RE: Great Britain decides it's illegal to be homeless... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Lucylastic -> RE: Great Britain decides it's illegal to be homeless... (11/29/2016 5:48:02 AM)

Landlords in the 80-s were as bad as they are in the 21st century.
My daughter was living in nottingham for a year(2014) and going to the Uni there, their landlord was a sleeze bag even I was surprised by. And I knew plenty from the 80s that are still fucking over their tenants.
Being homeless in the UK was and will always be a bad experience, the same as it is for most countries, and Yes, Ive been there, and thru the housing process, shitty tenants, shitty scumlords, and predators on all sides.

And the reason so many of the homeless, dont like shelters or hostels is because often they are worse than being on the street.
Many of them have mental health issues, there are many who chose/end up in prison. They cannot get the proper care, but that is something that conservatives politicians (in the UK, the US and Canada specifically) think isnt something to be concerned about. its simply a character flaw. Not the governments problem.




Real0ne -> RE: Great Britain decides it's illegal to be homeless... (11/29/2016 5:58:35 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

Although landlords had to contend with the same thing as individuals, many had other properties and other income.
They weren't as hard hit as individuals were.

And yes, they evicted a lot of tenants.
Not because they had to sell the property (it did happen, but very rarely), but because they only had short-term agreements and they knew they could always demand a higher rent from new tenants.
It's only recently that legislation has capped benefits.
Up until then, it was guaranteed money in the bank and many private landlords did fuck-all in terms of maintenance to maximise their income.
Many tenants on benefits or low incomes who were already struggling are now faced with crippling rent increases.

I'm sorry, for every poor widdle hard-done-by landlord, there's probably tens of thousands of fucked-over tenants.
It's about time those money-for-old-rope scumbags got their rental incomes capped and poorly maintained properties should be reposessed by legal force.
With all the housing turmoil going on and people being evicted, I've yet to see a landlord that is hard done by.
Pretty much all of them are raking it in and rubbing their hands all the way to the bank.




everyone is a tenant, if you dont rent from the guy down the street you rent from the gubmint mobacracy. Da gubmint has an interest in your property to maintain its tax base your livelyhood or lack of it be damned. property 'so-called' owners fail to pay the gubmints yearly rental fees they forfeit their property homes or otherwise. Most people are lucky they can think to the end of their nose much less the chain of events which leads up to the event, cause and effect. The mobacracy got its mob foothold when it started suppling infrastructure that had to be paid for which now led to paying to hold someones cock so they dont piss their pants services. welcome to old aristocracy brit style gubmint. blaming the landlords is only a legitimate bitch if you blame ALL of them which includes the fatcat gub extortionist mobacracy at the helm.




Real0ne -> RE: Great Britain decides it's illegal to be homeless... (11/29/2016 6:03:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Landlords in the 80-s were as bad as they are in the 21st century.
My daughter was living in nottingham for a year(2014) and going to the Uni there, their landlord was a sleeze bag even I was surprised by. And I knew plenty from the 80s that are still fucking over their tenants.
Being homeless in the UK was and will always be a bad experience, the same as it is for most countries, and Yes, Ive been there, and thru the housing process, shitty tenants, shitty scumlords, and predators on all sides.

And the reason so many of the homeless, dont like shelters or hostels is because often they are worse than being on the street.
Many of them have mental health issues, there are many who chose/end up in prison. They cannot get the proper care, but that is something that conservatives politicians (in the UK, the US and Canada specifically) think isnt something to be concerned about. its simply a character flaw. Not the governments problem.




an so you were out here everyday rooty toot tootin for unaffordable ohaha care for the us, so we can join your shitty pity party




WhoreMods -> RE: Great Britain decides it's illegal to be homeless... (11/29/2016 6:10:03 AM)

Shouldn't you be hanging around outside a school with a big bag of sweeties? They'll be letting the kids out for lunch soon...




Real0ne -> RE: Great Britain decides it's illegal to be homeless... (11/29/2016 6:28:46 AM)

and the next complaint I send to Collar chat Administration will be captioned 'THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN'




Lucylastic -> RE: Great Britain decides it's illegal to be homeless... (11/29/2016 6:53:38 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Landlords in the 80-s were as bad as they are in the 21st century.
My daughter was living in nottingham for a year(2014) and going to the Uni there, their landlord was a sleeze bag even I was surprised by. And I knew plenty from the 80s that are still fucking over their tenants.
Being homeless in the UK was and will always be a bad experience, the same as it is for most countries, and Yes, Ive been there, and thru the housing process, shitty tenants, shitty scumlords, and predators on all sides.

And the reason so many of the homeless, dont like shelters or hostels is because often they are worse than being on the street.
Many of them have mental health issues, there are many who chose/end up in prison. They cannot get the proper care, but that is something that conservatives politicians (in the UK, the US and Canada specifically) think isnt something to be concerned about. its simply a character flaw. Not the governments problem.




an so you were out here everyday rooty toot tootin for unaffordable ohaha care for the us, so we can join your shitty pity party

I was out????, where rooting for the ACA? ??????
I think you will find as I have said more than a few times, Ive always been for single payer. English and Canadian style. Ihave never stated either were perfect or without problems.
Hallucinate elsewhere.





freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Great Britain decides it's illegal to be homeless... (11/29/2016 7:16:58 AM)

I'm not saying it didn't happen, but it was a rarity in comparison.

And in 2007/8 I was made homeless when my housemate died on me and I couldn't afford the rent on my own.
My rent was increased from £750/m to £1,250/m and I was only working part time.
I was given 14 days notice to pay up or get out.
So I was right in the mix of all this shit and homeless just after xmas.

So yes, it might have happened to a tiny handful of landlords but not many compared to private owners.
In just my road alone, more than a dozen families were reposessed and none of them were landlords.
The owners of the property I rented had 3 other properties to fall back on.
Their agents got new tenants in within 2 weeks and they're still chasing me for over £3,500 in apparent costs and fees. They can go fuck themselves.

Landlords on the whole cashed in on the economy crash at the expense of tenants and private owners who lost their homes.
I have no sympathy for most landlords - they raked it in.




Real0ne -> RE: Great Britain decides it's illegal to be homeless... (11/29/2016 9:10:04 AM)

Here is something for you to see if you can explain.

Initially the idea of taxation was to provide food and other necessities for your country to protect itself. That taxation was based on the estate in land and the 'profits' made resulting from land tenancy (originally).

That tax amounted to 10% roughly.

I'd have to look to know for sure but I presume your taxes are not within the publics ability to vote for or against and like here just foisted upon you, in a 'here is what we did now you pay up or get the fuck out' proposition.

While I can certainly understand paying for necessary infrastructure that is fine, and I can certainly understand taxing appt complex landlords in the business of rentals, however how did that gain a foothold, in the private homes sector, where a home is a necessity for survival and 'not' a business?






tj444 -> RE: Great Britain decides it's illegal to be homeless... (11/29/2016 9:32:31 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Landlords in the 80-s were as bad as they are in the 21st century.
My daughter was living in nottingham for a year(2014) and going to the Uni there, their landlord was a sleeze bag even I was surprised by. And I knew plenty from the 80s that are still fucking over their tenants.
Being homeless in the UK was and will always be a bad experience, the same as it is for most countries, and Yes, Ive been there, and thru the housing process, shitty tenants, shitty scumlords, and predators on all sides.

And the reason so many of the homeless, dont like shelters or hostels is because often they are worse than being on the street.
Many of them have mental health issues, there are many who chose/end up in prison. They cannot get the proper care, but that is something that conservatives politicians (in the UK, the US and Canada specifically) think isnt something to be concerned about. its simply a character flaw. Not the governments problem.




an so you were out here everyday rooty toot tootin for unaffordable ohaha care for the us, so we can join your shitty pity party

I was out????, where rooting for the ACA? ??????
I think you will find as I have said more than a few times, Ive always been for single payer. English and Canadian style. Ihave never stated either were perfect or without problems.
Hallucinate elsewhere.


The R's that I know around here (Texas) spout all the lies about single payer that they have been fed.. they really believe that shite.. But knowing how the US govt (Feds & state) screw anything they touch up, even if they were to set up single payer here, they would just fuck it up sooooo bad.. it wouldnt be anything like English or Canadian single payer..

And Ryan (apparently) wants to change Medicare into some sorta voucher system.. Shortly after the election, I talked to a quadriplegic woman about it and she squawks about how fine that is for the politicians since their healthcare is covered, yet she voted the Rs in!!!.. Gotta love American logic.. [&:]




mnottertail -> RE: Great Britain decides it's illegal to be homeless... (11/29/2016 9:38:20 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

Here is something for you to see if you can explain.

Initially the idea of taxation was to provide food and other necessities for your country to protect itself. That taxation was based on the estate in land and the 'profits' made resulting from land tenancy (originally).

That tax amounted to 10% roughly.

I'd have to look to know for sure but I presume your taxes are not within the publics ability to vote for or against and like here just foisted upon you, in a 'here is what we did now you pay up or get the fuck out' proposition.

While I can certainly understand paying for necessary infrastructure that is fine, and I can certainly understand taxing appt complex landlords in the business of rentals, however how did that gain a foothold, in the private homes sector, where a home is a necessity for survival and 'not' a business?




That is not true. The first tax was to defend the Empire. The poor tax was to feed and clothe the poor that came later, then the next set of taxes were to defend the Empire again.

So, from flawed premises come flawed conclusion.




tj444 -> RE: Great Britain decides it's illegal to be homeless... (11/29/2016 9:53:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka


https://www.rt.com/op-edge/367955-homelessness-great-britain-shame/



There are cities in the US that make homelessness illegal or at least very difficult for them.. Right now we are (supposedly) in a good economy but there will be another recession, I expect it will be pretty bad, along the lines of this last Great Recession.. which means there will be a great increase in homeless everywhere.. Homelessness will never get down to zero, but a few places (like Utah) are doing something about it and making progress in lowering the numbers considerably, but most places dont want to spend anything to help or house them, even tho the stats prove it actually costs taxpayers less to provide a room/efficiency unit for them and try to get the ones they can help get a job and help those with addictions.. But so many people/voters would rather pay more of their taxes to go to pay costs to keep the homeless homeless rather than give them a "free ride" as they call it.. There is a lot of resistance to helping them.. even tho a good number of the homeless are vets..




Lucylastic -> RE: Great Britain decides it's illegal to be homeless... (11/29/2016 10:13:37 AM)

Im loving these cities that have housed so many homeless vets, BUT it needs to be a priority as well for homeless and mentally ill civvies.



This State Just Became The First To House All Its Homeless Veterans.
On Veterans Day, Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) and President Obama announced that the state is the first in the country to end veteran homelessness.
That means that every veteran who wants housing has been offered a place after the state says it has helped more than 1,400 veterans get into permanent housing in the last year. It also now has structures in place to ensure that any veteran who falls into homelessness in the future will be able to get back into housing within 90 days. As of 2013, there were more than 7,600 homeless people in the state, 9 percent of whom were veterans.
Connecticut announced in August that it housed all chronically homeless veterans — those that have been homeless for a year straight or four times in the last three — but Virginia is the first state to say it has found housing for them all.
Virginia beat the deadline it signed on to as part of the White House’s challenge to end veteran homelessness by the end of the year. Some cities had already gotten there: New Orleans, Houston, and Las Cruces, New Mexico ended veteran homelessness earlier in the year, while Phoenix and Salt Lake City ended chronic homelessness last year. On Wednesday, Obama also announced that Syracuse and Schenectady in New York and Las Vegas had ended homelessness for their veteran populations. More cities and states are likely to make announcements before the end of the year, as more than 20 mayors across the country also signed on.
It can be challenging in some places, though. Los Angeles had signed on to the pledge, only to pull out two months ago while announcing a state of emergency for its homeless population. Portland, Oregon, Seattle, and the state of Hawaii have declared similar states of emergency.
Housing is the biggest variables. New York City, for example, has signed onto the pledge and this summer said it was on track to get there by the end of the year, but there is very little available housing stock, let alone affordable housing, to put veterans in. With enough funding for affordable housing, the country could actually end homelessness for all people, veterans and others, a population of more than 600,000 people, relatively quickly and easily. There are some mechanisms available to do just that they just haven’t been given the resources.


https://thinkprogress.org/this-state-just-became-the-first-to-house-all-its-homeless-veterans-1bcbb361c27b#.ogfef65i7









PeonForHer -> RE: Great Britain decides it's illegal to be homeless... (11/29/2016 4:35:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


But ... but ... but ... the UK is so much more "advanced" and "forward-thinking" than we are

[/sarcasm]



Michael



*Sigh*. I've come to realise that I can't make jokes along those lines any more. I used to take it for granted that people would see I'd not take such a position seriously.




PeonForHer -> RE: Great Britain decides it's illegal to be homeless... (11/29/2016 4:43:29 PM)

quote:

Hostels are almost always full so there's often nowhere to go except to invade empty properties and abandoned buildings wherever they can find them.


... And just to add to the fun, squatting was made much more difficult after 2012. That was when it became a criminal offence to squat a residential property - even a knackered old council flat that nobody wanted and hadn't been occupied for years.




Real0ne -> RE: Great Britain decides it's illegal to be homeless... (11/29/2016 9:09:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Landlords in the 80-s were as bad as they are in the 21st century.
My daughter was living in nottingham for a year(2014) and going to the Uni there, their landlord was a sleeze bag even I was surprised by. And I knew plenty from the 80s that are still fucking over their tenants.
Being homeless in the UK was and will always be a bad experience, the same as it is for most countries, and Yes, Ive been there, and thru the housing process, shitty tenants, shitty scumlords, and predators on all sides.

And the reason so many of the homeless, dont like shelters or hostels is because often they are worse than being on the street.
Many of them have mental health issues, there are many who chose/end up in prison. They cannot get the proper care, but that is something that conservatives politicians (in the UK, the US and Canada specifically) think isnt something to be concerned about. its simply a character flaw. Not the governments problem.




an so you were out here everyday rooty toot tootin for unaffordable ohaha care for the us, so we can join your shitty pity party

I was out????, where rooting for the ACA? ??????
I think you will find as I have said more than a few times, Ive always been for single payer. English and Canadian style. Ihave never stated either were perfect or without problems.
Hallucinate elsewhere.


The R's that I know around here (Texas) spout all the lies about single payer that they have been fed.. they really believe that shite.. But knowing how the US govt (Feds & state) screw anything they touch up, even if they were to set up single payer here, they would just fuck it up sooooo bad.. it wouldnt be anything like English or Canadian single payer..

And Ryan (apparently) wants to change Medicare into some sorta voucher system.. Shortly after the election, I talked to a quadriplegic woman about it and she squawks about how fine that is for the politicians since their healthcare is covered, yet she voted the Rs in!!!.. Gotta love American logic.. [&:]



bingo and thats precisely where the bear shits in the buckwheat. well said.
These kinds of systems cant work in america until the massive 'corruption' in the mobocracy is dealt with. The only way they can add it is by taxation, which in this country would have to be graduated to be fair and that is NOT going to happen and london bridge comes falling down.







Marini -> RE: Great Britain decides it's illegal to be homeless... (12/1/2016 6:52:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

I can't see that happening here.
Local councils already clear out 'cardboard cities' whenever they appear so the likes of favelas sprouting up any time soon or for any length of time isn't likely.

Hostels are almost always full so there's often nowhere to go except to invade empty properties and abandoned buildings wherever they can find them.

As I said in post#12, places to survive are being pared into non-existence so there's even less 'legal' places to find.
When I was homeless for nearly 3 months, I was living in my car and was constantly woken by police and moved on even though I was legally parked.
Being homeless with no money, no job, no reliable friends, no food and constantly cold is no fun at all - been there, done that, got the T-shirt. It's demoralising and downright fucking awful and not something I would want to repeat.
I was fortunate in having a car so at least I was dry; but the humiliation of begging for 50p to get something from the 'soup kitchens' (not always free) is something I'll always remember.
I was also very fortunate in having a couple of people I knew where I could call in and get a wash/shower and a cuppa a couple of times a week.
I couldn't imagine not being able to keep relatively clean and sleeping outside in the cold wet and windy nights. *shudders*
I was lucky compared to some others.
[ETA: most of my food came from raiding the daily chuck-outs and rejects in the bins at the back of supermarkets and food outlets]

So no, favelas or anything similar isn't going to be tolerated here.
They'd sooner you were a homeless statistic than allow that sort of thing.



THIS
Hello mate!
Thank you for sharing such a heart wrenching up front and personal story.
When did helping other people become MORE important than helping your own citizens that are down on their luck, in need of shelter and assistance?
Aren't you a tax paying citizen?
And people wonder WHY citizens are turning on governments that certainly don't listen or care about tax paying citizens and their concerns?
[8|]
When did our world become upside down?
I am glad you overcame your obstacles, did not freeze to death living in your car, have lived to tell and appear to now by thriving.
Thank you again for sharing.
Cheers mate!




Marini -> RE: Great Britain decides it's illegal to be homeless... (12/1/2016 8:03:31 PM)

Many might find it interesting to read articles about globalization, inequality and poverty.
Read about globalization and go country to country.

Take South Africa for instance.
Globalization has increased poverty, there is rising unemployment and declining social security.

People should really READ what is actually going on with many people, and not believe the fucking proganda being spoon fed by
corporate run mass media.
Why we continue to expect the truth by the people, from the soulless corporations behind the media?




Marini -> RE: Great Britain decides it's illegal to be homeless... (12/1/2016 8:06:04 PM)

Double post- typing on I phone ain't easy.

I am certainly willing to pay more for products that don't come from using slave/sweatshop workers, and will help people stay afloat in my country.

Many of us have too much crap, anyway.





tj444 -> RE: Great Britain decides it's illegal to be homeless... (12/1/2016 9:28:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Im loving these cities that have housed so many homeless vets, BUT it needs to be a priority as well for homeless and mentally ill civvies.



This State Just Became The First To House All Its Homeless Veterans.
On Veterans Day, Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) and President Obama announced that the state is the first in the country to end veteran homelessness.
That means that every veteran who wants housing has been offered a place after the state says it has helped more than 1,400 veterans get into permanent housing in the last year. It also now has structures in place to ensure that any veteran who falls into homelessness in the future will be able to get back into housing within 90 days. As of 2013, there were more than 7,600 homeless people in the state, 9 percent of whom were veterans.
Connecticut announced in August that it housed all chronically homeless veterans — those that have been homeless for a year straight or four times in the last three — but Virginia is the first state to say it has found housing for them all.
Virginia beat the deadline it signed on to as part of the White House’s challenge to end veteran homelessness by the end of the year. Some cities had already gotten there: New Orleans, Houston, and Las Cruces, New Mexico ended veteran homelessness earlier in the year, while Phoenix and Salt Lake City ended chronic homelessness last year. On Wednesday, Obama also announced that Syracuse and Schenectady in New York and Las Vegas had ended homelessness for their veteran populations. More cities and states are likely to make announcements before the end of the year, as more than 20 mayors across the country also signed on.
It can be challenging in some places, though. Los Angeles had signed on to the pledge, only to pull out two months ago while announcing a state of emergency for its homeless population. Portland, Oregon, Seattle, and the state of Hawaii have declared similar states of emergency.
Housing is the biggest variables. New York City, for example, has signed onto the pledge and this summer said it was on track to get there by the end of the year, but there is very little available housing stock, let alone affordable housing, to put veterans in. With enough funding for affordable housing, the country could actually end homelessness for all people, veterans and others, a population of more than 600,000 people, relatively quickly and easily. There are some mechanisms available to do just that they just haven’t been given the resources.

https://thinkprogress.org/this-state-just-became-the-first-to-house-all-its-homeless-veterans-1bcbb361c27b#.ogfef65i7


Yes, Houston has done a fair bit to house vets but there are lots of other homeless out there. Houston does have some efficency units (small studios) but there are requirements (you do have to have income) but for single working poor, its your own place for the same cost as renting just a room in a house or apt. But there are waiting lists for those units.. Houston does allow building of small homes, container homes and rvs/tiny homes but there are requirements for those and you have to put them on a lot that doesnt have an HOA or deed restrictions.. The land costs in Houston are quite low compared to many big cities, of course that is only in the poor areas, the rich areas lots can cost big bucks.. its a very strange city..

I used to see the line-ups of homeless downtown, lined up at a shelter and lined up at a church soup kitchen and they hang around the library too.. There is a reason why there are so many damn cops downtown... Except for the odd store, downtown houston pretty much shuts down weekdays at 5 pm and is closed all weekend.. Houston is a very strange city...

Some people feel Airbnb has taken housing stock out of the cities so there is even less options for renters & at a higher cost.




WickedsDesire -> RE: Great Britain decides it's illegal to be homeless... (12/3/2016 6:56:26 AM)

More than 250,000 are homeless in England - Shelter
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-38157410

More than a quarter of a million people are homeless in England, an analysis of the latest official figures suggests.
Researchers from charity Shelter used data from four sets of official 2016 statistics to compile what it describes as a "conservative" total.
The figures show homelessness hotspots outside London, with high rates in Birmingham, Brighton and Luton.
The government says it does not recognise the figures, but is investing more than £500m on homelessness.

For the very first time, Shelter has totted up the official statistics from four different forms of recorded homelessness.
These were:
national government statistics on rough sleepers
statistics on those in temporary accommodation
the number of people housed in hostels
the number of people waiting to be housed by social services departments (obtained through Freedom of Information requests)
The charity insists the overall figure, 254,514, released to mark 50 years since its founding, is a "robust lower-end estimate".


lets call the "robust lower end figure" 300 000 for the UK pop 64 million = 0.5% or one person out of every 200...but then you need to look at the figures more closely and take of the population below ~18 and above ~65 and the figure is nearer 1%. or 1 per 100 of the polplation.

The UK has had a housing crisis for years and the chief instigator was mad loon thatcher.

It is further compounded by the decrease in revenue from council housing over the last 30 years and the barring of reinvesting the cash in new housing stock ( ridiculous wasn't it what did they expect was going to happen)

Right to buy[edit]
Laws restricted councils' investment in housing, preventing them subsidising it from local taxes, but more importantly, council tenants were given the Right to Buy in the Housing Act 1980 offering a discount price on their council house. Proposed as policy by Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and carried out under the remit of Secretary of State for the Environment Michael Heseltine, the Right To Buy scheme allowed tenants to buy their home with a discount of 33% - 50% off the market value, depending on the time they had lived there.[38] Councils were prevented from reinvesting the proceeds of these sales in new housing, and the total available stock, particularly of more desirable homes, declined.

The "right to buy" was popular with many former Labour voters and, although the Labour government of Tony Blair tightened the rules (reducing the maximum discount in areas of most housing need), it did not end the right-to-buy. Labour did relax the policy forbidding reinvestment of sales proceeds.[39]

Following its election in 2015, the Conservative government has announced proposals to extend the Right to Buy to housing association tenants.[40]

The effect of right to buy was unintended. Tenants who didn't buy their houses saw their rent rise steeply, this had to be covered by increased social benefits. Tenants who did sold them on to private investors who then let them at an artificially high rent to families unable to secure council property - these families had to have the rent subsidised by social benefits. The former tenants now also need private rented accommodation which was subsidised by social benefits. The government had choked off the supply - increased the demand for a diminishing asset.[41]




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
6.347656E-02