LadyDemura -> RE: Is CalExit viable (11/15/2016 11:50:42 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD Do you want it moved, or is it that any cut to the military is a good thing.? And BTW I was paying attention to this stuff since well before you were born. That land is just too valuable to be mostly unused. I can see that a small part of the beachfront might be useful for training for a battle in a similar beach, but why does it have to be that big? There's only a small portion of the California coastline that has water warm enough for it to be a tourist area, and most of it is mostly single family homes which isn't changing anytime soon. If was turned into a high rise beach condo and hotel area, it would bring in a lot of tax dollars. No, I don't want an untrained military, and I wouldn't think closing Camp Pendleton wouldn't really cut the military budget by much anyway. I was meaning megacity to be a continuous urban area from LA to SD, not necessarily a single city government. Resources are less of a problem than people make them out to be. If they just banned grass lawns in all of Southern California, there would be much less of a water problem. I'm not sure if it would be in a CalExit, though it seems like reservoirs should be built in the parts of the state where there is rain, and there would have to be even more conservation.
|
|
|
|