Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Voter ID in practice....


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Voter ID in practice.... Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Voter ID in practice.... - 11/19/2016 6:30:21 AM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline

Here's the news; I don't give a fuck what a distorted and highly disturbed mind such as yours believes or not.

In other news, neither does anyone else with more than half a brain.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Voter ID in practice.... - 11/19/2016 6:34:19 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird


Here's the news; I don't give a fuck what a distorted and highly disturbed mind such as yours believes or not.

In other news, neither does anyone else with more than half a brain.

Bye Bye

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Voter ID in practice.... - 11/19/2016 6:50:56 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird


Here's the news; I don't give a fuck what a distorted and highly disturbed mind such as yours believes or not.

In other news, neither does anyone else with more than half a brain.

Bye Bye

you were said good riddance to long ago, welfare patient, nobody hears you

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Voter ID in practice.... - 11/19/2016 6:53:34 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

bama, he's a malevolent creature just like vile critter parts and pretty much worthy of simply being ignored.

dogshit44 swoops in to energize the circlefelch, an ignorant fucker he is indeed, old shitgobbler44.

But we are not talking about your felching abilities nor your circlefelch coven, we are telling you that Voter ID is unconstitutional as it stands.

accept the facts, and move on. dont harass and riot and felchgobble

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Voter ID in practice.... - 11/19/2016 6:53:38 AM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
So yes, considering the intrusion upon anything like logical thought process imposed by recent two mental infants ...

Time to derail to better purpose.

I was all on regional N. Carolina folk/jazz stuff, but some in rural California were doing it as well or better, I have no issue in conceding.

Where's the money

Cowboy's Dream

Edit to add another:

Sure Beats Me

And another:

Not My Time to Go


< Message edited by Edwird -- 11/19/2016 7:12:17 AM >

(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Voter ID in practice.... - 11/19/2016 6:57:35 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

The 24th amendment precludes it at the state level as a requirement as well.


Persimmons and Pomegranates... not even as close as apples and oranges.

24th ammendment:

The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxxiv

Not a single word about requiring proof that the person showing up at the polls is actually the person registered to vote or how to do that.


Thats right and you can require any sort of free 'proof' you like, the operative word here being 'free' I would imagine even nutsuckers have some small understanding of that word. Unless taxation is 'free', then you are even stupider than anyone has ever believed, and they believe you are pretty fucking stupid, believe us all.

So, How about a publishers clearing house mailer? The walmart flyer from the mailbox? Yanno, without cost or payment to anyone who votes. Charge it to the people who dont vote. That would be fine. But once they vote, you have to refund that money, and you may not increase the government debt in the process, because somebody somewhere has to pay that at some time.

Fruits and vegetables is not your forte. Wholly inept.

When you say, "they believe you are pretty fucking stupid, believe us all". Who are they and us? You really only get one vote despite the multiple voices in your head.


its impossible to argue with someone who employs such tortured "logic."

you might just as well say, oh, since I have to transport myself to the polling station and that's associated with a cost, and I cant vote without getting there, its a poll tax!

material and equipment has to be used to create and accept ballots, and I cant vote without all that, its a poll tax!

the essence of a poll tax from which the 24th amendment sprang was in creating a economic burden/barrier for individuals vis-à-vis voting. issuing "free" voter ID cards whose cost is born by society at large, is not that. no effective barrier to voting or economic burden is created on any one individual person that inhibits them from voting.

further, given the left's repetitious history of cheating in elections, assuring the integrity of voting is worth the cost that's placed on society at large.

the argument that voter ID is an attempt to oppress the minority vote, especially in light of voter and election fraud, and in known cases where voter ID helps to increase turnout, and with minorities in favor of it, is liberal hokum.

(I predict this post will generate two "nutsuckers", at least one "felch" and any number of vile and extraneous insults)








You are the one with the tortured logic. You, as all you nutsuckers do, see no line between government and private citizenry.

But do give me the untortured logic of Voter ID and how it has no commerce with the amendment.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Voter ID in practice.... - 11/19/2016 7:24:52 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

bama, he's a malevolent creature just like vile critter parts and pretty much worthy of simply being ignored.

According to the profile it is a she and what I meant by bye bye was she was going on hide.
No point in wasting time on someone who seems to be taking lessons from the otter.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 11/19/2016 7:25:26 AM >


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Voter ID in practice.... - 11/19/2016 7:36:56 AM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline

Good gosh, if you're stupid enough to go with the template profile for people who don't fill out the form (and you're stupid 10 X that already), then you are stupid enough to admit that you got your fat ass kicked up and down the street by girls in your formative years.

No wonder.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Voter ID in practice.... - 11/19/2016 8:15:40 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

bama, he's a malevolent creature just like vile critter parts and pretty much worthy of simply being ignored.

According to the profile it is a she and what I meant by bye bye was she was going on hide.
No point in wasting time on someone who seems to be taking lessons from the otter.

I would imagine that is what welfare patients like you do, when you are not wiggling your little peener at the pizza boy from the porch. It aint like you are likely to have any factual interchange, being a nutsucker and a RIFboy.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Voter ID in practice.... - 11/19/2016 8:26:43 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
(Yes)

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Voter ID in practice.... - 11/19/2016 9:10:57 AM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
quote:

It is, I would imagine, embarrassing to be politicaliey on the same side as him.

I find it somewhat embarrassing to be of the same species as him.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to AQRMZ)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Voter ID in practice.... - 11/19/2016 9:23:01 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

lets see, I shared a little news of whats going on with the election in nc and you called me an idiot.

you shared a partisan opinion of the present governor that has no bearing whatsoever on voter/election fraud, which is what the post I had made was about.

tell me again who the idiot is?



Come on Bounty. Edweird is a little boy looking for recognition as a smart tough guy. He has no people skills. So he acts how he thinks smart tough guys act. He's actually afraid to leave the basement.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Voter ID in practice.... - 11/19/2016 9:24:49 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

interesting---I was likening him to vile critter parts too, with a little bit of joether thrown in.

Good point.

Concur.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Voter ID in practice.... - 11/19/2016 9:28:18 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

interesting---I was likening him to vile critter parts too, with a little bit of joether thrown in.

Good point.

Concur.

and with your cirlefelch coven, there aint nary a difference amongst you factless, imbecilic nutsuckers its one tongue in anothers ass daisychained and felchgobbling and that is the sum of it.


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Voter ID in practice.... - 11/19/2016 10:27:28 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
I thought the Americans didn't vote..they just dont have the intellect

was that you who said the first part of the second amendment, on an early post, swearyman, is all that inbred race care about? That's how i see it

< Message edited by WickedsDesire -- 11/19/2016 10:28:56 AM >

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Voter ID in practice.... - 11/20/2016 7:51:57 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

The 24th amendment precludes it at the state level as a requirement as well.


"High Court Upholds Indiana Law On Voter ID"

quote:

The Supreme Court ruled yesterday (this is from 2008) that states may require voters to present photo identification before casting ballots...

The court ruled 6 to 3 that the requirements enacted by Indiana's legislature were not enough of a burden to violate the Constitution. Because the law, which requires specific government-issued identification such as driver's licenses or passports, is generally regarded as the nation's strictest such measure, the ruling bodes well for other states that require photo ID and for states that are considering doing so...

Stevens said that called for a "unique balancing analysis" on the part of the court. Because the state's intent is legitimate, he said, the challengers "bear a heavy burden of persuasion, and one not met by the evidence in the case."

Stevens noted that it is "fair" to infer that "partisan considerations may have played a significant role" in Indiana's decision to pass the law.

"But if a nondiscriminatory law is supported by valid neutral justifications, those justifications should not be disregarded simply because partisan interests may have provided one motivation for the votes of individual legislators," he wrote...

More than 20 states, including Virginia, require some form of identification for voting...


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/28/AR2008042800968.html

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-21.ZO.html

some states have voter ID laws overturned, some states have theirs upheld---the difference being, apparently, in the way the laws are written and the nature of what they require. the short of it is however, requiring a "specific government issued ID" is NOT in and of itself, a violation of the constitution and therefore NOT a poll tax.

the arguments the left put forth have to do with the cost of getting certain documents to prove citizenship. however, the arguments start to get absurd---I read one account where a legislator was saying having to buy a stamp in order to mail in documents was a "poll tax." these things are inconveniences, not a hindrance per se, which was the original effect of poll taxes for some people at one point in our history.

ive seen no argument, except from vile critter parts, that giving out free identification to those who cannot afford it, that because the cost is born by society at large, it constitutes a poll tax. given the ruling above, which speaks to an even more direct cost to an individual, you can see why not.

so---sorry there comrade---you lose again.




< Message edited by bounty44 -- 11/20/2016 7:55:33 AM >

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Voter ID in practice.... - 11/20/2016 9:29:40 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
That has always been the case. They must provide a provisional ballot if no ID is given, absentee ballots require no id. Those are the laws that are upheld.
A government issued ID is not the issue, however; if it must be presented as the only way to vote, it is the issue.
It then becomes a poll tax as I have outlined.

The world is not the surfactant slogan and jingo of the slobberblog. Please read your own links my Boshevik loser friend. You have, as always a factless argument, and cannot ascertain the facts of the law, since you dont read them.

I agree with Souter, et al in Crawford V Marion ....et al. Read the second paragraph.





_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Voter ID in practice.... - 11/20/2016 9:57:38 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

What a bunch of fucking asswipe. Republicans have prevented votes all over this country, dropping registered voters by the 100s of thousands, for no reason.

The nutsuckers were born of corruption and are committed to destroying the foundations of this country.

nutsucker slobber blogs by the nobody susan wright are still nutsucker slobber blogs of no value.

Here you go mental patient. You didn't have any cites for your statements so I'm providing one here for you:

http://elitedaily.com/life/distinguishing-voices-head/



Tell you what shitlicker, if I want any lip off of you, I will scrape it off my zipper. Dont quote nutsucker slobber blogs with nutsucker slobber blogs.

you need to get that syphilis looked at, its in your brain, wilbur.

Lol, you're actually telling me what I can and cannot quote.

First, thank you for letting me know it bothers you.
Second, LMAO because it bothers you and you...or one of your voices...seem to feel you have the power here to make that call.

It doesnt bother me I just get a chance to tell you what a syphilitic brained felchgobber you are, and that I will let you know gives me wood you fucking retard.

I don't believe you get wood. Citation please?

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Voter ID in practice.... - 11/20/2016 10:45:34 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
alternatively, the confession that he gets sexually aroused from insulting people probably has its own little subsection in the APA's diagnostic and statistical manual---you know, the manual that lists psychological disorders.

that certainly might go a long way towards explaining his way of being around here wouldn't it? and all this time I thought it was just plain ol' malevolence.

< Message edited by bounty44 -- 11/20/2016 10:58:55 AM >

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Voter ID in practice.... - 11/20/2016 12:22:31 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
The fact that you are an ultracrepidarian that enjoys factlessness, displaying your imbecilit,y humiliation and felchgobbling has a section with yo,ur name on it, called dogshit44 syndrome.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Voter ID in practice.... Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125