Trump claims media 'dishonest' over crowd photos

Trump claims media 'dishonest' over crowd photos (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

[Poll]

the Mans insane

88% (15)

That’s total lefty CGI that is

11% (2)

Total Votes : 17

(last vote on : 1/5/2018 12:29:35 PM)
(Poll will run till: -- )

Message

WickedsDesire -> Trump claims media 'dishonest' over crowd photos (1/22/2017 7:03:50 AM)
President Donald Trump has accused the media of dishonesty over the number of people attending his inauguration. Mr Trump was speaking after photographs were published appearing to show more people attended the inauguration of his predecessor Barack Obama in 2009. Mr Trump's press secretary said it had been "the largest audience to ever see an inauguration" even though figures he cited add up to under 750,000 people. He said the new US administration would hold the media accountable. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-38707722 Trump left Obama right [image]http://www.collarspace.com/attachments/012217/A605F626-516D-4278-94D2-1D80C3DB69EF1.jpg[/image] Seems conclusive to me and then some. Then the deranged deluded dim wit goes on TV and says his crowd was bigger. What exactly does that say about the ~~man~~ deluded president when he cannot actually separate reality from lala land --> looking good America.

heavyblinker -> RE: Trump claims media 'dishonest' over crowd photos (1/22/2017 7:15:49 AM)
This is what he does on his first day as president. What a champ.

WickedsDesire -> RE: Trump claims media 'dishonest' over crowd photos (1/22/2017 7:46:24 AM)
It gets better - scroll down the link a we bit and you find another lying toerag here it is http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-38707722 To support the argument, his press secretary Sean Spicer outlined figures amounting to 720,000 people in the Mall, despite having asserted seconds before that "no one had numbers" for the inauguration. He also said that the number of people taking Washington's subway system on the day had been higher than during Mr Obama's second inauguration in 2013. In fact, there were 782,000 tickets that ~~year~~ day, but 571,000 this ~~year~~ day, the Washington-area transit authority says. Mr Spicer also said that plastic sheets had been used for the first time to cover the grass which "had the effect of highlighting areas people were not standing whereas in years past the grass eliminated this visual". In fact, the grass was also covered in 2013. Bunch of crooked deluded lying toerags methinks

BoscoX -> RE: Trump claims media 'dishonest' over crowd photos (1/22/2017 7:55:29 AM)
Trump supporters work, for one thing For another, your violent alt left Nazi friends weren't busting visitor's heads at Obama's inauguration Finally, Americans did their most significant protesting in the voting booth, where it really mattered

Kirata -> RE: Trump claims media 'dishonest' over crowd photos (1/22/2017 8:00:44 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire [image]http://www.collarspace.com/attachments/012217/A605F626-516D-4278-94D2-1D80C3DB69EF1.jpg[/image] I have no doubt that Obama's second inaugural drew a larger crowd, but some of the photos being bandied about are deceptive. They don't have a time stamp, and it seems fairly apparent that the one on the left (above) had to be taken either earlier or later than this one: [image]http://static.politifact.com.s3.amazonaws.com/politifact/photos/GYI_693551185_632191940.JPG[/image] K.

thompsonx -> RE: Trump claims media 'dishonest' over crowd photos (1/22/2017 8:15:57 AM)
ORIGINAL: BoscoX Finally, Americans did their most significant protesting in the voting booth, where it really mattered Where they voted nearly three million times more for bill's wife.

WickedsDesire -> RE: Trump claims media 'dishonest' over crowd photos (1/22/2017 8:48:38 AM)
there are at least two white tents in the original I posted in the very, very fore ground-most people wont notice them I actually dont rule out a different time stamp myself. But I am going with the original article backed up by his press secretary incompetent maths, lies and total disregard for actual facts. To support the argument, his press secretary Sean Spicer outlined figures amounting to 720,000 people in the Mall, despite having asserted seconds before that "no one had numbers" for the inauguration. He also said that the number of people taking Washington's subway system on the day had been higher than during Mr Obama's second inauguration in 2013. In fact, there were 782,000 tickets that year day, but 571,000 this year day, the Washington-area transit authority says. Mr Spicer also said that plastic sheets had been used for the first time to cover the grass which "had the effect of highlighting areas people were not standing whereas in years past the grass eliminated this visual". In fact, the grass was also covered in 2013. Bunch of crooked deluded lying toerags methinks Trump said it was the busiest ever ever ever in hi screech we whine claws all over the place fact from fiction reality from doolally be fuking worried - as for me I am simply enjoying the show :)

BoscoX -> RE: Trump claims media 'dishonest' over crowd photos (1/22/2017 9:07:46 AM)
Perhaps this is a battle they shouldn't have picked, right or wrong. At the same time though, keeping the howling media loons honest is a task that has been long neglected Even Hillary has decried the "epidemic" of fake news. Called on government to attack it. So...

Kirata -> RE: Trump claims media 'dishonest' over crowd photos (1/22/2017 9:12:22 AM)
Yeah, they're pushing this one too far. The on-site crowd simply didn't equal Obama's second inaugural. But regarding the level of interest in Trump's inauguration more generally... Donald Trump’s inauguration ratings were the second-highest in 36 years, according to Nielsen. The swearing-in of the 45th president was seen by 30.6 million viewers across 12 networks. The swearing-in of the 45th president was seen by 30.6 million viewers across 12 networks. The only inauguration over the last three decades that tops Trump’s number in the linear ratings? Barack Obama’s first inauguration back in 2009, which had a record-setting 37.8 million viewers... before that, to get an Inauguration Day number this high, you’d have to go all the way back to Ronald Reagan in 1981, who was seen by 41.8 million viewers And actually, Trump could have been seen by more viewers than either Obama or Reagan. Nielsen ratings do not account for online viewing, which has grown sharply in recent years and is far more commonplace than even four years ago. CNN.com, for example, clocked 16.9 million live streams, tying with its Election Day coverage for the site’s top event (live stream tallies are typically not apples-to-apples with Nielsen’s strict methodology of counting average viewers, but are still additive). Plus, portals like YouTube, Facebook and Twitter offered live streams as well. In terms of linear coverage, Fox News topped all networks, averaging 8.8 million viewers for the day and peaking with 11 million viewers from noon to 1 p.m. This was the highest-rated inauguration coverage in the network’s history. ~Source K.

thompsonx -> RE: Trump claims media 'dishonest' over crowd photos (1/22/2017 9:31:23 AM)
Roflmao... The last pic is just a close up of the crowd in front of the wshington monument seen in the larger photo with the acres of open space on either side cropped ouit.

MrRodgers -> RE: Trump claims media 'dishonest' over crowd photos (1/22/2017 9:41:50 AM)
Like Lincoln said...you can fool most of the people some of the time.

WickedsDesire -> RE: Trump claims media 'dishonest' over crowd photos (1/22/2017 9:53:28 AM)
He got up in front of the cameras and lied through his teeth. And then his press spokeman did exactly the same thing. I will tell you why the TV ratings were so high. Thats the first one I ever watched I actually wanted to see if they would swear in a complete lying rat bastard of a monster....I actually thought Aliens were going to land...and say nah! - anyone else - come on be honest?

Real0ne -> RE: Trump claims media 'dishonest' over crowd photos (1/22/2017 9:56:09 AM)
trump compared to ofailure? trump is just another white man, ssdd, ofailure on the other hand was the first and only black man

thompsonx -> RE: Trump claims media 'dishonest' over crowd photos (1/22/2017 10:23:21 AM)
ORIGINAL: Real0ne trump compared to ofailure? trump is just another white man, ssdd, ofailure on the other hand was the first and only black man Obama was the second black president in amerika.

CreativeDominant -> RE: Trump claims media 'dishonest' over crowd photos (1/22/2017 10:30:56 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: BoscoX Finally, Americans did their most significant protesting in the voting booth, where it really mattered Where they voted nearly three million times more for bill's wife. With most of those three million coming from two liberal enclaves...California and the East Coast. Thank God for the E.C.

WickedsDesire -> RE: Trump claims media 'dishonest' over crowd photos (1/22/2017 10:34:47 AM)
So when Obama was in office 8 years or something (ors it 10) no matter - what did the Republican controlled Senate and Republican controlled House Representatives allow him to pass v block? Personally I think he lied all the way through his campaign. But fek hes in office he should have said we had a wonderful turn out. And no it wasn't, quite, as busy as eg Obama but it was still wonderful and great to see them all. But he lied as did his press spokesman. The greater worry is if the two believed their lies to be true - I think Trump does and that should worry everyone.

mnottertail -> RE: Trump claims media 'dishonest' over crowd photos (1/22/2017 10:36:35 AM)
The sparseness of the crowds at the inauguration were Yuge. The empty seats along the route were Bigly.

Milesnmiles -> RE: Trump claims media 'dishonest' over crowd photos (1/22/2017 11:15:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata I have no doubt that Obama's second inaugural drew a larger crowd, but some of the photos being bandied about are deceptive. They don't have a time stamp, and it seems fairly apparent that the one on the left (above) had to be taken either earlier or later than this one: K. I thought the same thing, that without a time stamp there is no way to accurate way compare the two photos.

Milesnmiles -> RE: Trump claims media 'dishonest' over crowd photos (1/22/2017 11:21:19 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire He got up in front of the cameras and lied through his teeth. And then his press spokeman did exactly the same thing. I will tell you why the TV ratings were so high. Thats the first one I ever watched I actually wanted to see if they would swear in a complete lying rat bastard of a monster....I actually thought Aliens were going to land...and say nah! - anyone else - come on be honest? Honestly? I also thought Aliens were going to land and wanted to be watching when it happened.

aupair19 -> RE: Trump claims media 'dishonest' over crowd photos (1/22/2017 11:38:34 AM)
Trump and his press seccretary speak the total Pravda

Page: [1] 2 3 next > >>

Spam Policy

0.046875