RE: No Empty Seats

RE: No Empty Seats (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

BoscoX -> RE: No Empty Seats (1/21/2017 4:58:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: Greta75 On top of that. Apparently, Trump historically has the most popular vote of any Republican Presidents ever! The most republican votes ever was only about three million less than bill's wife??? Thank you for that little factoid. Liberals have always outnumbered Conservative in America. What's your point? That's why Electoral College is there to be fair. There are more people who self-identify as conservatives in America And quote: The purpose of the electoral college is to be a compromise between election of the president by the vote of Congress and the popular vote of the people. The founding fathers established the electoral college in the United States Constitution, believing that it would be both a buffer and provide fair power to all states regardless of size

thompsonx -> RE: No Empty Seats (1/21/2017 5:03:33 PM)
ORIGINAL: Greta75 ORIGINAL: thompsonx On top of that. Apparently, Trump historically has the most popular vote of any Republican Presidents ever! The most republican votes ever was only about three million less than bill's wife??? Thank you for that little factoid. Liberals have always outnumbered Conservative in America. By that metric how could a conservative ever have been elected? Are you saying that there has never been a conservative amerikan president? What's your point? You made a point that trump got the most votes of any republican ever. I made the observation that was about three milllion less than bill's wife. If the meaning of that escapes you perhaps you should ask one of the adults. That's why Electoral College is there to be fair. Perhaps you could tell us just how the e.c. works. How does one get on the e.c.? Who appoints the e.c.? Who appoints those who appoint the e.c? Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

Greta75 -> RE: No Empty Seats (1/21/2017 5:04:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoscoX There are more people who self-identify as conservatives in America Only problem with that poll like all the polls that predict Hillary will win, is it is only based on tiny sample size and not accurate data. Only 12,000 people were polled out of 300 million people? There is no way conservatives outnumber Liberals in the US. Just need to go by population density in blue states versus red states. I feel the red states are greatly outnumbered in population.

thompsonx -> RE: No Empty Seats (1/21/2017 5:07:47 PM)
ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote: The purpose of the electoral college is to be a compromise between election of the president by the vote of Congress and the popular vote of the people. The founding fathers established the electoral college in the United States Constitution, believing that it would be both a buffer and provide fair power to all states regardless of size Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

Greta75 -> RE: No Empty Seats (1/21/2017 5:08:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx By that metric how could a conservative ever have been elected? Are you saying that there has never been a conservative amerikan president? Stupid question right? Both Gore and Clinton won popular vote and lost. That kinda supports precisely what I said.

thompsonx -> RE: No Empty Seats (1/21/2017 5:10:07 PM)
ORIGINAL: Greta75 Only problem with that poll like all the polls that predict Hillary will win, is it is only based on tiny sample size and not accurate data. Only 12,000 people were polled out of 300 million people? There is no way conservatives outnumber Liberals in the US. Just need to go by population density in blue states versus red states. I feel the red states are greatly outnumbered in population. What you "feel" is different than reality.

thompsonx -> RE: No Empty Seats (1/21/2017 5:13:24 PM)
ORIGINAL: Greta75 ]ORIGINAL: thompsonx By that metric how could a conservative ever have been elected? Are you saying that there has never been a conservative amerikan president? Stupid question right? Both Gore and Clinton won popular vote and lost. That kinda supports precisely what I said. No. It ignores all the republicans who were eleced with a majority of the popular vote. Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

thompsonx -> RE: No Empty Seats (1/21/2017 5:41:00 PM)
ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: BoscoX Trump supporters have to work, Obama supporters get their food stamps and Obamaphones etc regardless of what they do on a given day More white people on wellfare than black.. D.C. is also 90% black "liberals" so of course more would show up for Obama. Not so dumbass d.c. is about half caucasian According to Pew, it's about 47% black, 43% white, with the remainder being hispanics and 'other'. White people make up about 170 million. 43%=about 73 million. Black people make up about 40 million.47% = about 19 million. 73 million is more than 19 million for those who are not good with sums.

Greta75 -> RE: No Empty Seats (1/22/2017 1:22:36 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: Greta75 ]ORIGINAL: thompsonx By that metric how could a conservative ever have been elected? Are you saying that there has never been a conservative amerikan president? Stupid question right? Both Gore and Clinton won popular vote and lost. That kinda supports precisely what I said. No. It ignores all the republicans who were eleced with a majority of the popular vote. Jesus you are phoquing stupid. Again, All the past republicans who won popular vote still have lower voters than Trump. Thus, point is, there are more Liberals. Because Liberals can lose despite having more popular vote.

thompsonx -> RE: No Empty Seats (1/22/2017 5:35:47 AM)
ORIGINAL: Greta75 ORIGINAL: thompsonx By that metric how could a conservative ever have been elected? Are you saying that there has never been a conservative amerikan president? Stupid question right? Both Gore and Clinton won popular vote and lost. That kinda supports precisely what I said. No. It ignores all the republicans who were eleced with a majority of the popular vote. Jesus you are phoquing stupid. Again, All the past republicans who won popular vote still have lower voters than Trump. Thus, point is, there are more Liberals. No stupid one, there were fewer people. Because Liberals can lose despite having more popular vote. Just as conservatives can loose despite having more popular vote. Do you just open your mouth to change feet? Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

WickedsDesire -> RE: No Empty Seats (1/22/2017 6:47:50 AM)
I am not even american idiot bitch wifey5...oh, neither are you I remember. Number of people eligible to vote 240 231 million Number of people registered to vote 200 million Voting Eligible Population Ballots 231,556,622 Voter Eligible Population That Didn't Vote 92,671,979 (40% Voter Eligible Population Total 138,884,643 (60%) Hillary 65,845,063 Trump 62,980,160 or, 46.9% didn't vote 25.6% voted for Clinton 25.5% voted for Trump 1.7% voted for Johnson How do they pick the electoral college then? I wonder if they get the republican out a gutless insane asylum what the hells that got to do with the thread anyway As for the fuking sock muppet puppet who started this thread with his usual made up slobbering pish - actually i will start a new thread

Politesub53 -> RE: No Empty Seats (1/23/2017 11:51:04 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Damn DC< they are bigger than trumps crowd:) [;)] Not if you use Kellyannes "Alternative facts" Guffaws a tad. I feel such facts will become precedent under Conway and Spicer.

BoscoX -> RE: No Empty Seats (1/23/2017 1:00:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Damn DC< they are bigger than trumps crowd:) [;)] Not if you use Kellyannes "Alternative facts" Guffaws a tad. I feel such facts will become precedent under Conway and Spicer. "Alternative facts"? We are supposed to trust the media now? As in, Hillary is inevitable +12 in every swing state ? "Donald Trump will never be president"

BoscoX -> RE: No Empty Seats (1/23/2017 1:04:32 PM)
"DONALD TRUMP REMOVED THE BUST OF MLK FIRST THING ON DAY 1!!!" The alternative facts were the correct ones though

bounty44 -> RE: No Empty Seats (1/23/2017 1:09:12 PM)
greta please---who gets elected and how many people vote for a particular candidate for is not an accurate assessment of the political landscape in America when it comes to who/how many are liberal or conservative.

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: No Empty Seats (1/23/2017 1:35:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 Again, All the past republicans who won popular vote still have lower voters than Trump. Not true if you take percentage values (of population). There have been 3 who scored more than Trump (45.96%), one of which was George W Bush (47.87%).

Greta75 -> RE: No Empty Seats (1/23/2017 2:03:16 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 greta please---who gets elected and how many people vote for a particular candidate for is not an accurate assessment of the political landscape in America when it comes to who/how many are liberal or conservative. Then we can simply compare the population of blue states versus red states. There are more red states than blue states. But there are more people living in blue states. It still looks like to me liberals outnumber conservatives.

Greta75 -> RE: No Empty Seats (1/23/2017 2:04:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 Again, All the past republicans who won popular vote still have lower voters than Trump. Not true if you take percentage values (of population). There have been 3 who scored more than Trump (45.96%), one of which was George W Bush (47.87%). I am not talking about percentages. I am talking about actual number of people who voted for them. MORE people voted for Trump than any Republicans despite their percentages.

Hillwilliam -> RE: No Empty Seats (1/23/2017 2:07:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 Again, All the past republicans who won popular vote still have lower voters than Trump. Not true if you take percentage values (of population). There have been 3 who scored more than Trump (45.96%), one of which was George W Bush (47.87%). I am not talking about percentages. I am talking about actual number of people who voted for them. MORE people voted for Trump than any Republicans despite their percentages. Because there are more voters genius.

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: No Empty Seats (1/23/2017 2:31:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 Again, All the past republicans who won popular vote still have lower voters than Trump. Not true if you take percentage values (of population). There have been 3 who scored more than Trump (45.96%), one of which was George W Bush (47.87%). I am not talking about percentages. I am talking about actual number of people who voted for them. MORE people voted for Trump than any Republicans despite their percentages. Because the population has grown - there are more people!! Apples to oranges Greta. You can't quote raw numbers - it doesn't work.

Page: << < prev 3 4 [5] 6 7 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875