Edwird -> RE: Demagoguery (12/18/2016 1:08:20 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ManOeuvre quote:
ORIGINAL: Edwird So, the notion of Trump being a demagogue is something you find boring, which as you propose, your particular notion of what is boring or not in fact defines what is reality or not. Interesting. Don't give me too much credit, Edwird. Well, boring is the worst term of derision I have available for a person, idea or thing, and I only break it out a few times per calendar year. Demagoguery, or the allegation to it, has become one of those weasel words like agitator, instigator, divisive, toxic and elitist, which, as DCNovice almost pointed out, is becoming a meaningless journalistic cliché on the same order as fuel. In the linked article, though the author cites a few examples of fuel as a product of story in search of a by-line, his real issue with its use (it seems to me) was the use of the passive, and the cowardice of substituting the word for an argument. </digression> I'm starting to feel the same way about "demagogue". It would be almost bearable if its frequent appearance were agitprop, rather than my worst nightmare, that people have of their own accord, sans Cobetckuu co|-03, become boring. Well, you got me there. I just don't read any of this crap anymore, haven't for years, now. So it should come as no surprise that I've totally missed out on how much the term "demagogue" has apparently and so completely overturned the order of things here lately. Thanks for keeping me up to date.
|
|
|
|