RE: The domestic violence rate in lesbian relationships (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


respectmen -> RE: The domestic violence rate in lesbian relationships (1/10/2017 5:06:20 PM)

Whore

quote:

Why are you insisting that the domestic violence rate in lesbian couples is a repudiation for the whole of feminism?


1. Feminism mostly ignores this part of the problem.
2. A woman is more likely to be a victim of DV in a lesbian relationship compared to a heterosexual relationship.

blnymph


quote:

(no failure at all) I cite those parts of your messages that might offer some path for comments and discussion (or insight). Liberties you take yourself, although I for my part would not manipulate the messages of others like you did before.
Only shortening for what is worthy or descriptive of your posts.


You keep making this idiotic claim simply because I proved you wrong in the "Every Brick" thread where I quoted the wording from the link that applied to your silly ignorant claim.

vincentML

quote:

The studies you linked were faulted for not representing the larger demographic. The methodology is questioned. You can't take any number of lesbian women and claim they are a representative sample without considering other demographics of the life experience of the members of the larger group: age, education level, economic status, length of relationship, type of relationship, profession or employment status, etc. A study is not representative merely because it is published.


As I mentioned, every other such study on DV is derived from all what you mentioned. So what's your point, what's your argument exactly? All studies should be dismissed?

Here's some more truth for the gynocentric boy to digest.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/05/07/attack-of-the-killer-dykes/






Musicmystery -> RE: The domestic violence rate in lesbian relationships (1/10/2017 5:50:28 PM)

Breitbart? Seriously?

No wonder you're so deranged.

http://realorsatire.com/breitbart-com/





respectmen -> RE: The domestic violence rate in lesbian relationships (1/10/2017 6:01:32 PM)

quote:

Breitbart? Seriously?

No wonder you're so deranged.



I guess if Breitbart said the sky is blue, it would still be invalidated because it's from Breitbart. [:D]




Musicmystery -> RE: The domestic violence rate in lesbian relationships (1/10/2017 6:44:16 PM)

Of course not, silly child.

But Breitbart would say the sky is blue because ___(enter name of people Breitbart hates)___ are doing __(name something bizarrely implausible that only Breitbart readers would imagine is actually true)___ that creates the side effect of a blue sky through ____(idiotic claims labeled science that actual scientists would laugh at)____.

[:D]




vincentML -> RE: The domestic violence rate in lesbian relationships (1/10/2017 10:04:17 PM)

quote:

As I mentioned, every other such study on DV is derived from all what you mentioned. So what's your point, what's your argument exactly? All studies should be dismissed?

It is not my claim that all studies should be dismissed. I never made such a claim. So, straw man bullshit by you.

My point is that the studies you linked are flawed due to poor methodology and consequent failure to be representative, and they are inherently suspect due to the wide disparity of findings which leads to zero confidence of there reliability.

You have not supplied a reasonable reply to those charges. Consequently, your headline is crap.





blnymph -> RE: The domestic violence rate in lesbian relationships (1/11/2017 2:21:06 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

blnymph


quote:

(no failure at all) I cite those parts of your messages that might offer some path for comments and discussion (or insight). Liberties you take yourself, although I for my part would not manipulate the messages of others like you did before.
Only shortening for what is worthy or descriptive of your posts.


You keep making this idiotic claim simply because I proved you wrong in the "Every Brick" thread where I quoted the wording from the link that applied to your silly ignorant claim.




You did not prove anything there except your Napoleon complex and your twisted perception of your own importance




tweakabelle -> RE: The domestic violence rate in lesbian relationships (1/11/2017 2:25:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen


Can you cite me where feminists show any appreciation for men and/or say anything good about men or patriarchy? Feminist literature anywhere?


I hate to be the one to tell you this but feminism isn't about men. It is not feminism's role to boost male egos or promote male interests.

Feminism is about women by women seeking to bring about a more equitable gender system. Feminism and feminists are mainly concerned with males/men inasmuch as they interact with women, with the turning around the ill-effects that the concentration of power and privilege in male hands has brought about.

It is not feminism's task or obligation to do anything for men - that is up to men. Indeed it would be quite presumptuous of feminists to claim to speak on men's behalf. There are good arguments and evidence to support the view that patriarchy has negative effects on the lives of many men, that it is to men's advantage to discard patriarchy but it isn't feminism's role to make these arguments - that's up to men, not feminists.

Sadly the MRA has failed men totally in this regard. It seems more interested in banging drums meaninglessly, acting out primitive warrior myths in forests and generally bitching and whining about their 'woes' with women than any kind of serious analysis or understanding of gender, how it operates in society and what is needed for positive changes in this area. Childish.

So your demands that feminism "show ... appreciation for men and/or say anything good about men or patriarchy" are just plain silly. It's a bit like asking Buddhists to promote Christianity or Islam - it just ain't gonna happen.




respectmen -> RE: The domestic violence rate in lesbian relationships (1/11/2017 8:47:14 AM)

quote:

I hate to be the one to tell you this but feminism isn't about men. It is not feminism's role to boost male egos or promote male interests.


Thanks for pointing out the bleeding obvious. Feminism is about making women first, above men, the centre of the universe. It makes out that women are special and more important than men. When it comes to feminism, every issue isn't a people issue, it's a women's issue as men just don't matter and are left out of the picture.

Feminism is mostly about women and the self centred needs of women. Where men come into it, men are used as a multipurpose scapegoat for women's woes to make women feel that they are faultless. The only use men have for feminism is to be used as an emotional punching bag for angry and frustrated women that didn't get their way in life, and therefore, blame people with a penis for it.


quote:

Feminism is about women by women seeking to bring about a more equitable gender system


When men do that for support of their gender as for pointing out inequalities that are in women's favour, it's considered as whining and misogyny.

quote:

Feminism and feminists are mainly concerned with males/men inasmuch as they interact with women, with the turning around the ill-effects that the concentration of power and privilege in male hands has brought about.


What power and privilege are you talking about here? Have you ever heard of the term "apex fallacy"? Just because a small subset of men (the elite) hold these powers and privileges, how do the rest of the male population hold any of such powers and privileges over women?

The Apex Fallacy is defined by Dr. Helen Smith who coined the neologism: "More men tend to be at the high end or low end in our society and because of this, people mistakenly believe that all men dominate in our culture because they see a few men at the top."


quote:

It is not feminism's task or obligation to do anything for men


But they expect men to support feminism's cause. So what we have here is that feminists expect men to help women but they don't want to return the favour and help men. When it comes to feminism, it's a one way street. Men are expected to give to feminism but feminism will never give to men in return.

That's a crappy deal for men.

quote:

There are good arguments and evidence to support the view that patriarchy has negative effects on the lives of many men


Really? I am seriously interested in you providing this evidence. I mean it, I will wait for it. To me, patriarchy blaming is not based on fact, it's based on faulty assumptions. Anything that annoys a feminist is the fault of patriarchy. Feminists just randomly blame patriarchy on anything without thinking about it.

How can you blame patriarchy for something when the same society has not experienced matriarchy? Can you see how anything blamed on patriarchy is based on assumption, not fact?

It's just used as an convenient scapegoat without any bases behind the claim.

quote:

Sadly the MRA has failed men totally in this regard. It seems more interested in banging drums meaninglessly, acting out primitive warrior myths in forests and generally bitching and whining about their 'woes' with women than any kind of serious analysis or understanding of gender, how it operates in society and what is needed for positive changes in this area. Childish.


That is exactly what feminists do!

Feminists bitch about men because men judge them for being fat. Fat acceptance! They ignore the biological differences in males on how they are attracted to the opposite gender.

Feminists bitch about male sexuality. Objectification. They ignore the biological differences in males on how they are attracted to the opposite gender.

Feminists bitch about how men sit on public transport. Manspreading. How dare men sit different to women!

Feminists bitch about how there are a difference in boys toys compared to girls toys in childhood. They totally ignore that males simply have different interest because they aren't wired like women.


Why? Because they have no serious analysis or understanding of gender, how it operates in society and what is needed for positive change...which is, accept men for being different. Just because men don't think and act like women, that doesn't make us oppressors or wrong.

One of the problems with feminists is that they expect men to think and act like women or else they are just plain wrong.

It's like the women's way is the superior way and the men's way is the inferior way. There is no superior or inferior when it comes to this, we are just simply different.





WhoreMods -> RE: The domestic violence rate in lesbian relationships (1/11/2017 8:49:55 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

Whore

quote:

Why are you insisting that the domestic violence rate in lesbian couples is a repudiation for the whole of feminism?


1. Feminism mostly ignores this part of the problem.
2. A woman is more likely to be a victim of DV in a lesbian relationship compared to a heterosexual relationship.

I'd be interested to see your working out for that one, given that a woman's nine times more likely to be in a straight relationship than a gay one before any domestic violence gets factored into the figures.




respectmen -> RE: The domestic violence rate in lesbian relationships (1/11/2017 9:17:54 AM)

I'd be interested to see your working out for that one, given that a woman's nine times more likely to be in a straight relationship than a gay one before any domestic violence gets factored into the figures.

You may also be interested in this

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/05/07/attack-of-the-killer-dykes/


quote:

Trump pulled down the Chicago Sun building and built that piece of shit...
(Billy Connolly)


On a side note, Billy Connolly is a fucking arrogant wanker.

Back in the days in my early 20s doing shitty jobs like a coffee maker at Sydney international airport, that man was once my customer and he was so bloody rude and whiny! He talked to me like a dog without me saying or doing anything beforehand. On the other hand, in this same job, I met Keanu Reeves, he appeared to be the lease arrogant famous person I came across in real life. He shook my hand and appreciated the coffee I made for him.







WhoreMods -> RE: The domestic violence rate in lesbian relationships (1/11/2017 9:41:54 AM)

A whinily hysterical tirade from Breitbart doesn't answer my question. Only 10% of women are lesbians. The figure can be upped slightly to account for bisexuals in same sex relationships, but even so what are we talking as the absolute maximum percentage of the female population who might be in a lesbian relationship? 15 or 20% tops?
Assuming that it's 20%, even if they're all in abusive relationships, can you demonstrate that less than a quarter of the other 80% have been involved in domestic violence?




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: The domestic violence rate in lesbian relationships (1/11/2017 9:46:48 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen
I'd be interested to see your working out for that one, given that a woman's nine times more likely to be in a straight relationship than a gay one before any domestic violence gets factored into the figures.

Howz about answering the fucking question RM instead of side-stepping it??

Even if 30% of all lesbian relationships were violent (which I doubt), when you put that into perspective, that's only about 4% of all relationships.
That's a pretty fucking small number to be making a shit-storm story out of.
But there again, what would we expect from a one-trick pony who is clueless??

quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen
You may also be interested in this

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/05/07/attack-of-the-killer-dykes/

Breitbart News Network (known commonly as Breitbart News, Breitbart or Breitbart.com) is a right-wing or far-right American news, opinion and commentary website.

Typical RM cite - FAR RIGHT news and OPINION website.
Not real news... opinion and commentary and not mainstream.
In other words... pure unadulterated crap and pish.
Not worth reading.




respectmen -> RE: The domestic violence rate in lesbian relationships (1/11/2017 9:54:59 AM)

quote:

Howz about answering the fucking question RM instead of side-stepping it??


I did

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/05/07/attack-of-the-killer-dykes/

But noooo, in your stance, women are perfect princesses. So it just can't be true!

quote:

Breitbart News Network (known commonly as Breitbart News, Breitbart or Breitbart.com) is a right-wing or far-right American news, opinion and commentary website.


You reject the information because it's from Breitbart, not the actual data at hand.

Typical lefty side stepping tactic.




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: The domestic violence rate in lesbian relationships (1/11/2017 10:10:08 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

quote:

Howz about answering the fucking question RM instead of side-stepping it??


I did

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/05/07/attack-of-the-killer-dykes/

But noooo, in your stance, women are perfect princesses. So it just can't be true!

quote:

Breitbart News Network (known commonly as Breitbart News, Breitbart or Breitbart.com) is a right-wing or far-right American news, opinion and commentary website.


You reject the information because it's from Breitbart, not the actual data at hand.

Typical lefty side stepping tactic.


No, your link is NOT answering the question at all.
And yes, I reject it because it's not a legit news source.
Not only is it not a creditable news outlet, it is FAR RIGHT WING.

Find something creditable with REAL data of significance for a change.

Oh, and fwiw, I'm not a leftie.




respectmen -> RE: The domestic violence rate in lesbian relationships (1/11/2017 10:50:32 AM)

quote:

Find something creditable with REAL data of significance for a change.


Like alt left/feminist sources?

Laughs

It is only credible when feminists claim it.




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: The domestic violence rate in lesbian relationships (1/11/2017 10:59:28 AM)

Nope.

Any legitimate and creditable NEWS source.
Anything that isn't far right, far left, or a blog site.

And there's no such thing as 'Alt left'.




respectmen -> RE: The domestic violence rate in lesbian relationships (1/11/2017 11:08:21 AM)

quote:

Any legitimate and creditable NEWS source.
Anything that isn't far right, far left, or a blog site.



http://www.pandys.org/articles/lesbiandomesticviolence.html

There ya go. I just spoon fed it to you.




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: The domestic violence rate in lesbian relationships (1/11/2017 11:17:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

quote:

Any legitimate and creditable NEWS source.
Anything that isn't far right, far left, or a blog site.



http://www.pandys.org/articles/lesbiandomesticviolence.html

There ya go. I just spoon fed it to you.

Really RM???

From your own link: "Perhaps surprisingly, statistics have shown that lesbian people experience domestic violence at a very similar rate to that of heterosexual women (Waldner-Haygrud, 1997; AVP, 1992)"

So let's see what you linked to -
Stuff that is 20 years old. So hardly relevant.
And a "very similar rate" to hetero women and there's only 10% who are lesbian.
That waters down the figures on a general level by a whole order of magnitude.
Again, hardly anything to write home about and makes it no longer significant - like all your other rants.

And again, it's a support group - not a creditable NEWS source.

Failed again.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.515625E-02