quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

a "spontaneous protest" is not consistent with actions of an "al-qaeda like" group in general nor specifically with what went on at benghazi.

nor is it consistent with other testimony.

nor does any of it explain the families' testimonies of Hillary telling them it was due to a video, and then her later saying in public that she never said that.

in any event, in this conversation, im not moving on to blaming Hillary for Benghazi, im simply saying she knew it wasn't a video, implied that it was, went along with others saying it was, and in the conflict between who is believable on the subject, her or the family members, im siding with the families.

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

a "spontaneous protest" is not consistent with actions of an "al-qaeda like" group in general nor specifically with what went on at benghazi.

nor is it consistent with other testimony.

nor does any of it explain the families' testimonies of Hillary telling them it was due to a video, and then her later saying in public that she never said that.

in any event, in this conversation, im not moving on to blaming Hillary for Benghazi, im simply saying she knew it wasn't a video, implied that it was, went along with others saying it was, and in the conflict between who is believable on the subject, her or the family members, im siding with the families.

In the leak of her e-mail to her daughter, the she-cunt mentioned that she hand-picked Stevens for that assignment. I have to admit, with that revelation and what came out shortly after the attack about all the requests for extra security, I found myself wondering what Ambassador Stevens had done to piss off the anti-Christ.

You mention not moving on to blaming the she-cunt for the attack and that's fair enough, but someone else equated not blaming her for Benghazi and not blaming Roosevelt for Pearl Harbor. I think a case can be made for both of them being responsible for the severity of the outcomes.

Roosevelt had intelligence that said that Pearl was vulnerable and he had intel that said that the Japanese had targeted Pearl. It's why he ordered Kimmel to get the fleet out of the harbor and why he later, tried to scape-goat Kimmel (who has been only partially vindicated).

One of the reasons Kimmel has been semi-vindicated (the conviction for dereliction of duty was reversed) was because his family managed to prove that Roosevelt (or someone in his chain of command) had failed to share pertinent Intelligence with Kimmel and (?) Short(?) (The Army commander. I forget his name).

I see parallels between Pearl and Benghazi when I look at 300 ignored requests for more security. I'm not saying that would have stopped the attack, but I am saying that it might have lessened the loss of human life and it might have provided more time for a reaction force to arrive (the "official" explanation from the she-cunt was there was no time to scramble a reaction force which presupposes she knew how long the attack would last?).



Michael

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

by the way, do you know that otter tail county Minnesota voted for trump over Hillary by close to a ratio of 3:1? oooh, that's gotta smart mnalevolent.

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

I can suggest many things besides "too much vodka."

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr
the she-cunt


Michael[/color]