RE: The racist victimology of the alt.whites

RE: The racist victimology of the alt.whites (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

WCME -> RE: The racist victimology of the alt.whites (11/26/2016 2:26:17 AM)
Speaking of "fuckwitedness"... Let's get down to brass tack, Edwird. You said, "You fuckwits (gosh you love that word) have no clue who I voted for" and inferred that I was making an assumption when I said "you lost". There are only two scenarios here. The first is that you voted for Trump yet strangely have an issue with blue collar whites as is evident in your first post or (equally odd) that you have an issue with Republicans which is evident in your second post. So to summarize, you're a guy who voted for Trump despite hating large majorities of other Trump voters in this scenario. Not likely, sugartits. The second (and far, far, FAR more likely) scenario is that you're angry because you voted for someone else besides Donald Trump, in which case (wait for it....) YOU LOST. I don't know how many ways I can say it. You (that is, your person) lost (as in the opposite of winning). Can someone else help me out here? This guy seems a little dense.

Edwird -> RE: The racist victimology of the alt.whites (11/26/2016 2:26:36 AM)
~FR~ Please read my now-edited post at #7. I went too fast the first time, sorry. It's more accurate and to the point now. Sorry, losers.

Real0ne -> RE: The racist victimology of the alt.whites (11/26/2016 2:33:51 AM)
and it still ignores the 800 pound gorrila sitting on your face.

Edwird -> RE: The racist victimology of the alt.whites (11/26/2016 2:35:37 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WCME Speaking of "fuckwitedness"... Let's get down to brass tack, Edwird. You said, "You fuckwits (gosh you love that word) have no clue who I voted for" and inferred that I was making an assumption when I said "you lost". There are only two scenarios here. The first is that you voted for Trump yet strangely have an issue with blue collar whites as is evident in your first post or (equally odd) that you have an issue with Republicans which is evident in your second post. So to summarize, you're a guy who voted for Trump despite hating large majorities of other Trump voters in this scenario. Not likely, sugartits. The second (and far, far, FAR more likely) scenario is that you're angry because you voted for someone else besides Donald Trump, in which case (wait for it....) YOU LOST. I don't know how many ways I can say it. You (that is, your person) lost (as in the opposite of winning). Can someone else help me out here? This guy seems a little dense. Not everyone whose prez candidate won the election even if such prez won by mass appeal to losers, and thereby obtained their only 'victory' in life, however vicariously, feels the joy in that faux 'accomplishment' as you do, I give you credit there. I'll just leave you with that.

Edwird -> RE: The racist victimology of the alt.whites (11/26/2016 2:39:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne and it still ignores the 800 pound gorrila sitting on your face. That being the conspiracy-deleted original 13'th amendment, yeah, I know.

Real0ne -> RE: The racist victimology of the alt.whites (11/26/2016 2:43:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird quote: ORIGINAL: WCME Speaking of "fuckwitedness"... Let's get down to brass tack, Edwird. You said, "You fuckwits (gosh you love that word) have no clue who I voted for" and inferred that I was making an assumption when I said "you lost". There are only two scenarios here. The first is that you voted for Trump yet strangely have an issue with blue collar whites as is evident in your first post or (equally odd) that you have an issue with Republicans which is evident in your second post. So to summarize, you're a guy who voted for Trump despite hating large majorities of other Trump voters in this scenario. Not likely, sugartits. The second (and far, far, FAR more likely) scenario is that you're angry because you voted for someone else besides Donald Trump, in which case (wait for it....) YOU LOST. I don't know how many ways I can say it. You (that is, your person) lost (as in the opposite of winning). Can someone else help me out here? This guy seems a little dense. Not everyone whose prez candidate won the election, and thereby obtained their only 'victory' in life, however vicariously, feels the joy in that faux 'accomplishment' as you do, I give you credit there. I'll just leave you with that. There are not enough ways to say it after defcon 1 activates the snotty twist and operation 'da nile' begins its whitewash cycle.

WCME -> RE: The racist victimology of the alt.whites (11/26/2016 2:49:36 AM)
quote: Not everyone whose prez candidate won the election even if such prez won by mass appeal to losers, and thereby obtained their only 'victory' in life, however vicariously, feels the joy in that faux 'accomplishment' as you do, I give you credit there. You give me credit for that bitter, angry nonsense you just made up? Um...thanks?

Edwird -> RE: The racist victimology of the alt.whites (11/26/2016 2:54:32 AM)
Who's in denial here? I have to say, I was a bit surprised by Lucy's reading list just a short while back. I've been there and many other places too. You, on the other hand, act as though you are the first to have ever come across this stuff you take as lifeblood what more thinking people took as just more in a long line of investigation long before and after whatever you flytrapped yourself onto.

Real0ne -> RE: The racist victimology of the alt.whites (11/26/2016 3:05:15 AM)
and thats the thanks I get for egglmacating you in US History by not only informing you and correcting your error by teaching you that democrat clinton signed nafta into law but even citing it to show you that the democrats are equally guilty of fucking the american people. Hope you enjoy your enjoy your boat ride and sore butt as much as I am [:D]

Edwird -> RE: The racist victimology of the alt.whites (11/26/2016 3:07:17 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WCME quote: Not everyone whose prez candidate won the election even if such prez won by mass appeal to losers, and thereby obtained their only 'victory' in life, however vicariously, feels the joy in that faux 'accomplishment' as you do, I give you credit there. You give me credit for that bitter, angry nonsense you just made up? Um...thanks? Here's some news ... I don't give a crap who would take credit for it, if the economy turned around (well, it already has, but just sayin'), or if all the numbers kept getting better ... It doesn't matter, to me. That's the difference between us. You and your kind would gladly grind civilization to dirt as long as you got in the last breath ... 'we won, you lost ... '

MercTech -> RE: The racist victimology of the alt.whites (11/26/2016 3:27:14 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird Reagan made a felony to have weed before you filled your first diaper. Actually, the first bans on Marijuana came four years before Reagan was born. California first regulated Cannabis in 1906 and Reagan was born in 1911. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_history_of_cannabis_in_the_United_States

Edwird -> RE: The racist victimology of the alt.whites (11/26/2016 3:31:34 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne and thats the thanks I get for egglmacating you in US History by not only informing you and correcting your error by teaching you that democrat clinton signed nafta into law but even citing it to show you that the democrats are equally guilty of fucking the american people. Hope you enjoy your enjoy your boat ride and sore butt as much as I am [:D] I read all that crap you read, but unfortunately you are still reading. Unlike you, I had already read tons of off-standard-media before getting to the 'how to avoid paying taxes disguised as 'self-sovereign' crapola. Before, along with, and after, many things you missed while flytrapping yourself on that one obsession. I'm not going to get into the issue of validity of the WTC and Pentagon stuff. The point is that whatever your chosen version of it, you totally overlooked the domestic terrorism as begotten by simple everyday 'financial innovation' that stole millions in wealth from retirees. You were too busy with your obsession of the Queen to see what was going on under our very noses by one white guy after another. As expected.

Edwird -> RE: The racist victimology of the alt.whites (11/26/2016 3:48:14 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MercTech quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird Reagan made a felony to have weed before you filled your first diaper. Actually, the first bans on Marijuana came four years before Reagan was born. California first regulated Cannabis in 1906 and Reagan was born in 1911. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_history_of_cannabis_in_the_United_States Do you remember those midnight movies? Big thing, back in the day. That's where I first saw the film Woodstock. Many others, but of course I can't remember the names of any of them. Not the worst thing, if being honest. Most of them weren't that good. But fun sometimes, and it was about socializing in any case. The first one I saw had this as title song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17u9mxdvQEo

Edwird -> RE: The racist victimology of the alt.whites (11/26/2016 3:56:48 AM)
PS Yeah, I might have mentioned before ... Older sister got pulled over in rural NC for speeding ~ 6-8 MPH above limit. County trooper saw 24 tiny plant;s in pods in back. Cop said he had to take her in, but she could drive to nearest parking lot 3 miles down the road, as he followed. Next day, sister out, car still there, $50 fine 2 months later. That was the world before Reagan.

Edwird -> RE: The racist victimology of the alt.whites (11/26/2016 4:03:33 AM)
Today, if you are lucky, we're talking $5,000 minimum, just to start, and good luck if only 1-3 years time. Reagan progress.

Edwird -> RE: The racist victimology of the alt.whites (11/26/2016 4:12:29 AM)
But who could argue that privatization of prisons are not a boon to the economy, or that the lobbyists from these private prison corporations are not the best to turn to when congress are deciding what laws are to be adjusted or newly introduced, for purpose of 'making society safer' and concomitantly improving the economy in this way?

Edwird -> RE: The racist victimology of the alt.whites (11/26/2016 4:29:42 AM)
So yeah, all you who proclaim 'Victory!' That 'victory' was quite costly last time around. Ruined careers for those happening onto same circumstance as my sister's pre-Reagan faux pas. Ten times worse for black teen boys. But "You lost!" is all you got? That is the most pitiful thing, definitely not any good sign to purpose of evolution.

Edwird -> RE: The racist victimology of the alt.whites (11/26/2016 4:39:59 AM)
Only in America

Awareness -> RE: The racist victimology of the alt.whites (11/26/2016 6:37:06 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird Two losers in a row, relying on personal false assumptions, with no inclination whatsoever to fact. You fuckwits have no clue who I voted for. Which is not in surprise here, being as that your puke-brained notions of the world you mistake for 'reality.' I think we can be pretty sure that whomever you voted for, said voting was done with your vagina.

Awareness -> RE: The racist victimology of the alt.whites (11/26/2016 6:38:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird quote: ORIGINAL: WCME Hey here's some reality for you: You lost. No, I didn't lose a fucking thing. I still have my own mind, sad to say, not in your case. Yeah, but let's face it - it's not much of a mind.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625