens to everyone sometime.



You are correct, sir (on both counts; Johnson and my brain fart). I sit corrected (No one stands to type).



Michael




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Obama Cements His "Legacy" (11/11/2016 7:01:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

just another wankers dream,

Never an idea, always a snide comment.

Yeah, there's a lot of that around here.
I'm not immune to that myself. And I have noticed that you are not either.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Obama Cements His "Legacy" (11/11/2016 7:02:18 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery
The FBI has already said it will not bring charges.

Then I expect two different scenarios could occur.
1) Trump removes Comey as soon as he's in office and pursues indictment, or
2) He drops it altogether.

I don't see an alternative for a third choice.

in which case Obama will not be in a position to pardon anybody.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Obama Cements His "Legacy" (11/11/2016 7:04:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

Here's an idea. Could always ask Bush I. He's the reigning expert on presidential pardons having pardoned 14 from the Reagan admin. that either were indicted or about to be indicted for Iran/Contra et al.

Cannot escape history, when it comes to presidential pardons, the repubs are the real experts. (pros) That's 'their' legacy.



I see you have no knowledge of American history. How very surprising




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Obama Cements His "Legacy" (11/11/2016 7:07:25 PM)

quote:

The House passed articles of impeachment; the Senate never tried the case.

incorrect. The Senate did try the case, and acquitted him.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton#Acquittal_by_the_Senate




BamaD -> RE: Obama Cements His "Legacy" (11/11/2016 8:54:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


Hmmmm ... That's weird. "Impeach" at that level usually equates to: "Indict". Which would be a formal charge.

Also a bit interesting is: Your Website.

quote:

Early in 1974, the cover-up began to fall apart. On March 1, a grand jury appointed by a new special prosecutor indicted seven of Nixon’s former aides on various charges related to the Watergate affair. The jury, unsure if they could indict a sitting president, called Nixon an “unindicted co-conspirator.”

In July, the Supreme Court ordered Nixon to turn over the tapes. While the president dragged his feet, the House of Representatives voted to impeach him for obstruction of justice, abuse of power, criminal cover-up and several violations of the Constitution. Finally, on August 5, Nixon released the tapes, which provided undeniable evidence of his complicity in the Watergate crimes. In the face of certain impeachment by the Senate, the president resigned on August 8.



While I LOVE the History Channel, I have to question the validity of this article since the entire population over 50 years old knows that only two presidents (Jackson and Clinton) have ever been impeached.


quote:

Now, THEREFORE, I, GERALD R. FORD, President of the United States, pursuant to the pardon power conferred upon me by Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, have granted and by these presents do grant a full, free, and absolute pardon unto Richard Nixon for all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 20, 1969 through August 9, 1974.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighth day of September, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and seventy-four, and of the Independence of the United States of America the one hundred and ninety-ninth.

GERALD R. FORD


Yep. He was only pardoned for (your claim) one crime, but on another part of their site, History claims that he was "charged" with at least three different crimes (and some that go un-named). They can't seem to make up their minds.

That said, Ford's pardon clearly says that there were "pending" issues at the time of the pardon which the pardon covers(/ed).



Michael


Spin it anyway you feel the need to.

The House passed articles of impeachment; the Senate never tried the case.

You might want to brush up on your History Channel watching skills.

No president has been convicted by the Senate thus far, but two have been found guilty by the House: Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton.

The house corresponds to a grand jury, the do not proclaim guilt or innocence the Senate conducts the trial and yes they did try Bill Clinton.




MercTech -> RE: Obama Cements His "Legacy" (11/13/2016 12:04:08 AM)

Hmmmm, One of the obstructing justice counts against Nixon had to do with having a secretary erase tapes. Hillary's IT guy erased emails. Dang that sounds like the same type of cake with slightly different icing.




MrRodgers -> RE: Obama Cements His "Legacy" (11/13/2016 1:01:08 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers
Here's an idea. Could always ask Bush I. He's the reigning expert on presidential pardons having pardoned 14 from the Reagan admin. that either were indicted or about to be indicted for Iran/Contra et al.

Cannot escape history, when it comes to presidential pardons, the repubs are the real experts. (pros) That's 'their' legacy.

What a bunch of crap. Numerous presidents have pardoned thousands of people. According to this site, FDR and Truman apparently pardoned over 5,000 themselves.

http://www.infoplease.com/us/government/presidential-pardons-1789-present.html

Crap hey ?

How many of all those pardons were from the most recent previous admin., how many were of applied to people from the executive branch such as their own appointees and office holders and how many were of people that were charged with or about to be charged with crimes (mostly felonies) from that previous admin. ?

I suspect very few if any.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875