BamaD
Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44 quote:
ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44 makes me wonder if there's ever been another time in our history where such a hubbub has been made over the electors voting. The "hubbub" is just fake news. Does anyone here who can think for themselves really believe that Democrat's death threats are going to significantly change anything? its not just that, its also the clamoring over getting electors to change their vote, by some mysterious moral imperative that only the left seems to be able to see. This is, like the first two examples I quoted, a case of the losers having their feeling hurt and trying to mess things up so they will feel better. If these tactics are rewarded we can see this sort of thing happen more and more often. If thinking you had the better candidate justifies threatening electors and lets you win, or at least de-legitimize the other guy, how many people will be willing to go that route? We can look forward to the house deciding elections in the future. It would alter us into a de facto parliamentary system, whoever controls the majority of house delegations will control who is President . Of course then they (whoever the loser is) will have to intimidate the congressmen.
_____________________________
Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.
|